* [PATCH 0/5] staging/csr: cleanup patches
@ 2012-08-04 7:15 Devendra Naga
2012-08-14 1:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Devendra Naga @ 2012-08-04 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, devel, linux-kernel, Mikko Virkkilä,
Lauri Hintsala, Riku Mettälä,
Veli-Pekka Peltola
Cc: Devendra Naga
Hi Greg,
These patches does
* coding style fixes
* little cleanups like unneeded initialisations and
comparing a bool against 1 in if
each and every patch is compile tested on top of the previous one
Thanks,
----------------------------
Actually i have a question about the dbg macros, unifi_warning,
unifi_error, and unifi_trace,
I think these can be implemented using dev_warn, dev_dbg, functions,
i mean we can remove these unifi_warning and unifi_error and unifi_trace
and use the dev_warn and dev_dbg.
Please correct me if i am wrong
Devendra Naga (5):
staging/csr: clean coding style in uf_start_thread
staging/csr: fix coding style problems in uf_stop_thread
staging/csr: fix coding style problems in uf_wait_for_thread_to_stop
staging/csr: remove the initialisation of interfaceTag and its
comment in handle_bh_error
staging/csr: fix coding style problems in handle_bh_error
drivers/staging/csr/bh.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Devendra Naga <develkernel412222@gmail.com>
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging/csr: cleanup patches
2012-08-04 7:15 [PATCH 0/5] staging/csr: cleanup patches Devendra Naga
@ 2012-08-14 1:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2012-08-14 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devendra Naga
Cc: devel, linux-kernel, Mikko Virkkilä,
Lauri Hintsala, Riku Mettälä,
Veli-Pekka Peltola
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 01:00:08PM +0545, Devendra Naga wrote:
> Actually i have a question about the dbg macros, unifi_warning,
> unifi_error, and unifi_trace,
>
> I think these can be implemented using dev_warn, dev_dbg, functions,
> i mean we can remove these unifi_warning and unifi_error and unifi_trace
> and use the dev_warn and dev_dbg.
Yes, we should use those instead.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-14 1:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-04 7:15 [PATCH 0/5] staging/csr: cleanup patches Devendra Naga
2012-08-14 1:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).