linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
To: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>,
	Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nicholas Troast <ntroast@codeaurora.org>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V1 4/5] spmi: pmic-arb: return the value instead of passing by pointer
Date: Mon,  3 Jul 2017 17:48:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499084308-2232-5-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499084308-2232-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org>

Returning the output value from a function, when it is possible, is the
better and cleaner way than passing it by the pointer. Hence, modify
the ppid_to_apid mapping function to return apid instead of passing
it by a pointer. While at it, pass the ppid as function parameter to
ppid_to_apid mapping function instead of passing the sid and addr.

Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index d8c857a..5285245 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -179,8 +179,7 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb {
  */
 struct pmic_arb_ver_ops {
 	const char *ver_str;
-	int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
-			u16 *apid);
+	int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid);
 	/* spmi commands (read_cmd, write_cmd, cmd) functionality */
 	int (*offset)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
 		      u32 *offset);
@@ -657,8 +656,8 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
 					   unsigned int *out_type)
 {
 	struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = d->host_data;
+	u16 apid, ppid;
 	int rc;
-	u16 apid;
 
 	dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "intspec[0] 0x%1x intspec[1] 0x%02x intspec[2] 0x%02x\n",
 		intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2]);
@@ -670,14 +669,15 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
 	if (intspec[0] > 0xF || intspec[1] > 0xFF || intspec[2] > 0x7)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, intspec[0],
-					    (intspec[1] << 8), &apid);
+	ppid = intspec[0] << 8 | intspec[1];
+	rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
 	if (rc < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed to xlate sid = 0x%x, periph = 0x%x, irq = %x rc = %d\n",
 		intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2], rc);
 		return rc;
 	}
 
+	apid = rc;
 	/* Keep track of {max,min}_apid for bounding search during interrupt */
 	if (apid > pmic_arb->max_apid)
 		pmic_arb->max_apid = apid;
@@ -706,19 +706,18 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
-				    u16 addr, u16 *apid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
 {
-	u16 ppid = sid << 8 | ((addr >> 8) & 0xFF);
 	u32 *mapping_table = pmic_arb->mapping_table;
 	int index = 0, i;
 	u16 apid_valid;
+	u16 apid;
 	u32 data;
 
 	apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
 	if (apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID) {
-		*apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-		return 0;
+		apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+		return apid;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH; ++i) {
@@ -732,21 +731,21 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
 			if (SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_FLAG(data)) {
 				index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
 			} else {
-				*apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
+				apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
 				pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
-					= *apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-				pmic_arb->apid_data[*apid].ppid = ppid;
-				return 0;
+					= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+				pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+				return apid;
 			}
 		} else {
 			if (SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_FLAG(data)) {
 				index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
 			} else {
-				*apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
+				apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
 				pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
-					= *apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-				pmic_arb->apid_data[*apid].ppid = ppid;
-				return 0;
+					= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+				pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+				return apid;
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -798,10 +797,8 @@ static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
 	return i;
 }
 
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
-				    u16 addr, u16 *apid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
 {
-	u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
 	u16 apid_valid;
 
 	apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
@@ -810,8 +807,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
 	if (!(apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	*apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-	return 0;
+	return apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
 }
 
 /* v2 offset per ppid and per ee */
@@ -819,12 +815,15 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
 				u32 *offset)
 {
 	u16 apid;
+	u16 ppid;
 	int rc;
 
-	rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(pmic_arb, sid, addr, &apid);
+	ppid = sid << 8 | ((addr >> 8) & 0xFF);
+	rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(pmic_arb, ppid);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;
 
+	apid = rc;
 	*offset = 0x1000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x8000 * apid;
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-03 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-03 12:18 [PATCH V1 0/5]: Fix-up patches Kiran Gunda
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 1/5] spmi: pmic-arb: remove the read/write access checks Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 2/5] spmi: pmic-arb: rename pa_xx to pmic_arb_xx and other code cleanup Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-07 14:48     ` kgunda
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 3/5] spmi: pmic-arb: replace the writel_relaxed with __raw_writel Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-03 12:18 ` Kiran Gunda [this message]
2017-07-06  6:44   ` [PATCH V1 4/5] spmi: pmic-arb: return the value instead of passing by pointer Stephen Boyd
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 5/5] spmi: pmic-arb: use irq_chip callback to set spmi irq wakeup capability Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-06 10:30     ` kgunda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1499084308-2232-5-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntroast@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).