linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] reentrancy in the common clk framework
@ 2012-08-15 23:43 Mike Turquette
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy Mike Turquette
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2012-08-15 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: shawn.guo, linus.walleij, rob.herring, pdeschrijver, pgaikwad,
	viresh.kumar, rnayak, paul, broonie, ccross, linux-arm-kernel,
	myungjoo.ham, rajagopal.venkat, Mike Turquette

The second version of the reentrancy/dvfs rfc differs from the
original[1] in that the former used per-clk mutexes and this version
uses a global lock to protect access to a per-clk enum.  The enum can be
in one of two states, LOCKED or UNLOCKED.

The second patch in the series introduces a new common clk rate-change
notifier handler which implements typical dynamic voltage and frequency
scaling logic.

The third patch uses the aforementioned common dvfs rate-change notifier
handler.  Instead of implementing the dvfs logic directly (as in [1[)
the driver simply registers a notifier handler using the common dvfs
infrastructure.  Potentially all cpufreq and devfreq users could use
this to implement voltage scaling.

The fourth patch demonstrates how it is possible to call top-level clk
api's reentrantly.  This example code switches parents of a mux clock
and does prepare/disable directly, without using internal functions.  A
more interesting application of this might be to have clk_set_parent
call clk_prepare_enable clk_disable_unprepare directly when reparenting.

There are wide-ranging considerations to the common clk framework in
this series; I know some of you will be in San Diego later this month
and hopefully I'll get some good feedback there as well as on the list.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1327866

Mike Turquette (4):
  clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy
  clk: notifier handler for dynamic voltage scaling
  cpufreq: omap: scale regulator from clk notifier
  omap3+: clk: dpll: call clk_prepare directly

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c |    8 +-
 drivers/clk/Makefile           |    3 +-
 drivers/clk/clk.c              |  354 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/clk/dvfs.c             |  116 +++++++++++++
 drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c |   85 +++-------
 include/linux/clk-private.h    |    1 +
 include/linux/clk-provider.h   |    4 +-
 include/linux/clk.h            |   27 ++-
 8 files changed, 488 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/dvfs.c

-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy
  2012-08-15 23:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] reentrancy in the common clk framework Mike Turquette
@ 2012-08-15 23:43 ` Mike Turquette
  2012-08-27 17:05   ` Pankaj Jangra
  2012-09-04 14:25   ` Shawn Guo
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] [RFC] clk: notifier handler for dynamic voltage scaling Mike Turquette
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2012-08-15 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: shawn.guo, linus.walleij, rob.herring, pdeschrijver, pgaikwad,
	viresh.kumar, rnayak, paul, broonie, ccross, linux-arm-kernel,
	myungjoo.ham, rajagopal.venkat, Mike Turquette

The global prepare_lock mutex prevents concurrent operations in the clk
api.  This incurs a performance penalty when unrelated clock subtrees
are contending for the lock.

Additionally there are use cases which benefit from reentrancy into the
clk api.  A simple example is reparenting a mux clock with a call to
clk_set_rate.  Patch #4 in this series demonstrates this without the use
of internal helper functions.

A more complex example is performing dynamic frequency and voltage
scaling from clk_set_rate.  Patches #2 and #3 in this series demonstrate
this.

This commit affects users of the global prepare_lock mutex, namely
clk_prepare, clk_unprepare, clk_set_rate and clk_set_parent.

This patch introduces an enum inside of struct clk which tracks whether
the framework has LOCKED or UNLOCKED the clk.

Access to clk->state must be protected by the global prepare_lock mutex.
In the future maybe the global mutex can be dropped and all operations
will only use a global spinlock to protect access to the per-clk enums.
A general outline of the new locking scheme is as follows:

1) hold the global prepare_lock mutex
2) traverse the tree checking to make sure that any clk's needed are
UNLOCKED and not LOCKED
	a) if a clk in the subtree of affected clk's is LOCKED then
	   release the global lock, wait_for_completion and then try
	   again up to a maximum of WAIT_TRIES times
	b) After WAIT_TRIES times return -EBUSY
3) if all clk's are UNLOCKED then mark them as LOCKED
4) release the global prepare_lock mutex
5) do the real work
6) hold the global prepare_lock mutex
7) set all of the clocks previously marked as LOCKED to UNLOCKED
8) release the global prepare_lock mutex and return

The primary down-side to this approach is that the clk api's might
return -EBUSY due to lock contention.  This is only after having tried
several times.  Bailing out like this is necessary to prevent deadlocks.

The enum approach in this version of the patchset does not benefit from
lockdep checking the lock order (but neither did v1).  It is possible
for circular dependencies to pop up for the careless developer and
bailing out after a number of unsuccessful tries is the sanest strategy.

Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c            |  354 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/clk-private.h  |    1 +
 include/linux/clk-provider.h |    4 +-
 3 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 51a29d1..92bb516 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+
+#define WAIT_TRIES	5
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(enable_lock);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(prepare_lock);
@@ -25,6 +28,8 @@ static HLIST_HEAD(clk_root_list);
 static HLIST_HEAD(clk_orphan_list);
 static LIST_HEAD(clk_notifier_list);
 
+static DECLARE_COMPLETION(clk_completion);
+
 /***        debugfs support        ***/
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG
@@ -372,23 +377,51 @@ struct clk *__clk_lookup(const char *name)
 
 /***        clk api        ***/
 
-void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+static struct clk *__clk_unprepare_lock(struct clk *clk)
 {
+	struct clk *top;
+
 	if (!clk)
-		return;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+	if (clk->state == LOCKED)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 
 	if (WARN_ON(clk->prepare_count == 0))
-		return;
+		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 
-	if (--clk->prepare_count > 0)
-		return;
+	if (clk->prepare_count > 1 || clk->flags & CLK_IS_ROOT) {
+		top = clk;
+		clk->state = LOCKED;
+		clk->prepare_count--;
+	} else {
+		top = __clk_unprepare_lock(clk->parent);
+		if (IS_ERR(top))
+			goto out;
 
-	WARN_ON(clk->enable_count > 0);
+		clk->state = LOCKED;
+		clk->prepare_count--;
+	}
 
+out:
+	return top;
+}
+
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
+{
 	if (clk->ops->unprepare)
 		clk->ops->unprepare(clk->hw);
 
-	__clk_unprepare(clk->parent);
+	if (clk != top)
+		__clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
+}
+
+static void __clk_prepare_unlock(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
+{
+	clk->state = UNLOCKED;
+
+	if (clk != top)
+		__clk_prepare_unlock(clk->parent, top);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -404,35 +437,94 @@ void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
  */
 void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
 {
+	struct clk *top = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+	int tries = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * walk the list of parents checking clk->state along the way.  If all
+	 * clk->state is UNLOCKED then continue.  If a clk->state is LOCKED then
+	 * bail out with -EBUSY.
+	 */
+	while (IS_ERR(top)) {
+		mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+		top = __clk_unprepare_lock(clk);
+		mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+
+		if (IS_ERR(top)) {
+			pr_debug("%s: %s failed with %ld on attempt %d\n",
+					__func__, clk->name, PTR_ERR(top),
+					tries);
+			wait_for_completion(&clk_completion);
+			if (WAIT_TRIES == ++tries)
+				break;
+		} else
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (WAIT_TRIES == tries) {
+		pr_warning("%s: failed to lock clocks; cyclical dependency?\n",
+				__func__);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* unprepare the list of clocks from clk to top */
+	__clk_unprepare(clk, top);
+
+	/* set clk->state from LOCKED to UNLOCKED and fire off completion */
 	mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
-	__clk_unprepare(clk);
+	__clk_prepare_unlock(clk, top);
 	mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+
+	complete(&clk_completion);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_unprepare);
 
-int __clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
+static struct clk *__clk_prepare_lock(struct clk *clk)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	struct clk *top;
 
 	if (!clk)
-		return 0;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+	if (clk->state == LOCKED)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 
-	if (clk->prepare_count == 0) {
-		ret = __clk_prepare(clk->parent);
+	if (clk->prepare_count > 0 || clk->flags & CLK_IS_ROOT) {
+		top = clk;
+		clk->state = LOCKED;
+		clk->prepare_count++;
+	} else {
+		top = __clk_prepare_lock(clk->parent);
+		if (IS_ERR(top))
+			goto out;
+
+		clk->state = LOCKED;
+		clk->prepare_count++;
+	}
+
+out:
+	return top;
+}
+
+int __clk_prepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (clk != top) {
+		ret = __clk_prepare(clk->parent, top);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
 		if (clk->ops->prepare) {
 			ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk->hw);
 			if (ret) {
-				__clk_unprepare(clk->parent);
+				/* this is safe since clk != top */
+				__clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
 				return ret;
 			}
 		}
 	}
 
-	clk->prepare_count++;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -450,13 +542,42 @@ int __clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
  */
 int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
 {
-	int ret;
+	struct clk *top = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+	int tries = 0;
+
+	while(IS_ERR(top)) {
+		mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+		top = __clk_prepare_lock(clk);
+		mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+
+		if (IS_ERR(top)) {
+			pr_debug("%s: %s failed with %ld on attempt %d\n",
+					__func__, clk->name, PTR_ERR(top),
+					tries);
+			wait_for_completion(&clk_completion);
+			if (WAIT_TRIES == ++tries)
+				break;
+		} else
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (WAIT_TRIES == tries) {
+		pr_err("%s: failed to lock clocks; cyclical dependency?\n",
+				__func__);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
 
