[PATCH v2 0/6] Remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation and simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()

[PATCH v2 0/6] Remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation and simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()

[Hanjun Guo]

v1->v2: Return specific error value instead of just return -1, and
correct some grammar mistake in changelog.

For cpu hot add, evaluate _MAT or parse MADT will did twice to get
APIC id:
acpi_processor_add()
	acpi_processor_get_info()
		acpi_get_cpuid() will evaluate _MAT or parse MADT;
        acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
                acpi_map_lsapic() will evaluate _MAT again;

This patch set introduces apic_id in struct processor to save parsed
APIC id, and use it to remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation.

Further more, the new logical cpu number will be generated in
acpi_register_lapic(), this can be returned to remove the cpumask
allocation and operation to simplify _acpi_map_lsapic().

There are also some cleanups for the ACPI processor dirver code.


Hanjun Guo (2):
  ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check
  ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments

Jiang Liu (4):
  ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save
    parsed APIC id
  ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation
  x86 / ACPI: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()
  ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info()

 arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c       |   38 ++----------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c   |   88 +++++++++--------------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c   |    8 ++--
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |   22 +++--------
 drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |   26 +++++++++---
 include/acpi/processor.h      |    3 ++
 include/linux/acpi.h          |    2 +-
 8 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC id

[Hanjun Guo]

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

For cpu hot add, we evaluate _MAT or parse MADT twice to get APIC id,
here is the code logic:
acpi_processor_add()
	acpi_processor_get_info()
		acpi_get_cpuid() will evaluate _MAT or parse MADT;
	acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
		acpi_map_lsapic() will evaluate _MAT again;

This can be done more effectively, this patch introduces apic_id in struct
processor to save parsed APIC id, and then we can use it and remove the
duplicated _MAT evaluation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    4 +++-
 drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/acpi/processor.h      |    3 +++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index f29e06e..f89f914 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -270,7 +270,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 		device_declaration = 1;
 		pr->acpi_id = value;
 	}
-	cpu_index = acpi_get_cpuid(pr->handle, device_declaration, pr->acpi_id);
+	pr->apic_id = acpi_get_apicid(pr->handle, device_declaration,
+					pr->acpi_id);
+	cpu_index = acpi_map_cpuid(pr->apic_id, pr->acpi_id);
 
 	/* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
 	if (!cpu0_initialized && (cpu_index == -1) &&
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index cf34d90..b3171f3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -162,16 +162,23 @@ exit:
 	return apic_id;
 }
 
-int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
+int acpi_get_apicid(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	int i;
-#endif
-	int apic_id = -1;
+	int apic_id;
 
 	apic_id = map_mat_entry(handle, type, acpi_id);
 	if (apic_id == -1)
 		apic_id = map_madt_entry(type, acpi_id);
+
+	return apic_id;
+}
+
+int acpi_map_cpuid(int apic_id, u32 acpi_id)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	int i;
+#endif
+
 	if (apic_id == -1) {
 		/*
 		 * On UP processor, there is no _MAT or MADT table.
@@ -211,6 +218,15 @@ int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
 #endif
 	return -1;
 }
+
+int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
+{
+	int apic_id;
+
+	apic_id = acpi_get_apicid(handle, type, acpi_id);
+
+	return acpi_map_cpuid(apic_id, acpi_id);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_cpuid);
 
 static bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index 66096d0..7816e45 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ struct acpi_processor_flags {
 struct acpi_processor {
 	acpi_handle handle;
 	u32 acpi_id;
+	u32 apic_id;
 	u32 id;
 	u32 pblk;
 	int performance_platform_limit;
@@ -314,6 +315,8 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit)
 
 /* in processor_core.c */
 void acpi_processor_set_pdc(acpi_handle handle);
+int acpi_get_apicid(acpi_handle, int type, u32 acpi_id);
+int acpi_map_cpuid(int apic_id, u32 acpi_id);
 int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle, int type, u32 acpi_id);
 
 /* in processor_throttling.c */
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation

[Hanjun Guo]

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Since APIC id is saved in processor struct, just use it and
remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
 arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c       |   38 ++++----------------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c   |   38 +++-----------------------------------
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    2 +-
 include/linux/acpi.h          |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
index 5eb71d2..59d52e3 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
@@ -882,40 +882,10 @@ __init void prefill_possible_map(void)
 		set_cpu_possible(i, true);
 }
 
