linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 21/24] namei: regularize use of put_link() and follow_link(), trim arguments
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:13:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429553588-24764-21-git-send-email-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150420181222.GK889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

don't bother with separate variables for link and cookie in trailing
symlink loops; use nd->stack[0] for that.  That makes *all* callers
of put_link() (and follow_link()) operate on nd->stack[nd->depth].link
and nd->stack[nd->depth].cookie.  Trim the argument lists.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/namei.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 1c967d1..a8d6751 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -752,12 +752,14 @@ static inline char *nd_get_link(struct nameidata *nd)
 	return nd->stack[nd->depth].body;
 }
 
-static inline void put_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link, void *cookie)
+static inline void put_link(struct nameidata *nd)
 {
-	struct inode *inode = link->dentry->d_inode;
+	struct saved *last = nd->stack + nd->depth;
+	struct inode *inode = last->link.dentry->d_inode;
 	if (inode->i_op->put_link)
-		inode->i_op->put_link(link->dentry, nd_get_link(nd), cookie);
-	path_put(link);
+		inode->i_op->put_link(last->link.dentry, last->body,
+				      last->cookie);
+	path_put(&last->link);
 }
 
 int sysctl_protected_symlinks __read_mostly = 0;
@@ -925,14 +927,16 @@ out:
 	return res;
 }
 
-static int follow_link(struct path *link, struct nameidata *nd, void **p)
+static int follow_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link)
 {
 	char *s;
 	int error = may_follow_link(link, nd);
+	struct saved *last = nd->stack + nd->depth;
 	if (unlikely(error))
 		return error;
 	nd->flags |= LOOKUP_PARENT;
-	s = get_link(link, nd, p);
+	last->link = *link;
+	s = get_link(&last->link, nd, &last->cookie);
 	if (unlikely(IS_ERR(s)))
 		return PTR_ERR(s);
 	if (unlikely(!s))
@@ -948,7 +952,7 @@ static int follow_link(struct path *link, struct nameidata *nd, void **p)
 	nd->inode = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
 	error = link_path_walk(s, nd);
 	if (unlikely(error))
-		put_link(nd, link, *p);
+		put_link(nd);
 	return error;
 }
 
@@ -1869,7 +1873,7 @@ Walked:
 			err = 0;
 			if (unlikely(!s)) {
 				/* jumped */
-				put_link(nd, &last->link, last->cookie);
+				put_link(nd);
 				nd->link_count--;
 				nd->depth--;
 				last--;
@@ -1900,7 +1904,7 @@ Walked:
 	terminate_walk(nd);
 Err:
 	while (unlikely(nd->depth)) {
-		put_link(nd, &last->link, last->cookie);
+		put_link(nd);
 		nd->link_count--;
 		nd->depth--;
 		last--;
@@ -1910,7 +1914,7 @@ OK:
 	if (unlikely(nd->depth)) {
 		name = last->name;
 		err = walk_component(nd, &next, LOOKUP_FOLLOW);
-		put_link(nd, &last->link, last->cookie);
+		put_link(nd);
 		nd->link_count--;
 		nd->depth--;
 		last--;
@@ -2065,13 +2069,11 @@ static int path_lookupat(int dfd, const struct filename *name,
 	if (!err && !(flags & LOOKUP_PARENT)) {
 		err = lookup_last(nd, &path);
 		while (err > 0) {
-			void *cookie;
-			struct path link = path;
-			err = follow_link(&link, nd, &cookie);
+			err = follow_link(nd, &path);
 			if (err)
 				break;
 			err = lookup_last(nd, &path);
-			put_link(nd, &link, cookie);
+			put_link(nd);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2426,13 +2428,11 @@ path_mountpoint(int dfd, const struct filename *name, struct path *path,
 
