linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: rk3288 : Add PM Domain support
@ 2014-10-16 11:02 jinkun.hong
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform jinkun.hong
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jinkun.hong @ 2014-10-16 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linus.walleij, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Russell King, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland,
	Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Grant Likely, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Randy Dunlap, linux-doc, dianders, Heiko Stuebner,
	linux-rockchip, Ulf Hansson, jinkun.hong

From: "jinkun.hong" <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>

Add power domain drivers based on generic power domain for Rockchip platform,
and support RK3288.

Based on:
- [PATCH v1 1/4] PM / clock_ops: Add pm_clk_add_clk()
  http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg735599.html

Changes in v3:
- change use pm_clk_resume() and pm_clk_suspend()
- DT structure has changed
- Decomposition power-controller, changed to multiple controller
   (gpu-power-controller, hevc-power-controller)

Changes in v2:
- remove the "pd->pd.of_node = np"
- move clocks to "optional"
- make pd_vio clocks all one entry per line and alphabetize.
- power: power-controller move back to pinctrl: pinctrl.

jinkun.hong (3):
  power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform
  dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain
  ARM: dts: add rk3288 power-domain node

 .../bindings/arm/rockchip/power_domain.txt         |   46 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi                      |   24 ++
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig                     |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile                    |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c                |  329 ++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 401 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/power_domain.txt
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c

-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform
  2014-10-16 11:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: rk3288 : Add PM Domain support jinkun.hong
@ 2014-10-16 11:02 ` jinkun.hong
  2014-10-16 13:06   ` Ulf Hansson
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain jinkun.hong
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: add rk3288 power-domain node jinkun.hong
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: jinkun.hong @ 2014-10-16 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linus.walleij, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Russell King, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland,
	Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Grant Likely, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Randy Dunlap, linux-doc, dianders, Heiko Stuebner,
	linux-rockchip, Ulf Hansson, jinkun.hong, Jack Dai

From: "jinkun.hong" <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>

Add power domain drivers based on generic power domain for Rockchip platform,
and support RK3288.

Signed-off-by: Jack Dai <jack.dai@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>

---

Changes in v3:
- change use pm_clk_resume() and pm_clk_suspend()

Changes in v2:
- remove the "pd->pd.of_node = np"