-static int _acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int *pcpu)
+static int _acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int physid, int *pcpu)
 {
-	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
-	union acpi_object *obj;
-	struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *lsapic;
 	cpumask_t tmp_map;
-	int cpu, physid;
-
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_MAT", NULL, &buffer)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (!buffer.length || !buffer.pointer)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	obj = buffer.pointer;
-	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
-	{
-		kfree(buffer.pointer);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	lsapic = (struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *)obj->buffer.pointer;
-
-	if ((lsapic->header.type != ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_SAPIC) ||
-	    (!(lsapic->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED))) {
-		kfree(buffer.pointer);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	physid = ((lsapic->id << 8) | (lsapic->eid));
-
-	kfree(buffer.pointer);
-	buffer.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER;
-	buffer.pointer = NULL;
+	int cpu;
 
 	cpumask_complement(&tmp_map, cpu_present_mask);
 	cpu = cpumask_first(&tmp_map);
@@ -934,9 +904,9 @@ static int _acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int *pcpu)
 }
 
 /* wrapper to silence section mismatch warning */
-int __ref acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int *pcpu)
+int __ref acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int physid, int *pcpu)
 {
-	return _acpi_map_lsapic(handle, pcpu);
+	return _acpi_map_lsapic(handle, physid, pcpu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_map_lsapic);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 2627a81..3e186d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -620,44 +620,12 @@ static void acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
 #endif
 }
 
-static int _acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int *pcpu)
+static int _acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int physid, int *pcpu)
 {
-	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
-	union acpi_object *obj;
-	struct acpi_madt_local_apic *lapic;
 	cpumask_var_t tmp_map, new_map;
-	u8 physid;
 	int cpu;
 	int retval = -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_MAT", NULL, &buffer)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (!buffer.length || !buffer.pointer)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	obj = buffer.pointer;
-	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER ||
-	    obj->buffer.length < sizeof(*lapic)) {
-		kfree(buffer.pointer);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	lapic = (struct acpi_madt_local_apic *)obj->buffer.pointer;
-
-	if (lapic->header.type != ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_APIC ||
-	    !(lapic->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) {
-		kfree(buffer.pointer);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	physid = lapic->id;
-
-	kfree(buffer.pointer);
-	buffer.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER;
-	buffer.pointer = NULL;
-	lapic = NULL;
-
 	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&tmp_map, GFP_KERNEL))
 		goto out;
 
@@ -695,9 +663,9 @@ out:
 }
 
 /* wrapper to silence section mismatch warning */
-int __ref acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int *pcpu)
+int __ref acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int physid, int *pcpu)
 {
-	return _acpi_map_lsapic(handle, pcpu);
+	return _acpi_map_lsapic(handle, physid, pcpu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_map_lsapic);
 
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index f89f914..66c9b70 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	cpu_maps_update_begin();
 	cpu_hotplug_begin();
 
-	ret = acpi_map_lsapic(pr->handle, &pr->id);
+	ret = acpi_map_lsapic(pr->handle, pr->apic_id, &pr->id);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index a5db4ae..3bc7414 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ void acpi_numa_arch_fixup(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
 /* Arch dependent functions for cpu hotplug support */
-int acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int *pcpu);
+int acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int physid, int *pcpu);
 int acpi_unmap_lsapic(int cpu);
 #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH v2 3/6] x86 / ACPI: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()

[Hanjun Guo]

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

In acpi_register_lapic(), it will generates a new logical cpu
number and maps to the local APIC id, this logical cpu number
can be returned to simplify _acpi_map_lsapic() implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c   |   50 +++++++++++++----------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c   |    8 ++++---
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h
index 626cf70..3142a94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline void early_reserve_e820_mpc_new(void) { }
 #define default_get_smp_config x86_init_uint_noop
 #endif
 
-void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version);
+int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version);
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 extern void mp_register_ioapic(int id, u32 address, u32 gsi_base);
 extern void mp_override_legacy_irq(u8 bus_irq, u8 polarity, u8 trigger,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 3e186d1..ab89c2b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -195,24 +195,31 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void acpi_register_lapic(int id, u8 enabled)
+/**
+ * acpi_register_lapic - register a local apic and generates a logic cpu number
+ * @id: local apic id to register
+ * @enabled: this cpu is enabled or not
+ *
+ * Returns the logic cpu number which maps to the local apic
+ */
+static int acpi_register_lapic(int id, u8 enabled)
 {
 	unsigned int ver = 0;
 
 	if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1)) {
 		printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "skipped apicid that is too big\n");
-		return;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (!enabled) {
 		++disabled_cpus;
-		return;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid != -1U)
 		ver = apic_version[boot_cpu_physical_apicid];
 
-	generic_processor_info(id, ver);
+	return generic_processor_info(id, ver);
 }
 
 static int __init
@@ -622,44 +629,19 @@ static void acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
 
 static int _acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int physid, int *pcpu)
 {
-	cpumask_var_t tmp_map, new_map;
 	int cpu;
-	int retval = -ENOMEM;
-
-	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&tmp_map, GFP_KERNEL))
-		goto out;
 
