linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept Boris Brezillon
                   ` (23 more replies)
  0 siblings, 24 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Hello,

This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or IOW, the capability
to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period,
duty and polarity) in one go.

It also adds support for initial PWM state retrieval (or hardware
readout), which should allow smooth handover between the bootloader and
Linux. For example, critical PWM users (like critical regulators
controlled by a PWM) can query the current PWM state, and adapt the PWM
config without having to disable/enable the PWM, or abruptly change the
period/dutycyle/polarity config.

In this version, I dropped all patches converting PWM users and PWM
drivers to the atomic API in order to limit the number of patches and
ease review. I plan to send the remaining patches once these ones have
been accepted.

If you want to test the series, or see the big picture, you can have a
look at this branch [1].

Best Regards,

Boris

[1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-rk/tree/atomic-pwm

Changes since v5:
- fix bugs in pwm_apply_state() implementation
- drop already applied patches
- s/pstate/state/
- add pwm_apply_args() helper
- limit the series to core changes and required changes in PWM users code

Changes since v4:
- introduce pwm_args to expose per-board/platform config
- deprecate non-atomic APIs
- implement non-atomic functions as wrappers around atomic ones
- patch all PWM users to use the atomic API
- rename the ->reset_state() hook into ->get_state()
- drop most acks
- rework PWM config in the pwm-regulator driver
- patch sun4i and sti PWM drivers to support HW readout

Changes since v3:
- rebased on pwm/for-next after pulling 4.4-rc1
- replace direct access to pwm fields by pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers, thus
  fixing some build errors
- split changes to allow each maintainer to review/ack or take the
  modification through its subsystem

Changes since v2:
- rebased on top of 4.3-rc2
- reintroduced pwm-regulator patches

Changes since v1:
- dropped applied patches
- squashed Heiko's fixes into the rockchip driver changes
- made a few cosmetic changes
- added kerneldoc comments
- added Heiko's patch to display more information in debugfs
- dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately)

Boris Brezillon (23):
  pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept
  pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate
  clk: pwm: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  hwmon: pwm-fan: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  input: misc: max77693: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  leds: pwm: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  regulator: pwm: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  fbdev: ssd1307fb: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  backlight: pwm_bl: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  backlight: lp8788: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  backlight: lp855x: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  backlight: lm3630a: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from
    pwm_args
  input: misc: max8997: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from
    pwm_args
  input: misc: pwm-beeper: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from
    pwm_args
  drm: i915: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  ARM: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  pwm: keep PWM state in sync with hardware state
  pwm: introduce the pwm_state concept
  pwm: move the enabled/disabled info into pwm_state
  pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra
  pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update
  pwm: update documentation
  pwm: switch to the atomic API

Heiko Stübner (1):
  pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs

 Documentation/pwm.txt                |  30 +++-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c  |   6 +
 drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c                |  17 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c   |   6 +
 drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c              |  26 ++-
 drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c |  17 +-
 drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c  |   6 +
 drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c      |   6 +
 drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c              |  11 +-
 drivers/pwm/core.c                   | 214 ++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c           |   2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c                |   2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c        |   2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c       |   2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c                |   2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c              |   3 +-
 drivers/pwm/sysfs.c                  |  61 ++++---
 drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c    |  20 ++-
 drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c |   6 +
 drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c  |   6 +
 drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c  |   6 +
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c     |  10 +-
 drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c      |  11 +-
 include/linux/pwm.h                  | 335 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 24 files changed, 606 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-)

-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 01/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/24] pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate Boris Brezillon
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform
reference config (specified through the PWM lookup table, DT definition or
directly hardcoded in PWM drivers).

Create a pwm_args struct to store this reference config, so that PWM users
can differentiate the current config from the reference one.

Patch all places where pwm->args should be initialized. We keep the
pwm_set_polarity/period() calls until all PWM users are patched to
use pwm_args instead of pwm_get_period/polarity().

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c         | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c |  2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c      |  2 +-
 include/linux/pwm.h        | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 7c330ff..ac89529 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -128,6 +128,14 @@ static int pwm_device_request(struct pwm_device *pwm, const char *label)
 	set_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags);
 	pwm->label = label;
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: this should be removed as soon as all PWM users are
+	 * properly making use of pwm_args to initialize the PWM device.
+	 * If we don't get rid of it, then PWM state and hardware can be
+	 * desynchronized.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(pwm);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -146,12 +154,12 @@ of_pwm_xlate_with_flags(struct pwm_chip *pc, const struct of_phandle_args *args)
 	if (IS_ERR(pwm))
 		return pwm;
 
-	pwm_set_period(pwm, args->args[1]);
+	pwm->args.period = args->args[1];
 
 	if (args->args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
-		pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
+		pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
 	else
-		pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL);
+		pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
 
 	return pwm;
 }
@@ -172,7 +180,7 @@ of_pwm_simple_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc, const struct of_phandle_args *args)
 	if (IS_ERR(pwm))
 		return pwm;
 
-	pwm_set_period(pwm, args->args[1]);
+	pwm->args.period = args->args[1];
 
 	return pwm;
 }
@@ -736,13 +744,13 @@ struct pwm_device *pwm_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
 	if (!chip)
 		goto out;
 
+	pwm->args.period = chosen->period;
+	pwm->args.polarity = chosen->polarity;
+
 	pwm = pwm_request_from_chip(chip, chosen->index, con_id ?: dev_id);
 	if (IS_ERR(pwm))
 		goto out;
 
-	pwm_set_period(pwm, chosen->period);
-	pwm_set_polarity(pwm, chosen->polarity);
-
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&pwm_lookup_lock);
 	return pwm;
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
index a80c108..7d33542 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int clps711x_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* Store constant period value */
-	pwm_set_period(pwm, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, freq));
+	pwm->args.period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, freq);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
index cb2f702..58b709f 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ pxa_pwm_of_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc, const struct of_phandle_args *args)
 	if (IS_ERR(pwm))
 		return pwm;
 
-	pwm_set_period(pwm, args->args[0]);
+	pwm->args.period = args->args[0];
 
 	return pwm;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 6555f01..c8859b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity {
 	PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED,
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments
+ * @period: reference period
+ * @polarity: reference polarity
+ *
+ * This structure describes board-dependent arguments attached to a PWM
+ * device. Those arguments are usually retrieved from the PWM lookup table or
+ * DT definition.
+ * This should not be confused with the PWM state: PWM args don't represent
+ * the current PWM state, but the configuration the PWM user plans to use
+ * on this PWM device.
+ */
+struct pwm_args {
+	unsigned int period;
+	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
+};
+
 enum {
 	PWMF_REQUESTED = 1 << 0,
 	PWMF_ENABLED = 1 << 1,
@@ -91,6 +108,7 @@ enum {
  * @period: period of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
  * @duty_cycle: duty cycle of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
  * @polarity: polarity of the PWM signal
+ * @args: PWM arguments
  */
 struct pwm_device {
 	const char *label;
@@ -103,6 +121,8 @@ struct pwm_device {
 	unsigned int period;
 	unsigned int duty_cycle;
 	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
+
+	struct pwm_args args;
 };
 
 static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
@@ -142,6 +162,18 @@ static inline enum pwm_polarity pwm_get_polarity(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	return pwm ? pwm->polarity : PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
 }
 
