* [LKP] [sched] a15b12ac36a: -46.9% time.voluntary_context_switches +1.5% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
@ 2014-12-23 5:15 Huang Ying
2014-12-23 8:57 ` Kirill Tkhai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huang Ying @ 2014-12-23 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kirill Tkhai; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, LKML, LKP ML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14209 bytes --]
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
commit a15b12ac36ad4e7b856a4ae54937ae26a51aebad ("sched: Do not stop cpu in set_cpus_allowed_ptr() if task is not running")
testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-g5/will-it-scale/performance-lock1
1ba93d42727c4400 a15b12ac36ad4e7b856a4ae549
---------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
1517261 ± 0% +1.5% 1539994 ± 0% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
247 ± 30% +131.8% 573 ± 49% sched_debug.cpu#61.ttwu_count
225 ± 22% +142.8% 546 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#81.ttwu_local
15115 ± 44% +37.3% 20746 ± 40% numa-meminfo.node7.Active
1028 ± 38% +115.3% 2214 ± 36% sched_debug.cpu#16.ttwu_local
2 ± 19% +133.3% 5 ± 43% sched_debug.cpu#89.cpu_load[3]
21 ± 45% +88.2% 40 ± 23% sched_debug.cfs_rq[99]:/.tg_load_contrib
414 ± 33% +98.6% 823 ± 28% sched_debug.cpu#81.ttwu_count
4 ± 10% +88.2% 8 ± 12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[33]:/.runnable_load_avg
22 ± 26% +80.9% 40 ± 24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[103]:/.tg_load_contrib
7 ± 17% -41.4% 4 ± 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq[41]:/.load
7 ± 17% -37.9% 4 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#41.load
3 ± 22% +106.7% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[36]:/.runnable_load_avg
174 ± 13% +48.7% 259 ± 31% sched_debug.cpu#112.ttwu_count
4 ± 19% +88.9% 8 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[35]:/.runnable_load_avg
260 ± 10% +55.6% 405 ± 26% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_anon_pages
1042 ± 10% +56.0% 1626 ± 26% numa-meminfo.node3.AnonPages
26 ± 22% +74.3% 45 ± 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq[65]:/.tg_load_contrib
21 ± 43% +71.3% 37 ± 26% sched_debug.cfs_rq[100]:/.tg_load_contrib
3686 ± 21% +40.2% 5167 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#16.ttwu_count
142 ± 9% +34.4% 191 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#112.ttwu_local
5 ± 18% +69.6% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq[35]:/.load
2 ± 30% +100.0% 5 ± 37% sched_debug.cpu#106.cpu_load[1]
3 ± 23% +100.0% 6 ± 48% sched_debug.cpu#106.cpu_load[2]
5 ± 18% +69.6% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#35.load
9 ± 20% +48.6% 13 ± 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.runnable_load_avg
1727 ± 15% +43.9% 2484 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu#34.ttwu_local
10 ± 17% -40.5% 6 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[0]
10 ± 14% -29.3% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[4]
10 ± 17% -33.3% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[1]
6121 ± 8% +56.7% 9595 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu#13.sched_goidle
13 ± 8% -25.9% 10 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[2]
12 ± 16% -24.0% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[2]
492 ± 17% -21.3% 387 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#46.ttwu_count
3761 ± 11% -23.9% 2863 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#93.curr->pid
570 ± 19% +43.2% 816 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#86.ttwu_count
5279 ± 8% +63.5% 8631 ± 33% sched_debug.cpu#13.ttwu_count
377 ± 22% -28.6% 269 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#46.ttwu_local
5396 ± 10% +29.9% 7007 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#16.sched_goidle
1959 ± 12% +36.9% 2683 ± 15% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_slab_reclaimable
7839 ± 12% +37.0% 10736 ± 15% numa-meminfo.node2.SReclaimable
5 ± 15% +66.7% 8 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[33]:/.load
5 ± 25% +47.8% 8 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[37]:/.load
2 ± 0% +87.5% 3 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#89.cpu_load[4]
5 ± 15% +66.7% 8 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#33.load
6 ± 23% +41.7% 8 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#37.load
8 ± 10% -26.5% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[1]
7300 ± 37% +63.6% 11943 ± 16% softirqs.TASKLET
2984 ± 6% +43.1% 4271 ± 23% sched_debug.cpu#20.ttwu_count
328 ± 4% +40.5% 462 ± 25% sched_debug.cpu#26.ttwu_local
10 ± 7% -27.5% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[3]
9 ± 8% -30.8% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[3]
9 ± 8% -27.0% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[4]
10 ± 14% -32.5% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[2]
16292 ± 6% +42.8% 23260 ± 25% sched_debug.cpu#13.nr_switches
14 ± 28% +55.9% 23 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[0]
5 ± 8% +28.6% 6 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#17.load
13 ± 7% -23.1% 10 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[3]
7 ± 10% -35.7% 4 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.runnable_load_avg
5076 ± 13% -21.8% 3970 ± 11% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_slab_unreclaimable
20306 ± 13% -21.8% 15886 ± 11% numa-meminfo.node0.SUnreclaim
10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[3]
11 ± 11% -29.5% 7 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[1]
10 ± 12% -26.8% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#44.cpu_load[1]
10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#44.cpu_load[0]
7 ± 17% +48.3% 10 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.runnable_load_avg
11 ± 12% -34.1% 7 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[0]
10 ± 10% -27.9% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[1]
10 ± 8% -26.8% 7 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[2]
10 ± 8% -28.6% 7 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[0]
10 ± 10% -27.9% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[1]
10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[2]
12940 ± 3% +49.8% 19387 ± 35% numa-meminfo.node2.Active(anon)
3235 ± 2% +49.8% 4844 ± 35% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_active_anon
17 ± 17% +36.6% 24 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#97.cpu_load[2]
14725 ± 8% +21.8% 17928 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#16.nr_switches
667 ± 10% +45.3% 969 ± 22% sched_debug.cpu#17.ttwu_local
3257 ± 5% +22.4% 3988 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#118.curr->pid
3144 ± 15% -20.7% 2493 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#95.curr->pid
2192 ± 11% +50.9% 3308 ± 37% sched_debug.cpu#18.ttwu_count
6 ± 11% +37.5% 8 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[22]:/.load
12 ± 5% +27.1% 15 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#5.cpu_load[1]
11 ± 12% -23.4% 9 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[3]
6 ± 11% +37.5% 8 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#22.load
8 ± 8% -25.0% 6 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[2]
7 ± 6% -20.0% 6 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#55.cpu_load[3]
