* [PATCH 1/7] crypto : stylistic cleanup in sha1-mb
@ 2016-05-20 0:43 Megha Dey
2016-05-31 8:13 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Megha Dey @ 2016-05-20 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: herbert
Cc: tim.c.chen, davem, linux-crypto, linux-kernel, megha.dey,
fenghua.yu, Megha Dey
From: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Currently there are several checkpatch warnings in the sha1_mb.c file:
'WARNING: line over 80 characters' in the sha1_mb.c file. Also, the
syntax of some multi-line comments are not correct. This patch fixes
these issues.
Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/sha1_mb.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/sha1_mb.c b/arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/sha1_mb.c
index 081255c..dcafb8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/sha1_mb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/sha-mb/sha1_mb.c
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ struct sha1_mb_ctx {
struct mcryptd_ahash *mcryptd_tfm;
};
-static inline struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *cast_hash_to_mcryptd_ctx(struct sha1_hash_ctx *hash_ctx)
+static inline struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx
+ *cast_hash_to_mcryptd_ctx(struct sha1_hash_ctx *hash_ctx)
{
struct shash_desc *desc;
@@ -85,7 +86,8 @@ static inline struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *cast_hash_to_mcryptd_ctx(struct s
return container_of(desc, struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx, desc);
}
-static inline struct ahash_request *cast_mcryptd_ctx_to_req(struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *ctx)
+static inline struct ahash_request
+ *cast_mcryptd_ctx_to_req(struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *ctx)
{
return container_of((void *) ctx, struct ahash_request, __ctx);
}
@@ -97,10 +99,12 @@ static void req_ctx_init(struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *rctx,
}
static asmlinkage void (*sha1_job_mgr_init)(struct sha1_mb_mgr *state);
-static asmlinkage struct job_sha1* (*sha1_job_mgr_submit)(struct sha1_mb_mgr *state,
- struct job_sha1 *job);
-static asmlinkage struct job_sha1* (*sha1_job_mgr_flush)(struct sha1_mb_mgr *state);
-static asmlinkage struct job_sha1* (*sha1_job_mgr_get_comp_job)(struct sha1_mb_mgr *state);
+static asmlinkage struct job_sha1* (*sha1_job_mgr_submit)
+ (struct sha1_mb_mgr *state, struct job_sha1 *job);
+static asmlinkage struct job_sha1* (*sha1_job_mgr_flush)
+ (struct sha1_mb_mgr *state);
+static asmlinkage struct job_sha1* (*sha1_job_mgr_get_comp_job)
+ (struct sha1_mb_mgr *state);
inline void sha1_init_digest(uint32_t *digest)
{
@@ -131,7 +135,8 @@ inline uint32_t sha1_pad(uint8_t padblock[SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE * 2],
return i >> SHA1_LOG2_BLOCK_SIZE;
}
-static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr, struct sha1_hash_ctx *ctx)
+static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr,
+ struct sha1_hash_ctx *ctx)
{
while (ctx) {
if (ctx->status & HASH_CTX_STS_COMPLETE) {
@@ -177,8 +182,8 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr, str
ctx->job.buffer = (uint8_t *) buffer;
ctx->job.len = len;
- ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *) sha1_job_mgr_submit(&mgr->mgr,
- &ctx->job);
+ ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *)sha1_job_mgr_submit(&mgr->mgr,
+ &ctx->job);
continue;
}
}
@@ -191,13 +196,15 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr, str
if (ctx->status & HASH_CTX_STS_LAST) {
uint8_t *buf = ctx->partial_block_buffer;
- uint32_t n_extra_blocks = sha1_pad(buf, ctx->total_length);
+ uint32_t n_extra_blocks =
+ sha1_pad(buf, ctx->total_length);
ctx->status = (HASH_CTX_STS_PROCESSING |
HASH_CTX_STS_COMPLETE);
ctx->job.buffer = buf;
ctx->job.len = (uint32_t) n_extra_blocks;
- ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *) sha1_job_mgr_submit(&mgr->mgr, &ctx->job);
+ ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *)
+ sha1_job_mgr_submit(&mgr->mgr, &ctx->job);
continue;
}
@@ -208,14 +215,17 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr, str
return NULL;
}
-static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_get_comp_ctx(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr)
+static struct sha1_hash_ctx
+ *sha1_ctx_mgr_get_comp_ctx (struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr)
{
/*
* If get_comp_job returns NULL, there are no jobs complete.
- * If get_comp_job returns a job, verify that it is safe to return to the user.
+ * If get_comp_job returns a job, verify that it is safe to return to
+ * the user.
* If it is not ready, resubmit the job to finish processing.
