linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit
@ 2013-04-19 16:40 Namjae Jeon
  2013-04-20 19:50 ` James Bottomley
  2013-04-22 21:23 ` Kent Overstreet
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2013-04-19 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dwmw2, axboe, shli, Paul.Clements, npiggin, neilb, cjb,
	adrian.hunter, James.Bottomley, JBottomley
  Cc: linux-scsi, linux-mtd, nbd-general, linux-raid, linux-mmc,
	linux-kernel, jcmvbkbc, Namjae Jeon, Namjae Jeon

From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>

linux-v3.8-rc1 and later support for plug for blkdev_issue_discard with
commit 0cfbcafcae8b7364b5fa96c2b26ccde7a3a296a9 
(block: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard )

For example,
1) DISCARD rq-1 with size size 4GB
2) DISCARD rq-2 with size size 1GB

If these 2 discard requests get merged, final request size will be 5GB.

In this case, request's __data_len field may overflow as it can store
max 4GB(unsigned int).

This issue was observed while doing mkfs.f2fs on 5GB SD card:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/1/292

# mkfs.f2fs /dev/mmcblk0p3
Info: sector size = 512
Info: total sectors = 11370496 (in 512bytes)
Info: zone aligned segment0 blkaddr: 512
[  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0

mkfs process gets stuck in D state and I see the following in the dmesg:

[  257.789733] __end_that: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
[  257.789764]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
[  257.789764]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656
[  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
[  257.794921] request botched: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
[  257.794921]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
[  257.794921]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656

Few drivers(e.g. mmc, mtd..) set q->limits.max_discard_sectors
more than UINT_MAX >> 9 sectors which is incorrect and it may lead to overflow
of request's __data_len field if merged discard request's size exceeds 4GB.

This patchset fixes this issue by updating helper function
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors which is used to set max_discard_sectors limit.

This patchset also replaces "q->limits.max_discard_sector = max_discard_sectors"
with blk_queue_max_discard_sectors call in other drivers like mmc, mtd etc.

Namjae Jeon (9):
  block: fix max discard sectors limit
  mmc: fix max_discard_sectors
  sd: use generic helper to set max_discard_sectors
  mtd: use generic helper to set max_discard_sectors
  loop: use generic helper to set max_discard_sectors
  nbd: use generic helper to set max_discard_sectors
  brd: use generic helper to set max_discard_sectors
  dm thin: use generic helper to set max_discard_sectors
  bcache: use generic helper to set max_discard_sectors
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit
  2013-04-19 16:40 [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit Namjae Jeon
@ 2013-04-20 19:50 ` James Bottomley
  2013-04-21  1:37   ` Namjae Jeon
  2013-04-26  7:33   ` Hannes Reinecke
  2013-04-22 21:23 ` Kent Overstreet
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2013-04-20 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Namjae Jeon
  Cc: dwmw2, axboe, shli, Paul.Clements, npiggin, neilb, cjb,
	adrian.hunter, linux-scsi, linux-mtd, nbd-general, linux-raid,
	linux-mmc, linux-kernel, jcmvbkbc, Namjae Jeon

On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 01:40 +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
> 
> linux-v3.8-rc1 and later support for plug for blkdev_issue_discard with
> commit 0cfbcafcae8b7364b5fa96c2b26ccde7a3a296a9 
> (block: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard )
> 
> For example,
> 1) DISCARD rq-1 with size size 4GB
> 2) DISCARD rq-2 with size size 1GB
> 
> If these 2 discard requests get merged, final request size will be 5GB.
> 
> In this case, request's __data_len field may overflow as it can store
> max 4GB(unsigned int).
> 
> This issue was observed while doing mkfs.f2fs on 5GB SD card:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/1/292
> 
> # mkfs.f2fs /dev/mmcblk0p3
> Info: sector size = 512
> Info: total sectors = 11370496 (in 512bytes)
> Info: zone aligned segment0 blkaddr: 512
> [  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
> 
> mkfs process gets stuck in D state and I see the following in the dmesg:
> 
> [  257.789733] __end_that: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
> [  257.789764]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
> [  257.789764]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656
> [  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
> [  257.794921] request botched: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
> [  257.794921]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
> [  257.794921]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656
> 
> Few drivers(e.g. mmc, mtd..) set q->limits.max_discard_sectors
> more than UINT_MAX >> 9 sectors which is incorrect and it may lead to overflow
> of request's __data_len field if merged discard request's size exceeds 4GB.
> 
> This patchset fixes this issue by updating helper function
> blk_queue_max_discard_sectors which is used to set max_discard_sectors limit.
> 
> This patchset also replaces "q->limits.max_discard_sector = max_discard_sectors"
> with blk_queue_max_discard_sectors call in other drivers like mmc, mtd etc.

I really don't understand this explanation.  How can you be affected by
the incorrect setting of q->limits.max_discard sectors when  n the
blkdev_issue_discard() code you see:

	max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >>
9);

?