+	/* unprepare the list of clocks from clk to top */
+	__clk_prepare(clk, top);
+
+	/* set clk->state from LOCKED to UNLOCKED and fire off completion */
 	mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
-	ret = __clk_prepare(clk);
+	__clk_prepare_unlock(clk, top);
 	mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
 
-	return ret;
+	complete(&clk_completion);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_prepare);
 
@@ -730,12 +851,12 @@ static int __clk_speculate_rates(struct clk *clk, unsigned long parent_rate)
 	if (clk->notifier_count)
 		ret = __clk_notify(clk, PRE_RATE_CHANGE, clk->rate, new_rate);
 
-	if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD)
+	if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
 		goto out;
 
 	hlist_for_each_entry(child, tmp, &clk->children, child_node) {
 		ret = __clk_speculate_rates(child, new_rate);
-		if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD)
+		if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
 			break;
 	}
 
@@ -759,15 +880,89 @@ static void clk_calc_subtree(struct clk *clk, unsigned long new_rate)
 	}
 }
 
+static int clk_test_lock_subtree(struct clk *clk)
+{
+	struct clk *child;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (clk->state != UNLOCKED)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(child, tmp, &clk->children, child_node) {
+		ret = clk_test_lock_subtree(child);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int clk_test_lock_additional_subtree(struct clk *clk, struct clk *avoid)
+{
+	struct clk *child;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (clk == avoid)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (clk->state != UNLOCKED)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(child, tmp, &clk->children, child_node) {
+		ret = clk_test_lock_additional_subtree(child, avoid);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void clk_lock_subtree(struct clk *clk)
+{
+	struct clk *child;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(child, tmp, &clk->children, child_node) {
+		clk->state = LOCKED;
+	}
+}
+
+static void clk_lock_additional_subtree(struct clk *clk, struct clk *avoid)
+{
+	struct clk *child;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+
+	if (clk == avoid)
+		return;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(child, tmp, &clk->children, child_node) {
+		clk->state = LOCKED;
+		clk_lock_additional_subtree(child, avoid);
+	}
+}
+
+static void clk_unlock_subtree(struct clk *clk)
+{
+	struct clk *child;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(child, tmp, &clk->children, child_node) {
+		clk->state = UNLOCKED;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
- * calculate the new rates returning the topmost clock that has to be
- * changed.
+ * calculate the new rates returning the topmost clock that has to be changed.
+ * Caller must set clk->state to LOCKED for clk and all of its children
  */
 static struct clk *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
 {
 	struct clk *top = clk;
 	unsigned long best_parent_rate = 0;
 	unsigned long new_rate;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	/* sanity */
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk))
@@ -794,6 +989,19 @@ static struct clk *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
 	}
 
 	if (!clk->ops->round_rate) {
+		/* set parent and all additional children as LOCKED */
+		mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+		ret = clk_test_lock_additional_subtree(clk->parent, clk);
+		if (!ret)
+			clk_lock_additional_subtree(clk->parent, clk);
+		mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+
+		if (ret == -EBUSY) {
+			pr_err("%s: %s: failed with EBUSY\n", __func__, clk->name);
+			/* FIXME the right thing to do? */
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
 		top = clk_calc_new_rates(clk->parent, rate);
 		new_rate = clk->parent->new_rate;
 
@@ -803,6 +1011,18 @@ static struct clk *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
 	new_rate = clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, &best_parent_rate);
 
 	if (best_parent_rate != clk->parent->rate) {
+		mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+		ret = clk_test_lock_additional_subtree(clk->parent, clk);
+		if (!ret)
+			clk_lock_additional_subtree(clk->parent, clk);
+		mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+
+		if (ret == -EBUSY) {
+			pr_err("%s: %s: failed with EBUSY\n", __func__, clk->name);
+			/* FIXME the right thing to do? */
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
 		top = clk_calc_new_rates(clk->parent, best_parent_rate);
 
 		goto out;
@@ -830,8 +1050,11 @@ static struct clk *clk_propagate_rate_change(struct clk *clk, unsigned long even
 
 	if (clk->notifier_count) {
 		ret = __clk_notify(clk, event, clk->rate, clk->new_rate);
-		if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD)
+		if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
 			fail_clk = clk;
+		if (notifier_to_errno(ret) == -EBUSY)
+			WARN(1, "%s: %s: possible cyclical dependency?\n",
+					__func__, clk->name);
 	}
 
 	hlist_for_each_entry(child, tmp, &clk->children, child_node) {
@@ -897,11 +1120,35 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk *clk)
  */
 int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
 {
-	struct clk *top, *fail_clk;
-	int ret = 0;
+	struct clk *top = clk, *fail_clk;
+	int ret = -EBUSY, i = 0, tries = 0;
+
+	if (!clk)
+		return 0;
 
