linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF Laurent Dufour
                   ` (24 more replies)
  0 siblings, 25 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

This is a port on kernel 4.15 of the work done by Peter Zijlstra to handle
page fault without holding the mm semaphore [1].

The idea is to try to handle user space page faults without holding the
mmap_sem. This should allow better concurrency for massively threaded
process since the page fault handler will not wait for other threads memory
layout change to be done, assuming that this change is done in another part
of the process's memory space. This type page fault is named speculative
page fault. If the speculative page fault fails because of a concurrency is
detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet allocating, it
is failing its processing and a classic page fault is then tried.

The speculative page fault (SPF) has to look for the VMA matching the fault
address without holding the mmap_sem, this is done by introducing a rwlock
which protects the access to the mm_rb tree. Previously this was done using
SRCU but it was introducing a lot of scheduling to process the VMA's
freeing operation which was hitting the performance by 20% as reported by
Kemi Wang [2].Using a rwlock to protect access to the mm_rb tree is
limiting the locking contention to these operations which are expected to
be in a O(log n) order. In addition to ensure that the VMA is not freed in
our back a reference count is added and 2 services (get_vma() and
put_vma()) are introduced to handle the reference count. When a VMA is
fetch from the RB tree using get_vma() is must be later freeed using
put_vma(). Furthermore, to allow the VMA to be used again by the classic
page fault handler a service is introduced can_reuse_spf_vma(). This
service is expected to be called with the mmap_sem hold. It checked that
the VMA is still matching the specified address and is releasing its
reference count as the mmap_sem is hold it is ensure that it will not be
freed in our back. In general, the VMA's reference count could be
decremented when holding the mmap_sem but it should not be increased as
holding the mmap_sem is ensuring that the VMA is stable. I can't see
anymore the overhead I got while will-it-scale benchmark anymore.

The VMA's attributes checked during the speculative page fault processing
have to be protected against parallel changes. This is done by using a per
VMA sequence lock. This sequence lock allows the speculative page fault
handler to fast check for parallel changes in progress and to abort the
speculative page fault in that case.

Once the VMA is found, the speculative page fault handler would check for
the VMA's attributes to verify that the page fault has to be handled
correctly or not. Thus the VMA is protected through a sequence lock which
allows fast detection of concurrent VMA changes. If such a change is
detected, the speculative page fault is aborted and a *classic* page fault
is tried.  VMA sequence lockings are added when VMA attributes which are
checked during the page fault are modified.

When the PTE is fetched, the VMA is checked to see if it has been changed,
so once the page table is locked, the VMA is valid, so any other changes
leading to touching this PTE will need to lock the page table, so no
parallel change is possible at this time.

The locking of the PTE is done with interrupts disabled, this allows to
check for the PMD to ensure that there is not an ongoing collapsing
operation. Since khugepaged is firstly set the PMD to pmd_none and then is
waiting for the other CPU to have catch the IPI interrupt, if the pmd is
valid at the time the PTE is locked, we have the guarantee that the
collapsing opertion will have to wait on the PTE lock to move foward. This
allows the SPF handler to map the PTE safely. If the PMD value is different
than the one recorded at the beginning of the SPF operation, the classic
page fault handler will be called to handle the operation while holding the
mmap_sem. As the PTE lock is done with the interrupts disabled, the lock is
done using spin_trylock() to avoid dead lock when handling a page fault
while a TLB invalidate is requested by an other CPU holding the PTE.

Support for THP is not done because when checking for the PMD, we can be
confused by an in progress collapsing operation done by khugepaged. The
issue is that pmd_none() could be true either if the PMD is not already
populate or if the underlying PTE are in the way to be collapsed. So we
cannot safely allocate a PMD if pmd_none() is true.

This series builds on top of v4.14-rc5 and is functional on x86 and
PowerPC.

------------------
Benchmarks results

Base kernel is 4.15-rc6-mmotm-2018-01-04-16-19
SPF is BASE + this series

Kernbench:
----------
Here are the results on a 16 CPUs X86 guest using kernbench on a 4.13-rc4
kernel (kernel is build 5 times):

Average Optimal load -j 8
 		 Base			SPF
                 Run (std deviation)
Elapsed	Time	 148.04	(0.62446)	150.31 (0.940585)	1.53%
User	Time	 1017.27 (1.23567)	1029.14	(4.43995)	1.17%
System	Time	 112.53	(0.888285)	118.62 (0.712215)	5.41%
Percent	CPU	 762.6	(2.30217)	763 (2.64575)		0.05%
Context	Switches 46394.2 (792.6)	46880.2	(812.688)	1.05%
Sleeps		 85207.4 (659.075)	85525.2	(663.924)	0.37%

Average Maximal load -j 16
 		 Base			SPF
                 Run (std deviation)
Elapsed	Time	 71.102	(0.424347)	72.438 (0.650054)	1.88%
User	Time	 945.085 (76.0995)	957.76 (75.2979)	1.34%
System	Time	 98.828	(14.4599)	104.596 (14.7918)	5.84%
Percent	CPU	 1054.8	(308.054)	1055.7 (308.63)		0.09%
Context	Switches 65134.6 (19763.6)	65487 (19626.2)		0.54%
Sleeps		 90760.7 (5896.06)	90821.1	(5611.64)	0.07%

The elapsed time is in the same order, a bit larger in the case of the spf
release, but that seems to be in the error margin. Context switches are now
in the same order.

Here are the kerbench results on a 80 CPUs Power8 system :
Average Maximal load -j 40
 		 Base			SPF
                 Run (std deviation)
Elapsed	Time	 108.37	(0.544885)	109.2 (0.454037)	0.77%
User Time	 4111.38 (13.7343)	4129.09	(13.6466)	0.43%
System Time	 99.098	(0.364925)	99.856 (0.386109)	0.76%
Percent CPU	 3884.6	(9.31665)	3871.8 (12.0706)	-0.33%
Context Switches 71962.2 (206.129)	72009.8 (185.303)	0.07%
Sleeps		 156369	(850.193)	155912 (1099.63)	-0.29%

Average Maximal load -j 80
		 Base			SPF
                 Run (std deviation)
Elapsed Time	 98.886 (0.629031)	99.726 (0.871854)	0.85%
User Time	 5408.5 (1367.35)	5416.23 (1356.89)	0.14%
System Time	 115.364 (17.161)	115.923 (16.939)	0.48%
Percent CPU	 5399.2 (1596.95)	5362.9 (1572.71)	-0.67%
Context Switches 138892 (70610.1)	138321 (69920.2)	-0.41%
Sleeps		 159509 (6171.69)	158354 (3595.75)	-0.72%

We can't see any impact, neither performance improvement, but this is
mostly mono threaded processes and the SPF handler is not activated.

Ebizzy:
-------
The test is counting the number of records per second it can manage, the
higher is the best. I run it like this 'ebizzy -mTRp'. To get consistent
result I repeated the test 100 times and measure the average result. The
number is the record processes per second, the higher is the best.

- 16 CPUs x86 VM
  		BASE		SPF		delta
16 CPUs x86 VM	11485.14	60902.26	430.27%
80 CPUs P8 node	37648.73	83078.01	120.67%

Here the delta is big, as this test is triggering the SPF handler
massively.


Will-It-Scale [6]
-----------------
I got a lot of deviation in the results returned by this benchmark,
especially when running a high number of CPUs.  However while the series v5
was showing a performance degradation, despite the deviations, I can't see
it anymore with this series.  This being said, it's hard to produce numbers
of such a benchmark as deviation is really too high.

------------------
Changes since V5:
 - use rwlock agains the mm RB tree in place of SRCU
 - add a VMA's reference count to protect VMA while using it without
   holding the mmap_sem.
 - check PMD value to detect collapsing operation
 - don't try speculative page fault for mono threaded processes
 - try to reuse the fetched VMA if VM_RETRY is returned
 - go directly to the error path if an error is detected during the SPF
   path
 - fix race window when moving VMA in move_vma()
Changes since v4:
 - As requested by Andrew Morton, use CONFIG_SPF and define it earlier in
 the series to ease bisection.
Changes since v3:
 - Don't build when CONFIG_SMP is not set
 - Fixed a lock dependency warning in __vma_adjust()
 - Use READ_ONCE to access p*d values in handle_speculative_fault()
 - Call memcp_oom() service in handle_speculative_fault()
Changes since v2:
 - Perf event is renamed in PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF
 - On Power handle do_page_fault()'s cleaning
 - On Power if the VM_FAULT_ERROR is returned by
 handle_speculative_fault(), do not retry but jump to the error path
 - If VMA's flags are not matching the fault, directly returns
 VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV and not VM_FAULT_RETRY
 - Check for pud_trans_huge() to avoid speculative path
 - Handles _vm_normal_page()'s introduced by 6f16211df3bf
 ("mm/device-public-memory: device memory cache coherent with CPU")
 - add and review few comments in the code
Changes since v1:
 - Remove PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_FAILED perf event.
 - Add tracing events to details speculative page fault failures.
 - Cache VMA fields values which are used once the PTE is unlocked at the
 end of the page fault events.
 - Ensure that fields read during the speculative path are written and read
 using WRITE_ONCE and READ_ONCE.
 - Add checks at the beginning of the speculative path to abort it if the
 VMA is known to not be supported.
Changes since RFC V5 [5]
 - Port to 4.13 kernel
 - Merging patch fixing lock dependency into the original patch
 - Replace the 2 parameters of vma_has_changed() with the vmf pointer
 - In patch 7, don't call __do_fault() in the speculative path as it may
 want to unlock the mmap_sem.
 - In patch 11-12, don't check for vma boundaries when
 page_add_new_anon_rmap() is called during the spf path and protect against
 anon_vma pointer's update.
 - In patch 13-16, add performance events to report number of successful
 and failed speculative events.