11 ± 9% -17.4% 9 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[4]
12 ± 5% -22.9% 9 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#38.cpu_load[3]
420 ± 13% +43.0% 601 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#30.ttwu_local
1682 ± 14% +38.5% 2329 ± 17% numa-meminfo.node7.AnonPages
423 ± 13% +37.0% 579 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node7.nr_anon_pages
15 ± 13% +41.9% 22 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[1]
6 ± 20% +44.0% 9 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[19]:/.runnable_load_avg
9 ± 4% -24.3% 7 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[4]
6341 ± 7% -19.6% 5100 ± 16% sched_debug.cpu#43.curr->pid
2577 ± 11% -11.9% 2270 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#33.ttwu_count
13 ± 6% -18.5% 11 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#40.cpu_load[2]
4828 ± 6% +23.8% 5979 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#34.curr->pid
4351 ± 12% +33.9% 5824 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#36.curr->pid
10 ± 8% -23.8% 8 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[4]
10 ± 14% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[2]
17 ± 22% +40.6% 24 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#97.cpu_load[1]
11 ± 9% +21.3% 14 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#7.cpu_load[2]
10 ± 8% -26.2% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#36.cpu_load[4]
12853 ± 2% +20.0% 15429 ± 11% numa-meminfo.node2.AnonPages
4744 ± 8% +30.8% 6204 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#35.curr->pid
3214 ± 2% +20.0% 3856 ± 11% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_anon_pages
6181 ± 6% +24.9% 7718 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#13.curr->pid
6675 ± 23% +27.5% 8510 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[91]:/.tg_load_avg
171261 ± 5% -22.2% 133177 ± 15% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
6589 ± 21% +29.3% 8522 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[89]:/.tg_load_avg
6508 ± 20% +28.0% 8331 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq[88]:/.tg_load_avg
6598 ± 22% +29.2% 8525 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[90]:/.tg_load_avg
590 ± 13% -21.4% 464 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#105.ttwu_local
175392 ± 5% -21.7% 137308 ± 14% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
11 ± 6% -18.2% 9 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#38.cpu_load[4]
6643 ± 23% +27.4% 8465 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[94]:/.tg_load_avg
6764 ± 7% +13.8% 7695 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#12.curr->pid
29 ± 28% +34.5% 39 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[98]:/.tg_load_contrib
1776 ± 7% +29.4% 2298 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#11.ttwu_local
13 ± 0% -19.2% 10 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#40.cpu_load[3]
7 ± 5% -17.2% 6 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[3]
7371 ± 20% -18.0% 6045 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
26560 ± 2% +14.0% 30287 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node2.Slab
16161 ± 6% -9.4% 14646 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
351 ± 6% -9.3% 318 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
7753 ± 27% -22.9% 5976 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#2.sched_goidle
3828 ± 9% +17.3% 4490 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#23.sched_goidle
23925 ± 2% +23.0% 29419 ± 23% numa-meminfo.node2.Active
47 ± 6% -15.8% 40 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#42.cpu_load[1]
282 ± 5% -9.7% 254 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[109]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
349 ± 5% -9.3% 317 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
6941 ± 3% +8.9% 7558 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#61.nr_switches
16051 ± 5% -8.9% 14618 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
238944 ± 3% +9.2% 260958 ± 5% numa-vmstat.node2.numa_local
12966 ± 5% -9.5% 11732 ± 6% sched_debug.cfs_rq[109]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
1004 ± 3% +8.2% 1086 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#118.sched_goidle
20746 ± 4% -8.4% 19000 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
451 ± 4% -8.3% 413 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
3538 ± 4% +17.2% 4147 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#26.ttwu_count
16 ± 9% +13.8% 18 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[3]
1531 ± 0% +11.3% 1704 ± 1% numa-meminfo.node7.KernelStack
3569 ± 3% +17.2% 4182 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#24.sched_goidle
1820 ± 3% -12.5% 1594 ± 8% slabinfo.taskstats.num_objs
1819 ± 3% -12.4% 1594 ± 8% slabinfo.taskstats.active_objs
4006 ± 5% +19.1% 4769 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#17.sched_goidle
21412 ± 19% -17.0% 17779 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#2.nr_switches
16 ± 9% +24.2% 20 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[2]
10493 ± 7% +13.3% 11890 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#23.nr_switches
1207 ± 2% -46.9% 640 ± 4% time.voluntary_context_switches
time.voluntary_context_switches
1300 ++-----------*--*--------------------*-------------------------------+
*..*.*..*.. + *.*..*..*.*..*..* .*..*..*. .*..*.*..*.. |
1200 ++ * * *. *.*..*
1100 ++ |
| |
1000 ++ |
| |
900 ++ |
| |
800 ++ |
700 ++ |
O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
600 ++ O O O O O O O O O |
| O |
500 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
To reproduce:
apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
bin/run-local job.yaml
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Huang, Ying
[-- Attachment #2: job.yaml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1495 bytes --]
---
testcase: will-it-scale
default_monitors:
wait: pre-test
uptime:
iostat:
vmstat:
numa-numastat:
numa-vmstat:
numa-meminfo:
proc-vmstat:
proc-stat:
meminfo:
slabinfo:
interrupts:
lock_stat:
latency_stats:
softirqs:
bdi_dev_mapping:
diskstats:
cpuidle:
cpufreq:
turbostat:
sched_debug:
interval: 10
pmeter:
default_watchdogs:
watch-oom:
watchdog:
cpufreq_governor:
- performance
commit: 08ebe1d6ccd168bdd5379d39b5df9314a1453534
model: G5
nr_cpu: 128
memory: 2048G
rootfs_partition:
perf-profile:
freq: 800
will-it-scale:
test:
- lock1
testbox: lkp-g5
tbox_group: lkp-g5
kconfig: x86_64-rhel
enqueue_time: 2014-12-18 15:25:08.942992045 +08:00
head_commit: 08ebe1d6ccd168bdd5379d39b5df9314a1453534
base_commit: b2776bf7149bddd1f4161f14f79520f17fc1d71d
branch: linux-devel/devel-hourly-2014121807
kernel: "/kernel/x86_64-rhel/08ebe1d6ccd168bdd5379d39b5df9314a1453534/vmlinuz-3.18.0-g08ebe1d"
user: lkp
queue: cyclic
rootfs: debian-x86_64.cgz
result_root: "/result/lkp-g5/will-it-scale/performance-lock1/debian-x86_64.cgz/x86_64-rhel/08ebe1d6ccd168bdd5379d39b5df9314a1453534/0"
job_file: "/lkp/scheduled/lkp-g5/cyclic_will-it-scale-performance-lock1-x86_64-rhel-HEAD-08ebe1d6ccd168bdd5379d39b5df9314a1453534-0.yaml"
dequeue_time: 2014-12-18 21:05:19.637058410 +08:00
job_state: finished
loadavg: 61.45 32.13 13.09 1/1010 20009
start_time: '1418908385'
end_time: '1418908697'
version: "/lkp/lkp/.src-20141218-145159"
[-- Attachment #3: reproduce --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9543 bytes --]