 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig      |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile     |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c |  329 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 331 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
index d168669..4920a88 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config ARCH_ROCKCHIP
 	select DW_APB_TIMER_OF
 	select ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER
 	select CLKSRC_ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER_SCHED_CLOCK
+	select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
 	help
 	  Support for Rockchip's Cortex-A9 Single-to-Quad-Core-SoCs
 	  containing the RK2928, RK30xx and RK31xx series.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile
index b29d8ea..805268d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ CFLAGS_platsmp.o := -march=armv7-a
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rockchip.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += headsmp.o platsmp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS) += pm_domains.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1d595f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -0,0 +1,329 @@
+/*
+ * Rockchip Generic power domain support.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 ROCKCHIP, Co. Ltd.
+ * Author: Hong Jinkun <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/pm_clock.h>
+
+#define PWR_OFFSET		0x08
+#define STATUS_OFFSET	0x0c
+#define REQ_OFFSET		0x10
+#define IDLE_OFFSET		0x14
+#define ACK_OFFSET		0x14
+
+struct rockchip_domain {
+	struct generic_pm_domain base;
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct regmap *regmap_pmu;
+	spinlock_t idle_lock;
+	spinlock_t pmu_lock;
+	u32 pwr_shift;
+	u32 status_shift;
+	u32 req_shift;
+	u32 idle_shift;
+	u32 ack_shift;
+};
+
+#define to_rockchip_pd(_gpd) container_of(_gpd, struct rockchip_domain, base)
+
+static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct rockchip_domain *pd,
+					 bool idle)
+{
+	u32 idle_mask = BIT(pd->idle_shift);
+	u32 idle_target = idle << (pd->idle_shift);
+	u32 ack_mask = BIT(pd->ack_shift);
+	u32 ack_target = idle << (pd->ack_shift);
+	unsigned int mask = BIT(pd->req_shift);
+	unsigned int val;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pd->idle_lock, flags);
+	val = (idle) ? mask : 0;
+	regmap_update_bits(pd->regmap_pmu, REQ_OFFSET, mask, val);
+	dsb();
+
+	do {
+		regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, ACK_OFFSET, &val);
+	} while ((val & ack_mask) != ack_target);
+
+	do {
+		regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, IDLE_OFFSET, &val);
+	} while ((val & idle_mask) != idle_target);
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pd->idle_lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool rockchip_pmu_power_domain_is_on(struct rockchip_domain *pd)
+{
+	unsigned int val;
+
+	regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, STATUS_OFFSET, &val);
+
+	/* 1'b0: power on, 1'b1: power off */
+	return !(val & BIT(pd->status_shift));
+}
+
+static void rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain(
+		struct rockchip_domain *pd, bool on)
+{
+	unsigned int mask = BIT(pd->pwr_shift);
+	unsigned int val;
+
+	val = (on) ? 0 : mask;
+	regmap_update_bits(pd->regmap_pmu, PWR_OFFSET, mask, val);
+	dsb();
+
+	do {
+		regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, STATUS_OFFSET, &val);
+	} while ((val & BIT(pd->status_shift)) == on);
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pmu_set_power_domain(struct rockchip_domain *pd,
+					 bool on)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pd->pmu_lock, flags);
+	if (rockchip_pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd) == on)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (!on) {
+		/* FIXME: add code to save AXI_QOS */
+		/* if power down, idle request to NIU first */
+		rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(pd, true);
+	}
+
+	rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain(pd, on);
+
+	if (on) {
+		/* if power up, idle request release to NIU */
+		rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(pd, false);
+		/* FIXME: add code to restore AXI_QOS */
+	}
+out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pd->pmu_lock, flags);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct rockchip_domain *pd = to_rockchip_pd(domain);
+
+	if (pd->dev == NULL)
+		pr_err("pd->dev is NULL, power on failed!", __func__);
+
+	pm_clk_resume(pd->dev);
+	ret = rockchip_pmu_set_power_domain(pd, true);
+	pm_clk_suspend(pd->dev);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct rockchip_domain *pd = to_rockchip_pd(domain);
+
+	if (pd->dev == NULL)
+		pr_err("pd->dev is NULL, power off failed!", __func__);
+
+	pm_clk_resume(pd->dev);
+	ret = rockchip_pmu_set_power_domain(pd, false);
+	pm_clk_suspend(pd->dev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void rockchip_pm_domain_attach_dev(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct clk *clk;
+	int ret;
+	int i = 0;
+	struct rockchip_domain *pd;
+
+	pd = (struct rockchip_domain *)dev->pm_domain;
+	pd->dev = dev;
+
+	ret = pm_clk_create(dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_create failed %d\n", ret);
+		return;
+	};
+
+	while ((clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, i++)) && !IS_ERR(clk)) {
+		ret = pm_clk_add_clk(dev, clk);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_add_clk failed %d\n", ret);
+			goto clk_err;
+		};
+	}
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
+		ret = pm_clk_resume(dev);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_resume failed %d\n", ret);
+			goto clk_err;
+		};
+	}
+	return;
+
+clk_err:
+	pm_clk_destroy(dev);
+
+}
+
+void rockchip_pm_domain_detach_dev(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct rockchip_domain *pd;
+
+	pd = (struct rockchip_domain *)dev->pm_domain;
+	pd->dev = NULL;
+
+	pm_clk_destroy(dev);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[];
+
+static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct rockchip_domain *pd;
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	int i = 0;
+	int ret;
+	struct regmap *regmap_pmu;
+	struct device_node *node;
+
+	match = of_match_node(rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
+	pd = (struct rockchip_domain *)match->data;
+
+	if (!pd)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "rockchip,pmu", 0);
+	regmap_pmu = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
+	of_node_put(node);
+	if (IS_ERR(regmap_pmu)) {
+		pr_err("%s: failed to get regmap_pmu", __func__);
+		return PTR_ERR(regmap_pmu);
+	}
+
+	pd->regmap_pmu = regmap_pmu;
+	pd->dev = NULL;
+
+	spin_lock_init(&pd->idle_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&pd->pmu_lock);
+
+	pm_genpd_init(&pd->base, NULL, false);
+
+	return of_genpd_add_provider_simple(pdev->dev.of_node, &pd->base);
+}
+
+static struct rockchip_domain gpu_domain = {
+	.base = {
+		.name = "pd_gpu",
+		.attach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_attach_dev,
+		.detach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_detach_dev,
+		.power_off = rockchip_pd_power_off,
+		.power_on = rockchip_pd_power_on,
+	},
+	.pwr_shift = 9,
+	.status_shift = 9,
+	.req_shift = 2,
+	.idle_shift = 2,
+	.ack_shift = 18,
+};
+
+static struct rockchip_domain hevc_domain = {
+	.base = {
+		.name = "pd_hevc",
+		.attach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_attach_dev,
+		.detach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_detach_dev,
+		.power_off = rockchip_pd_power_off,
+		.power_on = rockchip_pd_power_on,
+	},
+	.pwr_shift = 14,
+	.status_shift = 10,
+	.req_shift = 9,
+	.idle_shift = 9,
+	.ack_shift = 25,
+
+};
+
+static struct rockchip_domain video_domain = {
+	.base = {
+		.name = "pd_video",
+		.attach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_attach_dev,
+		.detach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_detach_dev,
+		.power_off = rockchip_pd_power_off,
+		.power_on = rockchip_pd_power_on,
+	},
+	.pwr_shift = 8,
+	.status_shift = 8,
+	.req_shift = 3,
+	.idle_shift = 3,
+	.ack_shift = 19,
+};
+
+static struct rockchip_domain vio_domain = {
+	.base = {
+		.name = "pd_vio",
+		.attach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_attach_dev,
+		.detach_dev = rockchip_pm_domain_detach_dev,
+		.power_off = rockchip_pd_power_off,
+		.power_on = rockchip_pd_power_on,
+	},
+	.pwr_shift = 7,
+	.status_shift = 7,
+	.req_shift = 4,
+	.idle_shift = 4,
+	.ack_shift = 20,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-gpu",
+		.data = (void *)&gpu_domain},
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-hevc",
+		.data = (void *)&hevc_domain},
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-video",
+			.data = (void *)&video_domain},
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-vio",
+		.data = (void *)&vio_domain},
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver rockchip_pm_domain_driver = {
+	.probe = rockchip_pm_domain_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name   = "rockchip-pm-domain",
+		.owner  = THIS_MODULE,
+		.of_match_table = rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match,
+	},
+};
+
+static int __init rockchip_pm_domain_drv_register(void)
+{
+	return platform_driver_register(&rockchip_pm_domain_driver);
+}
+postcore_initcall(rockchip_pm_domain_drv_register);
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain
  2014-10-16 11:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: rk3288 : Add PM Domain support jinkun.hong
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform jinkun.hong
@ 2014-10-16 11:02 ` jinkun.hong
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: add rk3288 power-domain node jinkun.hong
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jinkun.hong @ 2014-10-16 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linus.walleij, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Russell King, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland,
	Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Grant Likely, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Randy Dunlap, linux-doc, dianders, Heiko Stuebner,
	linux-rockchip, Ulf Hansson, jinkun.hong, Jack Dai