 	/* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
-	mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+	while (ret) {
+		mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+		ret = clk_test_lock_subtree(clk);
+		if (!ret)
+			clk_lock_subtree(clk);
+		mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_debug("%s: %s failed with %d on attempt %d\n",
+					__func__, clk->name, ret, tries);
+			wait_for_completion(&clk_completion);
+			if (WAIT_TRIES == ++tries)
+				break;
+		} else
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (i == WAIT_TRIES) {
+		pr_err("%s: failed to lock clocks; cyclical dependency?\n",
+				__func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	/* bail early if nothing to do */
 	if (rate == clk->rate)
@@ -932,12 +1179,13 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
 	/* change the rates */
 	clk_change_rate(top);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
-
-	return 0;
 out:
+	mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+	clk_unlock_subtree(top);
 	mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
 
+	complete(&clk_completion);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_set_rate);
@@ -1095,12 +1343,12 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
 
 	/* migrate prepare and enable */
 	if (clk->prepare_count)
-		__clk_prepare(parent);
+		clk_prepare(parent);
 
 	/* FIXME replace with clk_is_enabled(clk) someday */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&enable_lock, flags);
 	if (clk->enable_count)
-		__clk_enable(parent);
+		clk_enable(parent);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&enable_lock, flags);
 
 	/* change clock input source */
@@ -1109,11 +1357,11 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
 	/* clean up old prepare and enable */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&enable_lock, flags);
 	if (clk->enable_count)
-		__clk_disable(old_parent);
+		clk_disable(old_parent);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&enable_lock, flags);
 
 	if (clk->prepare_count)
-		__clk_unprepare(old_parent);
+		clk_unprepare(old_parent);
 
 out:
 	return ret;
@@ -1133,7 +1381,7 @@ out:
  */
 int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret = 0, i = 0, tries = 0;
 
 	if (!clk || !clk->ops)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1141,19 +1389,42 @@ int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
 	if (!clk->ops->set_parent)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
-	/* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
-	mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
-
 	if (clk->parent == parent)
 		goto out;
 
+	/* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
+	while (ret) {
+		mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+		ret = clk_test_lock_subtree(clk);
+		if (!ret)
+			clk_lock_subtree(clk);
+		mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_debug("%s: %s failed with %d on attempt %d\n",
+					__func__, clk->name, ret, tries);
+			wait_for_completion(&clk_completion);
+			if (WAIT_TRIES == ++tries)
+				break;
+		} else
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (i == WAIT_TRIES) {
+		pr_err("%s: failed to lock clocks; cyclical dependency?\n",
+				__func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	/* propagate PRE_RATE_CHANGE notifications */
 	if (clk->notifier_count)
 		ret = __clk_speculate_rates(clk, parent->rate);
 
 	/* abort if a driver objects */
-	if (ret == NOTIFY_STOP)
+	if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK) {
+		ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/* only re-parent if the clock is not in use */
 	if ((clk->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && clk->prepare_count)
@@ -1171,6 +1442,8 @@ int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
 	__clk_reparent(clk, parent);
 
 out:
+	mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+	clk_unlock_subtree(clk);
 	mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1307,6 +1580,9 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk)
 	if (clk->ops->init)
 		clk->ops->init(clk->hw);
 
+	/* everything looks good, mark this clock's state as ready */
+	clk->state = UNLOCKED;
+
 	clk_debug_register(clk);
 
 out:
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-private.h b/include/linux/clk-private.h
index 9c7f580..751ad6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-private.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-private.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct clk {
 	struct hlist_head	children;
 	struct hlist_node	child_node;
 	unsigned int		notifier_count;
+	enum {UNLOCKED, LOCKED}	state;
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG
 	struct dentry		*dentry;
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
index 77335fa..b3eb074 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
@@ -344,8 +344,8 @@ struct clk *__clk_lookup(const char *name);
 /*
  * FIXME clock api without lock protection
  */
-int __clk_prepare(struct clk *clk);
-void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk);
+int __clk_prepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top);
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top);
 void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent);
 unsigned long __clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/4] [RFC] clk: notifier handler for dynamic voltage scaling
  2012-08-15 23:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] reentrancy in the common clk framework Mike Turquette
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy Mike Turquette
@ 2012-08-15 23:43 ` Mike Turquette
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] [RFC] cpufreq: omap: scale regulator from clk notifier Mike Turquette
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] [RFC] omap3+: clk: dpll: call clk_prepare directly Mike Turquette
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2012-08-15 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: shawn.guo, linus.walleij, rob.herring, pdeschrijver, pgaikwad,
	viresh.kumar, rnayak, paul, broonie, ccross, linux-arm-kernel,
	myungjoo.ham, rajagopal.venkat, Mike Turquette

Dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (dvfs) is a common power saving
technique in many of today's modern processors.  This patch introduces a
common clk rate-change notifier handler which scales voltage
appropriately whenever clk_set_rate is called on an affected clock.