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu100/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu101/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu102/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu103/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu104/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu105/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu106/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu107/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu108/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu109/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu11/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu110/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu111/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu112/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu113/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu114/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu115/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu116/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu117/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu118/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu119/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu120/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu121/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu122/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu123/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu124/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu125/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu126/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu127/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu13/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu14/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu16/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu17/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu18/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu19/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu22/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu23/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu24/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu25/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu26/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu27/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu28/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu30/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu31/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu32/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu33/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu34/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu35/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu36/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu37/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu38/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu39/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu40/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu41/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu42/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu43/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu44/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu45/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu46/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu47/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu48/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu49/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu50/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu51/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu52/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu53/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu54/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu55/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu56/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu57/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu58/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu59/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu60/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu61/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu62/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu63/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu64/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu65/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu66/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu67/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu68/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu69/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu70/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu71/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu72/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu73/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu74/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu75/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu76/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu77/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu78/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu79/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu80/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu81/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu82/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu83/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu84/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu85/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu86/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu87/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu88/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu89/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu9/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu90/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu91/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu92/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu93/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu94/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu95/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu96/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu97/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu98/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu99/cpufreq/scaling_governor
./runtest.py lock1 8 1 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 96 128
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 89 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LKP mailing list
LKP@linux.intel.com
\r
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LKP] [sched] a15b12ac36a: -46.9% time.voluntary_context_switches +1.5% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
2014-12-23 5:15 [LKP] [sched] a15b12ac36a: -46.9% time.voluntary_context_switches +1.5% will-it-scale.per_process_ops Huang Ying
@ 2014-12-23 8:57 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-01-04 0:39 ` Huang Ying
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-12-23 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huang Ying, Kirill Tkhai; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, LKML, LKP ML
Hi, Huang,
what do these digits mean? What test does?