From: "jinkun.hong" <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>

Signed-off-by: Jack Dai <jack.dai@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>

---

Changes in v3:
- DT structure has changed

Changes in v2:
- move clocks to "optional"

 .../bindings/arm/rockchip/power_domain.txt         |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/power_domain.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/power_domain.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f8357b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/power_domain.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+* Rockchip Power Domains
+
+Rockchip processors include support for multiple power domains which can be
+powered up/down by software based on different application scenes to save power.
+
+Required properties for power domain controller:
+- compatible: should be one of the following.
+    * rockchip,rk3288-power-gpu - for rk3288 type gpu power domain.
+    * rockchip,rk3288-power-hevc - for rk3288 type hevc power domain.
+    * rockchip,rk3288-power-video - for rk3288 type video power domain.
+    * rockchip,rk3288-power-vio - for rk3288 type vio power domain.
+- rockchip,pmu: phandle referencing a syscon providing the pmu registers
+- #power-domain-cells: Number of cells in a power-domain specifier.
+		       should be 0.
+
+Example:
+
+	gpu_power: gpu-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-gpu";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	hevc_power: hevc-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-hevc";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	video_power: video-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-video";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	vio_power: vio-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-vio";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	gpu: gpu@0xffa30000 {
+		...
+		power-domains = <&gpu_power>;
+		...
+	};
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: add rk3288 power-domain node
  2014-10-16 11:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: rk3288 : Add PM Domain support jinkun.hong
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform jinkun.hong
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain jinkun.hong
@ 2014-10-16 11:02 ` jinkun.hong
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jinkun.hong @ 2014-10-16 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linus.walleij, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Russell King, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland,
	Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Grant Likely, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Randy Dunlap, linux-doc, dianders, Heiko Stuebner,
	linux-rockchip, Ulf Hansson, jinkun.hong, Jack Dai

From: "jinkun.hong" <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>

Signed-off-by: Jack Dai <jack.dai@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong <jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com>

---

Changes in v3:
- Decomposition power-controller, changed to multiple controller
   (gpu-power-controller, hevc-power-controller)

Changes in v2:
- make pd_vio clocks all one entry per line and alphabetize.
- power: power-controller move back to pinctrl: pinctrl.

