From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: Batch page_check_references in shrink_page_list sharing the same i_mmap_mutex Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:54:19 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1346799259.13492.272.camel@schen9-DESK> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1346772077.13492.267.camel@schen9-DESK> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 08:21 -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 17:48 -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > > > > > Thanks to Matthew's suggestions on improving the patch. Here's the > > updated version. It seems to be sane when I booted my machine up. I > > will put it through more testing when I get a chance. > > > > Tim > > > > Matthew, > > The new patch seems to be causing some of the workloads with mmaped file > read to seg fault. Will need to dig further to find out why. > > Tim > Okay, the problem seems to be the code below. It is too restrictive and causes some cases where the mutex needs to be taken in try_to_unmap_file to be missed. > > +int needs_page_mmap_mutex(struct page *page) > > +{ > > + return page->mapping && page_mapped(page) && page_rmapping(page) && > > + !PageKsm(page) && !PageAnon(page); > > +} > > + Changing the check to the following fixes the problem: @@ -873,8 +873,7 @@ static int page_referenced_file(struct page *page, int needs_page_mmap_mutex(struct page *page) { - return page->mapping && page_mapped(page) && page_rmapping(page) && - !PageKsm(page) && !PageAnon(page); + return page->mapping && !PageKsm(page) && !PageAnon(page); } I'll do more testing and generate a second version of the patch set with the fixes. Tim
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 22:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-08-18 1:06 Tim Chen 2012-08-20 16:43 ` Tim Chen 2012-08-21 13:21 ` Matthew Wilcox 2012-08-21 17:51 ` Tim Chen 2012-08-21 22:53 ` Tim Chen 2012-08-22 0:48 ` Tim Chen 2012-08-23 18:33 ` Matthew Wilcox 2012-09-04 15:21 ` Tim Chen 2012-09-04 22:54 ` Tim Chen [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1346799259.13492.272.camel@schen9-DESK \ --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \ --cc=minchan@kernel.org \ --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \ --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: Batch page_check_references in shrink_page_list sharing the same i_mmap_mutex' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).