23.12.2014, 08:16, "Huang Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> commit a15b12ac36ad4e7b856a4ae54937ae26a51aebad ("sched: Do not stop cpu in set_cpus_allowed_ptr() if task is not running")
>
> testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-g5/will-it-scale/performance-lock1
>
> 1ba93d42727c4400 a15b12ac36ad4e7b856a4ae549
> ---------------- --------------------------
> %stddev %change %stddev
> \ | \
> 1517261 ± 0% +1.5% 1539994 ± 0% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> 247 ± 30% +131.8% 573 ± 49% sched_debug.cpu#61.ttwu_count
> 225 ± 22% +142.8% 546 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#81.ttwu_local
> 15115 ± 44% +37.3% 20746 ± 40% numa-meminfo.node7.Active
> 1028 ± 38% +115.3% 2214 ± 36% sched_debug.cpu#16.ttwu_local
> 2 ± 19% +133.3% 5 ± 43% sched_debug.cpu#89.cpu_load[3]
> 21 ± 45% +88.2% 40 ± 23% sched_debug.cfs_rq[99]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 414 ± 33% +98.6% 823 ± 28% sched_debug.cpu#81.ttwu_count
> 4 ± 10% +88.2% 8 ± 12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[33]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 22 ± 26% +80.9% 40 ± 24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[103]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 7 ± 17% -41.4% 4 ± 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq[41]:/.load
> 7 ± 17% -37.9% 4 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#41.load
> 3 ± 22% +106.7% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[36]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 174 ± 13% +48.7% 259 ± 31% sched_debug.cpu#112.ttwu_count
> 4 ± 19% +88.9% 8 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[35]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 260 ± 10% +55.6% 405 ± 26% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_anon_pages
> 1042 ± 10% +56.0% 1626 ± 26% numa-meminfo.node3.AnonPages
> 26 ± 22% +74.3% 45 ± 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq[65]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 21 ± 43% +71.3% 37 ± 26% sched_debug.cfs_rq[100]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 3686 ± 21% +40.2% 5167 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#16.ttwu_count
> 142 ± 9% +34.4% 191 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#112.ttwu_local
> 5 ± 18% +69.6% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq[35]:/.load
> 2 ± 30% +100.0% 5 ± 37% sched_debug.cpu#106.cpu_load[1]
> 3 ± 23% +100.0% 6 ± 48% sched_debug.cpu#106.cpu_load[2]
> 5 ± 18% +69.6% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#35.load
> 9 ± 20% +48.6% 13 ± 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 1727 ± 15% +43.9% 2484 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu#34.ttwu_local
> 10 ± 17% -40.5% 6 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[0]
> 10 ± 14% -29.3% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[4]
> 10 ± 17% -33.3% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[1]
> 6121 ± 8% +56.7% 9595 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu#13.sched_goidle
> 13 ± 8% -25.9% 10 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[2]
> 12 ± 16% -24.0% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[2]
> 492 ± 17% -21.3% 387 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#46.ttwu_count
> 3761 ± 11% -23.9% 2863 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#93.curr->pid
> 570 ± 19% +43.2% 816 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#86.ttwu_count
> 5279 ± 8% +63.5% 8631 ± 33% sched_debug.cpu#13.ttwu_count
> 377 ± 22% -28.6% 269 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#46.ttwu_local
> 5396 ± 10% +29.9% 7007 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#16.sched_goidle
> 1959 ± 12% +36.9% 2683 ± 15% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_slab_reclaimable
> 7839 ± 12% +37.0% 10736 ± 15% numa-meminfo.node2.SReclaimable
> 5 ± 15% +66.7% 8 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[33]:/.load
> 5 ± 25% +47.8% 8 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[37]:/.load
> 2 ± 0% +87.5% 3 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#89.cpu_load[4]
> 5 ± 15% +66.7% 8 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#33.load
> 6 ± 23% +41.7% 8 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#37.load
> 8 ± 10% -26.5% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[1]
> 7300 ± 37% +63.6% 11943 ± 16% softirqs.TASKLET
> 2984 ± 6% +43.1% 4271 ± 23% sched_debug.cpu#20.ttwu_count
> 328 ± 4% +40.5% 462 ± 25% sched_debug.cpu#26.ttwu_local
> 10 ± 7% -27.5% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[3]
> 9 ± 8% -30.8% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[3]
> 9 ± 8% -27.0% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[4]
> 10 ± 14% -32.5% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[2]
> 16292 ± 6% +42.8% 23260 ± 25% sched_debug.cpu#13.nr_switches
> 14 ± 28% +55.9% 23 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[0]
> 5 ± 8% +28.6% 6 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#17.load
> 13 ± 7% -23.1% 10 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[3]
> 7 ± 10% -35.7% 4 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 5076 ± 13% -21.8% 3970 ± 11% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_slab_unreclaimable
> 20306 ± 13% -21.8% 15886 ± 11% numa-meminfo.node0.SUnreclaim
> 10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[3]
> 11 ± 11% -29.5% 7 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[1]
> 10 ± 12% -26.8% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#44.cpu_load[1]
> 10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#44.cpu_load[0]
> 7 ± 17% +48.3% 10 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 11 ± 12% -34.1% 7 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[0]
