linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: fix ftrace misleading comments for arch using it
@ 2015-12-06  2:02 Li Bin
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ia64: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code Li Bin
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Bin @ 2015-12-06  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rostedt, mingo
  Cc: linux-kernel, Li Bin, Tony Luck, Fenghua Yu, linux-ia64,
	James Hogan, linux-metag, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev, linux-sh, Thomas Gleixner, x86

Fix the following similar misleading comments of ftrace for arch
ia64/metag/powerpc/sh/x86:

Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
 disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
 as well as code changing. We do this by using the
 probe_kernel_* functions.

No real locking needed, this code is run through
kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
"Cc: H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org

Li Bin (5):
  ia64: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  metag: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  powerpc: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  sh: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct

 arch/ia64/kernel/ftrace.c    |   12 +++++-------
 arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c   |   11 +++++------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c |   12 +++++-------
 arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c      |   12 +++++-------
 arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c     |   12 +++++-------
 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/5] ia64: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  2015-12-06  2:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: fix ftrace misleading comments for arch using it Li Bin
@ 2015-12-06  2:02 ` Li Bin
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] metag: " Li Bin
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Bin @ 2015-12-06  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rostedt, mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, Li Bin, Tony Luck, Fenghua Yu, linux-ia64

There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
ignored by ftrace.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
 arch/ia64/kernel/ftrace.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/ftrace.c
index 3b0c2aa..cee411e 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -97,13 +97,11 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, unsigned char *old_code,
 	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
 
 	/*
-	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
-	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
-	 *  as well as code changing. We do this by using the
-	 *  probe_kernel_* functions.
-	 *
-	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
-	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
+	 * Note:
+	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
+	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
+	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
+	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
 	 */
 
 	if (!do_check)
-- 
1.7.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/5] metag: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  2015-12-06  2:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: fix ftrace misleading comments for arch using it Li Bin
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ia64: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code Li Bin
@ 2015-12-06  2:02 ` Li Bin
  2015-12-23 17:33   ` Steven Rostedt
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: " Li Bin
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Bin @ 2015-12-06  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rostedt, mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, Li Bin, James Hogan, linux-metag

There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
ignored by ftrace.

Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
 arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c |   11 +++++------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
index ed1d685..ac8c039 100644
--- a/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -54,12 +54,11 @@ static int ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long pc, unsigned char *old_code,
 	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
 
 	/*
-	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
-	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
-	 *  as well as code changing.
-	 *
-	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
-	 * kstop_machine.
+	 * Note:
+	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
+	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
+	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
+	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
 	 */
 
 	/* read the text we want to modify */
-- 
1.7.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  2015-12-06  2:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: fix ftrace misleading comments for arch using it Li Bin
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ia64: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code Li Bin
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] metag: " Li Bin
@ 2015-12-06  2:02 ` Li Bin
  2015-12-23 17:34   ` Steven Rostedt
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sh: " Li Bin
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct Li Bin
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Bin @ 2015-12-06  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rostedt, mingo
  Cc: linux-kernel, Li Bin, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev

There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
ignored by ftrace.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
index 44d4d8e..83e3c88 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -47,13 +47,11 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, unsigned int old, unsigned int new)
 	unsigned int replaced;
 
 	/*
-	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
-	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
-	 *  as well as code changing. We do this by using the
-	 *  probe_kernel_* functions.
-	 *
-	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
-	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
+	 * Note:
+	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
+	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
+	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
+	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
 	 */
 
 	/* read the text we want to modify */
-- 
1.7.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 4/5] sh: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  2015-12-06  2:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: fix ftrace misleading comments for arch using it Li Bin
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: " Li Bin
@ 2015-12-06  2:02 ` Li Bin
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct Li Bin
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Bin @ 2015-12-06  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rostedt, mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, Li Bin, linux-sh

There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
ignored by ftrace.

Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
 arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c
index 079d70e..38993e0 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -212,13 +212,11 @@ static int ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, unsigned char *old_code,
 	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
 
 	/*
-	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
-	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
-	 *  as well as code changing. We do this by using the
-	 *  probe_kernel_* functions.
-	 *
-	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
-	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
+	 * Note:
+	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
+	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
+	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
+	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
 	 */
 
 	/* read the text we want to modify */
-- 
1.7.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct
  2015-12-06  2:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: fix ftrace misleading comments for arch using it Li Bin
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sh: " Li Bin
@ 2015-12-06  2:02 ` Li Bin
  2015-12-23 17:37   ` Steven Rostedt
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Bin @ 2015-12-06  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rostedt, mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, Li Bin, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, x86

There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
ignored by ftrace.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
index 311bcf3..db0f6b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -106,13 +106,11 @@ ftrace_modify_code_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned const char *old_code,
 	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
 
 	/*
-	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
-	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
-	 *  as well as code changing. We do this by using the
-	 *  probe_kernel_* functions.
-	 *
-	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
-	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
+	 * Note:
+	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
+	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
+	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
+	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
 	 */
 
 	/* read the text we want to modify */
-- 
1.7.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] metag: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] metag: " Li Bin
@ 2015-12-23 17:33   ` Steven Rostedt
  2015-12-23 17:39     ` James Hogan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-12-23 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Bin; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel, James Hogan, linux-metag

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:55 +0800
Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:

> There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
> case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
> a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
> code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
> from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
> modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
> be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
> And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
> by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
> ignored by ftrace.
> 
> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>

Hi, can I get a metag maintainer to ack this. Or you can take the patch
too.