+static inline void pwm_get_args(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				struct pwm_args *args)
+{
+	*args = pwm->args;
+}
+
+static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	pwm_set_period(pwm, pwm->args.period);
+	pwm_set_polarity(pwm, pwm->args.polarity);
+}
+
 /**
  * struct pwm_ops - PWM controller operations
  * @request: optional hook for requesting a PWM
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 02/24] pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:24   ` Joachim Eastwood
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/24] clk: pwm: use pwm_get_args() " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx
field. Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support
atomic update.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:

--->8---
virtual patch

@@
struct pwm_device *p;
expression e;
@@
(
-(p)->polarity = e;
+pwm_set_polarity(p, e);
|
-(p)->polarity
+pwm_get_polarity(p)
|
-(p)->period = e;
+pwm_set_period(p, e);
|
-(p)->period
+pwm_get_period(p)
|
-(p)->duty_cycle = e;
+pwm_set_duty_cycle(p, e);
|
-(p)->duty_cycle
+pwm_get_duty_cycle(p)
)
--->8---
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c          | 2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +-
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c        | 3 ++-
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
index 7101c70..bd0ebd0 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (pwm->period != period_ns) {
+	if (pwm_get_period(pwm) != period_ns) {
 		int clk_div;
 
 		/* changing the clk divisor, need to disable fisrt */
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
index 9861fed..19dc64c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 			   LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK(lpc18xx_data->duty_event),
 			   LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK_ALL);
 
-	if (pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) {
+	if (pwm_get_polarity(pwm) == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) {
 		set_event = lpc18xx_pwm->period_event;
 		clear_event = lpc18xx_data->duty_event;
 		res_action = LPC18XX_PWM_RES_SET;
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
index b7e6ecb..3e95090 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_config(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 		load_value, load_value,	match_value, match_value);
 
 	omap->pdata->set_pwm(omap->dm_timer,
-			      pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED,
+			      pwm_get_polarity(pwm) == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED,
 			      true,
 			      PWM_OMAP_DMTIMER_TRIGGER_OVERFLOW_AND_COMPARE);
 
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
index 67af9f6..03a99a5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
@@ -354,7 +354,8 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	val = sun4i_pwm_readl(pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 	for (i = 0; i < pwm->chip.npwm; i++)
 		if (!(val & BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, i)))
-			pwm->chip.pwms[i].polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
+			pwm_set_polarity(&pwm->chip.pwms[i],
+					 PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 03/24] clk: pwm: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/24] pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/24] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
(the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
lookup table) and real PWM state.

Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.

This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c b/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c
index 8830458..1630a1f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static int clk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct clk_init_data init;
 	struct clk_pwm *clk_pwm;
 	struct pwm_device *pwm;
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	const char *clk_name;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	int ret;
@@ -71,22 +72,28 @@ static int clk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(pwm))
 		return PTR_ERR(pwm);
 
-	if (!pwm->period) {
+	pwm_get_args(pwm, &pargs);
+	if (!pargs.period) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid PWM period\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &clk_pwm->fixed_rate))
-		clk_pwm->fixed_rate = NSEC_PER_SEC / pwm->period;
+		clk_pwm->fixed_rate = NSEC_PER_SEC / pargs.period;
 
-	if (pwm->period != NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_pwm->fixed_rate &&
-	    pwm->period != DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_pwm->fixed_rate)) {
+	if (pargs.period != NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_pwm->fixed_rate &&
+	    pargs.period != DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_pwm->fixed_rate)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 			"clock-frequency does not match PWM period\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	ret = pwm_config(pwm, (pwm->period + 1) >> 1, pwm->period);
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to the
+	 * atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(pwm);
+	ret = pwm_config(pwm, (pargs.period + 1) >> 1, pargs.period);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 04/24] hwmon: pwm-fan: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/24] clk: pwm: use pwm_get_args() " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/24] input: misc: max77693: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
(the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
lookup table) and real PWM state.

Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.

This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Kamil Debski <k.debski@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
index 3e23003..f9af393 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
@@ -40,15 +40,18 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
 
 static int  __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long pwm)
 {
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	unsigned long duty;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
+
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->lock);
 	if (ctx->pwm_value == pwm)
 		goto exit_set_pwm_err;
 
-	duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
-	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
+	duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (pargs.period - 1), MAX_PWM);
+	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pargs.period);
 	if (ret)
 		goto exit_set_pwm_err;
 
@@ -215,6 +218,7 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
 	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx;
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	struct device *hwmon;
 	int duty_cycle;
 	int ret;
@@ -233,11 +237,19 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx);
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to the
+	 * atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(ctx->pwm);
+
 	/* Set duty cycle to maximum allowed */
-	duty_cycle = ctx->pwm->period - 1;
+	pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
+
+	duty_cycle = pargs.period - 1;
 	ctx->pwm_value = MAX_PWM;
 
-	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, ctx->pwm->period);
+	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, pargs.period);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -303,14 +315,16 @@ static int pwm_fan_suspend(struct device *dev)
 static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	unsigned long duty;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (ctx->pwm_value == 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
-	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
+	pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
+	duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (pargs.period - 1), MAX_PWM);
+	ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pargs.period);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	return pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 05/24] input: misc: max77693: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/24] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/24] leds: pwm: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
(the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
lookup table) and real PWM state.

Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.

This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
index 6d96bff..29ddeb7 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
@@ -70,10 +70,13 @@ struct max77693_haptic {
 
 static int max77693_haptic_set_duty_cycle(struct max77693_haptic *haptic)
 {
-	int delta = (haptic->pwm_dev->period + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
+	int delta;
 	int error;
 
-	error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta, haptic->pwm_dev->period);
+	pwm_get_args(haptic->pwm_dev, &pargs);
+	delta = (pargs.period + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
+	error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta, pargs.period);
 	if (error) {
 		dev_err(haptic->dev, "failed to configure pwm: %d\n", error);
 		return error;
@@ -234,6 +237,7 @@ static int max77693_haptic_play_effect(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 				       struct ff_effect *effect)
 {
 	struct max77693_haptic *haptic = input_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	u64 period_mag_multi;
 
 	haptic->magnitude = effect->u.rumble.strong_magnitude;
@@ -245,7 +249,8 @@ static int max77693_haptic_play_effect(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 	 * The formula to convert magnitude to pwm_duty as follows:
 	 * - pwm_duty = (magnitude * pwm_period) / MAX_MAGNITUDE(0xFFFF)
 	 */
-	period_mag_multi = (u64)haptic->pwm_dev->period * haptic->magnitude;
+	pwm_get_args(haptic->pwm_dev, &pargs);
+	period_mag_multi = (u64)pargs.period * haptic->magnitude;
 	haptic->pwm_duty = (unsigned int)(period_mag_multi >>
 						MAX_MAGNITUDE_SHIFT);
 
@@ -329,6 +334,12 @@ static int max77693_haptic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(haptic->pwm_dev);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to the
+	 * atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(haptic->pwm_dev);
+
 	haptic->motor_reg = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "haptic");
 	if (IS_ERR(haptic->motor_reg)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get regulator\n");
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 06/24] leds: pwm: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/24] input: misc: max77693: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/24] regulator: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
(the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
lookup table) and real PWM state.

Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.