* If sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit returned a job, it is ready to be returned.
- * Otherwise, all jobs currently being managed by the hash_ctx_mgr still need processing.
+ * Otherwise, all jobs currently being managed by the hash_ctx_mgr
+ * still need processing.
*/
struct sha1_hash_ctx *ctx;
@@ -235,7 +245,10 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr,
int flags)
{
if (flags & (~HASH_ENTIRE)) {
- /* User should not pass anything other than FIRST, UPDATE, or LAST */
+ /*
+ * User should not pass anything other than FIRST, UPDATE, or
+ * LAST
+ */
ctx->error = HASH_CTX_ERROR_INVALID_FLAGS;
return ctx;
}
@@ -264,14 +277,20 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr,
ctx->partial_block_buffer_length = 0;
}
- /* If we made it here, there were no errors during this call to submit */
+ /*
+ * If we made it here, there were no errors during this call to
+ * submit
+ */
ctx->error = HASH_CTX_ERROR_NONE;
/* Store buffer ptr info from user */
ctx->incoming_buffer = buffer;
ctx->incoming_buffer_length = len;
- /* Store the user's request flags and mark this ctx as currently being processed. */
+ /*
+ * Store the user's request flags and mark this ctx as currently
+ * being processed.
+ */
ctx->status = (flags & HASH_LAST) ?
(HASH_CTX_STS_PROCESSING | HASH_CTX_STS_LAST) :
HASH_CTX_STS_PROCESSING;
@@ -286,8 +305,12 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr,
* append as much as possible to the extra block.
*/
if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) | (len < SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE)) {
- /* Compute how many bytes to copy from user buffer into extra block */
- uint32_t copy_len = SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE - ctx->partial_block_buffer_length;
+ /*
+ * Compute how many bytes to copy from user buffer into
+ * extra block
+ */
+ uint32_t copy_len = SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE -
+ ctx->partial_block_buffer_length;
if (len < copy_len)
copy_len = len;
@@ -297,20 +320,28 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr,
buffer, copy_len);
ctx->partial_block_buffer_length += copy_len;
- ctx->incoming_buffer = (const void *)((const char *)buffer + copy_len);
+ ctx->incoming_buffer = (const void *)
+ ((const char *)buffer + copy_len);
ctx->incoming_buffer_length = len - copy_len;
}
- /* The extra block should never contain more than 1 block here */
+ /*
+ * The extra block should never contain more than 1 block
+ * here
+ */
assert(ctx->partial_block_buffer_length <= SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE);
- /* If the extra block buffer contains exactly 1 block, it can be hashed. */
+ /*
+ * If the extra block buffer contains exactly 1 block, it can
+ * be hashed.
+ */
if (ctx->partial_block_buffer_length >= SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE) {
ctx->partial_block_buffer_length = 0;
ctx->job.buffer = ctx->partial_block_buffer;
ctx->job.len = 1;
- ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *) sha1_job_mgr_submit(&mgr->mgr, &ctx->job);
+ ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *)
+ sha1_job_mgr_submit(&mgr->mgr, &ctx->job);
}
}
@@ -329,14 +360,15 @@ static struct sha1_hash_ctx *sha1_ctx_mgr_flush(struct sha1_ctx_mgr *mgr)
return NULL;
/*
- * If flush returned a job, resubmit the job to finish processing.
+ * If flush returned a job, resubmit the job to finish
+ * processing.
*/
ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit(mgr, ctx);
/*
- * If sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit returned a job, it is ready to be returned.
- * Otherwise, all jobs currently being managed by the sha1_ctx_mgr
- * still need processing. Loop.
+ * If sha1_ctx_mgr_resubmit returned a job, it is ready to be
+ * returned. Otherwise, all jobs currently being managed by the
+ * sha1_ctx_mgr still need processing. Loop.
