[GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3

[GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3

[Nicolas Ferre]

Arnd, Olof, Kevin,

Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
option).
This pull-request depends on:
- the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent
  3.15-rc6 tag.
- the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch.
So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base
before adding the material for this pull-request.

About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not,
while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks
nodes as they had been written by Boris.
As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this
when Mark gives his point of view.

Thanks, best regards,

The following changes since commit 6a84872a3c3090993be108f02f91b4de062a7d32:

  Merge branch 'at91-3.16-cleanup' into at91-3.16-dt3 (2014-05-22 18:01:22 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:


  git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt3

for you to fetch changes up to b4a86b3810f5dc4b959ee69a3818c876752c88cd:

  ARM: at91: move sam9n12 SoC to the CCF (2014-05-22 18:03:17 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
3.16 third DT series:
- move of both at91sam9n12 and at91sam9x5 to CCF

----------------------------------------------------------------
Boris BREZILLON (8):
      ARM: at91: prepare common clk transition for sam9x5 SoCs
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9x5 clocks
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9x5ek's crystal frequencies
      ARM: at91: move sam9x5 SoCs to the CCF
      ARM: at91: prepare common clk transition for sam9n12 SoC
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9n12 clocks
      ARM: at91/dt: define sam9n12ek crystal frequencies
      ARM: at91: move sam9n12 SoC to the CCF

 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi       | 348 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12ek.dts      |   8 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi        | 355 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_can.dtsi    |  31 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_isi.dtsi    |  26 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_lcd.dtsi    |  26 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb0.dtsi  |  11 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb1.dtsi  |  11 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_usart3.dtsi |  11 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5cm.dtsi      |   8 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig               |   2 -
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9n12.c         |   6 +-
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9x5.c          |   6 +-
 13 files changed, 842 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_can.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_isi.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_lcd.dtsi

-- 
Nicolas Ferre

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> option).

Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!

> This pull-request depends on:
> - the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent
>   3.15-rc6 tag.
> - the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch.
> So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base
> before adding the material for this pull-request.
> 
> About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not,
> while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks
> nodes as they had been written by Boris.
> As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this
> when Mark gives his point of view.

Ok. I've merged it into next/dt now.

	Arnd

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> > option).
> 
> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
> 

I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the
remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it
and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock
implementation and board files.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3

[Olof Johansson]

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
>> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
>> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
>> > option).
>>
>> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
>>
>
> I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the
> remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it
> and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock
> implementation and board files.

I think we should spend some more time discussing DTS naming instead!

(Just kidding, good progress. Agreed, let it go in when it's ready,
it's why we do frequent kernel releases)


-Olof