This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
index 4783bac..a9145aa 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
 		       struct led_pwm *led, struct device_node *child)
 {
 	struct led_pwm_data *led_data = &priv->leds[priv->num_leds];
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	int ret;
 
 	led_data->active_low = led->active_low;
@@ -117,7 +118,15 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
 	else
 		led_data->cdev.brightness_set_blocking = led_pwm_set_blocking;
 
-	led_data->period = pwm_get_period(led_data->pwm);
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to the
+	 * atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(led_data->pwm);
+
+	pwm_get_args(led_data->pwm, &pargs);
+
+	led_data->period = pargs.period;
 	if (!led_data->period && (led->pwm_period_ns > 0))
 		led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns;
 
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 07/24] regulator: pwm: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/24] leds: pwm: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-15  6:54   ` Mark Brown
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/24] fbdev: ssd1307fb: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
(the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
lookup table) and real PWM state.

Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.

This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
index 4689d62..ffdb895 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
@@ -59,16 +59,16 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 					 unsigned selector)
 {
 	struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	unsigned int pwm_reg_period;
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	int dutycycle;
 	int ret;
 
-	pwm_reg_period = pwm_get_period(drvdata->pwm);
+	pwm_get_args(drvdata->pwm, &pargs);
 
-	dutycycle = (pwm_reg_period *
+	dutycycle = (pargs.period *
 		    drvdata->duty_cycle_table[selector].dutycycle) / 100;
 
-	ret = pwm_config(drvdata->pwm, dutycycle, pwm_reg_period);
+	ret = pwm_config(drvdata->pwm, dutycycle, pargs.period);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&rdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -138,13 +138,15 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 {
 	struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
 	unsigned int ramp_delay = rdev->constraints->ramp_delay;
-	unsigned int period = pwm_get_period(drvdata->pwm);
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	int duty_cycle;
 	int ret;
 
+	pwm_get_args(drvdata->pwm, &pargs);
 	duty_cycle = pwm_voltage_to_duty_cycle_percentage(rdev, min_uV);
 
-	ret = pwm_config(drvdata->pwm, (period / 100) * duty_cycle, period);
+	ret = pwm_config(drvdata->pwm, (pargs.period / 100) * duty_cycle,
+			 pargs.period);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&rdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -281,6 +283,12 @@ static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(drvdata->pwm);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to the
+	 * atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(drvdata->pwm);
+
 	regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev,
 					    &drvdata->desc, &config);
 	if (IS_ERR(regulator)) {
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 08/24] fbdev: ssd1307fb: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/24] regulator: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/24] backlight: pwm_bl: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
(the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
lookup table) and real PWM state.

Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.

This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
index fa34808..652f688 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
 {
 	int ret;
 	u32 precharge, dclk, com_invdir, compins;
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 
 	if (par->device_info->need_pwm) {
 		par->pwm = pwm_get(&par->client->dev, NULL);
@@ -294,7 +295,15 @@ static int ssd1307fb_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
 			return PTR_ERR(par->pwm);
 		}
 
-		par->pwm_period = pwm_get_period(par->pwm);
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+		 * the atomic PWM API.
+		 */
+		pwm_apply_args(par->pwm);
+
+		pwm_get_args(par->pwm, &pargs);
+
+		par->pwm_period = pargs.period;
 		/* Enable the PWM */
 		pwm_config(par->pwm, par->pwm_period / 2, par->pwm_period);
 		pwm_enable(par->pwm);
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 09/24] backlight: pwm_bl: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/24] fbdev: ssd1307fb: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/24] backlight: lp8788: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args Boris Brezillon
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
(the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
lookup table) and real PWM state.

Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.

This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has
just been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index a33a290..b2b366b 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	struct pwm_bl_data *pb;
 	int initial_blank = FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!data) {
@@ -307,12 +308,19 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "got pwm for backlight\n");
 
 	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+	 * the atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(pb->pwm);
+
+	/*
 	 * The DT case will set the pwm_period_ns field to 0 and store the
 	 * period, parsed from the DT, in the PWM device. For the non-DT case,
 	 * set the period from platform data if it has not already been set
 	 * via the PWM lookup table.
 	 */
-	pb->period = pwm_get_period(pb->pwm);
+	pwm_get_args(pb->pwm, &pargs);
+	pb->period = pargs.period;
 	if (!pb->period && (data->pwm_period_ns > 0))
 		pb->period = data->pwm_period_ns;
 
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 10/24] backlight: lp8788: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/24] backlight: pwm_bl: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/24] backlight: lp855x: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
in pwm_args.

This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
use of it.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c
index 5d583d7..cf869ec 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c
@@ -145,6 +145,12 @@ static void lp8788_pwm_ctrl(struct lp8788_bl *bl, int br, int max_br)
 		}
 
 		bl->pwm = pwm;
+
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+		 * the atomic PWM API.
+		 */
+		pwm_apply_args(pwm);
 	}
 
 	pwm_config(bl->pwm, duty, period);
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 11/24] backlight: lp855x: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/24] backlight: lp8788: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/24] backlight: lm3630a: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
in pwm_args.

This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
use of it.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
index daca9e6..e5b14f5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
@@ -246,6 +246,12 @@ static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
 			return;
 
 		lp->pwm = pwm;
+
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+		 * the atomic PWM API.
+		 */
+		pwm_apply_args(pwm);
 	}
 
 	pwm_config(lp->pwm, duty, period);
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 12/24] backlight: lm3630a: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/24] backlight: lp855x: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/24] input: misc: max8997: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
in pwm_args.

This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
use of it.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
index 3d16bd6..60d6c2a 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
@@ -424,6 +424,12 @@ static int lm3630a_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 			dev_err(&client->dev, "fail : get pwm device\n");
 			return PTR_ERR(pchip->pwmd);
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+		 * the atomic PWM API.
+		 */
+		pwm_apply_args(pchip->pwmd);
 	}
 
 	/* interrupt enable  : irq 0 is not allowed */
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 13/24] input: misc: max8997: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/24] backlight: lm3630a: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-17 12:45   ` Dmitry Torokhov
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/24] input: misc: pwm-beeper: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
in pwm_args.

This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
use of it.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
index a806ba3..bf17f65 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
@@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static int max8997_haptic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				error);
 			goto err_free_mem;
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+		 * the atomic PWM API.
+		 */
+		pwm_apply_args(chip->pwm);
 		break;
 
 	default:
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 14/24] input: misc: pwm-beeper: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/24] input: misc: max8997: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/24] drm: i915: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
in pwm_args.

This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
use of it.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c b/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c
index f2261ab..8d71332 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c
@@ -87,6 +87,12 @@ static int pwm_beeper_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_free;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+	 * the atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(beeper->pwm);
+
 	beeper->input = input_allocate_device();
 	if (!beeper->input) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to allocate input device\n");
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 15/24] drm: i915: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/24] input: misc: pwm-beeper: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/24] ARM: " Boris Brezillon
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
in pwm_args.

This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
use of it.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index 21ee647..dc3a2e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -1640,6 +1640,12 @@ static int pwm_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+	 * the atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(panel->backlight.pwm);
+
 	retval = pwm_config(panel->backlight.pwm, CRC_PMIC_PWM_PERIOD_NS,
 			    CRC_PMIC_PWM_PERIOD_NS);
 	if (retval < 0) {
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 16/24] ARM: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/24] drm: i915: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-15  8:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/24] pwm: keep PWM state in sync with hardware state Boris Brezillon
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
in pwm_args.