There are three prerequisites to using this feature:

1) the affected clocks must be using the common clk framework
2) voltage must be scaled using the regulator framework
3) clock frequency and regulator voltage values must be paired via the
OPP library

If your platform or device meets these requirements then using the
notifier handler is easy.  A struct device is used as the basis for
performing initial look-ups for clocks via clk_get and regulators via
regulator_get.  This means that notifiers and subscribed on a per-device
basis and multiple devices can have notifiers subscribed to the same
clock.  Put another way, the voltage chosen for a rail during a call to
clk_set_rate is a function of the device, not the clock.

Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/Makefile |    3 +-
 drivers/clk/dvfs.c   |  116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/clk.h  |   27 +++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/dvfs.c

diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile
index 02ffdf6..8f1faa0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 # common clock types
 obj-$(CONFIG_CLKDEV_LOOKUP)	+= clkdev.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk.o clk-fixed-rate.o clk-gate.o \
-				   clk-mux.o clk-divider.o clk-fixed-factor.o
+				   clk-mux.o clk-divider.o clk-fixed-factor.o \
+				   dvfs.o
 # SoCs specific
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIGHBANK)	+= clk-highbank.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXS)		+= mxs/
diff --git a/drivers/clk/dvfs.c b/drivers/clk/dvfs.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9f5d1ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/dvfs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Linaro Ltd <mturquette@linaro.org>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * Helper functions for dynamic voltage & frequency transitions using
+ * the OPP library.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/opp.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+
+/*
+ * XXX clk, regulator & tolerance should be stored in the OPP table?
+ */
+struct dvfs_info {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	struct regulator *reg;
+	int tol;
+	/* FIXME struct device_opp *dev_opp */
+	struct notifier_block nb;
+};
+
+#define to_dvfs_info(_nb) container_of(_nb, struct dvfs_info, nb)
+
+static int dvfs_clk_notifier_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,
+		unsigned long flags, void *data)
+{
+	struct clk_notifier_data *cnd = data;
+	struct dvfs_info *di = to_dvfs_info(nb);
+	int ret, volt_new, volt_old;
+	struct opp *opp;
+
+	volt_old = regulator_get_voltage(di->reg);
+	opp = opp_find_freq_floor(di->dev, &cnd->new_rate);
+	volt_new = opp_get_voltage(opp);
+
+	/* scaling up?  scale voltage before frequency */
+	if (flags & PRE_RATE_CHANGE && cnd->new_rate > cnd->old_rate) {
+		dev_dbg(di->dev, "%s: %d mV --> %d mV\n",
+				__func__, volt_old, volt_new);
+
+		ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(di->reg, volt_new, di->tol);
+
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_warn(di->dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage up.\n",
+				 __func__);
+			return notifier_from_errno(ret);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* scaling down?  scale voltage after frequency */
+	if (flags & POST_RATE_CHANGE && cnd->new_rate < cnd->old_rate) {
+		dev_dbg(di->dev, "%s: %d mV --> %d mV\n",
+				__func__, volt_old, volt_new);
+
+		ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(di->reg, volt_new, di->tol);
+
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_warn(di->dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage down.\n",
+				 __func__);
+			return notifier_from_errno(ret);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+struct dvfs_info *dvfs_clk_notifier_register(struct dvfs_info_init *dii)
+{
+	struct dvfs_info *di;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!dii)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	di = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dvfs_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!di)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	di->dev = dii->dev;
+	di->clk = clk_get(di->dev, dii->con_id);
+	if (IS_ERR(di->clk))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	di->reg = regulator_get(di->dev, dii->reg_id);
+	if (IS_ERR(di->reg))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	di->tol = dii->tol;
+	di->nb.notifier_call = dvfs_clk_notifier_handler;
+
+	ret = clk_notifier_register(di->clk, &di->nb);
+
+	if (ret) {
+		kfree(di);
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+	}
+
+	return di;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dvfs_clk_notifier_register);
+
+void dvfs_clk_notifier_unregister(struct dvfs_info *di)
+{
+	clk_notifier_unregister(di->clk, &di->nb);
+	clk_put(di->clk);
+	regulator_put(di->reg);
+	kfree(di);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dvfs_clk_notifier_unregister);
diff --git a/include/linux/clk.h b/include/linux/clk.h
index 6587b52..643376b 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk.h
@@ -78,9 +78,34 @@ struct clk_notifier_data {
 	unsigned long		new_rate;
 };
 
-int clk_notifier_register(struct clk *clk, struct notifier_block *nb);
+/**
+ * struct dvfs_info_init - data needs to initialize struct dvfs_info
+ * @dev:	device related to this frequency-voltage pair
+ * @con_id:	string name of clock connection
+ * @reg_id:	string name of regulator
+ * @tol:	voltage tolerance for this device
+ *
+ * Provides the data needed to register a common dvfs sequence in a clk
+ * notifier handler.  The clk and regulator lookups are stored in a
+ * private struct and the notifier handler is registered with the clk
+ * framework with a call to dvfs_clk_notifier_register.
+ *
+ * FIXME stuffing @tol here is a hack.  It belongs in the opp table.
+ * Maybe clk & regulator will also live in the opp table some day.
+ */
+struct dvfs_info_init {
+	struct device *dev;
+	const char *con_id;
+	const char *reg_id;
+	int tol;
+};
+
+struct dvfs_info;
 