[1] http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/RFC-PATCH-0-6-Another-go-at-speculative-page-faults-tt965642.html#none
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9999687/
[3] http://ebizzy.sourceforge.net/
[4] http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/kernbench/kernbench-0.50/
[5] https://lwn.net/Articles/725607/
[6] https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale.git

Laurent Dufour (19):
  x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  powerpc/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  mm: Introduce pte_spinlock for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE
  mm: Protect VMA modifications using VMA sequence count
  mm: protect mremap() against SPF hanlder
  mm: Protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes
  mm: Cache some VMA fields in the vm_fault structure
  mm/migrate: Pass vm_fault pointer to migrate_misplaced_page()
  mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable
  mm: Introduce __maybe_mkwrite()
  mm: Introduce __vm_normal_page()
  mm: Introduce __page_add_new_anon_rmap()
  mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock
  mm: Try spin lock in speculative path
  mm: Adding speculative page fault failure trace events
  perf: Add a speculative page fault sw event
  perf tools: Add support for the SPF perf event
  mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA
  powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault

Peter Zijlstra (5):
  mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults
  mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE
  mm: VMA sequence count
  mm: Provide speculative fault infrastructure
  x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling

 arch/powerpc/Kconfig                  |   4 +
 arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c               |  31 +-
 arch/x86/Kconfig                      |   4 +
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c                   |  38 ++-
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c                    |   5 +-
 fs/userfaultfd.c                      |  17 +-
 include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h        |   2 +-
 include/linux/migrate.h               |   4 +-
 include/linux/mm.h                    |  91 +++++-
 include/linux/mm_types.h              |   7 +
 include/linux/pagemap.h               |   4 +-
 include/linux/rmap.h                  |  12 +-
 include/linux/swap.h                  |  10 +-
 include/trace/events/pagefault.h      |  87 ++++++
 include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h       |   1 +
 kernel/fork.c                         |   3 +
 mm/hugetlb.c                          |   2 +
 mm/init-mm.c                          |   3 +
 mm/internal.h                         |  20 ++
 mm/khugepaged.c                       |   5 +
 mm/madvise.c                          |   6 +-
 mm/memory.c                           | 563 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 mm/mempolicy.c                        |  51 ++-
 mm/migrate.c                          |   4 +-
 mm/mlock.c                            |  13 +-
 mm/mmap.c                             | 209 ++++++++++---
 mm/mprotect.c                         |   4 +-
 mm/mremap.c                           |  13 +
 mm/rmap.c                             |   5 +-
 mm/swap.c                             |   6 +-
 mm/swap_state.c                       |   8 +-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h |   1 +
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c               |   1 +
 tools/perf/util/parse-events.c        |   4 +
 tools/perf/util/parse-events.l        |   1 +
 tools/perf/util/python.c              |   1 +
 36 files changed, 1076 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/trace/events/pagefault.h

-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 18:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] powerpc/mm: " Laurent Dufour
                   ` (23 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

Introduce CONFIG_SPF which turns on the Speculative Page Fault handler when
building for 64bits with SMP.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index a317d5594b6a..d74353b85aaf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -2882,6 +2882,10 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
 config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP
 	def_bool y
 
+config SPF
+	def_bool y
+	depends on X86_64 && SMP
+
 source "net/Kconfig"
 
 source "drivers/Kconfig"
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 02/24] powerpc/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

Define CONFIG_SPF for BOOK3S_64 and SMP. This enables the Speculative Page
Fault handler.

Support is only provide for BOOK3S_64 currently because:
- require CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU because checks done in
  set_access_flags_filter()
- require BOOK3S because we can't support for book3e_hugetlb_preload()
  called by update_mmu_cache()

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index d99250d9185d..31be1d69b350 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -1209,6 +1209,10 @@ endif
 config	ARCH_RANDOM
 	def_bool n
 
+config SPF
+	def_bool y
+	depends on PPC_BOOK3S_64 && SMP
+
 source "net/Kconfig"
 
 source "drivers/Kconfig"
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] powerpc/mm: " Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-17  3:04   ` Andi Kleen
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE Laurent Dufour
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

One of the side effects of speculating on faults (without holding
mmap_sem) is that we can race with free_pgtables() and therefore we
cannot assume the page-tables will stick around.

Remove the reliance on the pte pointer.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[Remove only if !CONFIG_SPF]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 8a80986fff48..259f621345b2 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2274,6 +2274,7 @@ int apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apply_to_page_range);
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_SPF
 /*
  * handle_pte_fault chooses page fault handler according to an entry which was
  * read non-atomically.  Before making any commitment, on those architectures
@@ -2297,6 +2298,7 @@ static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
 	pte_unmap(page_table);
 	return same;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
 
 static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
@@ -2884,11 +2886,13 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		swapcache = page;
 	}
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_SPF
 	if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)) {
 		if (page)
 			put_page(page);
 		goto out;
 	}
+#endif
 
 	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
 	if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 04/24] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] mm: Introduce pte_spinlock " Laurent Dufour
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

When speculating faults (without holding mmap_sem) we need to validate
that the vma against which we loaded pages is still valid when we're
ready to install the new PTE.

Therefore, replace the pte_offset_map_lock() calls that (re)take the
PTL with pte_map_lock() which can fail in case we find the VMA changed
since we started the fault.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[Port to 4.12 kernel]
[Remove the comment about the fault_env structure which has been
 implemented as the vm_fault structure in the kernel]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  1 +
 mm/memory.c        | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 63f7ba111f64..ad299ed7b85c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
 #define FAULT_FLAG_USER		0x40	/* The fault originated in userspace */
 #define FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE	0x80	/* faulting for non current tsk/mm */
 #define FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION  0x100	/* The fault was during an instruction fetch */
+#define FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE	0x200	/* Speculative fault, not holding mmap_sem */
 
 #define FAULT_FLAG_TRACE \
 	{ FAULT_FLAG_WRITE,		"WRITE" }, \
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 259f621345b2..868424ab850c 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2438,6 +2438,13 @@ static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 }
 
+static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
+				       vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Handle the case of a page which we actually need to copy to a new page.
  *
@@ -2465,6 +2472,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	const unsigned long mmun_start = vmf->address & PAGE_MASK;
 	const unsigned long mmun_end = mmun_start + PAGE_SIZE;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+	int ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
 
 	if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma)))
 		goto oom;
@@ -2492,7 +2500,11 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	/*
 	 * Re-check the pte - we dropped the lock
 	 */
-	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
+	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) {
+		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false);
+		ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+		goto oom_free_new;
+	}
 	if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) {
 		if (old_page) {
 			if (!PageAnon(old_page)) {
@@ -2584,7 +2596,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 oom:
 	if (old_page)
 		put_page(old_page);
-	return VM_FAULT_OOM;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2605,8 +2617,8 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 int finish_mkwrite_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED));
-	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
-				       &vmf->ptl);
+	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf))
+		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 	/*
 	 * We might have raced with another page fault while we released the
 	 * pte_offset_map_lock.
@@ -2724,8 +2736,11 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 			get_page(vmf->page);
 			pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 			lock_page(vmf->page);
-			vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
-					vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
+			if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) {
+				unlock_page(vmf->page);
+				put_page(vmf->page);
+				return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+			}
 			if (!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)) {
 				unlock_page(vmf->page);
 				pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
@@ -2953,8 +2968,10 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 			 * Back out if somebody else faulted in this pte
 			 * while we released the pte lock.
 			 */
-			vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
-					vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
+			if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) {
+				delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN);
+				return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+			}
 			if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)))
 				ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
 			delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN);
@@ -3010,8 +3027,11 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	/*
 	 * Back out if somebody else already faulted in this pte.
 	 */
-	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
-			&vmf->ptl);
+	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) {
+		ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false);
+		goto out_page;
+	}
 	if (unlikely(!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)))
 		goto out_nomap;
 
@@ -3140,8 +3160,8 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 			!mm_forbids_zeropage(vma->vm_mm)) {
 		entry = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(vmf->address),
 						vma->vm_page_prot));
-		vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
-				vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
+		if (!pte_map_lock(vmf))
+			return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 		if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte))
 			goto unlock;
 		ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm);
@@ -3176,8 +3196,11 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
 		entry = pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry));
 
-	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
-			&vmf->ptl);
+	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) {
+		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false);
+		put_page(page);
+		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+	}
 	if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte))
 		goto release;
 
@@ -3301,8 +3324,9 @@ static int pte_alloc_one_map(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	 * pte_none() under vmf->ptl protection when we return to
 	 * alloc_set_pte().
 	 */
-	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
-			&vmf->ptl);
+	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf))
+		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 05/24] mm: Introduce pte_spinlock for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] mm: VMA sequence count Laurent Dufour
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

When handling page fault without holding the mmap_sem the fetch of the
pte lock pointer and the locking will have to be done while ensuring
that the VMA is not touched in our back.

So move the fetch and locking operations in a dedicated function.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 868424ab850c..6b2c4732e49d 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2438,6 +2438,13 @@ static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 }
 
+static bool pte_spinlock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
+	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
+	return true;
+}
+
 static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
@@ -3805,8 +3812,8 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	 * validation through pte_unmap_same(). It's of NUMA type but
 	 * the pfn may be screwed if the read is non atomic.
 	 */
-	vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
-	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
+	if (!pte_spinlock(vmf))
+		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 	if (unlikely(!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) {
 		pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 		goto out;
@@ -3999,8 +4006,8 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (pte_protnone(vmf->orig_pte) && vma_is_accessible(vmf->vma))
 		return do_numa_page(vmf);
 
-	vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
-	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
+	if (!pte_spinlock(vmf))
+		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 	entry = vmf->orig_pte;
 	if (unlikely(!pte_same(*vmf->pte, entry)))
 		goto unlock;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 06/24] mm: VMA sequence count
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] mm: Introduce pte_spinlock " Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] mm: Protect VMA modifications using " Laurent Dufour
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence
counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed.

The unmap_page_range() one allows us to make assumptions about
page-tables; when we find the seqcount hasn't changed we can assume
page-tables are still valid.