> 10 ± 10% -27.9% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[1]
> 10 ± 8% -26.8% 7 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[2]
> 10 ± 8% -28.6% 7 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[0]
> 10 ± 10% -27.9% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[1]
> 10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[2]
> 12940 ± 3% +49.8% 19387 ± 35% numa-meminfo.node2.Active(anon)
> 3235 ± 2% +49.8% 4844 ± 35% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_active_anon
> 17 ± 17% +36.6% 24 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#97.cpu_load[2]
> 14725 ± 8% +21.8% 17928 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#16.nr_switches
> 667 ± 10% +45.3% 969 ± 22% sched_debug.cpu#17.ttwu_local
> 3257 ± 5% +22.4% 3988 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#118.curr->pid
> 3144 ± 15% -20.7% 2493 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#95.curr->pid
> 2192 ± 11% +50.9% 3308 ± 37% sched_debug.cpu#18.ttwu_count
> 6 ± 11% +37.5% 8 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[22]:/.load
> 12 ± 5% +27.1% 15 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#5.cpu_load[1]
> 11 ± 12% -23.4% 9 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[3]
> 6 ± 11% +37.5% 8 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#22.load
> 8 ± 8% -25.0% 6 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[2]
> 7 ± 6% -20.0% 6 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#55.cpu_load[3]
> 11 ± 9% -17.4% 9 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[4]
> 12 ± 5% -22.9% 9 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#38.cpu_load[3]
> 420 ± 13% +43.0% 601 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#30.ttwu_local
> 1682 ± 14% +38.5% 2329 ± 17% numa-meminfo.node7.AnonPages
> 423 ± 13% +37.0% 579 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node7.nr_anon_pages
> 15 ± 13% +41.9% 22 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[1]
> 6 ± 20% +44.0% 9 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[19]:/.runnable_load_avg
> 9 ± 4% -24.3% 7 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[4]
> 6341 ± 7% -19.6% 5100 ± 16% sched_debug.cpu#43.curr->pid
> 2577 ± 11% -11.9% 2270 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#33.ttwu_count
> 13 ± 6% -18.5% 11 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#40.cpu_load[2]
> 4828 ± 6% +23.8% 5979 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#34.curr->pid
> 4351 ± 12% +33.9% 5824 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#36.curr->pid
> 10 ± 8% -23.8% 8 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[4]
> 10 ± 14% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[2]
> 17 ± 22% +40.6% 24 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#97.cpu_load[1]
> 11 ± 9% +21.3% 14 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#7.cpu_load[2]
> 10 ± 8% -26.2% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#36.cpu_load[4]
> 12853 ± 2% +20.0% 15429 ± 11% numa-meminfo.node2.AnonPages
> 4744 ± 8% +30.8% 6204 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#35.curr->pid
> 3214 ± 2% +20.0% 3856 ± 11% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_anon_pages
> 6181 ± 6% +24.9% 7718 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#13.curr->pid
> 6675 ± 23% +27.5% 8510 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[91]:/.tg_load_avg
> 171261 ± 5% -22.2% 133177 ± 15% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
> 6589 ± 21% +29.3% 8522 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[89]:/.tg_load_avg
> 6508 ± 20% +28.0% 8331 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq[88]:/.tg_load_avg
> 6598 ± 22% +29.2% 8525 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[90]:/.tg_load_avg
> 590 ± 13% -21.4% 464 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#105.ttwu_local
> 175392 ± 5% -21.7% 137308 ± 14% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
> 11 ± 6% -18.2% 9 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#38.cpu_load[4]
> 6643 ± 23% +27.4% 8465 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[94]:/.tg_load_avg
> 6764 ± 7% +13.8% 7695 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#12.curr->pid
> 29 ± 28% +34.5% 39 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[98]:/.tg_load_contrib
> 1776 ± 7% +29.4% 2298 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#11.ttwu_local
> 13 ± 0% -19.2% 10 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#40.cpu_load[3]
> 7 ± 5% -17.2% 6 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[3]
> 7371 ± 20% -18.0% 6045 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
> 26560 ± 2% +14.0% 30287 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node2.Slab
> 16161 ± 6% -9.4% 14646 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> 351 ± 6% -9.3% 318 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> 7753 ± 27% -22.9% 5976 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#2.sched_goidle
> 3828 ± 9% +17.3% 4490 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#23.sched_goidle
> 23925 ± 2% +23.0% 29419 ± 23% numa-meminfo.node2.Active
> 47 ± 6% -15.8% 40 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#42.cpu_load[1]
> 282 ± 5% -9.7% 254 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[109]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> 349 ± 5% -9.3% 317 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> 6941 ± 3% +8.9% 7558 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#61.nr_switches
> 16051 ± 5% -8.9% 14618 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> 238944 ± 3% +9.2% 260958 ± 5% numa-vmstat.node2.numa_local