+int clk_notifier_register(struct clk *clk, struct notifier_block *nb);
 int clk_notifier_unregister(struct clk *clk, struct notifier_block *nb);
+struct dvfs_info *dvfs_clk_notifier_register(struct dvfs_info_init *dii);
+void dvfs_clk_notifier_unregister(struct dvfs_info *di);
 
 #endif
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/4] [RFC] cpufreq: omap: scale regulator from clk notifier
  2012-08-15 23:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] reentrancy in the common clk framework Mike Turquette
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy Mike Turquette
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] [RFC] clk: notifier handler for dynamic voltage scaling Mike Turquette
@ 2012-08-15 23:43 ` Mike Turquette
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] [RFC] omap3+: clk: dpll: call clk_prepare directly Mike Turquette
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2012-08-15 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: shawn.guo, linus.walleij, rob.herring, pdeschrijver, pgaikwad,
	viresh.kumar, rnayak, paul, broonie, ccross, linux-arm-kernel,
	myungjoo.ham, rajagopal.venkat, Mike Turquette

This patch moves direct control of the MPU voltage regulator out of the
cpufreq driver .target callback and instead uses the common dvfs clk
rate-change notifier infrastructure.

Ideally it would be nice to reduce the .target callback for omap's
cpufreq driver to a simple call to clk_set_rate.  For now there is still
some other stuff needed there (jiffies per loop, rounding the rate, etc
etc).

Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c |   85 +++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
index 17fa04d..2f7de30 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static atomic_t freq_table_users = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 static struct clk *mpu_clk;
 static char *mpu_clk_name;
 static struct device *mpu_dev;
-static struct regulator *mpu_reg;
+static struct dvfs_info *di;
 
 static int omap_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
@@ -80,10 +80,9 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		       unsigned int relation)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
-	int r, ret = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
 	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-	struct opp *opp;
-	unsigned long freq, volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0;
+	unsigned long freq;
 
 	if (!freq_table) {
 		dev_err(mpu_dev, "%s: cpu%d: no freq table!\n", __func__,
@@ -119,47 +118,11 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	freq = freqs.new * 1000;
 
-	if (mpu_reg) {
-		opp = opp_find_freq_ceil(mpu_dev, &freq);
-		if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
-			dev_err(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to find MPU OPP for %d\n",
-				__func__, freqs.new);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-		volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
-		tol = volt * OPP_TOLERANCE / 100;
-		volt_old = regulator_get_voltage(mpu_reg);
-	}
-
-	dev_dbg(mpu_dev, "cpufreq-omap: %u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n", 
-		freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
-		freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
-
-	/* scaling up?  scale voltage before frequency */
-	if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new > freqs.old)) {
-		r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol);
-		if (r < 0) {
-			dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage up.\n",
-				 __func__);
-			freqs.new = freqs.old;
-			goto done;
-		}
-	}
+	dev_dbg(mpu_dev, "cpufreq-omap: %u MHz --> %u MHz\n",
+			freqs.old / 1000, freqs.new / 1000); 
 
 	ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
 
-	/* scaling down?  scale voltage after frequency */
-	if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new < freqs.old)) {
-		r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol);
-		if (r < 0) {
-			dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage down.\n",
-				 __func__);
-			ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000);
-			freqs.new = freqs.old;
-			goto done;
-		}
-	}
-
 	freqs.new = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/*
@@ -187,7 +150,6 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					freqs.new);
 #endif
 
-done:
 	/* notifiers */
 	for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
 		freqs.cpu = i;
@@ -207,10 +169,6 @@ static int __cpuinit omap_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	int result = 0;
 
-	mpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, mpu_clk_name);
-	if (IS_ERR(mpu_clk))
-		return PTR_ERR(mpu_clk);
-
 	if (policy->cpu >= NR_CPUS) {
 		result = -EINVAL;
 		goto fail_ck;
@@ -286,6 +244,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver omap_driver = {
 