The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and
the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have
re-checked the vma bounds against the address.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[Port to 4.12 kernel]
[Build depends on CONFIG_SPF]
[Introduce vm_write_* inline function depending on CONFIG_SPF]
[Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence by
 using vm_raw_write* functions]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h       | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mm_types.h |  3 +++
 mm/memory.c              |  2 ++
 mm/mmap.c                | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index ad299ed7b85c..ca7ceba84292 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1369,6 +1369,47 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 	unmap_mapping_range(mapping, holebegin, holelen, 0);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
+}
+static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					 int subclass)
+{
+	write_seqcount_begin_nested(&vma->vm_sequence, subclass);
+}
+static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
+}
+static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	raw_write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
+}
+static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	raw_write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
+}
+#else
+static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+}
+static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					 int subclass)
+{
+}
+static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+}
+static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+}
+static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
+
 extern int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
 		void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags);
 extern int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index fd1af6b9591d..e0e3df3b9641 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
 	struct mempolicy *vm_policy;	/* NUMA policy for the VMA */
 #endif
 	struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	seqcount_t vm_sequence;
+#endif
 } __randomize_layout;
 
 struct core_thread {
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 6b2c4732e49d..22bdc5c6c5ee 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1503,6 +1503,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 	unsigned long next;
 
 	BUG_ON(addr >= end);
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
 	tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
 	pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
 	do {
@@ -1512,6 +1513,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 		next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details);
 	} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
 	tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 }
 
 
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 4bb038e7984b..1dc5397fbd59 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -558,6 +558,10 @@ void __vma_link_rb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	else
 		mm->highest_vm_end = vm_end_gap(vma);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence);
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * vma->vm_prev wasn't known when we followed the rbtree to find the
 	 * correct insertion point for that vma. As a result, we could not
@@ -692,6 +696,30 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	long adjust_next = 0;
 	int remove_next = 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * Why using vm_raw_write*() functions here to avoid lockdep's warning ?
+	 *
+	 * Locked is complaining about a theoretical lock dependency, involving
+	 * 3 locks:
+	 *   mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> vma->vm_sequence --> fs_reclaim
+	 *
+	 * Here are the major path leading to this dependency :
+	 *  1. __vma_adjust() mmap_sem  -> vm_sequence -> i_mmap_rwsem
+	 *  2. move_vmap() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> fs_reclaim
+	 *  3. __alloc_pages_nodemask() fs_reclaim -> i_mmap_rwsem
+	 *  4. unmap_mapping_range() i_mmap_rwsem -> vm_sequence
+	 *
+	 * So there is no way to solve this easily, especially because in
+	 * unmap_mapping_range() the i_mmap_rwsem is grab while the impacted
+	 * VMAs are not yet known.
+	 * However, the way the vm_seq is used is guarantying that we will
+	 * never block on it since we just check for its value and never wait
+	 * for it to move, see vma_has_changed() and handle_speculative_fault().
+	 */
+	vm_raw_write_begin(vma);
+	if (next)
+		vm_raw_write_begin(next);
+
 	if (next && !insert) {
 		struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL;
 
@@ -902,6 +930,7 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 			anon_vma_merge(vma, next);
 		mm->map_count--;
 		mpol_put(vma_policy(next));
+		vm_raw_write_end(next);
 		kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next);
 		/*
 		 * In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge),
@@ -916,6 +945,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 			 * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated.
 			 */
 			next = vma->vm_next;
+			if (next)
+				vm_raw_write_begin(next);
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * For the scope of the comment "next" and
@@ -962,6 +993,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	if (insert && file)
 		uprobe_mmap(insert);
 
+	if (next && next != vma)
+		vm_raw_write_end(next);
+	vm_raw_write_end(vma);
+
 	validate_mm(mm);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 07/24] mm: Protect VMA modifications using VMA sequence count
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] mm: VMA sequence count Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] mm: protect mremap() against SPF hanlder Laurent Dufour
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

The VMA sequence count has been introduced to allow fast detection of
VMA modification when running a page fault handler without holding
the mmap_sem.

This patch provides protection against the VMA modification done in :
	- madvise()
	- mpol_rebind_policy()
	- vma_replace_policy()
	- change_prot_numa()
	- mlock(), munlock()
	- mprotect()
	- mmap_region()
	- collapse_huge_page()
	- userfaultd registering services

In addition, VMA fields which will be read during the speculative fault
path needs to be written using WRITE_ONCE to prevent write to be split
and intermediate values to be pushed to other CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c |  5 ++++-
 fs/userfaultfd.c   | 17 +++++++++++++----
 mm/khugepaged.c    |  3 +++
 mm/madvise.c       |  6 +++++-
 mm/mempolicy.c     | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 mm/mlock.c         | 13 ++++++++-----
 mm/mmap.c          | 17 ++++++++++-------
 mm/mprotect.c      |  4 +++-
 mm/swap_state.c    |  8 ++++++--
 9 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index ec6d2983a5cb..e312d67e0297 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1155,8 +1155,11 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 					goto out_mm;
 				}
 				for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
-					vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_SOFTDIRTY;
+					vm_write_begin(vma);
+					WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags,
+						   vma->vm_flags & ~VM_SOFTDIRTY);
 					vma_set_page_prot(vma);
+					vm_write_end(vma);
 				}
 				downgrade_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 				break;
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 87a13a7c8270..1da1ba63c7dd 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -659,8 +659,11 @@ int dup_userfaultfd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct list_head *fcs)
 
 	octx = vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx;
 	if (!octx || !(octx->features & UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK)) {
+		vm_write_begin(vma);
 		vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX;
-		vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MISSING);
+		WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags,
+			   vma->vm_flags & ~(VM_UFFD_WP | VM_UFFD_MISSING));
+		vm_write_end(vma);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -885,8 +888,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 			vma = prev;
 		else
 			prev = vma;
-		vma->vm_flags = new_flags;
+		vm_write_begin(vma);
+		WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, new_flags);
 		vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX;
+		vm_write_end(vma);
 	}
 	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	mmput(mm);
@@ -1434,8 +1439,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 		 * the next vma was merged into the current one and
 		 * the current one has not been updated yet.
 		 */
-		vma->vm_flags = new_flags;
+		vm_write_begin(vma);
+		WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, new_flags);
 		vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx = ctx;
+		vm_write_end(vma);
 
 	skip:
 		prev = vma;
@@ -1592,8 +1599,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_unregister(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 		 * the next vma was merged into the current one and
 		 * the current one has not been updated yet.
 		 */
-		vma->vm_flags = new_flags;
+		vm_write_begin(vma);
+		WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, new_flags);
 		vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX;
+		vm_write_end(vma);
 
 	skip:
 		prev = vma;
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index b7e2268dfc9a..32314e9e48dd 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1006,6 +1006,7 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	if (mm_find_pmd(mm, address) != pmd)
 		goto out;
 
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
 	anon_vma_lock_write(vma->anon_vma);
 
 	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
@@ -1041,6 +1042,7 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pmd_pgtable(_pmd));
 		spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
 		anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma);
+		vm_write_end(vma);
 		result = SCAN_FAIL;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -1075,6 +1077,7 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	set_pmd_at(mm, address, pmd, _pmd);
 	update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
 	spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 
 	*hpage = NULL;
 
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 751e97aa2210..78774076a9ac 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -184,7 +184,9 @@ static long madvise_behavior(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	/*
 	 * vm_flags is protected by the mmap_sem held in write mode.
 	 */
-	vma->vm_flags = new_flags;
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
+	WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, new_flags);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 out:
 	return error;
 }
@@ -450,9 +452,11 @@ static void madvise_free_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 		.private = tlb,
 	};
 
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
 	tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
 	walk_page_range(addr, end, &free_walk);
 	tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 }
 
 static int madvise_free_single_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 30e68da64873..d95ce3d8480d 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -380,8 +380,11 @@ void mpol_rebind_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t *new)
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
 	down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
-	for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next)
+	for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
+		vm_write_begin(vma);
 		mpol_rebind_policy(vma->vm_policy, new);
+		vm_write_end(vma);
+	}
 	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 }
 
@@ -554,9 +557,11 @@ unsigned long change_prot_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 {
 	int nr_updated;
 
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
 	nr_updated = change_protection(vma, addr, end, PAGE_NONE, 0, 1);
 	if (nr_updated)
 		count_vm_numa_events(NUMA_PTE_UPDATES, nr_updated);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 
 	return nr_updated;
 }
@@ -657,6 +662,7 @@ static int vma_replace_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (IS_ERR(new))
 		return PTR_ERR(new);
 
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
 	if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->set_policy) {
 		err = vma->vm_ops->set_policy(vma, new);
 		if (err)
@@ -664,11 +670,17 @@ static int vma_replace_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	}
 
 	old = vma->vm_policy;
-	vma->vm_policy = new; /* protected by mmap_sem */
+	/*
+	 * The speculative page fault handler access this field without
+	 * hodling the mmap_sem.
+	 */
+	WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_policy,  new);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 	mpol_put(old);
 
 	return 0;
  err_out:
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 	mpol_put(new);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -1551,23 +1563,28 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, compat_ulong_t, start, compat_ulong_t, len,
 struct mempolicy *__get_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 						unsigned long addr)
 {
-	struct mempolicy *pol = NULL;
+	struct mempolicy *pol;
 
-	if (vma) {
-		if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->get_policy) {
-			pol = vma->vm_ops->get_policy(vma, addr);
-		} else if (vma->vm_policy) {
-			pol = vma->vm_policy;
+	if (!vma)
+		return NULL;
 
-			/*
-			 * shmem_alloc_page() passes MPOL_F_SHARED policy with
-			 * a pseudo vma whose vma->vm_ops=NULL. Take a reference
-			 * count on these policies which will be dropped by
-			 * mpol_cond_put() later
-			 */
-			if (mpol_needs_cond_ref(pol))
-				mpol_get(pol);
-		}
+	if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->get_policy)
+		return vma->vm_ops->get_policy(vma, addr);
+
+	/*
+	 * This could be called without holding the mmap_sem in the
+	 * speculative page fault handler's path.
+	 */
+	pol = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_policy);
+	if (pol) {
+		/*
+		 * shmem_alloc_page() passes MPOL_F_SHARED policy with
+		 * a pseudo vma whose vma->vm_ops=NULL. Take a reference
+		 * count on these policies which will be dropped by
+		 * mpol_cond_put() later
+		 */
+		if (mpol_needs_cond_ref(pol))
+			mpol_get(pol);
 	}
 
 	return pol;
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index 16fc7411bd81..bdb311dd01f8 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -445,7 +445,9 @@ static unsigned long __munlock_pagevec_fill(struct pagevec *pvec,
 void munlock_vma_pages_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			     unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
-	vma->vm_flags &= VM_LOCKED_CLEAR_MASK;
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
+	WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED_CLEAR_MASK);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 
 	while (start < end) {
 		struct page *page;
@@ -568,10 +570,11 @@ static int mlock_fixup(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **prev,
 	 * It's okay if try_to_unmap_one unmaps a page just after we
 	 * set VM_LOCKED, populate_vma_page_range will bring it back.
 	 */
-
-	if (lock)
-		vma->vm_flags = newflags;
-	else
+	if (lock) {
+		vm_write_begin(vma);
+		WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, newflags);
+		vm_write_end(vma);
+	} else
 		munlock_vma_pages_range(vma, start, end);
 
 out:
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 1dc5397fbd59..73e740291a3a 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -847,17 +847,18 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	}
 
 	if (start != vma->vm_start) {
-		vma->vm_start = start;
+		WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_start, start);
 		start_changed = true;
 	}
 	if (end != vma->vm_end) {
-		vma->vm_end = end;
+		WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_end, end);
 		end_changed = true;
 	}
-	vma->vm_pgoff = pgoff;
+	WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_pgoff, pgoff);
 	if (adjust_next) {
-		next->vm_start += adjust_next << PAGE_SHIFT;
-		next->vm_pgoff += adjust_next;
+		WRITE_ONCE(next->vm_start,
+			   next->vm_start + (adjust_next << PAGE_SHIFT));
+		WRITE_ONCE(next->vm_pgoff, next->vm_pgoff + adjust_next);
 	}
 
 	if (root) {
@@ -1781,6 +1782,7 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
 out:
 	perf_event_mmap(vma);
 