 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
index 5950b0a..6a9b313 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
@@ -592,4 +592,28 @@
 			};
 		};
 	};
+
+	gpu_power: gpu-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-gpu";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	hevc_power: hevc-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-hevc";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	video_power: video-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-video";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	vio_power: vio-power-controller {
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-vio";
+		rockchip,pmu = <&pmu>;
+		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
+	};
 };
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform
  2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform jinkun.hong
@ 2014-10-16 13:06   ` Ulf Hansson
  2014-10-17 13:56     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2014-10-16 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jinkun.hong
  Cc: Linus Walleij, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King, Rob Herring,
	Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Grant Likely,
	linux-kernel, devicetree, Randy Dunlap, linux-doc, Doug Anderson,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jack Dai

Hi Jinkun,

[...]

> +
> +static int rockchip_pd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> +{
> +       int ret = 0;
> +       struct rockchip_domain *pd = to_rockchip_pd(domain);
> +
> +       if (pd->dev == NULL)
> +               pr_err("pd->dev is NULL, power on failed!", __func__);
> +
> +       pm_clk_resume(pd->dev);
> +       ret = rockchip_pmu_set_power_domain(pd, true);
> +       pm_clk_suspend(pd->dev);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> +{
> +       int ret = 0;
> +       struct rockchip_domain *pd = to_rockchip_pd(domain);
> +
> +       if (pd->dev == NULL)
> +               pr_err("pd->dev is NULL, power off failed!", __func__);
> +
> +       pm_clk_resume(pd->dev);
> +       ret = rockchip_pmu_set_power_domain(pd, false);
> +       pm_clk_suspend(pd->dev);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void rockchip_pm_domain_attach_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct clk *clk;
> +       int ret;
> +       int i = 0;
> +       struct rockchip_domain *pd;
> +
> +       pd = (struct rockchip_domain *)dev->pm_domain;
> +       pd->dev = dev;

This looks wrong.

You will update "pd->dev" for each device that gets added to the PM
domain. The last one will be set to "pd->dev".
So, it would still work as long as you only have one device per
domain. Is that the case?

Could you elaborate on why you have chosen to do it this way?

> +
> +       ret = pm_clk_create(dev);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_create failed %d\n", ret);
> +               return;
> +       };
> +
> +       while ((clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, i++)) && !IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +               ret = pm_clk_add_clk(dev, clk);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_add_clk failed %d\n", ret);
> +                       goto clk_err;
> +               };
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)) {

Could you elaborate on why you need to do this check here?

When I see a check for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME), that indicates
to me that we actually have an another issue, perhaps in the PM clk
API.

> +               ret = pm_clk_resume(dev);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_resume failed %d\n", ret);
> +                       goto clk_err;
> +               };
> +       }
> +       return;
> +
> +clk_err:
> +       pm_clk_destroy(dev);
> +
> +}
> +
> +void rockchip_pm_domain_detach_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct rockchip_domain *pd;
> +
> +       pd = (struct rockchip_domain *)dev->pm_domain;
> +       pd->dev = NULL;
> +
> +       pm_clk_destroy(dev);
> +}
> +

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform
  2014-10-16 13:06   ` Ulf Hansson
@ 2014-10-17 13:56     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2014-10-17 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson
  Cc: jinkun.hong, Linus Walleij, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala,
	Grant Likely, linux-kernel, devicetree, Randy Dunlap, linux-doc,
	Doug Anderson, Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jack Dai

Hi Ulf,

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> +
>> +       ret = pm_clk_create(dev);
>> +       if (ret) {
>> +               dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_create failed %d\n", ret);
>> +               return;
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       while ((clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, i++)) && !IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> +               ret = pm_clk_add_clk(dev, clk);
>> +               if (ret) {
>> +                       dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_add_clk failed %d\n", ret);
>> +                       goto clk_err;
>> +               };
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
>
> Could you elaborate on why you need to do this check here?

If runtime PM is enabled, the clocks are managed by runtime PM, and will
be enabled/disabled later when needed.

If runtime PM is disabled, the clocks are not managed by runtime PM,
so they should be enabled at initialization time.

Grygorii and I do the same thing for keystone resp. pm-rmobile.

> When I see a check for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME), that indicates
> to me that we actually have an another issue, perhaps in the PM clk
> API.

Good point. Perhaps this can be handled in pm_clk_add() instead?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-17 13:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-16 11:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: rk3288 : Add PM Domain support jinkun.hong
2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform jinkun.hong
2014-10-16 13:06   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-10-17 13:56     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: add document of Rockchip power domain jinkun.hong
2014-10-16 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: add rk3288 power-domain node jinkun.hong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).