*/
if (ctx)
return ctx;
@@ -394,9 +426,11 @@ static int sha_finish_walk(struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx **ret_rctx,
flag |= HASH_LAST;
}
- sha_ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *) shash_desc_ctx(&rctx->desc);
+ sha_ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *)
+ shash_desc_ctx(&rctx->desc);
kernel_fpu_begin();
- sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx, rctx->walk.data, nbytes, flag);
+ sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx,
+ rctx->walk.data, nbytes, flag);
if (!sha_ctx) {
if (flush)
sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_flush(cstate->mgr);
@@ -489,7 +523,7 @@ static int sha1_mb_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
unsigned int len)
{
struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *rctx =
- container_of(desc, struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx, desc);
+ container_of(desc, struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx, desc);
struct mcryptd_alg_cstate *cstate =
this_cpu_ptr(sha1_mb_alg_state.alg_cstate);
@@ -521,7 +555,8 @@ static int sha1_mb_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
sha_ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *) shash_desc_ctx(desc);
sha1_mb_add_list(rctx, cstate);
kernel_fpu_begin();
- sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx, rctx->walk.data, nbytes, HASH_UPDATE);
+ sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx, rctx->walk.data,
+ nbytes, HASH_UPDATE);
kernel_fpu_end();
/* check if anything is returned */
@@ -548,7 +583,7 @@ static int sha1_mb_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
unsigned int len, u8 *out)
{
struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *rctx =
- container_of(desc, struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx, desc);
+ container_of(desc, struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx, desc);
struct mcryptd_alg_cstate *cstate =
this_cpu_ptr(sha1_mb_alg_state.alg_cstate);
@@ -584,7 +619,8 @@ static int sha1_mb_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
sha1_mb_add_list(rctx, cstate);
kernel_fpu_begin();
- sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx, rctx->walk.data, nbytes, flag);
+ sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx, rctx->walk.data,
+ nbytes, flag);
kernel_fpu_end();
/* check if anything is returned */
@@ -608,7 +644,7 @@ done:
static int sha1_mb_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
{
struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *rctx =
- container_of(desc, struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx, desc);
+ container_of(desc, struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx, desc);
struct mcryptd_alg_cstate *cstate =
this_cpu_ptr(sha1_mb_alg_state.alg_cstate);
@@ -632,7 +668,8 @@ static int sha1_mb_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
/* flag HASH_FINAL and 0 data size */
sha1_mb_add_list(rctx, cstate);
kernel_fpu_begin();
- sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx, &data, 0, HASH_LAST);
+ sha_ctx = sha1_ctx_mgr_submit(cstate->mgr, sha_ctx, &data, 0,
+ HASH_LAST);
kernel_fpu_end();
/* check if anything is returned */
@@ -866,10 +903,12 @@ static unsigned long sha1_mb_flusher(struct mcryptd_alg_cstate *cstate)
if (time_before(cur_time, rctx->tag.expire))
break;
kernel_fpu_begin();
- sha_ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *) sha1_ctx_mgr_flush(cstate->mgr);
+ sha_ctx = (struct sha1_hash_ctx *)
+ sha1_ctx_mgr_flush(cstate->mgr);
kernel_fpu_end();
if (!sha_ctx) {
- pr_err("sha1_mb error: nothing got flushed for non-empty list\n");
+ pr_err("sha1_mb error: nothing got flushed for"
+ " non-empty list\n");
break;
}
rctx = cast_hash_to_mcryptd_ctx(sha_ctx);
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/7] crypto : stylistic cleanup in sha1-mb
2016-05-20 0:43 [PATCH 1/7] crypto : stylistic cleanup in sha1-mb Megha Dey
@ 2016-05-31 8:13 ` Herbert Xu
2016-05-31 20:01 ` Megha Dey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2016-05-31 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Megha Dey
Cc: tim.c.chen, davem, linux-crypto, linux-kernel, fenghua.yu, Megha Dey
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:43:04PM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
> From: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently there are several checkpatch warnings in the sha1_mb.c file:
> 'WARNING: line over 80 characters' in the sha1_mb.c file. Also, the
> syntax of some multi-line comments are not correct. This patch fixes
> these issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
This patch says 1/7 but there is no cover letter and I've only
seen patches 1 and 2. What's going on?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/7] crypto : stylistic cleanup in sha1-mb
2016-05-31 8:13 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2016-05-31 20:01 ` Megha Dey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Megha Dey @ 2016-05-31 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: tim.c.chen, davem, linux-crypto, linux-kernel, fenghua.yu
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:13 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:43:04PM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
> > From: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Currently there are several checkpatch warnings in the sha1_mb.c file:
> > 'WARNING: line over 80 characters' in the sha1_mb.c file. Also, the
> > syntax of some multi-line comments are not correct. This patch fixes
> > these issues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
>
> This patch says 1/7 but there is no cover letter and I've only
> seen patches 1 and 2. What's going on?
Herbert , I had 7 patches for the async+avx2 sha256-mb implementation. I
had sent just the async related changes here. However, I will resend the
patches as 2 sets. One which has only async implementation changes and
the other which has only sha256-mb avx2 implementation changes. Please
disregard the current patches and review the ones I will be sending
again.
>
> Cheers,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-31 19:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-20 0:43 [PATCH 1/7] crypto : stylistic cleanup in sha1-mb Megha Dey
2016-05-31 8:13 ` Herbert Xu
2016-05-31 20:01 ` Megha Dey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).