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
 	vm_stat_account(mm, vm_flags, len >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 	if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
 		if (!((vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL) || is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) ||
@@ -1803,6 +1805,7 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
 	vma->vm_flags |= VM_SOFTDIRTY;
 
 	vma_set_page_prot(vma);
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 
 	return addr;
 
@@ -2431,8 +2434,8 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 					mm->locked_vm += grow;
 				vm_stat_account(mm, vma->vm_flags, grow);
 				anon_vma_interval_tree_pre_update_vma(vma);
-				vma->vm_start = address;
-				vma->vm_pgoff -= grow;
+				WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_start, address);
+				WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_pgoff - grow);
 				anon_vma_interval_tree_post_update_vma(vma);
 				vma_gap_update(vma);
 				spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 58b629bb70de..3b68a3bdb57c 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ mprotect_fixup(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **pprev,
 	 * vm_flags and vm_page_prot are protected by the mmap_sem
 	 * held in write mode.
 	 */
-	vma->vm_flags = newflags;
+	vm_write_begin(vma);
+	WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, newflags);
 	dirty_accountable = vma_wants_writenotify(vma, vma->vm_page_prot);
 	vma_set_page_prot(vma);
 
@@ -376,6 +377,7 @@ mprotect_fixup(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **pprev,
 			(newflags & VM_WRITE)) {
 		populate_vma_page_range(vma, start, end, NULL);
 	}
+	vm_write_end(vma);
 
 	vm_stat_account(mm, oldflags, -nrpages);
 	vm_stat_account(mm, newflags, nrpages);
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 39ae7cfad90f..eeef59c2cd76 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -550,6 +550,10 @@ static unsigned long swapin_nr_pages(unsigned long offset)
  * the readahead.
  *
  * Caller must hold down_read on the vma->vm_mm if vma is not NULL.
+ * This is needed to ensure the VMA will not be freed in our back. In the case
+ * of the speculative page fault handler, this cannot happen, even if we don't
+ * hold the mmap_sem. Callees are assumed to take care of reading VMA's fields
+ * using READ_ONCE() to read consistent values.
  */
 struct page *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 			struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
@@ -643,9 +647,9 @@ static inline void swap_ra_clamp_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				     unsigned long *start,
 				     unsigned long *end)
 {
-	*start = max3(lpfn, PFN_DOWN(vma->vm_start),
+	*start = max3(lpfn, PFN_DOWN(READ_ONCE(vma->vm_start)),
 		      PFN_DOWN(faddr & PMD_MASK));
-	*end = min3(rpfn, PFN_DOWN(vma->vm_end),
+	*end = min3(rpfn, PFN_DOWN(READ_ONCE(vma->vm_end)),
 		    PFN_DOWN((faddr & PMD_MASK) + PMD_SIZE));
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 08/24] mm: protect mremap() against SPF hanlder
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] mm: Protect VMA modifications using " Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] mm: Protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes Laurent Dufour
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

If a thread is remapping an area while another one is faulting on the
destination area, the SPF handler may fetch the vma from the RB tree before
the pte has been moved by the other thread. This means that the moved ptes
will overwrite those create by the page fault handler leading to page
leaked.

	CPU 1				CPU2
	enter mremap()
	unmap the dest area
	copy_vma()			Enter speculative page fault handler
	   >> at this time the dest area is present in the RB tree
					fetch the vma matching dest area
					create a pte as the VMA matched
					Exit the SPF handler
					<data written in the new page>
	move_ptes()
	  > it is assumed that the dest area is empty,
 	  > the move ptes overwrite the page mapped by the CPU2.

To prevent that, when the VMA matching the dest area is extended or created
by copy_vma(), it should be marked as non available to the SPF handler.
The usual way to so is to rely on vm_write_begin()/end().
This is already in __vma_adjust() called by copy_vma() (through
vma_merge()). But __vma_adjust() is calling vm_write_end() before returning
which create a window for another thread.
This patch adds a new parameter to vma_merge() which is passed down to
vma_adjust().
The assumption is that copy_vma() is returning a vma which should be
released by calling vm_raw_write_end() by the callee once the ptes have
been moved.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
 mm/mmap.c          | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 mm/mremap.c        | 13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index ca7ceba84292..61a2b63eccad 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2186,16 +2186,24 @@ void anon_vma_interval_tree_verify(struct anon_vma_chain *node);
 extern int __vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin);
 extern int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	unsigned long end, pgoff_t pgoff, struct vm_area_struct *insert,
-	struct vm_area_struct *expand);
+	struct vm_area_struct *expand, bool keep_locked);
 static inline int vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	unsigned long end, pgoff_t pgoff, struct vm_area_struct *insert)
 {
-	return __vma_adjust(vma, start, end, pgoff, insert, NULL);
+	return __vma_adjust(vma, start, end, pgoff, insert, NULL, false);
 }
-extern struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct mm_struct *,
+extern struct vm_area_struct *__vma_merge(struct mm_struct *,
 	struct vm_area_struct *prev, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 	unsigned long vm_flags, struct anon_vma *, struct file *, pgoff_t,
-	struct mempolicy *, struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx);
+	struct mempolicy *, struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx, bool keep_locked);
+static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct mm_struct *vma,
+	struct vm_area_struct *prev, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
+	unsigned long vm_flags, struct anon_vma *anon, struct file *file,
+	pgoff_t off, struct mempolicy *pol, struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx uff)
+{
+	return __vma_merge(vma, prev, addr, end, vm_flags, anon, file, off,
+			   pol, uff, false);
+}
 extern struct anon_vma *find_mergeable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *);
 extern int __split_vma(struct mm_struct *, struct vm_area_struct *,
 	unsigned long addr, int new_below);
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 73e740291a3a..960e2f16ffcf 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static inline void __vma_unlink_prev(struct mm_struct *mm,
  */
 int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	unsigned long end, pgoff_t pgoff, struct vm_area_struct *insert,
-	struct vm_area_struct *expand)
+	struct vm_area_struct *expand, bool keep_locked)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	struct vm_area_struct *next = vma->vm_next, *orig_vma = vma;
@@ -996,7 +996,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 
 	if (next && next != vma)
 		vm_raw_write_end(next);
-	vm_raw_write_end(vma);
+	if (!keep_locked)
+		vm_raw_write_end(vma);
 
 	validate_mm(mm);
 
@@ -1132,12 +1133,13 @@ can_vma_merge_after(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long vm_flags,
  * parameter) may establish ptes with the wrong permissions of NNNN
  * instead of the right permissions of XXXX.
  */
-struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct mm_struct *mm,
+struct vm_area_struct *__vma_merge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			struct vm_area_struct *prev, unsigned long addr,
 			unsigned long end, unsigned long vm_flags,
 			struct anon_vma *anon_vma, struct file *file,
 			pgoff_t pgoff, struct mempolicy *policy,
-			struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx)
+			struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx,
+			bool keep_locked)
 {
 	pgoff_t pglen = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	struct vm_area_struct *area, *next;
@@ -1185,10 +1187,11 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 							/* cases 1, 6 */
 			err = __vma_adjust(prev, prev->vm_start,
 					 next->vm_end, prev->vm_pgoff, NULL,
-					 prev);
+					 prev, keep_locked);
 		} else					/* cases 2, 5, 7 */
 			err = __vma_adjust(prev, prev->vm_start,
-					 end, prev->vm_pgoff, NULL, prev);
+					   end, prev->vm_pgoff, NULL, prev,
+					   keep_locked);
 		if (err)
 			return NULL;
 		khugepaged_enter_vma_merge(prev, vm_flags);
@@ -1205,10 +1208,12 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 					     vm_userfaultfd_ctx)) {
 		if (prev && addr < prev->vm_end)	/* case 4 */
 			err = __vma_adjust(prev, prev->vm_start,
-					 addr, prev->vm_pgoff, NULL, next);
+					 addr, prev->vm_pgoff, NULL, next,
+					 keep_locked);
 		else {					/* cases 3, 8 */
 			err = __vma_adjust(area, addr, next->vm_end,
-					 next->vm_pgoff - pglen, NULL, next);
+					 next->vm_pgoff - pglen, NULL, next,
+					 keep_locked);
 			/*
 			 * In case 3 area is already equal to next and
 			 * this is a noop, but in case 8 "area" has
@@ -3163,9 +3168,20 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap,
 
 	if (find_vma_links(mm, addr, addr + len, &prev, &rb_link, &rb_parent))
 		return NULL;	/* should never get here */
-	new_vma = vma_merge(mm, prev, addr, addr + len, vma->vm_flags,
-			    vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, pgoff, vma_policy(vma),
-			    vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx);
+
+	/* There is 3 cases to manage here in
+	 *     AAAA            AAAA              AAAA              AAAA
+	 * PPPP....      PPPP......NNNN      PPPP....NNNN      PP........NN
+	 * PPPPPPPP(A)   PPPP..NNNNNNNN(B)   PPPPPPPPPPPP(1)       NULL
+	 *                                   PPPPPPPPNNNN(2)
+	 *				     PPPPNNNNNNNN(3)
+	 *
+	 * new_vma == prev in case A,1,2
+	 * new_vma == next in case B,3
+	 */
+	new_vma = __vma_merge(mm, prev, addr, addr + len, vma->vm_flags,
+			      vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, pgoff,
+			      vma_policy(vma), vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx, true);
 	if (new_vma) {
 		/*
 		 * Source vma may have been merged into new_vma
@@ -3205,6 +3221,15 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap,
 			get_file(new_vma->vm_file);
 		if (new_vma->vm_ops && new_vma->vm_ops->open)
 			new_vma->vm_ops->open(new_vma);
+		/*
+		 * As the VMA is linked right now, it may be hit by the
+		 * speculative page fault handler. But we don't want it to
+		 * to start mapping page in this area until the caller has
+		 * potentially move the pte from the moved VMA. To prevent
+		 * that we protect it right now, and let the caller unprotect
+		 * it once the move is done.
+		 */
+		vm_raw_write_begin(new_vma);
 		vma_link(mm, new_vma, prev, rb_link, rb_parent);
 		*need_rmap_locks = false;
 	}
diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
index 049470aa1e3e..8ed1a1d6eaed 100644
--- a/mm/mremap.c
+++ b/mm/mremap.c
@@ -302,6 +302,14 @@ static unsigned long move_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (!new_vma)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	/* new_vma is returned protected by copy_vma, to prevent speculative
+	 * page fault to be done in the destination area before we move the pte.
+	 * Now, we must also protect the source VMA since we don't want pages
+	 * to be mapped in our back while we are copying the PTEs.
+	 */
+	if (vma != new_vma)
+		vm_raw_write_begin(vma);
+
 	moved_len = move_page_tables(vma, old_addr, new_vma, new_addr, old_len,
 				     need_rmap_locks);
 	if (moved_len < old_len) {
@@ -318,6 +326,8 @@ static unsigned long move_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 */
 		move_page_tables(new_vma, new_addr, vma, old_addr, moved_len,
 				 true);
+		if (vma != new_vma)
+			vm_raw_write_end(vma);
 		vma = new_vma;
 		old_len = new_len;
 		old_addr = new_addr;
@@ -326,7 +336,10 @@ static unsigned long move_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		mremap_userfaultfd_prep(new_vma, uf);
 		arch_remap(mm, old_addr, old_addr + old_len,
 			   new_addr, new_addr + new_len);
+		if (vma != new_vma)
+			vm_raw_write_end(vma);
 	}
+	vm_raw_write_end(new_vma);
 