> 12966 ± 5% -9.5% 11732 ± 6% sched_debug.cfs_rq[109]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> 1004 ± 3% +8.2% 1086 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#118.sched_goidle
> 20746 ± 4% -8.4% 19000 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> 451 ± 4% -8.3% 413 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> 3538 ± 4% +17.2% 4147 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#26.ttwu_count
> 16 ± 9% +13.8% 18 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[3]
> 1531 ± 0% +11.3% 1704 ± 1% numa-meminfo.node7.KernelStack
> 3569 ± 3% +17.2% 4182 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#24.sched_goidle
> 1820 ± 3% -12.5% 1594 ± 8% slabinfo.taskstats.num_objs
> 1819 ± 3% -12.4% 1594 ± 8% slabinfo.taskstats.active_objs
> 4006 ± 5% +19.1% 4769 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#17.sched_goidle
> 21412 ± 19% -17.0% 17779 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#2.nr_switches
> 16 ± 9% +24.2% 20 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[2]
> 10493 ± 7% +13.3% 11890 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#23.nr_switches
> 1207 ± 2% -46.9% 640 ± 4% time.voluntary_context_switches
>
> time.voluntary_context_switches
>
> 1300 ++-----------*--*--------------------*-------------------------------+
> *..*.*..*.. + *.*..*..*.*..*..* .*..*..*. .*..*.*..*.. |
> 1200 ++ * * *. *.*..*
> 1100 ++ |
> | |
> 1000 ++ |
> | |
> 900 ++ |
> | |
> 800 ++ |
> 700 ++ |
> O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
> 600 ++ O O O O O O O O O |
> | O |
> 500 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> [*] bisect-good sample
> [O] bisect-bad sample
>
> To reproduce:
>
> apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> cd lkp-tests
> bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
> bin/run-local job.yaml
>
> Disclaimer:
> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
>
Regards,
Kirill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LKP] [sched] a15b12ac36a: -46.9% time.voluntary_context_switches +1.5% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
2014-12-23 8:57 ` Kirill Tkhai
@ 2015-01-04 0:39 ` Huang Ying
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huang Ying @ 2015-01-04 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kirill Tkhai; +Cc: Kirill Tkhai, Ingo Molnar, LKML, LKP ML, Wu Fengguang
Hi, Kirill,
Sorry for late.
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 11:57 +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Hi, Huang,
>
> what do these digits mean? What test does?
>
> 23.12.2014, 08:16, "Huang Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>:
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > commit a15b12ac36ad4e7b856a4ae54937ae26a51aebad ("sched: Do not stop cpu in set_cpus_allowed_ptr() if task is not running")
> >
> > testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-g5/will-it-scale/performance-lock1
> >
> > 1ba93d42727c4400 a15b12ac36ad4e7b856a4ae549
> > ---------------- --------------------------
Above is the good commit and the bad commit.
> > %stddev %change %stddev
> > \ | \
> > 1517261 ± 0% +1.5% 1539994 ± 0% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
We have basic description of data above, where %stddev is standard
deviation.
What's more do you want?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> > 247 ± 30% +131.8% 573 ± 49% sched_debug.cpu#61.ttwu_count
> > 225 ± 22% +142.8% 546 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#81.ttwu_local
> > 15115 ± 44% +37.3% 20746 ± 40% numa-meminfo.node7.Active
> > 1028 ± 38% +115.3% 2214 ± 36% sched_debug.cpu#16.ttwu_local
> > 2 ± 19% +133.3% 5 ± 43% sched_debug.cpu#89.cpu_load[3]
> > 21 ± 45% +88.2% 40 ± 23% sched_debug.cfs_rq[99]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 414 ± 33% +98.6% 823 ± 28% sched_debug.cpu#81.ttwu_count
> > 4 ± 10% +88.2% 8 ± 12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[33]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 22 ± 26% +80.9% 40 ± 24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[103]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 7 ± 17% -41.4% 4 ± 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq[41]:/.load
> > 7 ± 17% -37.9% 4 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#41.load
> > 3 ± 22% +106.7% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[36]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 174 ± 13% +48.7% 259 ± 31% sched_debug.cpu#112.ttwu_count
> > 4 ± 19% +88.9% 8 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[35]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 260 ± 10% +55.6% 405 ± 26% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_anon_pages
> > 1042 ± 10% +56.0% 1626 ± 26% numa-meminfo.node3.AnonPages
> > 26 ± 22% +74.3% 45 ± 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq[65]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 21 ± 43% +71.3% 37 ± 26% sched_debug.cfs_rq[100]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 3686 ± 21% +40.2% 5167 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#16.ttwu_count
> > 142 ± 9% +34.4% 191 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#112.ttwu_local
> > 5 ± 18% +69.6% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq[35]:/.load
> > 2 ± 30% +100.0% 5 ± 37% sched_debug.cpu#106.cpu_load[1]
> > 3 ± 23% +100.0% 6 ± 48% sched_debug.cpu#106.cpu_load[2]
> > 5 ± 18% +69.6% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#35.load
> > 9 ± 20% +48.6% 13 ± 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 1727 ± 15% +43.9% 2484 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu#34.ttwu_local
> > 10 ± 17% -40.5% 6 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[0]
> > 10 ± 14% -29.3% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[4]
