linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	"neilb@suse.de" <neilb@suse.de>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	"bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce context
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:58:27 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0C35F3.7060508@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325797111.11084.22.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

06.01.2012 00:58, Trond Myklebust пишет:
> On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 17:55 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 13:10 +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>>> This patch set was created in context of clone of git
>>> branch: git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git.
>>> tag: v3.1
>>>
>>> This patch set depends on previous patch sets titled:
>>> 1) "SUNRPC: initial part of making pipefs work in net ns"
>>> 2) "SUNPRC: cleanup PipeFS for network-namespace-aware users"
>>> 3) "SUNRPC: make RPC clients use network-namespace-aware PipeFS routines"
>>> 4) "NFS: create clients and IDMAP pipes per network namespace"
>>>
>>> This patch set is the final part of making SUNRPC PipeFS and it's users work in
>>> network namespace context.
>>>
>>> The following series consists of:
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Stanislav Kinsbursky (5):
>>>        NFS: handle blocklayout pipe PipeFS dentry by network namespace aware routines
>>>        NFS: blocklayout pipe creation per network namespace context introduced
>>>        NFS: blocklayout PipeFS notifier introduced
>>>        NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from blocklayout routines
>>>        SUNRPC: kernel PipeFS mount point creation routines removed
>>>
>>>
>>>   fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c    |  154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>   fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.h    |    3 -
>>>   fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c |    5 +
>>>   fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c  |    7 +-
>>>   fs/nfs/inode.c                      |    1
>>>   fs/nfs/netns.h                      |    1
>>>   include/linux/sunrpc/rpc_pipe_fs.h  |    2
>>>   net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c               |   21 -----
>>>   8 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> These patches need rebasing in order to apply on top of 3.2-rc7...
>
> OK. Further testing seems to indicate that we're going to have to
> postpone merging these patches until the 3.4 merge window.
>
> The problems are twofold:
>
> As the patches stand now in the linux-next tree, they can (and
> occasionally do) Oops on unmount. The reason was that I rejected the
> PipeFS notifier patch for the idmapper (due to the reported problem of
> nfs_idmap_init/nfs_idmap_quit being undefined when CONFIG_NFS_V4 is
> undefined), and the fact that it is missing causes the unmount at the
> end of our tests to hit the BUG() in fs/dcache.c:905. This suggests that
> we will have the same problem with the pNFS block layout driver, since I
> still haven't received a rebased update of the 5 'create blocklayout
> pipe per network namesapce context' patches.
>

Hello, Trond.
I've resend the patch set (rebased with fix for nfs_idmap_init/nfs_idmap_quit).

> The second problem that was highlighted was the fact that as they stand
> today, these patchsets do not allow for bisection. When we hit the Oops,
> I had Bryan try to bisect where the problem arose. He ended up pointing
> at the patch "SUNRPC: handle RPC client pipefs dentries by network
> namespace aware routine", which is indeed the cause, but which is one of
> the _dependencies_ for all the PipeFS notifier patches that fix the
> problem.
>

I'm confused here. Does this means, that I have to fix patch "SUNRPC: handle RPC 
client pipefs dentries by network namespace aware routine" to make it able to 
bisect?

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-10 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-29 10:10 [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce context Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29  9:17 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFS: handle blocklayout pipe PipeFS dentry by network namespace aware routines Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] NFS: blocklayout pipe creation per network namespace context introduced Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFS: blocklayout PipeFS notifier introduced Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from blocklayout routines Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 12:00   ` tao.peng
2011-11-29 12:19     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 12:40       ` tao.peng
2011-11-29 13:13         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 15:05           ` Peng Tao
2011-11-29 13:35         ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-11-29 15:10           ` Peng Tao
2011-11-29 15:18             ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-29 15:30               ` Peng Tao
2011-11-29 16:40                 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-29 16:42                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-29 17:19                     ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-29 17:27                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-29 17:30                       ` Peng Tao
2012-05-28 11:43                         ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] SUNRPC: kernel PipeFS mount point creation routines removed Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-30 22:55 ` [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce context Trond Myklebust
2012-01-05 20:58   ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-10 12:58     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-01-11 16:23       ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-11 17:23         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-11 17:46           ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-11 18:03             ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-10 10:50   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F0C35F3.7060508@parallels.com \
    --to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).