 	/* Conceal VM_ACCOUNT so old reservation is not undone */
 	if (vm_flags & VM_ACCOUNT) {
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 09/24] mm: Protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] mm: protect mremap() against SPF hanlder Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] mm: Cache some VMA fields in the vm_fault structure Laurent Dufour
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

The speculative page fault handler must be protected against anon_vma
changes. This is because page_add_new_anon_rmap() is called during the
speculative path.

In addition, don't try speculative page fault if the VMA don't have an
anon_vma structure allocated because its allocation should be
protected by the mmap_sem.

In __vma_adjust() when importer->anon_vma is set, there is no need to
protect against speculative page faults since speculative page fault
is aborted if the vma->anon_vma is not set.

When calling page_add_new_anon_rmap() vma->anon_vma is necessarily
valid since we checked for it when locking the pte and the anon_vma is
removed once the pte is unlocked. So even if the speculative page
fault handler is running concurrently with do_unmap(), as the pte is
locked in unmap_region() - through unmap_vmas() - and the anon_vma
unlinked later, because we check for the vma sequence counter which is
updated in unmap_page_range() before locking the pte, and then in
free_pgtables() so when locking the pte the change will be detected.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 22bdc5c6c5ee..3ac54a65b0f9 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -624,7 +624,9 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 * Hide vma from rmap and truncate_pagecache before freeing
 		 * pgtables
 		 */
+		vm_write_begin(vma);
 		unlink_anon_vmas(vma);
+		vm_write_end(vma);
 		unlink_file_vma(vma);
 
 		if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
@@ -638,7 +640,9 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			       && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(next)) {
 				vma = next;
 				next = vma->vm_next;
+				vm_write_begin(vma);
 				unlink_anon_vmas(vma);
+				vm_write_end(vma);
 				unlink_file_vma(vma);
 			}
 			free_pgd_range(tlb, addr, vma->vm_end,
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 10/24] mm: Cache some VMA fields in the vm_fault structure
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] mm: Protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] mm/migrate: Pass vm_fault pointer to migrate_misplaced_page() Laurent Dufour
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

When handling speculative page fault, the vma->vm_flags and
vma->vm_page_prot fields are read once the page table lock is released. So
there is no more guarantee that these fields would not change in our back.
They will be saved in the vm_fault structure before the VMA is checked for
changes.

This patch also set the fields in hugetlb_no_page() and
__collapse_huge_page_swapin even if it is not need for the callee.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  6 ++++++
 mm/hugetlb.c       |  2 ++
 mm/khugepaged.c    |  2 ++
 mm/memory.c        | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 61a2b63eccad..f14a73a8d420 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -361,6 +361,12 @@ struct vm_fault {
 					 * page table to avoid allocation from
 					 * atomic context.
 					 */
+	/*
+	 * These entries are required when handling speculative page fault.
+	 * This way the page handling is done using consistent field values.
+	 */
+	unsigned long vma_flags;
+	pgprot_t vma_page_prot;
 };
 
 /* page entry size for vm->huge_fault() */
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index ffcae114ceed..3b163ecc80e6 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3717,6 +3717,8 @@ static int hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				.vma = vma,
 				.address = address,
 				.flags = flags,
+				.vma_flags = vma->vm_flags,
+				.vma_page_prot = vma->vm_page_prot,
 				/*
 				 * Hard to debug if it ends up being
 				 * used by a callee that assumes
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 32314e9e48dd..a946d5306160 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -882,6 +882,8 @@ static bool __collapse_huge_page_swapin(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		.flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY,
 		.pmd = pmd,
 		.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address),
+		.vma_flags = vma->vm_flags,
+		.vma_page_prot = vma->vm_page_prot,
 	};
 
 	/* we only decide to swapin, if there is enough young ptes */
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 3ac54a65b0f9..79dfd2a60224 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2595,7 +2595,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		 * Don't let another task, with possibly unlocked vma,
 		 * keep the mlocked page.
 		 */
-		if (page_copied && (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) {
+		if (page_copied && (vmf->vma_flags & VM_LOCKED)) {
 			lock_page(old_page);	/* LRU manipulation */
 			if (PageMlocked(old_page))
 				munlock_vma_page(old_page);
@@ -2629,7 +2629,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
  */
 int finish_mkwrite_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED));
 	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf))
 		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 	/*
@@ -2731,7 +2731,7 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		 * We should not cow pages in a shared writeable mapping.
 		 * Just mark the pages writable and/or call ops->pfn_mkwrite.
 		 */
-		if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED)) ==
+		if ((vmf->vma_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED)) ==
 				     (VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED))
 			return wp_pfn_shared(vmf);
 
@@ -2778,7 +2778,7 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 			return VM_FAULT_WRITE;
 		}
 		unlock_page(vmf->page);
-	} else if (unlikely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED)) ==
+	} else if (unlikely((vmf->vma_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED)) ==
 					(VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED))) {
 		return wp_page_shared(vmf);
 	}
@@ -3065,7 +3065,7 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 
 	inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 	dec_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
-	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
+	pte = mk_pte(page, vmf->vma_page_prot);
 	if ((vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page, NULL)) {
 		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
 		vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
@@ -3091,7 +3091,7 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 
 	swap_free(entry);
 	if (mem_cgroup_swap_full(page) ||
-	    (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) || PageMlocked(page))
+	    (vmf->vma_flags & VM_LOCKED) || PageMlocked(page))
 		try_to_free_swap(page);
 	unlock_page(page);
 	if (page != swapcache && swapcache) {
@@ -3148,7 +3148,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	pte_t entry;
 
 	/* File mapping without ->vm_ops ? */
-	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
+	if (vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED)
 		return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
 
 	/*
@@ -3172,7 +3172,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) &&
 			!mm_forbids_zeropage(vma->vm_mm)) {
 		entry = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(vmf->address),
-						vma->vm_page_prot));
+						vmf->vma_page_prot));
 		if (!pte_map_lock(vmf))
 			return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 		if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte))
@@ -3205,8 +3205,8 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	 */
 	__SetPageUptodate(page);
 
-	entry = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
-	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
+	entry = mk_pte(page, vmf->vma_page_prot);
+	if (vmf->vma_flags & VM_WRITE)
 		entry = pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry));
 
 	if (!pte_map_lock(vmf)) {
@@ -3402,7 +3402,7 @@ static int do_set_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page)
 	for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++)
 		flush_icache_page(vma, page + i);
 
-	entry = mk_huge_pmd(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
+	entry = mk_huge_pmd(page, vmf->vma_page_prot);
 	if (write)
 		entry = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(entry), vma);
 
@@ -3476,11 +3476,11 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
 
 	flush_icache_page(vma, page);
-	entry = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
+	entry = mk_pte(page, vmf->vma_page_prot);
 	if (write)
 		entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
 	/* copy-on-write page */
-	if (write && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
+	if (write && !(vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
 		inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 		page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
@@ -3519,7 +3519,7 @@ int finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 
 	/* Did we COW the page? */
 	if ((vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) &&
-	    !(vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
+	    !(vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED))
 		page = vmf->cow_page;
 	else
 		page = vmf->page;
@@ -3773,7 +3773,7 @@ static int do_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
 	else if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE))
 		ret = do_read_fault(vmf);
-	else if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
+	else if (!(vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED))
 		ret = do_cow_fault(vmf);
 	else
 		ret = do_shared_fault(vmf);
@@ -3830,7 +3830,7 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	 * accessible ptes, some can allow access by kernel mode.
 	 */
 	pte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
-	pte = pte_modify(pte, vma->vm_page_prot);
+	pte = pte_modify(pte, vmf->vma_page_prot);
 	pte = pte_mkyoung(pte);
 	if (was_writable)
 		pte = pte_mkwrite(pte);
@@ -3864,7 +3864,7 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	 * Flag if the page is shared between multiple address spaces. This
 	 * is later used when determining whether to group tasks together
 	 */
-	if (page_mapcount(page) > 1 && (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
+	if (page_mapcount(page) > 1 && (vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED))
 		flags |= TNF_SHARED;
 
 	last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page);
@@ -3909,7 +3909,7 @@ static inline int wp_huge_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, pmd_t orig_pmd)
 		return vmf->vma->vm_ops->huge_fault(vmf, PE_SIZE_PMD);
 
 	/* COW handled on pte level: split pmd */
-	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED, vmf->vma);
+	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED, vmf->vma);
 	__split_huge_pmd(vmf->vma, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, false, NULL);
 
 	return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
@@ -4056,6 +4056,8 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		.flags = flags,
 		.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address),
 		.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma),
+		.vma_flags = vma->vm_flags,
+		.vma_page_prot = vma->vm_page_prot,
 	};
 	unsigned int dirty = flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 11/24] mm/migrate: Pass vm_fault pointer to migrate_misplaced_page()
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] mm: Cache some VMA fields in the vm_fault structure Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable Laurent Dufour
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

migrate_misplaced_page() is only called during the page fault handling so
it's better to pass the pointer to the struct vm_fault instead of the vma.