 static int __init omap_cpufreq_init(void)
 {
+	struct dvfs_info_init dii;
+
 	if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
 		mpu_clk_name = "virt_prcm_set";
 	else if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
@@ -298,34 +258,33 @@ static int __init omap_cpufreq_init(void)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	mpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, mpu_clk_name);
+	if (IS_ERR(mpu_clk))
+		return PTR_ERR(mpu_clk);
+
 	mpu_dev = omap_device_get_by_hwmod_name("mpu");
 	if (!mpu_dev) {
 		pr_warning("%s: unable to get the mpu device\n", __func__);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
-	mpu_reg = regulator_get(mpu_dev, "vcc");
-	if (IS_ERR(mpu_reg)) {
-		pr_warning("%s: unable to get MPU regulator\n", __func__);
-		mpu_reg = NULL;
-	} else {
-		/* 
-		 * Ensure physical regulator is present.
-		 * (e.g. could be dummy regulator.)
-		 */
-		if (regulator_get_voltage(mpu_reg) < 0) {
-			pr_warn("%s: physical regulator not present for MPU\n",
+	dii.dev = mpu_dev;
+	dii.con_id = mpu_clk_name;
+	dii.reg_id = "vcc";
+	dii.tol = OPP_TOLERANCE;
+
+	di = dvfs_clk_notifier_register(&dii);
+	if (IS_ERR(di))
+		pr_warning("%s: failed to register dvfs clk notifier\n",
 				__func__);
-			regulator_put(mpu_reg);
-			mpu_reg = NULL;
-		}
-	}
 
+out:
 	return cpufreq_register_driver(&omap_driver);
 }
 
 static void __exit omap_cpufreq_exit(void)
 {
+	dvfs_clk_notifier_unregister(di);
 	cpufreq_unregister_driver(&omap_driver);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 4/4] [RFC] omap3+: clk: dpll: call clk_prepare directly
  2012-08-15 23:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] reentrancy in the common clk framework Mike Turquette
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] [RFC] cpufreq: omap: scale regulator from clk notifier Mike Turquette
@ 2012-08-15 23:43 ` Mike Turquette
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2012-08-15 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: shawn.guo, linus.walleij, rob.herring, pdeschrijver, pgaikwad,
	viresh.kumar, rnayak, paul, broonie, ccross, linux-arm-kernel,
	myungjoo.ham, rajagopal.venkat, Mike Turquette

In the commit titled "clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy" it became
possible for nested calls to the clock api.  The OMAP3+ DPLL .set_rate
callback has been using the __clk_prepare and __clk_unprepare calls as a
way around this limitation, but these calls are no longer needed with
the aforementioned patch.  Convert the .set_rate callback to use
clk_prepare and clk_unprepare directly.

Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
index ee18d00..1cc3ec8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
@@ -436,9 +436,9 @@ int omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 	if (!dd)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	__clk_prepare(dd->clk_bypass);
+	clk_prepare(dd->clk_bypass);
 	clk_enable(dd->clk_bypass);
-	__clk_prepare(dd->clk_ref);
+	clk_prepare(dd->clk_ref);
 	clk_enable(dd->clk_ref);
 
 	if (__clk_get_rate(dd->clk_bypass) == rate &&
@@ -483,9 +483,9 @@ int omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 		__clk_reparent(hw->clk, new_parent);
 
 	clk_disable(dd->clk_ref);
-	__clk_unprepare(dd->clk_ref);
+	clk_unprepare(dd->clk_ref);
 	clk_disable(dd->clk_bypass);
-	__clk_unprepare(dd->clk_bypass);
+	clk_unprepare(dd->clk_bypass);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy Mike Turquette
@ 2012-08-27 17:05   ` Pankaj Jangra
  2012-09-04 14:25   ` Shawn Guo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pankaj Jangra @ 2012-08-27 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Turquette
  Cc: linux-kernel, paul, pgaikwad, viresh.kumar, linus.walleij,
	rnayak, rob.herring, ccross, myungjoo.ham, broonie,
	rajagopal.venkat, shawn.guo, pdeschrijver, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Mike,

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> The global prepare_lock mutex prevents concurrent operations in the clk
> api.  This incurs a performance penalty when unrelated clock subtrees
> are contending for the lock.
>
> Additionally there are use cases which benefit from reentrancy into the
> clk api.  A simple example is reparenting a mux clock with a call to
> clk_set_rate.  Patch #4 in this series demonstrates this without the use
> of internal helper functions.
>
> A more complex example is performing dynamic frequency and voltage
> scaling from clk_set_rate.  Patches #2 and #3 in this series demonstrate
> this.
>
> This commit affects users of the global prepare_lock mutex, namely
> clk_prepare, clk_unprepare, clk_set_rate and clk_set_parent.
>
> This patch introduces an enum inside of struct clk which tracks whether
> the framework has LOCKED or UNLOCKED the clk.
>
> Access to clk->state must be protected by the global prepare_lock mutex.
> In the future maybe the global mutex can be dropped and all operations
> will only use a global spinlock to protect access to the per-clk enums.
> A general outline of the new locking scheme is as follows:
>
> 1) hold the global prepare_lock mutex
> 2) traverse the tree checking to make sure that any clk's needed are
> UNLOCKED and not LOCKED
>         a) if a clk in the subtree of affected clk's is LOCKED then
>            release the global lock, wait_for_completion and then try
>            again up to a maximum of WAIT_TRIES times
>         b) After WAIT_TRIES times return -EBUSY
> 3) if all clk's are UNLOCKED then mark them as LOCKED
> 4) release the global prepare_lock mutex
> 5) do the real work
> 6) hold the global prepare_lock mutex
> 7) set all of the clocks previously marked as LOCKED to UNLOCKED
> 8) release the global prepare_lock mutex and return
>
> The primary down-side to this approach is that the clk api's might
> return -EBUSY due to lock contention.  This is only after having tried
> several times.  Bailing out like this is necessary to prevent deadlocks.
>
> The enum approach in this version of the patchset does not benefit from
> lockdep checking the lock order (but neither did v1).  It is possible
> for circular dependencies to pop up for the careless developer and
> bailing out after a number of unsuccessful tries is the sanest strategy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk.c            |  354 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/clk-private.h  |    1 +
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h |    4 +-
>  3 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>

