* [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits
@ 2013-01-14 2:01 Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-14 2:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-30 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Wim Van Sebroeck
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Takahisa Tanaka @ 2013-01-14 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-watchdog
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck, Paul Menzel, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz,
Bjorn Helgaas, Andrew Morton, Jonathan Nieder, linux-kernel,
Florian Mickler, Takahisa Tanaka
In case of SB800 or later chipset and re-programming MMIO address(*),
sp5100_tco module may read incorrect value of reserved bit, because the module
reads a value from an incorrect I/O address. However, this bug doesn't cause
a problem, because when re-programming MMIO address, by chance the module
writes zero (this is BIOS's default value) to the low three bits of register.
* In most cases, PC with SB8x0 or later chipset doesn't need to re-programming
MMIO address, because such PC can enable AcpiMmio and can use 0xfed80b00 for
watchdog register base address.
This patch fixes this bug.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176
Signed-off-by: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
index 2b0e000..5dfe86e 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
@@ -500,14 +500,15 @@ static unsigned char sp5100_tco_setupdevice(void)
/* Restore to the low three bits, if chipset is SB8x0(or later) */
if (sp5100_tco_pci->revision >= 0x40) {
u8 reserved_bit;
- reserved_bit = inb(base_addr) & 0x7;
+ outb(base_addr+0, index_reg);
+ reserved_bit = inb(data_reg) & 0x7;
val |= (u32)reserved_bit;
}
/* Re-programming the watchdog timer base address */
outb(base_addr+0, index_reg);
/* Low three bits of BASE are reserved */
- outb((val >> 0) & 0xf8, data_reg);
+ outb((val >> 0) & 0xff, data_reg);
outb(base_addr+1, index_reg);
outb((val >> 8) & 0xff, data_reg);
outb(base_addr+2, index_reg);
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero
2013-01-14 2:01 [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Takahisa Tanaka
@ 2013-01-14 2:01 ` Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-30 19:20 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-01-30 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Wim Van Sebroeck
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Takahisa Tanaka @ 2013-01-14 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-watchdog
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck, Paul Menzel, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz,
Bjorn Helgaas, Andrew Morton, Jonathan Nieder, linux-kernel,
Florian Mickler, Takahisa Tanaka
In case of SP5100 or SB7x0 chipsets, the sp5100_tco module writes zero to
reserved bits. The module, however, shouldn't depend on specific default
value, and should perform a read-merge-write operation for the reserved
bits.
This patch makes the sp5100_tco module perform a read-merge-write operation
on all the chipset (sp5100, sb7x0, sb8x0 or later).
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176
Signed-off-by: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
index 5dfe86e..e3b8f75 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static unsigned char sp5100_tco_setupdevice(void)
{
struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
const char *dev_name = NULL;
- u32 val;
+ u32 val, tmp_val;
u32 index_reg, data_reg, base_addr;
/* Match the PCI device */
@@ -497,31 +497,19 @@ static unsigned char sp5100_tco_setupdevice(void)
pr_debug("Got 0x%04x from resource tree\n", val);
}
- /* Restore to the low three bits, if chipset is SB8x0(or later) */
- if (sp5100_tco_pci->revision >= 0x40) {
- u8 reserved_bit;
- outb(base_addr+0, index_reg);
- reserved_bit = inb(data_reg) & 0x7;
- val |= (u32)reserved_bit;
- }
+ /* Restore to the low three bits */
+ outb(base_addr+0, index_reg);
+ tmp_val = val | (inb(data_reg) & 0x7);
/* Re-programming the watchdog timer base address */
outb(base_addr+0, index_reg);
- /* Low three bits of BASE are reserved */
- outb((val >> 0) & 0xff, data_reg);
+ outb((tmp_val >> 0) & 0xff, data_reg);
outb(base_addr+1, index_reg);
- outb((val >> 8) & 0xff, data_reg);
+ outb((tmp_val >> 8) & 0xff, data_reg);
outb(base_addr+2, index_reg);
- outb((val >> 16) & 0xff, data_reg);
+ outb((tmp_val >> 16) & 0xff, data_reg);
outb(base_addr+3, index_reg);
- outb((val >> 24) & 0xff, data_reg);
-
- /*
- * Clear unnecessary the low three bits,
- * if chipset is SB8x0(or later)
- */
- if (sp5100_tco_pci->revision >= 0x40)
- val &= ~0x7;
+ outb((tmp_val >> 24) & 0xff, data_reg);
if (!request_mem_region_exclusive(val, SP5100_WDT_MEM_MAP_SIZE,
dev_name)) {
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits
2013-01-14 2:01 [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-14 2:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero Takahisa Tanaka
@ 2013-01-30 19:19 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-02-06 8:46 ` Paul Menzel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wim Van Sebroeck @ 2013-01-30 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Takahisa Tanaka
Cc: linux-watchdog, Paul Menzel, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz, Bjorn Helgaas,
Andrew Morton, Jonathan Nieder, linux-kernel, Florian Mickler
Hi,
> In case of SB800 or later chipset and re-programming MMIO address(*),
> sp5100_tco module may read incorrect value of reserved bit, because the module
> reads a value from an incorrect I/O address. However, this bug doesn't cause
> a problem, because when re-programming MMIO address, by chance the module
> writes zero (this is BIOS's default value) to the low three bits of register.