This way during the speculative page fault path the saved vma->vm_flags
could be used.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/migrate.h | 4 ++--
 mm/memory.c             | 2 +-
 mm/migrate.c            | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
index 0c6fe904bc97..08960ec74246 100644
--- a/include/linux/migrate.h
+++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
@@ -126,14 +126,14 @@ static inline void __ClearPageMovable(struct page *page)
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
 extern bool pmd_trans_migrating(pmd_t pmd);
 extern int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page,
-				  struct vm_area_struct *vma, int node);
+				  struct vm_fault *vmf, int node);
 #else
 static inline bool pmd_trans_migrating(pmd_t pmd)
 {
 	return false;
 }
 static inline int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page,
-					 struct vm_area_struct *vma, int node)
+					 struct vm_fault *vmf, int node)
 {
 	return -EAGAIN; /* can't migrate now */
 }
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 79dfd2a60224..e4c0f08b78e8 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3878,7 +3878,7 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	}
 
 	/* Migrate to the requested node */
-	migrated = migrate_misplaced_page(page, vma, target_nid);
+	migrated = migrate_misplaced_page(page, vmf, target_nid);
 	if (migrated) {
 		page_nid = target_nid;
 		flags |= TNF_MIGRATED;
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 33224b92db98..6e1ae62501da 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ bool pmd_trans_migrating(pmd_t pmd)
  * node. Caller is expected to have an elevated reference count on
  * the page that will be dropped by this function before returning.
  */
-int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_fault *vmf,
 			   int node)
 {
 	pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
@@ -1913,7 +1913,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * with execute permissions as they are probably shared libraries.
 	 */
 	if (page_mapcount(page) != 1 && page_is_file_cache(page) &&
-	    (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
+	    (vmf->vma_flags & VM_EXEC))
 		goto out;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 12/24] mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] mm/migrate: Pass vm_fault pointer to migrate_misplaced_page() Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] mm: Introduce __maybe_mkwrite() Laurent Dufour
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

The speculative page fault handler which is run without holding the
mmap_sem is calling lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() but the vm_flags
is not guaranteed to remain constant.
Introducing __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() which has the vma flags
value parameter instead of the vma pointer.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/swap.h | 10 ++++++++--
 mm/memory.c          |  8 ++++----
 mm/swap.c            |  6 +++---
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index a1a3f4ed94ce..99377b66ea93 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -337,8 +337,14 @@ extern void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page);
 extern void mark_page_lazyfree(struct page *page);
 extern void swap_setup(void);
 
-extern void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
-						struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+extern void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
+						unsigned long vma_flags);
+
+static inline void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
+						struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	return __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma->vm_flags);
+}
 
 /* linux/mm/vmscan.c */
 extern unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e4c0f08b78e8..cbd7e5c3a42f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2540,7 +2540,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		ptep_clear_flush_notify(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
 		page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(new_page, memcg, false, false);
-		lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vma);
+		__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vmf->vma_flags);
 		/*
 		 * We call the notify macro here because, when using secondary
 		 * mmu page tables (such as kvm shadow page tables), we want the
@@ -3082,7 +3082,7 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (unlikely(page != swapcache && swapcache)) {
 		page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
-		lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+		__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
 	} else {
 		do_page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, exclusive);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, true, false);
@@ -3232,7 +3232,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 	page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 	mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
-	lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+	__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
 setpte:
 	set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry);
 
@@ -3484,7 +3484,7 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 		page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
-		lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+		__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
 	} else {
 		inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, mm_counter_file(page));
 		page_add_file_rmap(page, false);
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 566cfb9fdaf3..7e25a74397b9 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -455,12 +455,12 @@ void lru_cache_add(struct page *page)
  * directly back onto it's zone's unevictable list, it does NOT use a
  * per cpu pagevec.
  */
-void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
-					 struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
+					   unsigned long vma_flags)
 {
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
 
-	if (likely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED))
+	if (likely((vma_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED))
 		SetPageActive(page);
 	else if (!TestSetPageMlocked(page)) {
 		/*
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 13/24] mm: Introduce __maybe_mkwrite()
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] mm: Introduce __vm_normal_page() Laurent Dufour
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

The current maybe_mkwrite() is getting passed the pointer to the vma
structure to fetch the vm_flags field.

When dealing with the speculative page fault handler, it will be better to
rely on the cached vm_flags value stored in the vm_fault structure.

This patch introduce a __maybe_mkwrite() service which can be called by
passing the value of the vm_flags field.

There is no change functional changes expected for the other callers of
maybe_mkwrite().

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h | 9 +++++++--
 mm/memory.c        | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index f14a73a8d420..d77a11067b94 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -685,13 +685,18 @@ void free_compound_page(struct page *page);
  * pte_mkwrite.  But get_user_pages can cause write faults for mappings
  * that do not have writing enabled, when used by access_process_vm.
  */
-static inline pte_t maybe_mkwrite(pte_t pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline pte_t __maybe_mkwrite(pte_t pte, unsigned long vma_flags)
 {
-	if (likely(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
+	if (likely(vma_flags & VM_WRITE))
 		pte = pte_mkwrite(pte);
 	return pte;
 }
 
+static inline pte_t maybe_mkwrite(pte_t pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	return __maybe_mkwrite(pte, vma->vm_flags);
+}
+
 int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		struct page *page);
 int finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index cbd7e5c3a42f..c24891d5676f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2438,7 +2438,7 @@ static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 
 	flush_cache_page(vma, vmf->address, pte_pfn(vmf->orig_pte));
 	entry = pte_mkyoung(vmf->orig_pte);
-	entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
+	entry = __maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vmf->vma_flags);
 	if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry, 1))
 		update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
 	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
@@ -2529,8 +2529,8 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 			inc_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 		}
 		flush_cache_page(vma, vmf->address, pte_pfn(vmf->orig_pte));
-		entry = mk_pte(new_page, vma->vm_page_prot);
-		entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
+		entry = mk_pte(new_page, vmf->vma_page_prot);
+		entry = __maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vmf->vma_flags);
 		/*
 		 * Clear the pte entry and flush it first, before updating the
 		 * pte with the new entry. This will avoid a race condition
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 14/24] mm: Introduce __vm_normal_page()
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] mm: Introduce __maybe_mkwrite() Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] mm: Introduce __page_add_new_anon_rmap() Laurent Dufour
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

When dealing with the speculative fault path we should use the VMA's field
cached value stored in the vm_fault structure.

Currently vm_normal_page() is using the pointer to the VMA to fetch the
vm_flags value. This patch provides a new __vm_normal_page() which is
receiving the vm_flags flags value as parameter.

Note: The speculative path is turned on for architecture providing support
for special PTE flag. So only the first block of vm_normal_page is used
during the speculative path.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  7 +++++--
 mm/memory.c        | 18 ++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index d77a11067b94..0d1b8d2d1e4f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1260,8 +1260,11 @@ struct zap_details {
 	pgoff_t last_index;			/* Highest page->index to unmap */
 };
 
-struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
-			     pte_t pte, bool with_public_device);
+struct page *__vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+			      pte_t pte, bool with_public_device,
+			      unsigned long vma_flags);
+#define _vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pte, with_public_device) \
+	__vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pte, with_public_device, (vma)->vm_flags)
 #define vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pte) _vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pte, false)
 
 struct page *vm_normal_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index c24891d5676f..a7cb109bf25a 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -826,8 +826,9 @@ static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 #else
 # define HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL 0
 #endif
-struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
-			     pte_t pte, bool with_public_device)
+struct page *__vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+			      pte_t pte, bool with_public_device,
+			      unsigned long vma_flags)
 {
 	unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
 
@@ -836,7 +837,7 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 			goto check_pfn;
 		if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->find_special_page)
 			return vma->vm_ops->find_special_page(vma, addr);
-		if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP))
+		if (vma_flags & (VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP))
 			return NULL;
 		if (is_zero_pfn(pfn))
 			return NULL;
@@ -868,8 +869,8 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 
 	/* !HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL case follows: */
 
-	if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP|VM_MIXEDMAP))) {
-		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MIXEDMAP) {
+	if (unlikely(vma_flags & (VM_PFNMAP|VM_MIXEDMAP))) {
+		if (vma_flags & VM_MIXEDMAP) {
 			if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
 				return NULL;
 			goto out;
@@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 			off = (addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 			if (pfn == vma->vm_pgoff + off)
 				return NULL;
-			if (!is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
+			if (!is_cow_mapping(vma_flags))
 				return NULL;
 		}
 	}
@@ -2722,7 +2723,8 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 
-	vmf->page = vm_normal_page(vma, vmf->address, vmf->orig_pte);
+	vmf->page = __vm_normal_page(vma, vmf->address, vmf->orig_pte, false,
+				     vmf->vma_flags);
 	if (!vmf->page) {
 		/*
 		 * VM_MIXEDMAP !pfn_valid() case, or VM_SOFTDIRTY clear on a
@@ -3837,7 +3839,7 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, pte);
 	update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
 
-	page = vm_normal_page(vma, vmf->address, pte);
+	page = __vm_normal_page(vma, vmf->address, pte, false, vmf->vma_flags);
 	if (!page) {
 		pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 		return 0;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 15/24] mm: Introduce __page_add_new_anon_rmap()
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] mm: Introduce __vm_normal_page() Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:25 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock Laurent Dufour
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

When dealing with speculative page fault handler, we may race with VMA
being split or merged. In this case the vma->vm_start and vm->vm_end
fields may not match the address the page fault is occurring.

This can only happens when the VMA is split but in that case, the
anon_vma pointer of the new VMA will be the same as the original one,
because in __split_vma the new->anon_vma is set to src->anon_vma when
*new = *vma.

So even if the VMA boundaries are not correct, the anon_vma pointer is
still valid.

If the VMA has been merged, then the VMA in which it has been merged
must have the same anon_vma pointer otherwise the merge can't be done.

So in all the case we know that the anon_vma is valid, since we have
checked before starting the speculative page fault that the anon_vma
pointer is valid for this VMA and since there is an anon_vma this
means that at one time a page has been backed and that before the VMA
is cleaned, the page table lock would have to be grab to clean the
PTE, and the anon_vma field is checked once the PTE is locked.

This patch introduce a new __page_add_new_anon_rmap() service which
doesn't check for the VMA boundaries, and create a new inline one
which do the check.