This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
use of it.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c
index 774c982..25a139b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c
@@ -496,6 +496,12 @@ static int rx1950_backlight_init(struct device *dev)
 		return PTR_ERR(lcd_pwm);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
+	 * the atomic PWM API.
+	 */
+	pwm_apply_args(lcd_pwm);
+
 	rx1950_lcd_power(1);
 	rx1950_bl_power(1);
 
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 17/24] pwm: keep PWM state in sync with hardware state
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/24] ARM: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 18/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_state concept Boris Brezillon
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Before the introduction of pwm_args, the core was resetting the PWM period
and polarity states to the reference values (those provided through the
DT, a PWM lookup table or hardcoded in the driver).

Now that all PWM users are correctly using pwm_args to configure their
PWM device, we can safely remove the pwm_apply_args() call in
pwm_device_request().

We can also get rid of the pwm_set_period() call done in
pwm_apply_args(), because PWM users are now directly using pargs->period
instead of pwm_get_period(). By doing that we avoid messing with the
current PWM period.

The only remaining bit in pwm_apply_args() is the initial polarity
setting, and it should go away when all PWM users have been patched to
use the atomic API (with this API the polarity will be set along with
other PWM arguments when configuring the PWM).

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c  | 8 --------
 include/linux/pwm.h | 1 -
 2 files changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index ac89529..26c3cf5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -128,14 +128,6 @@ static int pwm_device_request(struct pwm_device *pwm, const char *label)
 	set_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags);
 	pwm->label = label;
 
-	/*
-	 * FIXME: this should be removed as soon as all PWM users are
-	 * properly making use of pwm_args to initialize the PWM device.
-	 * If we don't get rid of it, then PWM state and hardware can be
-	 * desynchronized.
-	 */
-	pwm_apply_args(pwm);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index c8859b7..2f500a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ static inline void pwm_get_args(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	pwm_set_period(pwm, pwm->args.period);
 	pwm_set_polarity(pwm, pwm->args.polarity);
 }
 
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 18/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_state concept
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/24] pwm: keep PWM state in sync with hardware state Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 19/24] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info into pwm_state Boris Brezillon
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

The PWM state, represented by its period, duty_cycle and polarity,
is currently directly stored in the PWM device.
Declare a pwm_state structure embedding those field so that we can later
use this struct to atomically update all the PWM parameters at once.

All pwm_get_xxx() helpers are now implemented as wrappers around
pwm_get_state().

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c  |  8 ++++----
 include/linux/pwm.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 26c3cf5..59bcece 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ int pwmchip_add_with_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 		pwm->chip = chip;
 		pwm->pwm = chip->base + i;
 		pwm->hwpwm = i;
-		pwm->polarity = polarity;
+		pwm->state.polarity = polarity;
 
 		radix_tree_insert(&pwm_tree, pwm->pwm, pwm);
 	}
@@ -446,8 +446,8 @@ int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	pwm->duty_cycle = duty_ns;
-	pwm->period = period_ns;
+	pwm->state.duty_cycle = duty_ns;
+	pwm->state.period = period_ns;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm, enum pwm_polarity polarity)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	pwm->polarity = polarity;
+	pwm->state.polarity = polarity;
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 2f500a5..3022c05 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -97,6 +97,18 @@ enum {
 	PWMF_EXPORTED = 1 << 2,
 };
 
+/*
+ * struct pwm_state - state of a PWM channel
+ * @period: PWM period (in nanoseconds)
+ * @duty_cycle: PWM duty cycle (in nanoseconds)
+ * @polarity: PWM polarity
+ */
+struct pwm_state {
+	unsigned int period;
+	unsigned int duty_cycle;
+	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
+};
+
 /**
  * struct pwm_device - PWM channel object
  * @label: name of the PWM device
@@ -105,10 +117,8 @@ enum {
  * @pwm: global index of the PWM device
  * @chip: PWM chip providing this PWM device
  * @chip_data: chip-private data associated with the PWM device
- * @period: period of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
- * @duty_cycle: duty cycle of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
- * @polarity: polarity of the PWM signal
  * @args: PWM arguments
+ * @state: curent PWM channel state
  */
 struct pwm_device {
 	const char *label;
@@ -118,13 +128,21 @@ struct pwm_device {
 	struct pwm_chip *chip;
 	void *chip_data;
 
-	unsigned int period;
-	unsigned int duty_cycle;
-	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
-
 	struct pwm_args args;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 };
 
+/**
+ * pwm_get_state() - retrieve the current PWM state
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ * @state: state to fill with the current PWM state
+ */
+static inline void pwm_get_state(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				 struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	*state = pwm->state;
+}
+
 static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
 	return test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags);
@@ -133,23 +151,31 @@ static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period)
 {
 	if (pwm)
-		pwm->period = period;
+		pwm->state.period = period;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	return pwm ? pwm->period : 0;
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+
+	return state.period;
 }
 
 static inline void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty)
 {
 	if (pwm)
-		pwm->duty_cycle = duty;
+		pwm->state.duty_cycle = duty;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	return pwm ? pwm->duty_cycle : 0;
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+
+	return state.duty_cycle;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -159,7 +185,11 @@ int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm, enum pwm_polarity polarity);
 
 static inline enum pwm_polarity pwm_get_polarity(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	return pwm ? pwm->polarity : PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+
+	return state.polarity;
 }
 
 static inline void pwm_get_args(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 19/24] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info into pwm_state
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 18/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_state concept Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 20/24] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Prepare the transition to PWM atomic update by moving the enabled/disabled
state into the pwm_state struct. This way we can easily update the whole
PWM state by copying the new state in the ->state field.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c  | 13 +++++++++----
 include/linux/pwm.h | 11 ++++++++---
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 59bcece..c2759bc 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -499,10 +499,10 @@ int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	if (!pwm)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) {
+	if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
 		err = pwm->chip->ops->enable(pwm->chip, pwm);
-		if (err)
-			clear_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags);
+		if (!err)
+			pwm->state.enabled = true;
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -515,8 +515,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_enable);
  */
 void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	if (pwm && test_and_clear_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags))
+	if (!pwm)
+		return;
+
+	if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
 		pwm->chip->ops->disable(pwm->chip, pwm);
+		pwm->state.enabled = false;
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_disable);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 3022c05..7bfeacf 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ struct pwm_args {
 
 enum {
 	PWMF_REQUESTED = 1 << 0,
-	PWMF_ENABLED = 1 << 1,
-	PWMF_EXPORTED = 1 << 2,
+	PWMF_EXPORTED = 1 << 1,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -102,11 +101,13 @@ enum {
  * @period: PWM period (in nanoseconds)
  * @duty_cycle: PWM duty cycle (in nanoseconds)
  * @polarity: PWM polarity
+ * @enabled: PWM enabled status
  */
 struct pwm_state {
 	unsigned int period;
 	unsigned int duty_cycle;
 	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
+	bool enabled;
 };
 
 /**
@@ -145,7 +146,11 @@ static inline void pwm_get_state(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	return test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags);
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+
+	return state.enabled;
 }
 
 static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period)
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 20/24] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 19/24] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info into pwm_state Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 21/24] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Add a ->get_state() function to the pwm_ops struct to let PWM drivers
initialize the PWM state attached to a PWM device.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c  |  3 +++
 include/linux/pwm.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index c2759bc..0e7f687 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ int pwmchip_add_with_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 		pwm->hwpwm = i;
 		pwm->state.polarity = polarity;
 
