[PATCH v5 0/4] Enabling ATA Command Priorities

[PATCH v5 0/4] Enabling ATA Command Priorities

[Adam Manzanares]

This patch builds ATA commands with high priority if the iocontext of a process
is set to real time. The goal of the patch is to improve tail latencies of 
workloads that use higher queue depths. This requires setting the iocontext 
ioprio on the request when it is initialized.

This patch has been tested with an Ultrastar HE8 HDD and cuts the 
the p99.99 tail latency of foreground IO from 2s down to 72ms when
using the deadline scheduler. This patch works independently of the
scheduler so it can be used with all of the currently available 
request based schedulers. 

Foreground IO, for the previously described results, is an async fio job 
submitting 4K read requests at a QD of 1 to the HDD. The foreground IO is set 
with the iopriority class of real time. The background workload is another fio
job submitting read requests at a QD of 32 to the same HDD with default 
iopriority.

This feature is enabled for ATA devices by setting the ata enable_prio device 
attribute to 1. An ATA device is also checked to see if the device supports per
command priority.

v5:
 - Updated block patch commit message to explain the why 

v4:
 - Added blk_rq_set_prio function to associate request prio with ioc prio
 - In init_request_from_bio use bio_prio if it is valid
 - Removed queue flag used to enable prio
 - Added ata enable_prio dev attribute to sysfs to enable prioritized commands

v3:
 - Removed null dereference issue in blk-core
 - Renamed queue sysfs entries for clarity
 - Added documentation for sysfs queue entry

v2:
 - Add queue flag to set iopriority going to the request
 - If queue flag set, send iopriority class to ata_build_rw_tf
 - Remove redundant code in ata_ncq_prio_enabled function.


Adam Manzanares (4):
  block: Add iocontext priority to request
  fusion: remove iopriority handling
  ata: Enabling ATA Command Priorities
  ata: ATA Command Priority Disabled By Default

 block/blk-core.c                  |  4 ++-
 drivers/ata/libahci.c             |  1 +
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c         | 35 +++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c         | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/ata/libata.h              |  2 +-
 drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c |  5 ---
 include/linux/ata.h               |  6 ++++
 include/linux/blkdev.h            | 14 ++++++++
 include/linux/libata.h            | 26 ++++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH v5 1/4] block: Add iocontext priority to request

[Adam Manzanares]

Patch adds an association between iocontext ioprio and the ioprio of a
request. This is done to enable request based drivers the ability to
act on priority information stored in the request. An example being
ATA devices that support command priorities. If the ATA driver discovers
that the device supports command priorities and the request has valid
priority information indicating the request is high priority, then a high
priority command can be sent to the device. This should improve tail
latencies for high priority IO on any device that queues requests
internally and can make use of the priority information stored in the
request.

The ioprio of the request is set in blk_rq_set_prio which takes the
request and the ioc as arguments. If the ioc is valid in blk_rq_set_prio
then the iopriority of the request is set as the iopriority of the ioc.
In init_request_from_bio a check is made to see if the ioprio of the bio
is valid and if so then the request prio comes from the bio.

Signed-off-by: Adam Manzananares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c       |  4 +++-
 include/linux/blkdev.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 14d7c07..361b1b9 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ static struct request *__get_request(struct request_list *rl, int op,
 
 	blk_rq_init(q, rq);
 	blk_rq_set_rl(rq, rl);
+	blk_rq_set_prio(rq, ioc);
 	req_set_op_attrs(rq, op, op_flags | REQ_ALLOCED);
 
 	/* init elvpriv */
@@ -1656,7 +1657,8 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)
 
 	req->errors = 0;
 	req->__sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
-	req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
+	if (ioprio_valid(bio_prio(bio)))
+		req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
 	blk_rq_bio_prep(req->q, req, bio);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index c47c358..9a0ceaa 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -934,6 +934,20 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_rq_count_bios(struct request *rq)
 }
 
 /*
+ * blk_rq_set_prio - associate a request with prio from ioc
+ * @rq: request of interest
+ * @ioc: target iocontext
+ *
+ * Assocate request prio with ioc prio so request based drivers
+ * can leverage priority information.
+ */
+static inline void blk_rq_set_prio(struct request *rq, struct io_context *ioc)
+{
+	if (ioc)
+		rq->ioprio = ioc->ioprio;
+}
+
+/*
  * Request issue related functions.
  */
 extern struct request *blk_peek_request(struct request_queue *q);
-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling

[Adam Manzanares]

The request priority is now by default coming from the ioc. It was not
clear what this code was trying to do based upon the iopriority class or
data. The driver should check that a device supports priorities and use
them according to the specificiations of ioprio.

Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
index 6c9fc11..4740bb6 100644
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
@@ -1369,11 +1369,6 @@ mptscsih_qcmd(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
 	if ((vdevice->vtarget->tflags & MPT_TARGET_FLAGS_Q_YES)
 	    && (SCpnt->device->tagged_supported)) {
 		scsictl = scsidir | MPI_SCSIIO_CONTROL_SIMPLEQ;
-		if (SCpnt->request && SCpnt->request->ioprio) {
-			if (((SCpnt->request->ioprio & 0x7) == 1) ||
-				!(SCpnt->request->ioprio & 0x7))
-				scsictl |= MPI_SCSIIO_CONTROL_HEADOFQ;
-		}
 	} else
 		scsictl = scsidir | MPI_SCSIIO_CONTROL_UNTAGGED;
 
-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH v5 3/4] ata: Enabling ATA Command Priorities

[Adam Manzanares]

This patch checks to see if an ATA device supports NCQ command priorities.
If so and the user has specified an iocontext that indicates
IO_PRIO_CLASS_RT then we build a tf with a high priority command.

This is done to improve the tail latency of commands that are high
priority by passing priority to the device.

Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c |  6 +++++-
 drivers/ata/libata.h      |  2 +-
 include/linux/ata.h       |  6 ++++++
 include/linux/libata.h    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 223a770..181b530 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -739,6 +739,7 @@ u64 ata_tf_read_block(const struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev)
  *	@n_block: Number of blocks
  *	@tf_flags: RW/FUA etc...
  *	@tag: tag
+ *	@class: IO priority class
  *
  *	LOCKING:
  *	None.
@@ -753,7 +754,7 @@ u64 ata_tf_read_block(const struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev)
  */
 int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev,
 		    u64 block, u32 n_block, unsigned int tf_flags,
-		    unsigned int tag)
+		    unsigned int tag, int class)
 {
 	tf->flags |= ATA_TFLAG_ISADDR | ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE;
 	tf->flags |= tf_flags;
@@ -785,6 +786,12 @@ int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev,
 		tf->device = ATA_LBA;
 		if (tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_FUA)
 			tf->device |= 1 << 7;
+
+		if (ata_ncq_prio_enabled(dev)) {
+			if (class == IOPRIO_CLASS_RT)
+				tf->hob_nsect |= ATA_PRIO_HIGH <<
+						 ATA_SHIFT_PRIO;
+		}
 	} else if (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_LBA) {
 		tf->flags |= ATA_TFLAG_LBA;
 
@@ -2156,6 +2163,30 @@ static void ata_dev_config_ncq_non_data(struct ata_device *dev)
 	}
 }
 
+static void ata_dev_config_ncq_prio(struct ata_device *dev)
+{
+	struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
+	unsigned int err_mask;
+
+	err_mask = ata_read_log_page(dev,
+				     ATA_LOG_SATA_ID_DEV_DATA,
+				     ATA_LOG_SATA_SETTINGS,
+				     ap->sector_buf,
+				     1);
+	if (err_mask) {
+		ata_dev_dbg(dev,
+			    "failed to get Identify Device data, Emask 0x%x\n",
+			    err_mask);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (ap->sector_buf[ATA_LOG_NCQ_PRIO_OFFSET] & BIT(3))
+		dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO;
+	else
+		ata_dev_dbg(dev, "SATA page does not support priority\n");
+
+}
+
 static int ata_dev_config_ncq(struct ata_device *dev,
 			       char *desc, size_t desc_sz)
 {
@@ -2205,6 +2236,8 @@ static int ata_dev_config_ncq(struct ata_device *dev,
 			ata_dev_config_ncq_send_recv(dev);
 		if (ata_id_has_ncq_non_data(dev->id))
 			ata_dev_config_ncq_non_data(dev);
+		if (ata_id_has_ncq_prio(dev->id))
+			ata_dev_config_ncq_prio(dev);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index e207b33..18629e8 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
 #include <asm/unaligned.h>
+#include <linux/ioprio.h>
 