The problem is not that we issue discards bigger than __data_len can
allow, the problem is that we merge them larger than __data_len will
allow.  That means the merge code needs fixing to pay attention to
max_discard_sectors, so isn't this the correct fix:

James

---

diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 78feda9..33f358f 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_queue_get_max_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
 						     unsigned int cmd_flags)
 {
 	if (unlikely(cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD))
-		return q->limits.max_discard_sectors;
+		return min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
 
 	if (unlikely(cmd_flags & REQ_WRITE_SAME))
 		return q->limits.max_write_same_sectors;



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit
  2013-04-20 19:50 ` James Bottomley
@ 2013-04-21  1:37   ` Namjae Jeon
  2013-04-26  7:33   ` Hannes Reinecke
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2013-04-21  1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley
  Cc: dwmw2, axboe, shli, Paul.Clements, npiggin, neilb, cjb,
	adrian.hunter, linux-scsi, linux-mtd, nbd-general, linux-raid,
	linux-mmc, linux-kernel, jcmvbkbc, Namjae Jeon

2013/4/21 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>:
> On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 01:40 +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
>>
>> linux-v3.8-rc1 and later support for plug for blkdev_issue_discard with
>> commit 0cfbcafcae8b7364b5fa96c2b26ccde7a3a296a9
>> (block: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard )
>>
>> For example,
>> 1) DISCARD rq-1 with size size 4GB
>> 2) DISCARD rq-2 with size size 1GB
>>
>> If these 2 discard requests get merged, final request size will be 5GB.
>>
>> In this case, request's __data_len field may overflow as it can store
>> max 4GB(unsigned int).
>>
>> This issue was observed while doing mkfs.f2fs on 5GB SD card:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/1/292
>>
>> # mkfs.f2fs /dev/mmcblk0p3
>> Info: sector size = 512
>> Info: total sectors = 11370496 (in 512bytes)
>> Info: zone aligned segment0 blkaddr: 512
>> [  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
>>
>> mkfs process gets stuck in D state and I see the following in the dmesg:
>>
>> [  257.789733] __end_that: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
>> [  257.789764]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
>> [  257.789764]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656
>> [  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
>> [  257.794921] request botched: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
>> [  257.794921]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
>> [  257.794921]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656
>>
>> Few drivers(e.g. mmc, mtd..) set q->limits.max_discard_sectors
>> more than UINT_MAX >> 9 sectors which is incorrect and it may lead to overflow
>> of request's __data_len field if merged discard request's size exceeds 4GB.
>>
>> This patchset fixes this issue by updating helper function
>> blk_queue_max_discard_sectors which is used to set max_discard_sectors limit.
>>
>> This patchset also replaces "q->limits.max_discard_sector = max_discard_sectors"
>> with blk_queue_max_discard_sectors call in other drivers like mmc, mtd etc.
>
Hi. James.
> I really don't understand this explanation.  How can you be affected by
> the incorrect setting of q->limits.max_discard sectors when  n the
> blkdev_issue_discard() code you see:
>
>         max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >>
> 9);
>
> ?
>
> The problem is not that we issue discards bigger than __data_len can
> allow, the problem is that we merge them larger than __data_len will
> allow.  That means the merge code needs fixing to pay attention to
> max_discard_sectors, so isn't this the correct fix:
Yes, I agree. And the below patch looks good to fix this issue.
Thanks for your comment.

>
> James
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 78feda9..33f358f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_queue_get_max_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
>                                                      unsigned int cmd_flags)
>  {
>         if (unlikely(cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD))
> -               return q->limits.max_discard_sectors;
> +               return min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
>
>         if (unlikely(cmd_flags & REQ_WRITE_SAME))
>                 return q->limits.max_write_same_sectors;
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit
  2013-04-19 16:40 [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit Namjae Jeon
  2013-04-20 19:50 ` James Bottomley
@ 2013-04-22 21:23 ` Kent Overstreet
  2013-04-23  5:16   ` Namjae Jeon
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kent Overstreet @ 2013-04-22 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Namjae Jeon
  Cc: dwmw2, axboe, shli, Paul.Clements, npiggin, neilb, cjb,
	adrian.hunter, James.Bottomley, JBottomley, linux-scsi,
	linux-mtd, nbd-general, linux-raid, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	jcmvbkbc, Namjae Jeon

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:40:02AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
> 
> linux-v3.8-rc1 and later support for plug for blkdev_issue_discard with
> commit 0cfbcafcae8b7364b5fa96c2b26ccde7a3a296a9 
> (block: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard )
> 
> For example,
> 1) DISCARD rq-1 with size size 4GB
> 2) DISCARD rq-2 with size size 1GB
> 
> If these 2 discard requests get merged, final request size will be 5GB.
> 
> In this case, request's __data_len field may overflow as it can store
> max 4GB(unsigned int).