+		if (chip->ops->get_state)
+			chip->ops->get_state(chip, pwm, &pwm->state);
+
 		radix_tree_insert(&pwm_tree, pwm->pwm, pwm);
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 7bfeacf..73ca679 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -205,6 +205,29 @@ static inline void pwm_get_args(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
+	/*
+	 * PWM users calling pwm_apply_args() expect to have a fresh config
+	 * where the polarity and period are set according to pwm_args info.
+	 * The problem is, polarity can only be changed when the PWM is
+	 * disabled.
+	 *
+	 * PWM drivers supporting hardware readout may declare the PWM device
+	 * as enabled, and prevent polarity setting, which changes from the
+	 * existing behavior, where all PWM devices are declared as disabled
+	 * at startup (even if they are actually enabled), thus authorizing
+	 * polarity setting.
+	 *
+	 * Instead of setting ->enabled to false, we call pwm_disable()
+	 * before pwm_set_polarity() to ensure that everything is configured
+	 * as expected, and the PWM is really disabled when the user request
+	 * it.
+	 *
+	 * Note that PWM users requiring a smooth handover between the
+	 * bootloader and the kernel (like critical regulators controlled by
+	 * PWM devices) will have to switch to the atomic API and avoid calling
+	 * pwm_apply_args().
+	 */
+	pwm_disable(pwm);
 	pwm_set_polarity(pwm, pwm->args.polarity);
 }
 
@@ -216,6 +239,9 @@ static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
  * @set_polarity: configure the polarity of this PWM
  * @enable: enable PWM output toggling
  * @disable: disable PWM output toggling
+ * @get_state: get the current PWM state. This function is only
+ *	       called once per PWM device when the PWM chip is
+ *	       registered.
  * @dbg_show: optional routine to show contents in debugfs
  * @owner: helps prevent removal of modules exporting active PWMs
  */
@@ -228,6 +254,8 @@ struct pwm_ops {
 			    enum pwm_polarity polarity);
 	int (*enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm);
 	void (*disable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm);
+	void (*get_state)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			  struct pwm_state *state);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 	void (*dbg_show)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s);
 #endif
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 21/24] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 20/24] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 22/24] pwm: update documentation Boris Brezillon
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Add an ->apply() method to the pwm_ops struct to allow PWM drivers to
implement atomic update.
This method will be preferred over the ->enable(), ->disable() and
->config() methods if available.

Add the pwm_apply_state() function to the PWM user API.

Note that the pwm_apply_state() does not guarantee the atomicity of the
update operation, it all depends on the availability and implementation
of the ->apply() method.

pwm_enable/disable/set_polarity/config() are now implemented as wrappers
around the pwm_apply_state() function.

pwm_adjust_config() is allowing smooth handover between the bootloader
and the kernel. This function tries to adapt the current PWM state to
the PWM arguments coming from a PWM lookup table or a DT definition
without changing the duty_cycle/period proportion.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c  | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 include/linux/pwm.h | 269 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 0e7f687..112a696 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -226,6 +226,19 @@ void *pwm_get_chip_data(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_get_chip_data);
 
+static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_ops *ops)
+{
+	/* driver supports legacy, non-atomic operation */
+	if (ops->config && ops->enable && ops->disable)
+		return true;
+
+	/* driver supports atomic operation */
+	if (ops->apply)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /**
  * pwmchip_add_with_polarity() - register a new PWM chip
  * @chip: the PWM chip to add
@@ -244,8 +257,10 @@ int pwmchip_add_with_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->ops->config ||
-	    !chip->ops->enable || !chip->ops->disable || !chip->npwm)
+	if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!pwm_ops_check(chip->ops))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
@@ -431,102 +446,137 @@ void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_free);
 
 /**
- * pwm_config() - change a PWM device configuration
+ * pwm_apply_state() - atomically apply a new state to a PWM device
  * @pwm: PWM device
- * @duty_ns: "on" time (in nanoseconds)
- * @period_ns: duration (in nanoseconds) of one cycle
- *
- * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
+ * @state: new state to apply. This can be adjusted by the PWM driver
+ *	   if the requested config is not achievable, for example,
+ *	   ->duty_cycle and ->period might be approximated.
  */
-int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state)
 {
 	int err;
 
-	if (!pwm || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns <= 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
+	if (!pwm)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = pwm->chip->ops->config(pwm->chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
-	pwm->state.duty_cycle = duty_ns;
-	pwm->state.period = period_ns;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_config);
+	if (!memcmp(state, &pwm->state, sizeof(*state)))
+		return 0;
 
-/**
- * pwm_set_polarity() - configure the polarity of a PWM signal
- * @pwm: PWM device
- * @polarity: new polarity of the PWM signal
- *
- * Note that the polarity cannot be configured while the PWM device is
- * enabled.
- *
- * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
- */
-int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm, enum pwm_polarity polarity)
-{
-	int err;
+	if (pwm->chip->ops->apply) {
+		err = pwm->chip->ops->apply(pwm->chip, pwm, state);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 
-	if (!pwm || !pwm->chip->ops)
-		return -EINVAL;
+		pwm->state = *state;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: restore the initial state in case of error.
+		 */
+		if (state->polarity != pwm->state.polarity) {
+			if (!pwm->chip->ops->set_polarity)
+				return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+			/*
+			 * Changing the polarity of a running PWM is
+			 * only allowed when the PWM driver implements
+			 * ->apply().
+			 */
+			if (pwm->state.enabled) {
+				pwm->chip->ops->disable(pwm->chip, pwm);
+				pwm->state.enabled = false;
+			}
+
+			err = pwm->chip->ops->set_polarity(pwm->chip, pwm,
+							   state->polarity);
+			if (err)
+				return err;
+
+			pwm->state.polarity = state->polarity;
+		}
 
-	if (!pwm->chip->ops->set_polarity)
-		return -ENOSYS;
+		if (state->period != pwm->state.period ||
+		    state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle) {
+			err = pwm->chip->ops->config(pwm->chip, pwm,
+						     state->duty_cycle,
+						     state->period);
+			if (err)
+				return err;
 
-	if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
-		return -EBUSY;
+			pwm->state.duty_cycle = state->duty_cycle;
+			pwm->state.period = state->period;
+		}
 
-	err = pwm->chip->ops->set_polarity(pwm->chip, pwm, polarity);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+		if (state->enabled != pwm->state.enabled) {
+			if (state->enabled) {
+				err = pwm->chip->ops->enable(pwm->chip, pwm);
+				if (err)
+					return err;
+			} else {
+				pwm->chip->ops->disable(pwm->chip, pwm);
+			}
 
-	pwm->state.polarity = polarity;
+			pwm->state.enabled = state->enabled;
+		}
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_set_polarity);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_apply_state);
 
 /**
- * pwm_enable() - start a PWM output toggling
+ * pwm_adjust_config() - adjust the current PWM config to the PWM arguments
  * @pwm: PWM device
  *
- * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
+ * This function will adjust the PWM config to the PWM arguments provided
+ * by the DT or PWM lookup table. This is particularly useful to adapt
+ * the bootloader config to the Linux one.
  */
-int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
-	int err = 0;
+	struct pwm_state state;
+	struct pwm_args pargs;
 
-	if (!pwm)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	pwm_get_args(pwm, &pargs);
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+
+	/*
+	 * if the current period is zero this either means the PWM driver
+	 * does not support initial state retrieval or the PWM was not
+	 * configured.
+	 * In any case, we setup the new period and poloarity, and assign a
+	 * duty_cycle of 0.
+	 */
+	if (!state.period) {
+		state.duty_cycle = 0;
+		state.period = pargs.period;
+		state.polarity = pargs.polarity;
 