When called from a page fault handler, if this is not a speculative one,
there is a guarantee that vm_start and vm_end match the faulting address,
so this check is useless. In the context of the speculative page fault
handler, this check may be wrong but anon_vma is still valid as explained
above.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rmap.h | 12 ++++++++++--
 mm/memory.c          |  8 ++++----
 mm/rmap.c            |  5 ++---
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
index 988d176472df..a5d282573093 100644
--- a/include/linux/rmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
@@ -174,8 +174,16 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
 		unsigned long, bool);
 void do_page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
 			   unsigned long, int);
-void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
-		unsigned long, bool);
+void __page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
+			      unsigned long, bool);
+static inline void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
+					  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					  unsigned long address, bool compound)
+{
+	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end, vma);
+	__page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, address, compound);
+}
+
 void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *, bool);
 void page_remove_rmap(struct page *, bool);
 
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index a7cb109bf25a..0ce303260ad1 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2539,7 +2539,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		 * thread doing COW.
 		 */
 		ptep_clear_flush_notify(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
-		page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false);
+		__page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(new_page, memcg, false, false);
 		__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vmf->vma_flags);
 		/*
@@ -3082,7 +3082,7 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 
 	/* ksm created a completely new copy */
 	if (unlikely(page != swapcache && swapcache)) {
-		page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
+		__page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
 		__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
 	} else {
@@ -3232,7 +3232,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	}
 
 	inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
-	page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
+	__page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 	mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
 	__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
 setpte:
@@ -3484,7 +3484,7 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	/* copy-on-write page */
 	if (write && !(vmf->vma_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
 		inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
-		page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
+		__page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
 		mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
 		__lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
 	} else {
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 47db27f8049e..6ec168ba5f73 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ void do_page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
 }
 
 /**
- * page_add_new_anon_rmap - add pte mapping to a new anonymous page
+ * __page_add_new_anon_rmap - add pte mapping to a new anonymous page
  * @page:	the page to add the mapping to
  * @vma:	the vm area in which the mapping is added
  * @address:	the user virtual address mapped
@@ -1146,12 +1146,11 @@ void do_page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
  * This means the inc-and-test can be bypassed.
  * Page does not have to be locked.
  */
-void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
+void __page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, bool compound)
 {
 	int nr = compound ? hpage_nr_pages(page) : 1;
 
-	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end, vma);
 	__SetPageSwapBacked(page);
 	if (compound) {
 		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageTransHuge(page), page);
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 16/24] mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] mm: Introduce __page_add_new_anon_rmap() Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 18:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] mm: Provide speculative fault infrastructure Laurent Dufour
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

This change is inspired by the Peter's proposal patch [1] which was
protecting the VMA using SRCU. Unfortunately, SRCU is not scaling well in
that particular case, and it is introducing major performance degradation
due to excessive scheduling operations.

To allow access to the mm_rb tree without grabbing the mmap_sem, this patch
is protecting it access using a rwlock.  As the mm_rb tree is a O(log n)
search it is safe to protect it using such a lock.  The VMA cache is not
protected by the new rwlock and it should not be used without holding the
mmap_sem.

To allow the picked VMA structure to be used once the rwlock is released, a
use count is added to the VMA structure. When the VMA is allocated it is
set to 1.  Each time the VMA is picked with the rwlock held its use count
is incremented. Each time the VMA is released it is decremented. When the
use count hits zero, this means that the VMA is no more used and should be
freed.

This patch is preparing for 2 kind of VMA access :
 - as usual, under the control of the mmap_sem,
 - without holding the mmap_sem for the speculative page fault handler.

Access done under the control the mmap_sem doesn't require to grab the
rwlock to protect read access to the mm_rb tree, but access in write must
be done under the protection of the rwlock too. This affects inserting and
removing of elements in the RB tree.

The patch is introducing 2 new functions:
 - vma_get() to find a VMA based on an address by holding the new rwlock.
 - vma_put() to release the VMA when its no more used.
These services are designed to be used when access are made to the RB tree
without holding the mmap_sem.

When a VMA is removed from the RB tree, its vma->vm_rb field is cleared and
we rely on the WMB done when releasing the rwlock to serialize the write
with the RMB done in a later patch to check for the VMA's validity.

When free_vma is called, the file associated with the VMA is closed
immediately, but the policy and the file structure remained in used until
the VMA's use count reach 0, which may happens later when exiting an
in progress speculative page fault.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5108281/

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h |   4 ++
 kernel/fork.c            |   3 ++
 mm/init-mm.c             |   3 ++
 mm/internal.h            |   6 +++
 mm/mmap.c                | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 5 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index e0e3df3b9641..2684df7e7294 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
 	struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPF
 	seqcount_t vm_sequence;
+	atomic_t vm_ref_count;		/* see vma_get(), vma_put() */
 #endif
 } __randomize_layout;
 
@@ -353,6 +354,9 @@ struct kioctx_table;
 struct mm_struct {
 	struct vm_area_struct *mmap;		/* list of VMAs */
 	struct rb_root mm_rb;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	rwlock_t mm_rb_lock;
+#endif
 	u32 vmacache_seqnum;                   /* per-thread vmacache */
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 	unsigned long (*get_unmapped_area) (struct file *filp,
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 0914307d4f3b..d99606e1e9ba 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -898,6 +898,9 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
 	mm->mmap = NULL;
 	mm->mm_rb = RB_ROOT;
 	mm->vmacache_seqnum = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	rwlock_init(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
+#endif
 	atomic_set(&mm->mm_users, 1);
 	atomic_set(&mm->mm_count, 1);
 	init_rwsem(&mm->mmap_sem);
diff --git a/mm/init-mm.c b/mm/init-mm.c
index f94d5d15ebc0..aaa5d7851d87 100644
--- a/mm/init-mm.c
+++ b/mm/init-mm.c
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
 
 struct mm_struct init_mm = {
 	.mm_rb		= RB_ROOT,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	.mm_rb_lock	= __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.mm_rb_lock),
+#endif
 	.pgd		= swapper_pg_dir,
 	.mm_users	= ATOMIC_INIT(2),
 	.mm_count	= ATOMIC_INIT(1),
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 62d8c34e63d5..4b9c3357bd6c 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ void page_writeback_init(void);
 
 int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+extern struct vm_area_struct *get_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
+				      unsigned long addr);
+extern void put_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+#endif
+
 void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *start_vma,
 		unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling);
 
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 960e2f16ffcf..972ddee0b151 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -160,6 +160,27 @@ void unlink_file_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	}
 }
 
+static void __free_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	if (vma->vm_file)
+		fput(vma->vm_file);
+	mpol_put(vma_policy(vma));
+	kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, vma);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+void put_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&vma->vm_ref_count))
+		__free_vma(vma);
+}
+#else
+static inline void put_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	return __free_vma(vma);
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Close a vm structure and free it, returning the next.
  */
@@ -170,10 +191,7 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *remove_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	might_sleep();
 	if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->close)
 		vma->vm_ops->close(vma);
-	if (vma->vm_file)
-		fput(vma->vm_file);
-	mpol_put(vma_policy(vma));
-	kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, vma);
+	put_vma(vma);
 	return next;
 }
 
@@ -411,26 +429,41 @@ static void vma_gap_update(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 }
 
 static inline void vma_rb_insert(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-				 struct rb_root *root)
+				 struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
+	struct rb_root *root = &mm->mm_rb;
+
 	/* All rb_subtree_gap values must be consistent prior to insertion */
 	validate_mm_rb(root, NULL);
 
 	rb_insert_augmented(&vma->vm_rb, root, &vma_gap_callbacks);
 }
 
-static void __vma_rb_erase(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct rb_root *root)
+static void __vma_rb_erase(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
+	struct rb_root *root = &mm->mm_rb;
 	/*
 	 * Note rb_erase_augmented is a fairly large inline function,
 	 * so make sure we instantiate it only once with our desired
 	 * augmented rbtree callbacks.
 	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	write_lock(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
+#endif
 	rb_erase_augmented(&vma->vm_rb, root, &vma_gap_callbacks);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	write_unlock(&mm->mm_rb_lock); /* wmb */
+#endif
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure the removal is complete before clearing the node.
+	 * Matched by vma_has_changed()/handle_speculative_fault().
+	 */
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&vma->vm_rb);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void vma_rb_erase_ignore(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-						struct rb_root *root,
+						struct mm_struct *mm,
 						struct vm_area_struct *ignore)
 {
 	/*
@@ -438,21 +471,21 @@ static __always_inline void vma_rb_erase_ignore(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * with the possible exception of the "next" vma being erased if
 	 * next->vm_start was reduced.
 	 */
-	validate_mm_rb(root, ignore);
+	validate_mm_rb(&mm->mm_rb, ignore);
 
-	__vma_rb_erase(vma, root);
+	__vma_rb_erase(vma, mm);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void vma_rb_erase(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
-					 struct rb_root *root)
+					 struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	/*
 	 * All rb_subtree_gap values must be consistent prior to erase,
 	 * with the possible exception of the vma being erased.
 	 */
-	validate_mm_rb(root, vma);
+	validate_mm_rb(&mm->mm_rb, vma);
 
-	__vma_rb_erase(vma, root);
+	__vma_rb_erase(vma, mm);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -558,10 +591,6 @@ void __vma_link_rb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	else
 		mm->highest_vm_end = vm_end_gap(vma);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
-	seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence);
-#endif
-
 	/*
 	 * vma->vm_prev wasn't known when we followed the rbtree to find the
 	 * correct insertion point for that vma. As a result, we could not
@@ -571,10 +600,17 @@ void __vma_link_rb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * immediately update the gap to the correct value. Finally we
 	 * rebalance the rbtree after all augmented values have been set.
 	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	atomic_set(&vma->vm_ref_count, 1);
+	write_lock(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
+#endif
 	rb_link_node(&vma->vm_rb, rb_parent, rb_link);
 	vma->rb_subtree_gap = 0;
 	vma_gap_update(vma);
-	vma_rb_insert(vma, &mm->mm_rb);
+	vma_rb_insert(vma, mm);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	write_unlock(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
+#endif
 }
 
 static void __vma_link_file(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
@@ -650,7 +686,7 @@ static __always_inline void __vma_unlink_common(struct mm_struct *mm,
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *next;
 
-	vma_rb_erase_ignore(vma, &mm->mm_rb, ignore);
+	vma_rb_erase_ignore(vma, mm, ignore);
 	next = vma->vm_next;
 	if (has_prev)
 		prev->vm_next = next;
@@ -923,16 +959,13 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 	}
 
 	if (remove_next) {
-		if (file) {
+		if (file)
 			uprobe_munmap(next, next->vm_start, next->vm_end);
-			fput(file);
-		}
 		if (next->anon_vma)
 			anon_vma_merge(vma, next);
 		mm->map_count--;
-		mpol_put(vma_policy(next));
 		vm_raw_write_end(next);
-		kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next);
+		put_vma(next);
 		/*
 		 * In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge),
 		 * we must remove another next too. It would clutter
@@ -2182,15 +2215,11 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_unmapped_area);
 
