* [RFC v2] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page
@ 2017-01-19 14:59 ysxie
2017-01-23 4:39 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2017-01-23 5:14 ` Minchan Kim
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ysxie @ 2017-01-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
Cc: n-horiguchi, mhocko, akpm, minchan, vbabka, guohanjun, qiuxishi
From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
This patch is to extends soft offlining framework to support
non-lru page, which already support migration after
commit bda807d44454 ("mm: migrate: support non-lru movable page
migration")
When memory corrected errors occur on a non-lru movable page,
we can choose to stop using it by migrating data onto another
page and disable the original (maybe half-broken) one.
Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
---
v2:
delete function soft_offline_movable_page() and hanle non-lru movable
page in __soft_offline_page() as Michal Hocko suggested.
Any comment is more than welcome.
mm/memory-failure.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index f283c7e..74be9e1 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1527,7 +1527,8 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
{
int ret = __get_any_page(page, pfn, flags);
- if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) && !PageLRU(page)) {
+ if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) &&
+ !PageLRU(page) && !__PageMovable(page)) {
/*
* Try to free it.
*/
@@ -1609,7 +1610,7 @@ static int soft_offline_huge_page(struct page *page, int flags)
static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret = -1;
unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
/*
@@ -1619,7 +1620,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
* so there's no race between soft_offline_page() and memory_failure().
*/
lock_page(page);
- wait_on_page_writeback(page);
+ if (PageLRU(page))
+ wait_on_page_writeback(page);
if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
unlock_page(page);
put_hwpoison_page(page);
@@ -1630,7 +1632,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
* Try to invalidate first. This should work for
* non dirty unmapped page cache pages.
*/
- ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
+ if (PageLRU(page))
+ ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
unlock_page(page);
/*
* RED-PEN would be better to keep it isolated here, but we
@@ -1649,7 +1652,10 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
* Try to migrate to a new page instead. migrate.c
* handles a large number of cases for us.
*/
- ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
+ if (PageLRU(page))
+ ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
+ else
+ ret = !isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
/*
* Drop page reference which is came from get_any_page()
* successful isolate_lru_page() already took another one.
@@ -1657,18 +1663,15 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
put_hwpoison_page(page);
if (!ret) {
LIST_HEAD(pagelist);
- inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
+ if (PageLRU(page))
+ inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
page_is_file_cache(page));
list_add(&page->lru, &pagelist);
ret = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page, NULL, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL,
MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_FAILURE);
if (ret) {
- if (!list_empty(&pagelist)) {
- list_del(&page->lru);
- dec_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
- page_is_file_cache(page));
- putback_lru_page(page);
- }
+ if (!list_empty(&pagelist))
+ putback_movable_pages(&pagelist);
pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: migration failed %d, type %lx\n",
pfn, ret, page->flags);
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC v2] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page
2017-01-19 14:59 [RFC v2] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page ysxie
@ 2017-01-23 4:39 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2017-01-23 5:14 ` Minchan Kim
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Naoya Horiguchi @ 2017-01-23 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ysxie
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, mhocko, akpm, minchan, vbabka, guohanjun,
qiuxishi
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:59:03PM +0800, ysxie@foxmail.com wrote:
> From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
>
> This patch is to extends soft offlining framework to support
> non-lru page, which already support migration after
> commit bda807d44454 ("mm: migrate: support non-lru movable page
> migration")
>
> When memory corrected errors occur on a non-lru movable page,
> we can choose to stop using it by migrating data onto another
> page and disable the original (maybe half-broken) one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> ---
> v2:
> delete function soft_offline_movable_page() and hanle non-lru movable
> page in __soft_offline_page() as Michal Hocko suggested.
>
> Any comment is more than welcome.
>
> mm/memory-failure.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index f283c7e..74be9e1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1527,7 +1527,8 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> {
> int ret = __get_any_page(page, pfn, flags);
>
> - if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) && !PageLRU(page)) {
> + if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) &&
> + !PageLRU(page) && !__PageMovable(page)) {
> /*
> * Try to free it.