> > 10 ± 17% -33.3% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[1]
> > 6121 ± 8% +56.7% 9595 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu#13.sched_goidle
> > 13 ± 8% -25.9% 10 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[2]
> > 12 ± 16% -24.0% 9 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[2]
> > 492 ± 17% -21.3% 387 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#46.ttwu_count
> > 3761 ± 11% -23.9% 2863 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu#93.curr->pid
> > 570 ± 19% +43.2% 816 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu#86.ttwu_count
> > 5279 ± 8% +63.5% 8631 ± 33% sched_debug.cpu#13.ttwu_count
> > 377 ± 22% -28.6% 269 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#46.ttwu_local
> > 5396 ± 10% +29.9% 7007 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#16.sched_goidle
> > 1959 ± 12% +36.9% 2683 ± 15% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_slab_reclaimable
> > 7839 ± 12% +37.0% 10736 ± 15% numa-meminfo.node2.SReclaimable
> > 5 ± 15% +66.7% 8 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[33]:/.load
> > 5 ± 25% +47.8% 8 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[37]:/.load
> > 2 ± 0% +87.5% 3 ± 34% sched_debug.cpu#89.cpu_load[4]
> > 5 ± 15% +66.7% 8 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#33.load
> > 6 ± 23% +41.7% 8 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#37.load
> > 8 ± 10% -26.5% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[1]
> > 7300 ± 37% +63.6% 11943 ± 16% softirqs.TASKLET
> > 2984 ± 6% +43.1% 4271 ± 23% sched_debug.cpu#20.ttwu_count
> > 328 ± 4% +40.5% 462 ± 25% sched_debug.cpu#26.ttwu_local
> > 10 ± 7% -27.5% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[3]
> > 9 ± 8% -30.8% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[3]
> > 9 ± 8% -27.0% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[4]
> > 10 ± 14% -32.5% 6 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#41.cpu_load[2]
> > 16292 ± 6% +42.8% 23260 ± 25% sched_debug.cpu#13.nr_switches
> > 14 ± 28% +55.9% 23 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[0]
> > 5 ± 8% +28.6% 6 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#17.load
> > 13 ± 7% -23.1% 10 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[3]
> > 7 ± 10% -35.7% 4 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 5076 ± 13% -21.8% 3970 ± 11% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_slab_unreclaimable
> > 20306 ± 13% -21.8% 15886 ± 11% numa-meminfo.node0.SUnreclaim
> > 10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[3]
> > 11 ± 11% -29.5% 7 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[1]
> > 10 ± 12% -26.8% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#44.cpu_load[1]
> > 10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#44.cpu_load[0]
> > 7 ± 17% +48.3% 10 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 11 ± 12% -34.1% 7 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[0]
> > 10 ± 10% -27.9% 7 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[1]
> > 10 ± 8% -26.8% 7 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#47.cpu_load[2]
> > 10 ± 8% -28.6% 7 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[0]
> > 10 ± 10% -27.9% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[1]
> > 10 ± 10% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[2]
> > 12940 ± 3% +49.8% 19387 ± 35% numa-meminfo.node2.Active(anon)
> > 3235 ± 2% +49.8% 4844 ± 35% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_active_anon
> > 17 ± 17% +36.6% 24 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#97.cpu_load[2]
> > 14725 ± 8% +21.8% 17928 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#16.nr_switches
> > 667 ± 10% +45.3% 969 ± 22% sched_debug.cpu#17.ttwu_local
> > 3257 ± 5% +22.4% 3988 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#118.curr->pid
> > 3144 ± 15% -20.7% 2493 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#95.curr->pid
> > 2192 ± 11% +50.9% 3308 ± 37% sched_debug.cpu#18.ttwu_count
> > 6 ± 11% +37.5% 8 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[22]:/.load
> > 12 ± 5% +27.1% 15 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#5.cpu_load[1]
> > 11 ± 12% -23.4% 9 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[3]
> > 6 ± 11% +37.5% 8 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#22.load
> > 8 ± 8% -25.0% 6 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[2]
> > 7 ± 6% -20.0% 6 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#55.cpu_load[3]
> > 11 ± 9% -17.4% 9 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#39.cpu_load[4]
> > 12 ± 5% -22.9% 9 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#38.cpu_load[3]
> > 420 ± 13% +43.0% 601 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#30.ttwu_local
> > 1682 ± 14% +38.5% 2329 ± 17% numa-meminfo.node7.AnonPages
> > 423 ± 13% +37.0% 579 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node7.nr_anon_pages
> > 15 ± 13% +41.9% 22 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[1]
> > 6 ± 20% +44.0% 9 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[19]:/.runnable_load_avg
> > 9 ± 4% -24.3% 7 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#43.cpu_load[4]
> > 6341 ± 7% -19.6% 5100 ± 16% sched_debug.cpu#43.curr->pid
> > 2577 ± 11% -11.9% 2270 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#33.ttwu_count
> > 13 ± 6% -18.5% 11 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#40.cpu_load[2]
> > 4828 ± 6% +23.8% 5979 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#34.curr->pid
> > 4351 ± 12% +33.9% 5824 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#36.curr->pid
> > 10 ± 8% -23.8% 8 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#37.cpu_load[4]
