* [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family @ 2012-01-06 15:33 Nicolas Ferre 2012-01-07 11:14 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2012-01-13 11:10 ` Nicolas Ferre 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2012-01-06 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux, plagnioj, linux, linux-arm-kernel Cc: patrice.vilchez, Nicolas Ferre Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and remove LOC during current cleanup process. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> --- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644 --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5 Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped. Who: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com> + +---------------------------- + +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed +When: 3.4 +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find. +Who: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> -- 1.7.5.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family 2012-01-06 15:33 [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family Nicolas Ferre @ 2012-01-07 11:14 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2012-01-13 11:10 ` Nicolas Ferre 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2012-01-07 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: linux-kernel, linux, linux, linux-arm-kernel, patrice.vilchez On 16:33 Fri 06 Jan , Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be > difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and > remove LOC during current cleanup process. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Best Regards, J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family 2012-01-06 15:33 [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family Nicolas Ferre 2012-01-07 11:14 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2012-01-13 11:10 ` Nicolas Ferre 2012-01-13 18:16 ` Greg KH 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2012-01-13 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton, Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel, linux, plagnioj, linux, linux-arm-kernel, patrice.vilchez On 01/06/2012 04:33 PM, Nicolas Ferre : > Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be > difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and > remove LOC during current cleanup process. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > --- > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Hi Andrew, Greg, Can you please take this patch or is somebody else in charge of this file? It it is going to mainline through you, can you add also: Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Or tell me to resend a complete patch. Thanks for your help, best regards, > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5 > Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around > for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped. > Who: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com> > + > +---------------------------- > + > +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed > +When: 3.4 > +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c > + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c > + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h > + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h > + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h > + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c > +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find. > +Who: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> -- Nicolas Ferre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family 2012-01-13 11:10 ` Nicolas Ferre @ 2012-01-13 18:16 ` Greg KH 2012-01-13 19:12 ` Nicolas Ferre 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2012-01-13 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux, plagnioj, linux, linux-arm-kernel, patrice.vilchez On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 01/06/2012 04:33 PM, Nicolas Ferre : > > Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be > > difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and > > remove LOC during current cleanup process. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > > --- > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Hi Andrew, Greg, > > Can you please take this patch or is somebody else in charge of this file? Why wouldn't the maintainers of the feature you are saying is going away be the ones responsible for submitting this? > It it is going to mainline through you, can you add also: > > Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > Or tell me to resend a complete patch. > > Thanks for your help, best regards, > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5 > > Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around > > for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped. > > Who: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com> > > + > > +---------------------------- > > + > > +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed > > +When: 3.4 > > +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c > > + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c > > + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h > > + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h > > + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h > > + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c > > +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find. > > +Who: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > > + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Ok, why not send this through the ARM tree? Why need me and Andrew? confused, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family 2012-01-13 18:16 ` Greg KH @ 2012-01-13 19:12 ` Nicolas Ferre 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2012-01-13 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH, Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel, linux, plagnioj, linux, linux-arm-kernel, patrice.vilchez On 01/13/2012 07:16 PM, Greg KH : > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 01/06/2012 04:33 PM, Nicolas Ferre : >>> Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be >>> difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and >>> remove LOC during current cleanup process. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> Hi Andrew, Greg, >> >> Can you please take this patch or is somebody else in charge of this file? > > Why wouldn't the maintainers of the feature you are saying is going away > be the ones responsible for submitting this? Actually, I am the guy ;-) >> It it is going to mainline through you, can you add also: >> >> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> >> >> Or tell me to resend a complete patch. >> >> Thanks for your help, best regards, >> >> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5 >>> Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around >>> for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped. >>> Who: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com> >>> + >>> +---------------------------- >>> + >>> +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed >>> +When: 3.4 >>> +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c >>> +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find. >>> +Who: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> >>> + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > > Ok, why not send this through the ARM tree? Why need me and Andrew? Ok, I though there was a special procedure for this file. I will queue this one in arm-soc tree. Thanks, best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-13 19:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-01-06 15:33 [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family Nicolas Ferre 2012-01-07 11:14 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2012-01-13 11:10 ` Nicolas Ferre 2012-01-13 18:16 ` Greg KH 2012-01-13 19:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).