> */
> @@ -1609,7 +1610,7 @@ static int soft_offline_huge_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>
> static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -1;
> unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>
> /*
> @@ -1619,7 +1620,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> * so there's no race between soft_offline_page() and memory_failure().
> */
> lock_page(page);
> - wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> + wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
> unlock_page(page);
> put_hwpoison_page(page);
> @@ -1630,7 +1632,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> * Try to invalidate first. This should work for
> * non dirty unmapped page cache pages.
> */
> - ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> + ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
> unlock_page(page);
> /*
> * RED-PEN would be better to keep it isolated here, but we
> @@ -1649,7 +1652,10 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> * Try to migrate to a new page instead. migrate.c
> * handles a large number of cases for us.
> */
> - ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> + ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
> + else
> + ret = !isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
> /*
> * Drop page reference which is came from get_any_page()
> * successful isolate_lru_page() already took another one.
> @@ -1657,18 +1663,15 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> put_hwpoison_page(page);
> if (!ret) {
> LIST_HEAD(pagelist);
> - inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> + inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> page_is_file_cache(page));
> list_add(&page->lru, &pagelist);
> ret = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page, NULL, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL,
> MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_FAILURE);
> if (ret) {
> - if (!list_empty(&pagelist)) {
> - list_del(&page->lru);
> - dec_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> - page_is_file_cache(page));
> - putback_lru_page(page);
> - }
> + if (!list_empty(&pagelist))
> + putback_movable_pages(&pagelist);
>
> pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: migration failed %d, type %lx\n",
> pfn, ret, page->flags);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC v2] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page
2017-01-19 14:59 [RFC v2] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page ysxie
2017-01-23 4:39 ` Naoya Horiguchi
@ 2017-01-23 5:14 ` Minchan Kim
2017-01-23 12:39 ` Yisheng Xie
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Minchan Kim @ 2017-01-23 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ysxie
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, n-horiguchi, mhocko, akpm, vbabka,
guohanjun, qiuxishi
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:59:03PM +0800, ysxie@foxmail.com wrote:
> From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
>
> This patch is to extends soft offlining framework to support
> non-lru page, which already support migration after
> commit bda807d44454 ("mm: migrate: support non-lru movable page
> migration")
>
> When memory corrected errors occur on a non-lru movable page,
> we can choose to stop using it by migrating data onto another
> page and disable the original (maybe half-broken) one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> delete function soft_offline_movable_page() and hanle non-lru movable
> page in __soft_offline_page() as Michal Hocko suggested.
>
> Any comment is more than welcome.
>
> mm/memory-failure.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index f283c7e..74be9e1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1527,7 +1527,8 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> {
> int ret = __get_any_page(page, pfn, flags);
>
> - if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) && !PageLRU(page)) {
> + if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) &&
> + !PageLRU(page) && !__PageMovable(page)) {
__PageMovable without holding page_lock could be raced so need to check
if it's okay to miss some of pages offlining by the race.
When I read description of soft_offline_page, it seems to be okay.
Just wanted double check. :)
> /*
> * Try to free it.
> */
> @@ -1609,7 +1610,7 @@ static int soft_offline_huge_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>
> static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -1;
> unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>
> /*
> @@ -1619,7 +1620,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> * so there's no race between soft_offline_page() and memory_failure().
> */
> lock_page(page);
> - wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> + wait_on_page_writeback(page);
I doubt we need to add such limitation(i.e., Only LRU pages could be write-backed).
Do you have some reason to add that code?
> if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
> unlock_page(page);
> put_hwpoison_page(page);
> @@ -1630,7 +1632,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> * Try to invalidate first. This should work for
> * non dirty unmapped page cache pages.
> */
> - ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> + ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
Ditto.
> unlock_page(page);
> /*
> * RED-PEN would be better to keep it isolated here, but we
> @@ -1649,7 +1652,10 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> * Try to migrate to a new page instead. migrate.c
> * handles a large number of cases for us.
> */
> - ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> + ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
> + else
> + ret = !isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
> /*
> * Drop page reference which is came from get_any_page()
> * successful isolate_lru_page() already took another one.