> > 10 ± 14% -28.6% 7 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#45.cpu_load[2]
> > 17 ± 22% +40.6% 24 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#97.cpu_load[1]
> > 11 ± 9% +21.3% 14 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#7.cpu_load[2]
> > 10 ± 8% -26.2% 7 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#36.cpu_load[4]
> > 12853 ± 2% +20.0% 15429 ± 11% numa-meminfo.node2.AnonPages
> > 4744 ± 8% +30.8% 6204 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#35.curr->pid
> > 3214 ± 2% +20.0% 3856 ± 11% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_anon_pages
> > 6181 ± 6% +24.9% 7718 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu#13.curr->pid
> > 6675 ± 23% +27.5% 8510 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[91]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 171261 ± 5% -22.2% 133177 ± 15% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
> > 6589 ± 21% +29.3% 8522 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[89]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 6508 ± 20% +28.0% 8331 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq[88]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 6598 ± 22% +29.2% 8525 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[90]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 590 ± 13% -21.4% 464 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#105.ttwu_local
> > 175392 ± 5% -21.7% 137308 ± 14% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
> > 11 ± 6% -18.2% 9 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#38.cpu_load[4]
> > 6643 ± 23% +27.4% 8465 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[94]:/.tg_load_avg
> > 6764 ± 7% +13.8% 7695 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#12.curr->pid
> > 29 ± 28% +34.5% 39 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq[98]:/.tg_load_contrib
> > 1776 ± 7% +29.4% 2298 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#11.ttwu_local
> > 13 ± 0% -19.2% 10 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#40.cpu_load[3]
> > 7 ± 5% -17.2% 6 ± 0% sched_debug.cpu#51.cpu_load[3]
> > 7371 ± 20% -18.0% 6045 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
> > 26560 ± 2% +14.0% 30287 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node2.Slab
> > 16161 ± 6% -9.4% 14646 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> > 351 ± 6% -9.3% 318 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> > 7753 ± 27% -22.9% 5976 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu#2.sched_goidle
> > 3828 ± 9% +17.3% 4490 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu#23.sched_goidle
> > 23925 ± 2% +23.0% 29419 ± 23% numa-meminfo.node2.Active
> > 47 ± 6% -15.8% 40 ± 19% sched_debug.cpu#42.cpu_load[1]
> > 282 ± 5% -9.7% 254 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[109]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> > 349 ± 5% -9.3% 317 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> > 6941 ± 3% +8.9% 7558 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu#61.nr_switches
> > 16051 ± 5% -8.9% 14618 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> > 238944 ± 3% +9.2% 260958 ± 5% numa-vmstat.node2.numa_local
> > 12966 ± 5% -9.5% 11732 ± 6% sched_debug.cfs_rq[109]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> > 1004 ± 3% +8.2% 1086 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#118.sched_goidle
> > 20746 ± 4% -8.4% 19000 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
> > 451 ± 4% -8.3% 413 ± 1% sched_debug.cfs_rq[45]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
> > 3538 ± 4% +17.2% 4147 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#26.ttwu_count
> > 16 ± 9% +13.8% 18 ± 2% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[3]
> > 1531 ± 0% +11.3% 1704 ± 1% numa-meminfo.node7.KernelStack
> > 3569 ± 3% +17.2% 4182 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#24.sched_goidle
> > 1820 ± 3% -12.5% 1594 ± 8% slabinfo.taskstats.num_objs
> > 1819 ± 3% -12.4% 1594 ± 8% slabinfo.taskstats.active_objs
> > 4006 ± 5% +19.1% 4769 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#17.sched_goidle
> > 21412 ± 19% -17.0% 17779 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu#2.nr_switches
> > 16 ± 9% +24.2% 20 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#99.cpu_load[2]
> > 10493 ± 7% +13.3% 11890 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu#23.nr_switches
> > 1207 ± 2% -46.9% 640 ± 4% time.voluntary_context_switches
> >
> > time.voluntary_context_switches
> >
> > 1300 ++-----------*--*--------------------*-------------------------------+
> > *..*.*..*.. + *.*..*..*.*..*..* .*..*..*. .*..*.*..*.. |
> > 1200 ++ * * *. *.*..*
> > 1100 ++ |
> > | |
> > 1000 ++ |
> > | |
> > 900 ++ |
> > | |
> > 800 ++ |
> > 700 ++ |
> > O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
> > 600 ++ O O O O O O O O O |
> > | O |
> > 500 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> > [*] bisect-good sample
> > [O] bisect-bad sample
> >
> > To reproduce:
> >
> > apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
> > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> > cd lkp-tests
> > bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
> > bin/run-local job.yaml
> >
> > Disclaimer:
> > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> > design or configuration may affect actual performance.
> >
>
> Regards,
> Kirill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-04 0:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-23 5:15 [LKP] [sched] a15b12ac36a: -46.9% time.voluntary_context_switches +1.5% will-it-scale.per_process_ops Huang Ying
2014-12-23 8:57 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-01-04 0:39 ` Huang Ying
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).