-	if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
-		err = pwm->chip->ops->enable(pwm->chip, pwm);
-		if (!err)
-			pwm->state.enabled = true;
+		return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
 	}
 
-	return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_enable);
+	/*
+	 * Adjust the PWM dutycycle/period based on the period value provided
+	 * in PWM args.
+	 */
+	if (pargs.period != state.period) {
+		u64 dutycycle = (u64)state.duty_cycle * pargs.period;
 
-/**
- * pwm_disable() - stop a PWM output toggling
- * @pwm: PWM device
- */
-void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
-{
-	if (!pwm)
-		return;
+		do_div(dutycycle, state.period);
+		state.duty_cycle = dutycycle;
+		state.period = pargs.period;
+	}
 
-	if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
-		pwm->chip->ops->disable(pwm->chip, pwm);
-		pwm->state.enabled = false;
+	/*
+	 * If the polarity changed, we should also change the dutycycle value.
+	 */
+	if (pargs.polarity != state.polarity) {
+		state.polarity = pargs.polarity;
+		state.duty_cycle = state.period - state.duty_cycle;
 	}
+
+	return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_disable);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_adjust_config);
 
 static struct pwm_chip *of_node_to_pwmchip(struct device_node *np)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 73ca679..2ec9200 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -5,59 +5,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
-struct pwm_device;
 struct seq_file;
-
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)
-/*
- * pwm_request - request a PWM device
- */
-struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label);
-
-/*
- * pwm_free - free a PWM device
- */
-void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm);
-
-/*
- * pwm_config - change a PWM device configuration
- */
-int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
-
-/*
- * pwm_enable - start a PWM output toggling
- */
-int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
-
-/*
- * pwm_disable - stop a PWM output toggling
- */
-void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
-#else
-static inline struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label)
-{
-	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
-}
-
-static inline void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm)
-{
-}
-
-static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
-{
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-
-static inline int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
-{
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-
-static inline void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
-{
-}
-#endif
-
 struct pwm_chip;
 
 /**
@@ -183,11 +131,6 @@ static inline unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	return state.duty_cycle;
 }
 
-/*
- * pwm_set_polarity - configure the polarity of a PWM signal
- */
-int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm, enum pwm_polarity polarity);
-
 static inline enum pwm_polarity pwm_get_polarity(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
 {
 	struct pwm_state state;
@@ -203,34 +146,6 @@ static inline void pwm_get_args(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	*args = pwm->args;
 }
 
-static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
-{
-	/*
-	 * PWM users calling pwm_apply_args() expect to have a fresh config
-	 * where the polarity and period are set according to pwm_args info.
-	 * The problem is, polarity can only be changed when the PWM is
-	 * disabled.
-	 *
-	 * PWM drivers supporting hardware readout may declare the PWM device
-	 * as enabled, and prevent polarity setting, which changes from the
-	 * existing behavior, where all PWM devices are declared as disabled
-	 * at startup (even if they are actually enabled), thus authorizing
-	 * polarity setting.
-	 *
-	 * Instead of setting ->enabled to false, we call pwm_disable()
-	 * before pwm_set_polarity() to ensure that everything is configured
-	 * as expected, and the PWM is really disabled when the user request
-	 * it.
-	 *
-	 * Note that PWM users requiring a smooth handover between the
-	 * bootloader and the kernel (like critical regulators controlled by
-	 * PWM devices) will have to switch to the atomic API and avoid calling
-	 * pwm_apply_args().
-	 */
-	pwm_disable(pwm);
-	pwm_set_polarity(pwm, pwm->args.polarity);
-}
-
 /**
  * struct pwm_ops - PWM controller operations
  * @request: optional hook for requesting a PWM
@@ -239,6 +154,10 @@ static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
  * @set_polarity: configure the polarity of this PWM
  * @enable: enable PWM output toggling
  * @disable: disable PWM output toggling
+ * @apply: atomically apply a new PWM config. The state argument
+ *	   should be adjusted with the real hardware config (if the
+ *	   approximate the period or duty_cycle value, state should
+ *	   reflect it)
  * @get_state: get the current PWM state. This function is only
  *	       called once per PWM device when the PWM chip is
  *	       registered.
@@ -254,6 +173,8 @@ struct pwm_ops {
 			    enum pwm_polarity polarity);
 	int (*enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm);
 	void (*disable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm);
+	int (*apply)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+		     struct pwm_state *state);
 	void (*get_state)(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 			  struct pwm_state *state);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
@@ -291,6 +212,115 @@ struct pwm_chip {
 };
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM)
+/* PWM user APIs */
+struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label);
+void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm);
+int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state);
+int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm);
+
+/**
+ * pwm_config() - change a PWM device configuration
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ * @duty_ns: "on" time (in nanoseconds)
+ * @period_ns: duration (in nanoseconds) of one cycle
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
+ */
+static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns,
+			     int period_ns)
+{
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	if (!pwm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	if (state.duty_cycle == duty_ns && state.period == period_ns)
+		return 0;
+
+	state.duty_cycle = duty_ns;
+	state.period = period_ns;
+	return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+}
+
+/**
+ * pwm_set_polarity() - configure the polarity of a PWM signal
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ * @polarity: new polarity of the PWM signal
+ *
+ * Note that the polarity cannot be configured while the PWM device is
+ * enabled.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
+ */
+static inline int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				   enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	if (!pwm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	if (state.polarity == polarity)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Changing the polarity of a running PWM without adjusting the
+	 * dutycycle/period value is a bit risky (can introduce glitches).
+	 * Return -EBUSY in this case.
+	 * Note that this is allowed when using pwm_apply_state() because
+	 * the user specifies all the parameters.
+	 */
+	if (state.enabled)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	state.polarity = polarity;
+	return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+}
+
+/**
+ * pwm_enable() - start a PWM output toggling
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
+ */
+static inline int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	if (!pwm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	if (state.enabled)
+		return 0;
+
+	state.enabled = true;
+	return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+}
+
+/**
+ * pwm_disable() - stop a PWM output toggling
+ * @pwm: PWM device
+ */
+static inline void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct pwm_state state;
+
+	if (!pwm)
+		return;
+
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	if (!state.enabled)
+		return;
+
+	state.enabled = false;
+	pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+}
+
+
+/* PWM provider APIs */
 int pwm_set_chip_data(struct pwm_device *pwm, void *data);
 void *pwm_get_chip_data(struct pwm_device *pwm);
 
