linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4] trace: Use 64-bit timekeeping
@ 2015-01-28 14:16 Tina Ruchandani
  2015-01-28 14:53 ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tina Ruchandani @ 2015-01-28 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar

The ring_buffer_producer uses 'struct timeval' to measure
its start and end times. 'struct timeval' on 32-bit systems
will have its tv_sec value overflow in year 2038 and beyond.
This patch replaces struct timeval with 'ktime_t' which uses
64-bit representation for nanoseconds.

Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v4:
	- Fix typo in commit message.
	- Avoid typecast to 'long long' by defining RUN_TIME as '10ULL'
	  instead of '10'.
Changes in v3:
	- Use a more efficient way to compute condition for exiting loop.
	- Fix variable naming - all caps is only for macros.
Changes in v2:
	- Use ktime_t instead of timespec64 for efficiency reasons.
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 3f9e328..13d945c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/time.h>
+#include <linux/ktime.h>
 #include <asm/local.h>
 
 struct rb_page {
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct rb_page {
 };
 
 /* run time and sleep time in seconds */
-#define RUN_TIME	10
+#define RUN_TIME	10ULL
 #define SLEEP_TIME	10
 
 /* number of events for writer to wake up the reader */
@@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_consumer(void)
 
 static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
 {
-	struct timeval start_tv;
-	struct timeval end_tv;
+	ktime_t start_time, end_time, timeout;
 	unsigned long long time;
 	unsigned long long entries;
 	unsigned long long overruns;
@@ -227,7 +226,8 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
 	 * make the system stall)
 	 */
 	trace_printk("Starting ring buffer hammer\n");
-	do_gettimeofday(&start_tv);
+	start_time = ktime_get();
+	timeout = ktime_add_ns(start_time, RUN_TIME * NSEC_PER_SEC);
 	do {
 		struct ring_buffer_event *event;
 		int *entry;
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
 				ring_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event);
 			}
 		}
-		do_gettimeofday(&end_tv);
+		end_time = ktime_get();
 
 		cnt++;
 		if (consumer && !(cnt % wakeup_interval))
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
 			cond_resched();
 #endif
 
-	} while (end_tv.tv_sec < (start_tv.tv_sec + RUN_TIME) && !kill_test);
+	} while (ktime_before(end_time, timeout) && !kill_test);
 	trace_printk("End ring buffer hammer\n");
 
 	if (consumer) {
@@ -280,9 +280,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
 		wait_for_completion(&read_done);
 	}
 
-	time = end_tv.tv_sec - start_tv.tv_sec;
-	time *= USEC_PER_SEC;
-	time += (long long)((long)end_tv.tv_usec - (long)start_tv.tv_usec);
+	time = ktime_us_delta(end_time, start_time);
 
 	entries = ring_buffer_entries(buffer);
 	overruns = ring_buffer_overruns(buffer);
-- 
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] trace: Use 64-bit timekeeping
  2015-01-28 14:16 [PATCH v4] trace: Use 64-bit timekeeping Tina Ruchandani
@ 2015-01-28 14:53 ` Steven Rostedt
  2015-01-28 14:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-01-28 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tina Ruchandani; +Cc: linux-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, Ingo Molnar

On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:46:11 +0530
Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@gmail.com> wrote:

> The ring_buffer_producer uses 'struct timeval' to measure
> its start and end times. 'struct timeval' on 32-bit systems
> will have its tv_sec value overflow in year 2038 and beyond.
> This patch replaces struct timeval with 'ktime_t' which uses
> 64-bit representation for nanoseconds.
> 
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> 	- Fix typo in commit message.
> 	- Avoid typecast to 'long long' by defining RUN_TIME as '10ULL'
> 	  instead of '10'.

Although I have not tested this, this patch looks fine to me. Is this
going to go through some cleanup tree or should I just pull it?

-- Steve


> Changes in v3:
> 	- Use a more efficient way to compute condition for exiting loop.
> 	- Fix variable naming - all caps is only for macros.
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Use ktime_t instead of timespec64 for efficiency reasons.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] trace: Use 64-bit timekeeping
  2015-01-28 14:53 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2015-01-28 14:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
  2015-01-28 15:05     ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2015-01-28 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Tina Ruchandani, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar

On Wednesday 28 January 2015 09:53:49 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:46:11 +0530
> Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The ring_buffer_producer uses 'struct timeval' to measure
> > its start and end times. 'struct timeval' on 32-bit systems
> > will have its tv_sec value overflow in year 2038 and beyond.
> > This patch replaces struct timeval with 'ktime_t' which uses
> > 64-bit representation for nanoseconds.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> >       - Fix typo in commit message.
> >       - Avoid typecast to 'long long' by defining RUN_TIME as '10ULL'
> >         instead of '10'.
> 
> Although I have not tested this, this patch looks fine to me. Is this
> going to go through some cleanup tree or should I just pull it?
> 

Please apply it to your tree.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] trace: Use 64-bit timekeeping
  2015-01-28 14:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2015-01-28 15:05     ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-01-28 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: Tina Ruchandani, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar

On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:55:39 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:


> Please apply it to your tree.

Will do.

Thanks,

-- Steve


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-29  4:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-28 14:16 [PATCH v4] trace: Use 64-bit timekeeping Tina Ruchandani
2015-01-28 14:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-01-28 14:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-28 15:05     ` Steven Rostedt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).