linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Doug Anderson" <dianders@google.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/12] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:33:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442828009-6241-8-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442828009-6241-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

Add an ->apply() method to the pwm_ops struct to allow PWM drivers to
implement atomic update.
This method will be preferred over the ->enable(), ->disable() and
->config() methods if available.

Add the pwm_get_state(), pwm_get_default_state() and pwm_apply_state()
functions for PWM users to be able to use the atomic update feature.

Note that the pwm_apply_state() does not guarantee the atomicity of the
update operation, it all depends on the availability and implementation
of the ->apply() method.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c  | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/pwm.h |  27 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 60ad758..ff3c662 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ static struct pwm_device *pwm_to_device(unsigned int pwm)
 	return radix_tree_lookup(&pwm_tree, pwm);
 }
 
+static void pwm_set_state(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			  const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	pwm->state = *state;
+}
+
 static int alloc_pwms(int pwm, unsigned int count)
 {
 	unsigned int from = 0;
@@ -226,6 +232,19 @@ void *pwm_get_chip_data(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_get_chip_data);
 
+static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_ops *ops)
+{
+	/* driver supports legacy, non-atomic operation */
+	if (ops->config && ops->enable && ops->disable)
+		return true;
+
+	/* driver supports atomic operation */
+	if (ops->apply)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /**
  * pwmchip_add_with_polarity() - register a new PWM chip
  * @chip: the PWM chip to add
@@ -244,8 +263,10 @@ int pwmchip_add_with_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->ops->config ||
-	    !chip->ops->enable || !chip->ops->disable || !chip->npwm)
+	if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!pwm_ops_check(chip->ops))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
@@ -445,7 +466,19 @@ int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
 	if (!pwm || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns <= 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = pwm->chip->ops->config(pwm->chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns);
+	if (pwm->chip->ops->apply) {
+		struct pwm_state state;
+
+		pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+		state.period = period_ns;
+		state.duty_cycle = duty_ns;
+
+		err = pwm->chip->ops->apply(pwm->chip, pwm, &state);
+	} else {
+		err = pwm->chip->ops->config(pwm->chip, pwm, duty_ns,
+					     period_ns);
+	}
+
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -473,6 +506,18 @@ int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm, enum pwm_polarity polarity)
 	if (!pwm || !pwm->chip->ops)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (pwm->chip->ops->apply) {
+		struct pwm_state state;
+
+		pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+		state.polarity = polarity;
+		err = pwm->chip->ops->apply(pwm->chip, pwm, &state);
+		if (!err)
+			pwm->state.polarity = polarity;
+
+		return err;
+	}
+
 	if (!pwm->chip->ops->set_polarity)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
@@ -497,17 +542,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_set_polarity);
  */
 int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	if (pwm && !pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
-		int err;
+	int err;
 
-		err = pwm->chip->ops->enable(pwm->chip, pwm);
-		if (!err)
-			pwm->state.enabled = true;
+	if (!pwm)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-		return err;
+	if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (pwm->chip->ops->apply) {
+		struct pwm_state state;
+
+		pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+		state.enabled = true;
+
+		err = pwm->chip->ops->apply(pwm->chip, pwm, &state);
+	} else {
+		err = pwm->chip->ops->enable(pwm->chip, pwm);
 	}
 
-	return pwm ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+	if (!err)
+		pwm->state.enabled = true;
+
+	return err;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_enable);
 
@@ -517,13 +574,74 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_enable);
  */
 void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	if (pwm && pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
+	if (!pwm || !pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
+		return;
+
+	if (pwm->chip->ops->apply) {
+		struct pwm_state state;
+
+		pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+		state.enabled = false;
+
+		pwm->chip->ops->apply(pwm->chip, pwm, &state);
+	} else {
 		pwm->chip->ops->disable(pwm->chip, pwm);
-		pwm->state.enabled = false;
 	}
+
+	pwm->state.enabled = false;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_disable);
 