@@ -316,6 +346,47 @@ void devm_pwm_put(struct device *dev, struct pwm_device *pwm);
 
 bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm);
 #else
+static inline struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label)
+{
+	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+}
+
+static inline void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+}
+
+static inline int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				  const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns,
+			     int period_ns)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static inline int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				   enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static inline void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+}
+
 static inline int pwm_set_chip_data(struct pwm_device *pwm, void *data)
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
@@ -387,6 +458,34 @@ static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	/*
+	 * PWM users calling pwm_apply_args() expect to have a fresh config
+	 * where the polarity and period are set according to pwm_args info.
+	 * The problem is, polarity can only be changed when the PWM is
+	 * disabled.
+	 *
+	 * PWM drivers supporting hardware readout may declare the PWM device
+	 * as enabled, and prevent polarity setting, which changes from the
+	 * existing behavior, where all PWM devices are declared as disabled
+	 * at startup (even if they are actually enabled), thus authorizing
+	 * polarity setting.
+	 *
+	 * Instead of setting ->enabled to false, we call pwm_disable()
+	 * before pwm_set_polarity() to ensure that everything is configured
+	 * as expected, and the PWM is really disabled when the user request
+	 * it.
+	 *
+	 * Note that PWM users requiring a smooth handover between the
+	 * bootloader and the kernel (like critical regulators controlled by
+	 * PWM devices) will have to switch to the atomic API and avoid calling
+	 * pwm_apply_args().
+	 */
+	pwm_disable(pwm);
+	pwm_set_polarity(pwm, pwm->args.polarity);
+}
+
 struct pwm_lookup {
 	struct list_head list;
 	const char *provider;
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 22/24] pwm: update documentation
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 21/24] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 23/24] pwm: switch to the atomic API Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 24/24] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Boris Brezillon
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Update the PWM subsystem documentation to reflect the atomic PWM changes.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 Documentation/pwm.txt | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/pwm.txt b/Documentation/pwm.txt
index ca895fd..789b27c 100644
--- a/Documentation/pwm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/pwm.txt
@@ -42,9 +42,26 @@ variants of these functions, devm_pwm_get() and devm_pwm_put(), also exist.
 
 After being requested, a PWM has to be configured using:
 
-int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
+int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state);
 
-To start/stop toggling the PWM output use pwm_enable()/pwm_disable().
+This API controls both the PWM period/duty_cycle config and the
+enable/disable state.
+
+The pwm_config(), pwm_enable() and pwm_disable() functions are just wrappers
+around pwm_apply_state() and should not be used if the user wants to change
+several parameter at once. For example, if you see pwm_config() and
+pwm_{enable,disable}() calls in the same function, this probably means you
+should switch to pwm_apply_state().
+
+The PWM user API also allows one to query the PWM state with pwm_get_state().
+
+In addition to the PWM state, the PWM API also exposes PWM arguments, which
+are the reference PWM config one should use on this PWM.
+PWM arguments are usually platform-specific and allows the PWM user to only
+care about dutycycle relatively to the full period (like, duty = 50% of the
+period). struct pwm_args contains 2 fields (period and polarity) and should
+be used to set the initial PWM config (usually done in the probe function
+of the PWM user). PWM arguments are retrieved with pwm_get_args().
 
 Using PWMs with the sysfs interface
 -----------------------------------
@@ -105,6 +122,15 @@ goes low for the remainder of the period. Conversely, a signal with inversed
 polarity starts low for the duration of the duty cycle and goes high for the
 remainder of the period.
 
+Drivers are encouraged to implement ->apply() instead of the legacy
+->enable(), ->disable() and ->config() methods. Doing that should provide
+atomicity in the PWM config workflow, which is required when the PWM controls
+a critical device (like a regulator).
+
+The implementation of ->get_state() (a method used to retrieve initial PWM
+state) is also encouraged for the same reason: letting the PWM user know
+about the current PWM state would allow him to avoid glitches.
+
 Locking
 -------
 
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 23/24] pwm: switch to the atomic API
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 22/24] pwm: update documentation Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 24/24] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Boris Brezillon
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

Replace legacy pwm_get/set_xxx() and pwm_config/enable/disable() calls
by pwm_get/apply_state().

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c  |  5 ++++-
 drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 112a696..aefffcf 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -947,13 +947,16 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < chip->npwm; i++) {
 		struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
+		struct pwm_state state;
+
+		pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
 
 		seq_printf(s, " pwm-%-3d (%-20.20s):", i, pwm->label);
 
 		if (test_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags))
 			seq_puts(s, " requested");
 
-		if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
+		if (state.enabled)
 			seq_puts(s, " enabled");
 
 		seq_puts(s, "\n");
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
index ab28c89..40daf1c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
@@ -47,13 +47,13 @@ static ssize_t period_show(struct device *child,
 {
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	const struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
-	unsigned int period;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	period = pwm_get_period(pwm);
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
 	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", period);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.period);
 }
 
 static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child,
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child,
 {
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 	unsigned int val;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -70,7 +71,9 @@ static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child,
 		return ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	ret = pwm_config(pwm, pwm_get_duty_cycle(pwm), val);
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	state.period = val;
+	ret = pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
 	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
 	return ret ? : size;
@@ -82,13 +85,13 @@ static ssize_t duty_cycle_show(struct device *child,
 {
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	const struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
-	unsigned int duty;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	duty = pwm_get_duty_cycle(pwm);
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
 	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", duty);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.duty_cycle);
 }
 
 static ssize_t duty_cycle_store(struct device *child,
@@ -97,6 +100,7 @@ static ssize_t duty_cycle_store(struct device *child,
 {
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 	unsigned int val;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -105,7 +109,9 @@ static ssize_t duty_cycle_store(struct device *child,
 		return ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	ret = pwm_config(pwm, val, pwm_get_period(pwm));
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	state.duty_cycle = val;
+	ret = pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
 	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
 	return ret ? : size;
@@ -117,13 +123,13 @@ static ssize_t enable_show(struct device *child,
 {
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	const struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
-	bool enabled;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	enabled = pwm_is_enabled(pwm);
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
 	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", enabled);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", state.enabled);
 }
 
 static ssize_t enable_store(struct device *child,
@@ -132,24 +138,20 @@ static ssize_t enable_store(struct device *child,
 {
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 	int val, ret;
 
 	ret = kstrtoint(buf, 0, &val);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (val != 0 && val != 1)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	switch (val) {
-	case 0:
-		pwm_disable(pwm);
-		break;
-	case 1:
-		ret = pwm_enable(pwm);
-		break;
-	default:
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		break;
-	}
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	state.enabled = val;
+	ret = pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
 	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
 	return ret ? : size;
@@ -162,9 +164,13 @@ static ssize_t polarity_show(struct device *child,
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	const struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
 	const char *polarity = "unknown";
+	struct pwm_state state;
 
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	switch (pwm_get_polarity(pwm)) {
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
+
+	switch (state.polarity) {
 	case PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL:
 		polarity = "normal";
 		break;
@@ -173,7 +179,6 @@ static ssize_t polarity_show(struct device *child,
 		polarity = "inversed";
 		break;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
 	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", polarity);
 }
@@ -185,6 +190,7 @@ static ssize_t polarity_store(struct device *child,
 	struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child);
 	struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
 	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (sysfs_streq(buf, "normal"))
@@ -195,7 +201,12 @@ static ssize_t polarity_store(struct device *child,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&export->lock);
-	ret = pwm_set_polarity(pwm, polarity);
+	pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+	state.polarity = polarity;
+	if (state.enabled)
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+	else
+		ret = pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
 	mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
 
 	return ret ? : size;
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 24/24] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs
  2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 23/24] pwm: switch to the atomic API Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:17 ` Boris Brezillon
  23 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber,
	Boris Brezillon

From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>

The pwm-states make it possible to also output the polarity, duty cycle
and period information in the debugfs pwm summary-outout.
This makes it easier to gather overview information about pwms without
needing to walk through the sysfs attributes of every pwm.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/core.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index aefffcf..9f4e97e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -959,6 +959,11 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s)
 		if (state.enabled)
 			seq_puts(s, " enabled");
 