> +}
> +
> +void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)

Why do you need to change the signature of __clk_prepare and
__clk_unprepare functions ?
I mean i did not understand the use of passing struct clk *top? As i
understand, it tells when you reach at the last
clk struct in the tree which needs to be prepared/unprepared. Do we
have extra benefit of this or if i am missing something?

> +{
>         if (clk->ops->unprepare)
>                 clk->ops->unprepare(clk->hw);
>
> -       __clk_unprepare(clk->parent);
> +       if (clk != top)
> +               __clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
> +}
> +
> +static void __clk_prepare_unlock(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
> +{
> +       clk->state = UNLOCKED;
> +
> +       if (clk != top)
> +               __clk_prepare_unlock(clk->parent, top);
>  }
>
>  /**
> @@ -404,35 +437,94 @@ void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
>   */
>  void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
>  {
> +       struct clk *top = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> +       int tries = 0;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * walk the list of parents checking clk->state along the way.  If all
> +        * clk->state is UNLOCKED then continue.  If a clk->state is LOCKED then
> +        * bail out with -EBUSY.
> +        */
> +       while (IS_ERR(top)) {
> +               mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
> +               top = __clk_unprepare_lock(clk);
> +               mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
> +
> +               if (IS_ERR(top)) {
> +                       pr_debug("%s: %s failed with %ld on attempt %d\n",
> +                                       __func__, clk->name, PTR_ERR(top),
> +                                       tries);
> +                       wait_for_completion(&clk_completion);
> +                       if (WAIT_TRIES == ++tries)
> +                               break;
> +               } else
> +                       break;

Braces around else part please.

> +       }
> +
> +       if (WAIT_TRIES == tries) {
> +               pr_warning("%s: failed to lock clocks; cyclical dependency?\n",
> +                               __func__);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* unprepare the list of clocks from clk to top */
> +       __clk_unprepare(clk, top);
> +

> +       /* unprepare the list of clocks from clk to top */
> +       __clk_prepare(clk, top);

You mean prepare right ? :)



Regards,
Pankaj Kumar

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy
  2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy Mike Turquette
  2012-08-27 17:05   ` Pankaj Jangra
@ 2012-09-04 14:25   ` Shawn Guo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-09-04 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Turquette
  Cc: linux-kernel, linus.walleij, rob.herring, pdeschrijver, pgaikwad,
	viresh.kumar, rnayak, paul, broonie, ccross, linux-arm-kernel,
	myungjoo.ham, rajagopal.venkat

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 04:43:31PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> +void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
> +{
>  	if (clk->ops->unprepare)
>  		clk->ops->unprepare(clk->hw);
>  
> -	__clk_unprepare(clk->parent);
> +	if (clk != top)
> +		__clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
> +}

The __clk_unprepare does not match the __clk_prepare below in terms of
if we should call clk->ops->prepare/unprepare on top clock.

I have to change __clk_unprepare to something like the below to get
the series work on imx6q.

 void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
 {
+       if (clk == top)
+               return;
+
        if (clk->ops->unprepare)
                clk->ops->unprepare(clk->hw);

-       if (clk != top)
-               __clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
+       __clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
 }

> +int __clk_prepare(struct clk *clk, struct clk *top)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (clk != top) {
> +		ret = __clk_prepare(clk->parent, top);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
>  		if (clk->ops->prepare) {
>  			ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk->hw);
>  			if (ret) {
> -				__clk_unprepare(clk->parent);
> +				/* this is safe since clk != top */
> +				__clk_unprepare(clk->parent, top);
>  				return ret;
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	clk->prepare_count++;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-04 14:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-15 23:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] reentrancy in the common clk framework Mike Turquette
2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] [RFC] clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy Mike Turquette
2012-08-27 17:05   ` Pankaj Jangra
2012-09-04 14:25   ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] [RFC] clk: notifier handler for dynamic voltage scaling Mike Turquette
2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] [RFC] cpufreq: omap: scale regulator from clk notifier Mike Turquette
2012-08-15 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] [RFC] omap3+: clk: dpll: call clk_prepare directly Mike Turquette

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).