> * In most cases, PC with SB8x0 or later chipset doesn't need to re-programming
> MMIO address, because such PC can enable AcpiMmio and can use 0xfed80b00 for
> watchdog register base address.
>
> This patch fixes this bug.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176
> Signed-off-by: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>
Added to linux-watchdog-next.
Kind regards,
Wim.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero
2013-01-14 2:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero Takahisa Tanaka
@ 2013-01-30 19:20 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-01-31 13:43 ` t t
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wim Van Sebroeck @ 2013-01-30 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Takahisa Tanaka
Cc: linux-watchdog, Paul Menzel, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz, Bjorn Helgaas,
Andrew Morton, Jonathan Nieder, linux-kernel, Florian Mickler
Hi,
> In case of SP5100 or SB7x0 chipsets, the sp5100_tco module writes zero to
> reserved bits. The module, however, shouldn't depend on specific default
> value, and should perform a read-merge-write operation for the reserved
> bits.
>
> This patch makes the sp5100_tco module perform a read-merge-write operation
> on all the chipset (sp5100, sb7x0, sb8x0 or later).
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176
> Signed-off-by: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>
Added to linux-watchdog-next.
Kind regards,
Wim.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero
2013-01-30 19:20 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
@ 2013-01-31 13:43 ` t t
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: t t @ 2013-01-31 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wim Van Sebroeck
Cc: linux-watchdog, Paul Menzel, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz, Bjorn Helgaas,
Andrew Morton, Jonathan Nieder, linux-kernel, Florian Mickler
2013/1/31 Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>:
> Hi,
>
>> In case of SP5100 or SB7x0 chipsets, the sp5100_tco module writes zero to
>> reserved bits. The module, however, shouldn't depend on specific default
>> value, and should perform a read-merge-write operation for the reserved
>> bits.
>>
>> This patch makes the sp5100_tco module perform a read-merge-write operation
>> on all the chipset (sp5100, sb7x0, sb8x0 or later).
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176
>> Signed-off-by: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>
>
> Added to linux-watchdog-next.
Thanks Wim!
Kind regards,
Takahisa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits
2013-01-30 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Wim Van Sebroeck
@ 2013-02-06 8:46 ` Paul Menzel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2013-02-06 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wim Van Sebroeck
Cc: Takahisa Tanaka, linux-watchdog, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz,
Bjorn Helgaas, Andrew Morton, Jonathan Nieder, linux-kernel,
Florian Mickler
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]
Dear Wim,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.01.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Wim Van Sebroeck:
> > In case of SB800 or later chipset and re-programming MMIO address(*),
> > sp5100_tco module may read incorrect value of reserved bit, because the module
> > reads a value from an incorrect I/O address. However, this bug doesn't cause
> > a problem, because when re-programming MMIO address, by chance the module
> > writes zero (this is BIOS's default value) to the low three bits of register.
> > * In most cases, PC with SB8x0 or later chipset doesn't need to re-programming
> > MMIO address, because such PC can enable AcpiMmio and can use 0xfed80b00 for
> > watchdog register base address.
> >
> > This patch fixes this bug.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176
> > Signed-off-by: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>
>
> Added to linux-watchdog-next.
Is it allowed to rewrite history of linux-watchdog-next? If yes, could
you please add `CC: stable@vger.kernel.org` to both of Takahisa’s
patches and also add my
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
ASRock E350M1 (SB800)
as commented on the bug report to it?
Thanks,
Paul
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-06 8:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-14 2:01 [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-14 2:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-30 19:20 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-01-31 13:43 ` t t
2013-01-30 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-02-06 8:46 ` Paul Menzel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).