linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	kernellwp@gmail.com, jgross@suse.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	bsingharora@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
	Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/9] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:27:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476998874-2089-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476998874-2089-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch support to fix lock holder preemption issue.

For kernel users, we could use bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) to detech if
one vcpu is preempted or not.

The default implementation is a macro defined by false. So compiler can
wrap it out if arch dose not support such vcpu pteempted check.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 348f51b..44c1ce7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -3506,6 +3506,18 @@ static inline void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
+/*
+ * In order to deal with a various lock holder preemption issues provide an
+ * interface to see if a vCPU is currently running or not.
+ *
+ * This allows us to terminate optimistic spin loops and block, analogous to
+ * the native optimistic spin heuristic of testing if the lock owner task is
+ * running or not.
+ */
+#ifndef vcpu_is_preempted
+#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu)	false
+#endif
+
 extern long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *new_mask);
 extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask);
 
-- 
2.4.11

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-20 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-20 21:27 [PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-10-20 21:27 ` Pan Xinhui [this message]
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen " Pan Xinhui
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] x86, kvm: support " Pan Xinhui
2016-10-24  8:08   ` xinhui
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] x86, xen: " Pan Xinhui
2016-10-21  5:08   ` Juergen Gross
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Pan Xinhui
2016-10-20 21:27 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-10-21  1:23   ` Boqun Feng
2016-10-21 11:27   ` David Laight
2016-10-21 18:39     ` rkrcmar
2016-10-24  2:46       ` xinhui
2016-10-24 14:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-24 15:05         ` rkrcmar
2016-10-24  2:44     ` xinhui
2016-10-24  8:12   ` xinhui
2016-10-21  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] implement " Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476998874-2089-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).