 	err = mountpoint_last(&nd, path);
 	while (err > 0) {
-		void *cookie;
-		struct path link = *path;
-		err = follow_link(&link, &nd, &cookie);
+		err = follow_link(&nd, path);
 		if (err)
 			break;
 		err = mountpoint_last(&nd, path);
-		put_link(&nd, &link, cookie);
+		put_link(&nd);
 	}
 out:
 	path_cleanup(&nd);
@@ -3310,8 +3310,6 @@ static struct file *path_openat(int dfd, struct filename *pathname,
 
 	error = do_last(nd, &path, file, op, &opened, pathname);
 	while (unlikely(error > 0)) { /* trailing symlink */
-		struct path link = path;
-		void *cookie;
 		if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW)) {
 			path_put_conditional(&path, nd);
 			path_put(&nd->path);
@@ -3319,11 +3317,11 @@ static struct file *path_openat(int dfd, struct filename *pathname,
 			break;
 		}
 		nd->flags &= ~(LOOKUP_OPEN|LOOKUP_CREATE|LOOKUP_EXCL);
-		error = follow_link(&link, nd, &cookie);
+		error = follow_link(nd, &path);
 		if (unlikely(error))
 			break;
 		error = do_last(nd, &path, file, op, &opened, pathname);
-		put_link(nd, &link, cookie);
+		put_link(nd);
 	}
 out:
 	path_cleanup(nd);
-- 
2.1.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-20 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-20 18:12 [RFC][PATCHSET] non-recursive link_path_walk() and reducing stack footprint Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 01/24] lustre: rip the private symlink nesting limit out Al Viro
2015-04-20 19:08   ` Andreas Dilger
2015-04-20 19:22     ` Al Viro
2015-04-20 20:35       ` Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 02/24] VFS: replace {, total_}link_count in task_struct with pointer to nameidata Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 03/24] ovl: rearrange ovl_follow_link to it doesn't need to call ->put_link Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 04/24] VFS: replace nameidata arg to ->put_link with a char* Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 05/24] SECURITY: remove nameidata arg from inode_follow_link Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 06/24] VFS: remove nameidata args from ->follow_link Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 07/24] namei: expand nested_symlink() in its only caller Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 08/24] namei.c: separate the parts of follow_link() that find the link body Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 09/24] namei: fold follow_link() into link_path_walk() Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 10/24] link_path_walk: handle get_link() returning ERR_PTR() immediately Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 11/24] link_path_walk: don't bother with walk_component() after jumping link Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 12/24] link_path_walk: turn inner loop into explicit goto Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 13/24] link_path_walk: massage a bit more Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 14/24] link_path_walk: get rid of duplication Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH 15/24] link_path_walk: final preparations to killing recursion Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 16/24] link_path_walk: kill the recursion Al Viro
2015-04-20 21:04   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-20 21:32     ` Al Viro
2015-04-20 21:39       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-20 21:51         ` Al Viro
2015-04-20 21:41       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-20 21:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-20 21:59           ` Al Viro
2015-04-20 21:52         ` Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 17/24] link_path_walk: split "return from recursive call" path Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 18/24] link_path_walk: cleanup - turn goto start; into continue; Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 19/24] namei: fold may_follow_link() into follow_link() Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 20/24] namei: introduce nameidata->stack Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` Al Viro [this message]
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/24] namei: trim the arguments of get_link() Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 23/24] new ->follow_link() and ->put_link() calling conventions Al Viro
2015-04-20 18:13 ` [PATCH 24/24] uninline walk_component() Al Viro
2015-04-21 14:49 ` [RFC][PATCHSET] non-recursive link_path_walk() and reducing stack footprint Al Viro
2015-04-21 15:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-21 15:12     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-21 15:45       ` Al Viro
2015-04-21 16:46         ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-04-21 21:20         ` Al Viro
2015-04-22 18:07           ` Al Viro
2015-04-22 20:12             ` Al Viro
2015-04-22 21:05               ` Al Viro
2015-04-23  7:45                 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-23 18:07                   ` Al Viro
2015-04-24  6:35                     ` NeilBrown
2015-04-24 13:42                       ` Al Viro
2015-05-04  5:11                         ` Al Viro
2015-05-04  7:30                           ` NeilBrown
2015-04-23  5:01           ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1429553588-24764-21-git-send-email-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).