> @@ -1657,18 +1663,15 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> put_hwpoison_page(page);
> if (!ret) {
> LIST_HEAD(pagelist);
> - inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> + if (PageLRU(page))
isolate_lru_page removes PG_lru so this check will be false. Namely, happens
isolated count mismatch happens.
> + inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> page_is_file_cache(page));
> list_add(&page->lru, &pagelist);
> ret = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page, NULL, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL,
> MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_FAILURE);
> if (ret) {
> - if (!list_empty(&pagelist)) {
> - list_del(&page->lru);
> - dec_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> - page_is_file_cache(page));
> - putback_lru_page(page);
> - }
> + if (!list_empty(&pagelist))
> + putback_movable_pages(&pagelist);
>
> pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: migration failed %d, type %lx\n",
> pfn, ret, page->flags);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC v2] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page
2017-01-23 5:14 ` Minchan Kim
@ 2017-01-23 12:39 ` Yisheng Xie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yisheng Xie @ 2017-01-23 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Minchan Kim, ysxie
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, n-horiguchi, mhocko, akpm, vbabka,
guohanjun, qiuxishi
Hi Minchan,
Thanks for reviewing.
On 2017/1/23 13:14, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:59:03PM +0800, ysxie@foxmail.com wrote:
>> From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
>>
>> @@ -1527,7 +1527,8 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>> {
>> int ret = __get_any_page(page, pfn, flags);
>>
>> - if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) && !PageLRU(page)) {
>> + if (ret == 1 && !PageHuge(page) &&
>> + !PageLRU(page) && !__PageMovable(page)) {
>
> __PageMovable without holding page_lock could be raced so need to check
> if it's okay to miss some of pages offlining by the race.
> When I read description of soft_offline_page, it seems to be okay.
> Just wanted double check. :)
Yes, I have thought about whether should add page_lock to avoid race. For it is ok to
miss some of pages caused by race, I do not add page_lock.
>
>> /*
>> * Try to free it.
>> */
>> @@ -1609,7 +1610,7 @@ static int soft_offline_huge_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>>
>> static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>> {
>> - int ret;
>> + int ret = -1;
>> unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1619,7 +1620,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>> * so there's no race between soft_offline_page() and memory_failure().
>> */
>> lock_page(page);
>> - wait_on_page_writeback(page);
>> + if (PageLRU(page))
>> + wait_on_page_writeback(page);
>
> I doubt we need to add such limitation(i.e., Only LRU pages could be write-backed).
> Do you have some reason to add that code?
I add this check for not quite sure about whether non-lru page will as marked as
PageWriteBack(page). I will delete no need limitation in next version.
>
>> if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
>> unlock_page(page);
>> put_hwpoison_page(page);
>> @@ -1630,7 +1632,8 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>> * Try to invalidate first. This should work for
>> * non dirty unmapped page cache pages.
>> */
>> - ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
>> + if (PageLRU(page))
>> + ret = invalidate_inode_page(page);
>
> Ditto.
>
>> unlock_page(page);
>> /*
>> * RED-PEN would be better to keep it isolated here, but we
>> @@ -1649,7 +1652,10 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>> * Try to migrate to a new page instead. migrate.c
>> * handles a large number of cases for us.
>> */
>> - ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
>> + if (PageLRU(page))
>> + ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
>> + else
>> + ret = !isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
>> /*
>> * Drop page reference which is came from get_any_page()
>> * successful isolate_lru_page() already took another one.
>> @@ -1657,18 +1663,15 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>> put_hwpoison_page(page);
>> if (!ret) {
>> LIST_HEAD(pagelist);
>> - inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
>> + if (PageLRU(page))
>
> isolate_lru_page removes PG_lru so this check will be false. Namely, happens
> isolated count mismatch happens.
>
Really sorry about that. That's my mistake.
I will use !__PageMovable(page) instead in v3.
Thanks
Yisheng Xie.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-23 12:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-19 14:59 [RFC v2] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page ysxie
2017-01-23 4:39 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2017-01-23 5:14 ` Minchan Kim
2017-01-23 12:39 ` Yisheng Xie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).