 #include "libata.h"
 #include "libata-transport.h"
@@ -1757,6 +1758,8 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_rw_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 {
 	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = qc->scsicmd;
 	const u8 *cdb = scmd->cmnd;
+	struct request *rq = scmd->request;
+	int class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(req_get_ioprio(rq));
 	unsigned int tf_flags = 0;
 	u64 block;
 	u32 n_block;
@@ -1823,7 +1826,8 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_rw_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 	qc->nbytes = n_block * scmd->device->sector_size;
 
 	rc = ata_build_rw_tf(&qc->tf, qc->dev, block, n_block, tf_flags,
-			     qc->tag);
+			     qc->tag, class);
+
 	if (likely(rc == 0))
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
index 3b301a4..8f3a559 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ extern u64 ata_tf_to_lba48(const struct ata_taskfile *tf);
 extern struct ata_queued_cmd *ata_qc_new_init(struct ata_device *dev, int tag);
 extern int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev,
 			   u64 block, u32 n_block, unsigned int tf_flags,
-			   unsigned int tag);
+			   unsigned int tag, int class);
 extern u64 ata_tf_read_block(const struct ata_taskfile *tf,
 			     struct ata_device *dev);
 extern unsigned ata_exec_internal(struct ata_device *dev,
diff --git a/include/linux/ata.h b/include/linux/ata.h
index adbc812..ebe4c3b 100644
--- a/include/linux/ata.h
+++ b/include/linux/ata.h
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ enum {
 	ATA_LOG_DEVSLP_DETO	  = 0x01,
 	ATA_LOG_DEVSLP_VALID	  = 0x07,
 	ATA_LOG_DEVSLP_VALID_MASK = 0x80,
+	ATA_LOG_NCQ_PRIO_OFFSET   = 0x09,
 
 	/* NCQ send and receive log */
 	ATA_LOG_NCQ_SEND_RECV_SUBCMDS_OFFSET	= 0x00,
@@ -897,6 +898,11 @@ static inline bool ata_id_has_ncq_non_data(const u16 *id)
 	return id[ATA_ID_SATA_CAPABILITY_2] & BIT(5);
 }
 
+static inline bool ata_id_has_ncq_prio(const u16 *id)
+{
+	return id[ATA_ID_SATA_CAPABILITY] & BIT(12);
+}
+
 static inline bool ata_id_has_trim(const u16 *id)
 {
 	if (ata_id_major_version(id) >= 7 &&
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index e37d4f9..244f261 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ enum {
 	ATA_DFLAG_NO_UNLOAD	= (1 << 17), /* device doesn't support unload */
 	ATA_DFLAG_UNLOCK_HPA	= (1 << 18), /* unlock HPA */
 	ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_SEND_RECV = (1 << 19), /* device supports NCQ SEND and RECV */
+	ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO	= (1 << 20), /* device supports NCQ priority */
 	ATA_DFLAG_INIT_MASK	= (1 << 24) - 1,
 
 	ATA_DFLAG_DETACH	= (1 << 24),
@@ -341,7 +342,9 @@ enum {
 	ATA_SHIFT_PIO		= 0,
 	ATA_SHIFT_MWDMA		= ATA_SHIFT_PIO + ATA_NR_PIO_MODES,
 	ATA_SHIFT_UDMA		= ATA_SHIFT_MWDMA + ATA_NR_MWDMA_MODES,
+	ATA_SHIFT_PRIO		= 6,
 
+	ATA_PRIO_HIGH		= 2,
 	/* size of buffer to pad xfers ending on unaligned boundaries */
 	ATA_DMA_PAD_SZ		= 4,
 
@@ -1609,6 +1612,21 @@ static inline int ata_ncq_enabled(struct ata_device *dev)
 			      ATA_DFLAG_NCQ)) == ATA_DFLAG_NCQ;
 }
 
+/**
+ *	ata_ncq_prio_enabled - Test whether NCQ prio is enabled
+ *	@dev: ATA device to test for
+ *
+ *	LOCKING:
+ *	spin_lock_irqsave(host lock)
+ *
+ *	RETURNS:
+ *	1 if NCQ prio is enabled for @dev, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static inline int ata_ncq_prio_enabled(struct ata_device *dev)
+{
+	return (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO) == ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO;
+}
+
 static inline bool ata_fpdma_dsm_supported(struct ata_device *dev)
 {
 	return (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_SEND_RECV) &&
-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH v5 4/4] ata: ATA Command Priority Disabled By Default

[Adam Manzanares]

Add a sysfs entry to turn on priority information being passed
to a ATA device. By default this feature is turned off.