+/**
+ * pwm_apply_state() - atomically apply a new state to a PWM device
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ * @state: new state to apply
+ */
+int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	int err = 0;
+
+	if (!pwm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!memcmp(state, &pwm->state, sizeof(*state)))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (pwm->chip->ops->apply) {
+		err = pwm->chip->ops->apply(pwm->chip, pwm, state);
+		if (!err)
+			pwm_set_state(pwm, state);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: restore the initial state in case of error.
+		 */
+		if (state->polarity != pwm->state.polarity) {
+			pwm_disable(pwm);
+			err = pwm_set_polarity(pwm, state->polarity);
+			if (err)
+				goto out;
+		}
+
+		if (state->period != pwm->state.period ||
+		    state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle) {
+			err = pwm_config(pwm, state->period, state->duty_cycle);
+			if (err)
+				goto out;
+		}
+
+		if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled) {
+			if (state->enabled)
+				err = pwm_enable(pwm);
+			else
+				pwm_disable(pwm);
+		}
+	}
+
+out:
+	return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_apply_state);
+
 static struct pwm_chip *of_node_to_pwmchip(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	struct pwm_chip *chip;
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index cddb12b..11ee041 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -171,6 +171,30 @@ static inline enum pwm_polarity pwm_get_polarity(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	return pwm ? pwm->state.polarity : PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
 }
 
+int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state);
+
+/**
+ * pwm_get_state() - retrieve the current PWM state
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ * @state: state to fill with the current PWM state
+ */
+static inline void pwm_get_state(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				 struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	*state = pwm->state;
+}
+
+/**
+ * pwm_get_default_state() - retrieve the default PWM state
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ * @state: state to fill with the default PWM state
+ */
+static inline void pwm_get_default_state(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+					 struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	*state = pwm->default_state;
+}
+
 /**
  * struct pwm_ops - PWM controller operations
  * @request: optional hook for requesting a PWM
@@ -179,6 +203,7 @@ static inline enum pwm_polarity pwm_get_polarity(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
  * @set_polarity: configure the polarity of this PWM
  * @enable: enable PWM output toggling
  * @disable: disable PWM output toggling
+ * @apply: atomically apply a new PWM config
  * @reset_state: reset the current PWM state (pwm->state) to the actual
  *		 hardware state. This function is only called once per
  *		 PWM device when the PWM chip is registered.
@@ -194,6 +219,8 @@ struct pwm_ops {
 			    enum pwm_polarity polarity);
 	int (*enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm);
 	void (*disable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm);
+	int (*apply)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+		     const struct pwm_state *state);
 	void (*reset_state)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 	void (*dbg_show)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s);
-- 
1.9.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-21  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-21  9:33 [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21 18:20   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-09-22  6:36   ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-09-22 21:49   ` Lee Jones
2015-11-07  2:35   ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] pwm: define a new pwm_state struct Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to " Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period Boris Brezillon
2015-09-22 22:12   ` Lee Jones
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] pwm: declare a default PWM state Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21 21:13   ` Mark Brown
2015-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field Boris Brezillon
2015-09-21 21:10   ` Mark Brown
2015-09-21 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Heiko Stübner
2015-10-09 21:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-10 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 pre-03/12] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled() Boris Brezillon
2015-10-19 10:12 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Heiko Stübner
2015-11-10 17:34   ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-10 18:26     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-01-25 16:28     ` Doug Anderson
2016-01-25 17:08       ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-25 17:55         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-01-25 18:51         ` Doug Anderson
2016-02-03 14:53           ` Thierry Reding
2016-02-03 19:04             ` Doug Anderson
2016-02-04 11:02               ` Mark Brown
2016-02-04 14:01                 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-02-23 14:57                   ` Thierry Reding
2016-02-22 16:27               ` Doug Anderson
2016-02-22 17:59               ` Thierry Reding
2016-02-22 19:15                 ` Doug Anderson
2016-02-22 21:24                   ` Mark Brown
2016-02-23  3:03                     ` Doug Anderson
2016-02-23 14:38                   ` Thierry Reding
2016-02-23 17:35                     ` Doug Anderson
2016-02-23 18:14                       ` Thierry Reding
2016-02-23 18:42                         ` Doug Anderson
2016-02-25 23:14                           ` Doug Anderson
2016-03-07 16:34                             ` Doug Anderson
2016-03-10 17:54                               ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-11  9:51                                 ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1442828009-6241-8-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@zonque.org \
    --cc=dianders@google.com \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).