-- Steve

> ---
>  arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c |   11 +++++------
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
> index ed1d685..ac8c039 100644
> --- a/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -54,12 +54,11 @@ static int ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long pc, unsigned char *old_code,
>  	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
> -	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
> -	 *  as well as code changing.
> -	 *
> -	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
> -	 * kstop_machine.
> +	 * Note:
> +	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
> +	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
> +	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
> +	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
>  	 */
>  
>  	/* read the text we want to modify */


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: " Li Bin
@ 2015-12-23 17:34   ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-12-23 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Bin
  Cc: mingo, linux-kernel, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:56 +0800
Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:

> There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
> case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
> a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
> code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
> from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
> modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
> be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
> And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
> by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
> ignored by ftrace.
> 
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>

Hi, can I get a POWERPC maintainer to ack this, or you can take it too.

-- Steve

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c |   12 +++++-------
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 44d4d8e..83e3c88 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -47,13 +47,11 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, unsigned int old, unsigned int new)
>  	unsigned int replaced;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
> -	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
> -	 *  as well as code changing. We do this by using the
> -	 *  probe_kernel_* functions.
> -	 *
> -	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
> -	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
> +	 * Note:
> +	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
> +	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
> +	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
> +	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
>  	 */
>  
>  	/* read the text we want to modify */


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct
  2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct Li Bin
@ 2015-12-23 17:37   ` Steven Rostedt
  2015-12-29 13:35     ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-12-23 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Bin; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, x86

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:58 +0800
Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:

> There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
> case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
> a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
> code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
> from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
> modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
> be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
> And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
> by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
> ignored by ftrace.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c |   12 +++++-------
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 311bcf3..db0f6b1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -106,13 +106,11 @@ ftrace_modify_code_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned const char *old_code,
>  	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
> -	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
> -	 *  as well as code changing. We do this by using the
> -	 *  probe_kernel_* functions.
> -	 *
> -	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
> -	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
> +	 * Note:
> +	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
> +	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
> +	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
> +	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
>  	 */

Thomas,

This has been now fixed. You want to ack it and I take it, or can you
take it. Or is there something else that should be fixed?

-- Steve

>  
>  	/* read the text we want to modify */


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] metag: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code
  2015-12-23 17:33   ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2015-12-23 17:39     ` James Hogan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: James Hogan @ 2015-12-23 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Li Bin, mingo, linux-kernel, linux-metag

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2323 bytes --]

Hi Steven,

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:33:46PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:55 +0800
> Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> > There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
> > case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
> > a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
> > code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
> > from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any
> > modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions
> > be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well.
> > And by now, __init section codes should not been modified
> > by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and
> > ignored by ftrace.
> > 
> > Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> > Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
> > Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
> 
> Hi, can I get a metag maintainer to ack this. Or you can take the patch
> too.

Yep, sorry for the delay,

Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>

Cheers
James

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c |   11 +++++------
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
> > index ed1d685..ac8c039 100644
> > --- a/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/metag/kernel/ftrace.c
> > @@ -54,12 +54,11 @@ static int ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long pc, unsigned char *old_code,
> >  	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
> > -	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
> > -	 *  as well as code changing.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
> > -	 * kstop_machine.
> > +	 * Note:
> > +	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
> > +	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
> > +	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
> > +	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
> >  	 */
> >  
> >  	/* read the text we want to modify */
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct
  2015-12-23 17:37   ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2015-12-29 13:35     ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2015-12-29 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Li Bin, mingo, linux-kernel, H. Peter Anvin, x86

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:58 +0800
> Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > index 311bcf3..db0f6b1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > @@ -106,13 +106,11 @@ ftrace_modify_code_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned const char *old_code,
> >  	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
> > -	 *  disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
> > -	 *  as well as code changing. We do this by using the
> > -	 *  probe_kernel_* functions.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
> > -	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
> > +	 * Note:
> > +	 * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug was to happen, it
> > +	 * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
> > +	 * Carefully read and modify the code with probe_kernel_*(), and make
> > +	 * sure what we read is what we expected it to be before modifying it.
> >  	 */
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> This has been now fixed. You want to ack it and I take it, or can you
> take it. Or is there something else that should be fixed?

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-29 13:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-06  2:02 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: fix ftrace misleading comments for arch using it Li Bin
2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ia64: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code Li Bin
2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] metag: " Li Bin
2015-12-23 17:33   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-23 17:39     ` James Hogan
2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: " Li Bin
2015-12-23 17:34   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sh: " Li Bin
2015-12-06  2:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code_direct Li Bin
2015-12-23 17:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-29 13:35     ` Thomas Gleixner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).