This patch depends on ata: Enabling ATA Command Priorities

Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/ata/libahci.c     |  1 +
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c |  2 +-
 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/libata.h    |  8 ++++++
 4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
index dcf2c72..383adf7 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ahci_shost_attrs);
 struct device_attribute *ahci_sdev_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_sw_activity,
 	&dev_attr_unload_heads,
+	&dev_attr_enable_prio,
 	NULL
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ahci_sdev_attrs);
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 181b530..d0cf987 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev,
 		if (tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_FUA)
 			tf->device |= 1 << 7;
 
-		if (ata_ncq_prio_enabled(dev)) {
+		if (ata_ncq_prio_enabled(dev) && ata_prio_enabled(dev)) {
 			if (class == IOPRIO_CLASS_RT)
 				tf->hob_nsect |= ATA_PRIO_HIGH <<
 						 ATA_SHIFT_PRIO;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 18629e8..10ba118 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -271,6 +271,73 @@ DEVICE_ATTR(unload_heads, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
 	    ata_scsi_park_show, ata_scsi_park_store);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_attr_unload_heads);
 
+static ssize_t ata_enable_prio_show(struct device *device,
+				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
+	struct ata_port *ap;
+	struct ata_device *dev;
+	int rc = 0;
+	int enable_prio;
+
+	ap = ata_shost_to_port(sdev->host);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(ap->lock);
+	dev = ata_scsi_find_dev(ap, sdev);
+	if (!dev) {
+		rc = -ENODEV;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+
+	enable_prio = ata_prio_enabled(dev);
+
+unlock:
+	spin_unlock_irq(ap->lock);
+
+	return rc ? rc : snprintf(buf, 20, "%u\n", enable_prio);
+}
+
+static ssize_t ata_enable_prio_store(struct device *device,
+				     struct device_attribute *attr,
+				     const char *buf, size_t len)
+{
+	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
+	struct ata_port *ap;
+	struct ata_device *dev;
+	long int input;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kstrtol(buf, 10, &input);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+	if ((input < 0) || (input > 1))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ap = ata_shost_to_port(sdev->host);
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
+	dev = ata_scsi_find_dev(ap, sdev);
+	if (unlikely(!dev)) {
+		rc = -ENODEV;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+
+	if (input)
+		dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_ENABLE_PRIO;
+	else
+		dev->flags &= ~ATA_DFLAG_ENABLE_PRIO;
+
+unlock:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
+
+	return rc ? rc : len;
+}
+
+DEVICE_ATTR(enable_prio, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
+	    ata_enable_prio_show, ata_enable_prio_store);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_attr_enable_prio);
+
 void ata_scsi_set_sense(struct ata_device *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
 			u8 sk, u8 asc, u8 ascq)
 {
@@ -402,6 +469,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_attr_sw_activity);
 
 struct device_attribute *ata_common_sdev_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_unload_heads,
+	&dev_attr_enable_prio,
 	NULL
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_common_sdev_attrs);
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index 244f261..c8acb16 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ enum {
 	ATA_DFLAG_UNLOCK_HPA	= (1 << 18), /* unlock HPA */
 	ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_SEND_RECV = (1 << 19), /* device supports NCQ SEND and RECV */
 	ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO	= (1 << 20), /* device supports NCQ priority */
+	ATA_DFLAG_ENABLE_PRIO	= (1 << 21), /* User enable device priority */
 	ATA_DFLAG_INIT_MASK	= (1 << 24) - 1,
 
 	ATA_DFLAG_DETACH	= (1 << 24),
@@ -544,6 +545,7 @@ typedef void (*ata_postreset_fn_t)(struct ata_link *link, unsigned int *classes)
 
 extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_link_power_management_policy;
 extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_unload_heads;
+extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_enable_prio;
 extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_em_message_type;
 extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_em_message;
 extern struct device_attribute dev_attr_sw_activity;
@@ -1627,6 +1629,12 @@ static inline int ata_ncq_prio_enabled(struct ata_device *dev)
 	return (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO) == ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO;
 }
 
+static inline int ata_prio_enabled(struct ata_device *dev)
+{
+	return ((dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_ENABLE_PRIO) ==
+		 ATA_DFLAG_ENABLE_PRIO);
+}
+
 static inline bool ata_fpdma_dsm_supported(struct ata_device *dev)
 {
 	return (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_SEND_RECV) &&
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] ata: ATA Command Priority Disabled By Default

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Adam.