Complete NACK - like James said, this fix is nonsensical. This should be
fixed by just checking for overflow before merging requests, not with
weird hacks in the drivers.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit
  2013-04-22 21:23 ` Kent Overstreet
@ 2013-04-23  5:16   ` Namjae Jeon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2013-04-23  5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kent Overstreet
  Cc: dwmw2, axboe, shli, Paul.Clements, npiggin, neilb, cjb,
	adrian.hunter, James.Bottomley, JBottomley, linux-scsi,
	linux-mtd, nbd-general, linux-raid, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	jcmvbkbc, Namjae Jeon

2013/4/23, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:40:02AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
>>
>> linux-v3.8-rc1 and later support for plug for blkdev_issue_discard with
>> commit 0cfbcafcae8b7364b5fa96c2b26ccde7a3a296a9
>> (block: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard )
>>
>> For example,
>> 1) DISCARD rq-1 with size size 4GB
>> 2) DISCARD rq-2 with size size 1GB
>>
>> If these 2 discard requests get merged, final request size will be 5GB.
>>
>> In this case, request's __data_len field may overflow as it can store
>> max 4GB(unsigned int).
>
> Complete NACK - like James said, this fix is nonsensical. This should be
> fixed by just checking for overflow before merging requests, not with
> weird hacks in the drivers.
that agree to your opinion, and will change at only appropriate
place(James'change) and will send the updated patch soon.
Thanks.
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit
  2013-04-20 19:50 ` James Bottomley
  2013-04-21  1:37   ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2013-04-26  7:33   ` Hannes Reinecke
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2013-04-26  7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley
  Cc: Namjae Jeon, dwmw2, axboe, shli, Paul.Clements, npiggin, neilb,
	cjb, adrian.hunter, linux-scsi, linux-mtd, nbd-general,
	linux-raid, linux-mmc, linux-kernel, jcmvbkbc, Namjae Jeon

On 04/20/2013 09:50 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 01:40 +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
>>
>> linux-v3.8-rc1 and later support for plug for blkdev_issue_discard with
>> commit 0cfbcafcae8b7364b5fa96c2b26ccde7a3a296a9 
>> (block: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard )
>>
>> For example,
>> 1) DISCARD rq-1 with size size 4GB
>> 2) DISCARD rq-2 with size size 1GB
>>
>> If these 2 discard requests get merged, final request size will be 5GB.
>>
>> In this case, request's __data_len field may overflow as it can store
>> max 4GB(unsigned int).
>>
>> This issue was observed while doing mkfs.f2fs on 5GB SD card:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/1/292
>>
>> # mkfs.f2fs /dev/mmcblk0p3
>> Info: sector size = 512
>> Info: total sectors = 11370496 (in 512bytes)
>> Info: zone aligned segment0 blkaddr: 512
>> [  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
>>
>> mkfs process gets stuck in D state and I see the following in the dmesg:
>>
>> [  257.789733] __end_that: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
>> [  257.789764]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
>> [  257.789764]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656
>> [  257.789764] blk_update_request: bio idx 0 >= vcnt 0
>> [  257.794921] request botched: dev mmcblk0: type=1, flags=122c8081
>> [  257.794921]   sector 4194304, nr/cnr 2981888/4294959104
>> [  257.794921]   bio df3840c0, biotail df3848c0, buffer   (null), len 1526726656
>>
>> Few drivers(e.g. mmc, mtd..) set q->limits.max_discard_sectors
>> more than UINT_MAX >> 9 sectors which is incorrect and it may lead to overflow
>> of request's __data_len field if merged discard request's size exceeds 4GB.
>>
>> This patchset fixes this issue by updating helper function
>> blk_queue_max_discard_sectors which is used to set max_discard_sectors limit.
>>
>> This patchset also replaces "q->limits.max_discard_sector = max_discard_sectors"
>> with blk_queue_max_discard_sectors call in other drivers like mmc, mtd etc.
> 
> I really don't understand this explanation.  How can you be affected by
> the incorrect setting of q->limits.max_discard sectors when  n the
> blkdev_issue_discard() code you see:
> 
> 	max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >>
> 9);
> 
> ?
> 
> The problem is not that we issue discards bigger than __data_len can
> allow, the problem is that we merge them larger than __data_len will
> allow.  That means the merge code needs fixing to pay attention to
> max_discard_sectors, so isn't this the correct fix:
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 78feda9..33f358f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_queue_get_max_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
>  						     unsigned int cmd_flags)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD))
> -		return q->limits.max_discard_sectors;
> +		return min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(cmd_flags & REQ_WRITE_SAME))
>  		return q->limits.max_write_same_sectors;
> 
> 
Patch works, and fixes the discard failing issue I've been pestering
mkp with at LSF. Please apply.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-26  7:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-19 16:40 [PATCH v2 0/9] fix max discard sectors limit Namjae Jeon
2013-04-20 19:50 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-21  1:37   ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-26  7:33   ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-22 21:23 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-04-23  5:16   ` Namjae Jeon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).