+		seq_printf(s, " period:%uns", state.period);
+		seq_printf(s, " duty:%uns", state.duty_cycle);
+		seq_printf(s, " polarity:%s",
+			   state.polarity ? "inverse" : "normal");
+
 		seq_puts(s, "\n");
 	}
 }
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 02/24] pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/24] pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-14 19:24   ` Joachim Eastwood
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Joachim Eastwood @ 2016-04-14 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Boris Brezillon
  Cc: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	linux-clk, Mark Brown, Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors,
	Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input,
	Bryan Wu, Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds,
	Maxime Ripard, Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber

On 14 April 2016 at 21:17, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx
> field. Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support
> atomic update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:
>
> --->8---
> virtual patch
>
> @@
> struct pwm_device *p;
> expression e;
> @@
> (
> -(p)->polarity = e;
> +pwm_set_polarity(p, e);
> |
> -(p)->polarity
> +pwm_get_polarity(p)
> |
> -(p)->period = e;
> +pwm_set_period(p, e);
> |
> -(p)->period
> +pwm_get_period(p)
> |
> -(p)->duty_cycle = e;
> +pwm_set_duty_cycle(p, e);
> |
> -(p)->duty_cycle
> +pwm_get_duty_cycle(p)
> )
> --->8---
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c          | 2 +-
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c  | 2 +-

> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> index 9861fed..19dc64c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>                            LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK(lpc18xx_data->duty_event),
>                            LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK_ALL);
>
> -       if (pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) {
> +       if (pwm_get_polarity(pwm) == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) {
>                 set_event = lpc18xx_pwm->period_event;
>                 clear_event = lpc18xx_data->duty_event;
>                 res_action = LPC18XX_PWM_RES_SET;

For the lpc18xx-sct part:
Acked-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>


regards,
Joachim Eastwood

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 07/24] regulator: pwm: use pwm_get_args() where appropriate
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/24] regulator: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-15  6:54   ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2016-04-15  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Boris Brezillon
  Cc: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	linux-clk, Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 280 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:17:27PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config
> (the platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM
> lookup table) and real PWM state.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 16/24] ARM: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/24] ARM: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-15  8:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2016-04-15  8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Boris Brezillon, Thierry Reding, linux-pwm
  Cc: Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, Mark Brown,
	Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors, Jean Delvare,
	Guenter Roeck, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim, linux-samsung-soc,
	intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet,
	linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten,
	Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan, Milo Kim, Doug Anderson,
	Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber

On 04/14/2016 09:17 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
> polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
> in pwm_args.
> 
> This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
> soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
> use of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 13/24] input: misc: max8997: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/24] input: misc: max8997: " Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-04-17 12:45   ` Dmitry Torokhov
  2016-04-17 15:39     ` Boris Brezillon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2016-04-17 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Boris Brezillon
  Cc: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	linux-clk, Mark Brown, Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors,
	Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:17:33PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
> polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
> in pwm_args.
> 
> This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
> soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
> use of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
> index a806ba3..bf17f65 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static int max8997_haptic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				error);
>  			goto err_free_mem;
>  		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
> +		 * the atomic PWM API.
> +		 */
> +		pwm_apply_args(chip->pwm);

I do not understand. We did not fetch/modify any args, what are we
applying and why? Especially since we saying we want to remove this
later.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 13/24] input: misc: max8997: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args
  2016-04-17 12:45   ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2016-04-17 15:39     ` Boris Brezillon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-04-17 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dmitry Torokhov
  Cc: Thierry Reding, linux-pwm, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	linux-clk, Mark Brown, Liam Girdwood, Kamil Debski, lm-sensors,
	Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, linux-input, Bryan Wu,
	Richard Purdie, Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds, Maxime Ripard,
	Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-sunxi, Joachim Eastwood, Thomas Petazzoni,
	Heiko Stuebner, linux-rockchip, Jingoo Han, Lee Jones,
	linux-fbdev, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, Tomi Valkeinen,
	Robert Jarzmik, Alexandre Belloni, Kukjin Kim,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, intel-gfx, Daniel Vetter,
	Jani Nikula, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, Hartley Sweeten, Ryan Mallon, Alexander Shiyan,
	Milo Kim, Doug Anderson, Caesar Wang, Stephen Barber

Hi Dmitry,

On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 05:45:48 -0700
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:17:33PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Call pwm_apply_args() just after requesting the PWM device so that the
> > polarity and period are initialized according to the information provided
> > in pwm_args.
> > 
> > This is an intermediate state, and pwm_apply_args() should be dropped as
> > soon as the atomic PWM infrastructure is in place and the driver makes
> > use of it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
> > index a806ba3..bf17f65 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/max8997_haptic.c
> > @@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static int max8997_haptic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  				error);
> >  			goto err_free_mem;
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
> > +		 * the atomic PWM API.
> > +		 */
> > +		pwm_apply_args(chip->pwm);
> 
> I do not understand. We did not fetch/modify any args, what are we
> applying and why? Especially since we saying we want to remove this
> later.

This is part of the process to allow some PWM users to retrieve the
current PWM state instead of blindly applying a new config. This is
particularly useful when one want a smooth handover between the
bootloader and the kernel, and we have a real case here with a critical
regulator (controlling the DDR voltage) controlled by a PWM device:
the bootloader setup the PWM to 1.2V, and we want the kernel to
retrieve the current PWM config and adjust the duty_cycle according to
the PWM arguments provided by the DT definition.

So, now let's switch to the actual reason for calling pwm_apply_args()
directly from PWM users code. The operations done in pwm_apply_args()
were previously done by the core when the user was requesting the PWM.
Those operations consisted in initializing the PWM period and polarity
to the values specified in the DT or PWM lookup table (what we call
pwm_args).
This is working fine as long as we don't care about the initial PWM
state, but as explained above, that may no longer be the case. That's
why we want PWM users to explicitly state that they don't care about the
initial PWM state and want to apply the default state instead: 
period = pwm_args.period and polarity = pwm_args.polarity.

Once all PWM users have been patched to explicitly call
pwm_apply_args(), we'll be able to remove this call from the core
(patch 17), and let PWM drivers implement ->get_state() to provide
hardware readout (patch 20).

PWM users that are interested in adjusting existing PWM config to the
polarity and period specified in pwm_args will be able to do so instead
of calling pwm_apply_args(). And for those who just don't care about
initial state, they should just call pwm_apply_state() with the initial
state they expect instead of pwm_apply_args(), which is only partially
describing the PWM config (PWM args don't specify whether the PWM
should be disabled or enabled, and what duty_cycle to use).

Hope this clarifies a bit the situation.

Best Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-17 15:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-14 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/24] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/24] pwm: use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers where appropriate Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:24   ` Joachim Eastwood
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/24] clk: pwm: use pwm_get_args() " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/24] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/24] input: misc: max77693: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/24] leds: pwm: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/24] regulator: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15  6:54   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/24] fbdev: ssd1307fb: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/24] backlight: pwm_bl: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/24] backlight: lp8788: explicitly apply PWM config extracted from pwm_args Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/24] backlight: lp855x: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/24] backlight: lm3630a: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/24] input: misc: max8997: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-17 12:45   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-04-17 15:39     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/24] input: misc: pwm-beeper: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/24] drm: i915: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/24] ARM: " Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15  8:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/24] pwm: keep PWM state in sync with hardware state Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 18/24] pwm: introduce the pwm_state concept Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 19/24] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info into pwm_state Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 20/24] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 21/24] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 22/24] pwm: update documentation Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 23/24] pwm: switch to the atomic API Boris Brezillon
2016-04-14 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 24/24] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Boris Brezillon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).