linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, sza@esh.hu,
	arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org,
	kbuild-all@01.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/7] ARM: NOMMU: Set ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE for M-class cpus
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 11:24:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495621472-9323-7-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495621472-9323-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com>

Now, we have dedicated non-cacheable region for consistent DMA
operations. However, that region can still be marked as bufferable by
MPU, so it'd be safer to have barriers by default. M-class machines
that didn't need it until now also likely won't need it in the future,
therefore, we offer this as an option.

Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza@esh.hu>
Tested-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
index d731f28..f50bbda 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
@@ -1049,8 +1049,8 @@ config ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
 	default 5
 
 config ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
-	bool "Use non-cacheable memory for DMA" if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K) && !CPU_V7
-	default y if CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7
+	bool "Use non-cacheable memory for DMA" if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7M) && !CPU_V7
+	default y if CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 || CPU_V7M
 	help
 	  Historically, the kernel has used strongly ordered mappings to
 	  provide DMA coherent memory.  With the advent of ARMv7, mapping
@@ -1065,6 +1065,10 @@ config ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
 	  and therefore turning this on may result in unpredictable driver
 	  behaviour.  Therefore, we offer this as an option.
 
+	  On some of the beefier ARMv7-M machines (with DMA and write
+	  buffers) you likely want this enabled, while those that
+	  didn't need it until now also won't need it in the future.
+
 	  You are recommended say 'Y' here and debug any affected drivers.
 
 config ARM_HEAVY_MB
-- 
2.0.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-24 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-24 10:24 [PATCH v5 0/7] ARM: Fix dma_alloc_coherent() and friends for NOMMU Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] dma: Take into account dma_pfn_offset Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 12:47     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dma: Add simple dma_noop_mmap Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 12:46     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-26  9:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] drivers: dma-coherent: Account dma_pfn_offset when used with device tree Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-20 13:50     ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-26  9:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 12:59     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drivers: dma-coherent: Introduce default DMA pool Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-20 14:24     ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-26  9:42       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-26 14:08         ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-27 14:36         ` Robin Murphy
2017-06-27 15:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-22 13:18     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-26  9:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] ARM: NOMMU: Introduce dma operations for noMMU Vladimir Murzin
2017-05-24 10:24 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2017-05-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] ARM: dma-mapping: Remove traces of NOMMU code Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-08  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] ARM: Fix dma_alloc_coherent() and friends for NOMMU Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-08 16:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-06-15  7:25     ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 12:59       ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-06-20 13:00         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495621472-9323-7-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sza@esh.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).