Sorry about late reply.  Was on vacation.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 04:00:31PM -0700, Adam Manzanares wrote:
> Add a sysfs entry to turn on priority information being passed
> to a ATA device. By default this feature is turned off.
> 
> This patch depends on ata: Enabling ATA Command Priorities

Looks generally good but can we please use a device attribute name
which is more specific - ie. enable_ncq_prio?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] ata: Enabling ATA Command Priorities

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 04:00:30PM -0700, Adam Manzanares wrote:
> This patch checks to see if an ATA device supports NCQ command priorities.
> If so and the user has specified an iocontext that indicates
> IO_PRIO_CLASS_RT then we build a tf with a high priority command.
> 
> This is done to improve the tail latency of commands that are high
> priority by passing priority to the device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>

Looks good to me.  Once the block changes are applied, I'll pull it
into libata tree and apply the ata part on top.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling

[Shaun Tancheff]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Adam Manzanares
<adam.manzanares@hgst.com> wrote:
> The request priority is now by default coming from the ioc. It was not
> clear what this code was trying to do based upon the iopriority class or
> data. The driver should check that a device supports priorities and use
> them according to the specificiations of ioprio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@wdc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
> index 6c9fc11..4740bb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
> +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
> @@ -1369,11 +1369,6 @@ mptscsih_qcmd(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt)
>         if ((vdevice->vtarget->tflags & MPT_TARGET_FLAGS_Q_YES)
>             && (SCpnt->device->tagged_supported)) {
>                 scsictl = scsidir | MPI_SCSIIO_CONTROL_SIMPLEQ;
> -               if (SCpnt->request && SCpnt->request->ioprio) {
> -                       if (((SCpnt->request->ioprio & 0x7) == 1) ||
> -                               !(SCpnt->request->ioprio & 0x7))
> -                               scsictl |= MPI_SCSIIO_CONTROL_HEADOFQ;
> -               }
>         } else
>                 scsictl = scsidir | MPI_SCSIIO_CONTROL_UNTAGGED;

Style wise you can further remove the extra parens around
  SCpnt->device->tagged_supported
As well as the now redundant braces.

Regards,
Shaun

> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DQIBAg&c=IGDlg0lD0b-nebmJJ0Kp8A&r=Wg5NqlNlVTT7Ugl8V50qIHLe856QW0qfG3WVYGOrWzA&m=ZE7JzxXeXPEWqk9WYm42hZHj8gESRg1QoS5XklfbprM&s=C0iMyTgYbYl06F1SQ2DqfdESKBtl3Whp5rSnHSBXOc4&e=

Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] ata: ATA Command Priority Disabled By Default

[Adam Manzanares]

Hello Tejun,

The 10/13/2016 19:22, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Adam.
> 
> Sorry about late reply.  Was on vacation.

NP I was on vacation at the end of the week last week.

> 
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 04:00:31PM -0700, Adam Manzanares wrote:
> > Add a sysfs entry to turn on priority information being passed
> > to a ATA device. By default this feature is turned off.
> > 
> > This patch depends on ata: Enabling ATA Command Priorities
> 
> Looks generally good but can we please use a device attribute name
> which is more specific - ie. enable_ncq_prio?

Will do, I'll also double check the naming scheme of functions and variables 
also. The functions that check if the device has the ncq prio capability might
be too similar to the function that checks if the device attribute is 
enabled.

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

Take care,
Adam

Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling

[Christoph Hellwig]

> Style wise you can further remove the extra parens around
>   SCpnt->device->tagged_supported
> As well as the now redundant braces.

I did send a patch looking just like that earlier :)

Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] fusion: remove iopriority handling

[Adam Manzanares]

Th 10/13/2016 22:34, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Style wise you can further remove the extra parens around
> >   SCpnt->device->tagged_supported
> > As well as the now redundant braces.
> 
> I did send a patch looking just like that earlier :)

I'll remove the patch from the patchset. I must have missed the patch 
you are referencing.

Take care,
Adam