-	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&new_map, GFP_KERNEL))
-		goto free_tmp_map;
-
-	cpumask_copy(tmp_map, cpu_present_mask);
-	acpi_register_lapic(physid, ACPI_MADT_ENABLED);
-
-	/*
-	 * If acpi_register_lapic successfully generates a new logical cpu
-	 * number, then the following will get us exactly what was mapped
-	 */
-	cpumask_andnot(new_map, cpu_present_mask, tmp_map);
-	if (cpumask_empty(new_map)) {
-		printk ("Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number\n");
-		retval = -EINVAL;
-		goto free_new_map;
+	cpu = acpi_register_lapic(physid, ACPI_MADT_ENABLED);
+	if (cpu < 0) {
+		pr_info(PREFIX "Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number\n");
+		return cpu;
 	}
 
 	acpi_processor_set_pdc(handle);
-
-	cpu = cpumask_first(new_map);
 	acpi_map_cpu2node(handle, cpu, physid);
 
 	*pcpu = cpu;
-	retval = 0;
-
-free_new_map:
-	free_cpumask_var(new_map);
-free_tmp_map:
-	free_cpumask_var(tmp_map);
-out:
-	return retval;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /* wrapper to silence section mismatch warning */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index eca89c5..c98fe31 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
 	apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
 }
 
-void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
+int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 {
 	int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
 	bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(boot_cpu_physical_apicid,
@@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 			"  Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n", max, thiscpu, apicid);
 
 		disabled_cpus++;
-		return;
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
 	if (num_processors >= nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -2138,7 +2138,7 @@ void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 			"  Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n", max, thiscpu, apicid);
 
 		disabled_cpus++;
-		return;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	num_processors++;
@@ -2183,6 +2183,8 @@ void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 #endif
 	set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
 	set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
+
+	return cpu;
 }
 
 int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info()

[Hanjun Guo]

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

errata.smp is used by nowhere, so the variable assignment is meanless,
remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 66c9b70..5364d02 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -220,9 +220,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	static int cpu0_initialized;
 
-	if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
-		errata.smp = TRUE;
-
 	acpi_processor_errata(pr);
 
 	/*
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check

[Hanjun Guo]

acpi_processor_errata() is only called in acpi_processor_get_info(),
and the argument 'pr' passed to acpi_processor_errata() will never be
NULL, so the if (!pr) check is unnecessary and can be removed.

Since the 'pr' argument is not used by acpi_processor_errata() any more,
so change the argument into void too.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 5364d02..7ce0750 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -140,15 +140,11 @@ static int acpi_processor_errata_piix4(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int acpi_processor_errata(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+static int acpi_processor_errata(void)
 {
 	int result = 0;
 	struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
 
-
-	if (!pr)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	/*
 	 * PIIX4
 	 */
@@ -220,7 +216,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	static int cpu0_initialized;
 
-	acpi_processor_errata(pr);
+	acpi_processor_errata();
 
 	/*
 	 * Check to see if we have bus mastering arbitration control.  This
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments

[Hanjun Guo]

acpi_get_processor_id() can be find nowhere, and the acpi id
is synchronized to APIC id when acpi_get_cpuid() is called, so
the comments can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 7ce0750..da42892 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -240,11 +240,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * TBD: Synch processor ID (via LAPIC/LSAPIC structures) on SMP.
-		 *      >>> 'acpi_get_processor_id(acpi_id, &id)' in
-		 *      arch/xxx/acpi.c
-		 */
 		pr->acpi_id = object.processor.proc_id;
 	} else {
 		/*
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation and simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, September 02, 2013 11:57:33 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> v1->v2: Return specific error value instead of just return -1, and
> correct some grammar mistake in changelog.
> 
> For cpu hot add, evaluate _MAT or parse MADT will did twice to get
> APIC id:
> acpi_processor_add()
> 	acpi_processor_get_info()
> 		acpi_get_cpuid() will evaluate _MAT or parse MADT;
>         acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
>                 acpi_map_lsapic() will evaluate _MAT again;
> 
> This patch set introduces apic_id in struct processor to save parsed
> APIC id, and use it to remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation.
> 
> Further more, the new logical cpu number will be generated in
> acpi_register_lapic(), this can be returned to remove the cpumask
> allocation and operation to simplify _acpi_map_lsapic().
> 
> There are also some cleanups for the ACPI processor dirver code.

I like the series, so I've queued it up for 3.13.

Thanks,
Rafael


> Hanjun Guo (2):
>   ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check
>   ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments
> 
> Jiang Liu (4):
>   ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save
>     parsed APIC id
>   ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation
>   x86 / ACPI: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()
>   ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info()
> 
>  arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c       |   38 ++----------------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h |    2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c   |   88 +++++++++--------------------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c   |    8 ++--
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |   22 +++--------
>  drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |   26 +++++++++---
>  include/acpi/processor.h      |    3 ++
>  include/linux/acpi.h          |    2 +-
>  8 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
> 
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.