 /* Look up the first VMA which satisfies  addr < vm_end,  NULL if none. */
-struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+static struct vm_area_struct *__find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
+					 unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct rb_node *rb_node;
-	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
-
-	/* Check the cache first. */
-	vma = vmacache_find(mm, addr);
-	if (likely(vma))
-		return vma;
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma = NULL;
 
 	rb_node = mm->mm_rb.rb_node;
 
@@ -2208,13 +2237,40 @@ struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 			rb_node = rb_node->rb_right;
 	}
 
+	return vma;
+}
+
+struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+
+	/* Check the cache first. */
+	vma = vmacache_find(mm, addr);
+	if (likely(vma))
+		return vma;
+
+	vma = __find_vma(mm, addr);
 	if (vma)
 		vmacache_update(addr, vma);
 	return vma;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_vma);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+struct vm_area_struct *get_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma = NULL;
+
+	read_lock(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
+	vma = __find_vma(mm, addr);
+	if (vma)
+		atomic_inc(&vma->vm_ref_count);
+	read_unlock(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
+
+	return vma;
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Same as find_vma, but also return a pointer to the previous VMA in *pprev.
  */
@@ -2582,7 +2638,7 @@ detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	insertion_point = (prev ? &prev->vm_next : &mm->mmap);
 	vma->vm_prev = NULL;
 	do {
-		vma_rb_erase(vma, &mm->mm_rb);
+		vma_rb_erase(vma, mm);
 		mm->map_count--;
 		tail_vma = vma;
 		vma = vma->vm_next;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 17/24] mm: Provide speculative fault infrastructure
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path Laurent Dufour
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Provide infrastructure to do a speculative fault (not holding
mmap_sem).

The not holding of mmap_sem means we can race against VMA
change/removal and page-table destruction. We use the SRCU VMA freeing
to keep the VMA around. We use the VMA seqcount to detect change
(including umapping / page-table deletion) and we use gup_fast() style
page-table walking to deal with page-table races.

Once we've obtained the page and are ready to update the PTE, we
validate if the state we started the fault with is still valid, if
not, we'll fail the fault with VM_FAULT_RETRY, otherwise we update the
PTE and we're done.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[Manage the newly introduced pte_spinlock() for speculative page
 fault to fail if the VMA is touched in our back]
[Rename vma_is_dead() to vma_has_changed() and declare it here]
[Fetch p4d and pud]
[Set vmd.sequence in __handle_mm_fault()]
[Abort speculative path when handle_userfault() has to be called]
[Add additional VMA's flags checks in handle_speculative_fault()]
[Clear FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY in handle_speculative_fault()]
[Don't set vmf->pte and vmf->ptl if pte_map_lock() failed]
[Remove warning comment about waiting for !seq&1 since we don't want
 to wait]
[Remove warning about no huge page support, mention it explictly]
[Don't call do_fault() in the speculative path as __do_fault() calls
 vma->vm_ops->fault() which may want to release mmap_sem]
[Only vm_fault pointer argument for vma_has_changed()]
[Fix check against huge page, calling pmd_trans_huge()]
[Use READ_ONCE() when reading VMA's fields in the speculative path]
[Explicitly check for __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL as we can't support for
 processing done in vm_normal_page()]
[Check that vma->anon_vma is already set when starting the speculative
 path]
[Check for memory policy as we can't support MPOL_INTERLEAVE case due to
 the processing done in mpol_misplaced()]
[Don't support VMA growing up or down]
[Move check on vm_sequence just before calling handle_pte_fault()]
[Don't build SPF services if !CONFIG_SPF]
[Add mem cgroup oom check]
[Use READ_ONCE to access p*d entries]
[Replace deprecated ACCESS_ONCE() by READ_ONCE() in vma_has_changed()]
[Don't fetch pte again in handle_pte_fault() when running the speculative
 path]
[Check PMD against concurrent collapsing operation]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h |   2 +-
 include/linux/mm.h             |   8 +
 include/linux/pagemap.h        |   4 +-
 mm/internal.h                  |  16 +-
 mm/memory.c                    | 321 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 344 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h b/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
index 0660a03d37d9..9e25283d6fc9 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb_inline.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 static inline bool is_vm_hugetlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
-	return !!(vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB);
+	return !!(READ_ONCE(vma->vm_flags) & VM_HUGETLB);
 }
 
 #else
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 0d1b8d2d1e4f..4d8a7621da8a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -331,6 +331,10 @@ struct vm_fault {
 	gfp_t gfp_mask;			/* gfp mask to be used for allocations */
 	pgoff_t pgoff;			/* Logical page offset based on vma */
 	unsigned long address;		/* Faulting virtual address */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	unsigned int sequence;
+	pmd_t orig_pmd;			/* value of PMD at the time of fault */
+#endif
 	pmd_t *pmd;			/* Pointer to pmd entry matching
 					 * the 'address' */
 	pud_t *pud;			/* Pointer to pud entry matching
@@ -1348,6 +1352,10 @@ int invalidate_inode_page(struct page *page);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 extern int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		unsigned int flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+extern int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
+				    unsigned long address, unsigned int flags);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
 extern int fixup_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
 			    unsigned long address, unsigned int fault_flags,
 			    bool *unlocked);
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 34ce3ebf97d5..70e4d2688e7b 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -456,8 +456,8 @@ static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	pgoff_t pgoff;
 	if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
 		return linear_hugepage_index(vma, address);
-	pgoff = (address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	pgoff += vma->vm_pgoff;
+	pgoff = (address - READ_ONCE(vma->vm_start)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	pgoff += READ_ONCE(vma->vm_pgoff);
 	return pgoff;
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 4b9c3357bd6c..f35998b72183 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -44,7 +44,21 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf);
 extern struct vm_area_struct *get_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				      unsigned long addr);
 extern void put_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
-#endif
+
+static inline bool vma_has_changed(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	int ret = RB_EMPTY_NODE(&vmf->vma->vm_rb);
+	unsigned int seq = READ_ONCE(vmf->vma->vm_sequence.sequence);
+
+	/*
+	 * Matches both the wmb in write_seqlock_{begin,end}() and
+	 * the wmb in vma_rb_erase().
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+
+	return ret || seq != vmf->sequence;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
 
 void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *start_vma,
 		unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 0ce303260ad1..96720cc7ca74 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -769,7 +769,8 @@ static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 	if (page)
 		dump_page(page, "bad pte");
 	pr_alert("addr:%p vm_flags:%08lx anon_vma:%p mapping:%p index:%lx\n",
-		 (void *)addr, vma->vm_flags, vma->anon_vma, mapping, index);
+		 (void *)addr, READ_ONCE(vma->vm_flags), vma->anon_vma,
+		 mapping, index);
 	pr_alert("file:%pD fault:%pf mmap:%pf readpage:%pf\n",
 		 vma->vm_file,
 		 vma->vm_ops ? vma->vm_ops->fault : NULL,
@@ -2445,19 +2446,108 @@ static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
 static bool pte_spinlock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
+	bool ret = false;
+	pmd_t pmdval;
+
+	/* Check if vma is still valid */
+	if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE)) {
+		vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
+		spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	local_irq_disable();
+	if (vma_has_changed(vmf))
+		goto out;
+
+	/*
+	 * We check if the pmd value is still the same to ensure that there
+	 * is a huge collapse operation in progress in our back.
+	 */
+	pmdval = READ_ONCE(*vmf->pmd);
+	if (!pmd_same(pmdval, vmf->orig_pmd))
+		goto out;
+
+	vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
+	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
+
+	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
+		spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = true;
+out:
+	local_irq_enable();
+	return ret;
+}
+#else
+static inline bool pte_spinlock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
 	vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
 	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
 	return true;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
 static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
+	bool ret = false;
+	pte_t *pte;
+	pmd_t pmdval;
+	spinlock_t *ptl;
+
+	if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE)) {
+		vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
+					       vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The first vma_has_changed() guarantees the page-tables are still
+	 * valid, having IRQs disabled ensures they stay around, hence the
+	 * second vma_has_changed() to make sure they are still valid once
+	 * we've got the lock. After that a concurrent zap_pte_range() will
+	 * block on the PTL and thus we're safe.
+	 */
+	local_irq_disable();
+	if (vma_has_changed(vmf))
+		goto out;
+
+	/*
+	 * We check if the pmd value is still the same to ensure that there
+	 * is a huge collapse operation in progress in our back.
+	 */
+	pmdval = READ_ONCE(*vmf->pmd);
+	if (!pmd_same(pmdval, vmf->orig_pmd))
+		goto out;
+
+	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
+				  vmf->address, &ptl);
+	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
+		pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	vmf->pte = pte;
+	vmf->ptl = ptl;
+	ret = true;
+out:
+	local_irq_enable();
+	return ret;
+}
+#else
+static inline bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
 	vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
 				       vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
 	return true;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
 
 /*
  * Handle the case of a page which we actually need to copy to a new page.
@@ -3182,6 +3272,14 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm);
 		if (ret)
 			goto unlock;
+		/*
+		 * Don't call the userfaultfd during the speculative path.
+		 * We already checked for the VMA to not be managed through
+		 * userfaultfd, but it may be set in our back once we have lock
+		 * the pte. In such a case we can ignore it this time.
+		 */
+		if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE)
+			goto setpte;
 		/* Deliver the page fault to userland, check inside PT lock */
 		if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
 			pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
@@ -3224,7 +3322,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		goto release;
 
 	/* Deliver the page fault to userland, check inside PT lock */
-	if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
+	if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE) && userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
 		pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false);
 		put_page(page);
@@ -3967,13 +4065,22 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 
 	if (unlikely(pmd_none(*vmf->pmd))) {
 		/*
+		 * In the case of the speculative page fault handler we abort
+		 * the speculative path immediately as the pmd is probably
+		 * in the way to be converted in a huge one. We will try
+		 * again holding the mmap_sem (which implies that the collapse
+		 * operation is done).
+		 */
+		if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE)
+			return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+		/*
 		 * Leave __pte_alloc() until later: because vm_ops->fault may
 		 * want to allocate huge page, and if we expose page table
 		 * for an instant, it will be difficult to retract from
 		 * concurrent faults and from rmap lookups.
 		 */
 		vmf->pte = NULL;
-	} else {
+	} else if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE)) {
 		/* See comment in pte_alloc_one_map() */
 		if (pmd_devmap_trans_unstable(vmf->pmd))
 			return 0;
@@ -3982,6 +4089,9 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		 * pmd from under us anymore at this point because we hold the
 		 * mmap_sem read mode and khugepaged takes it in write mode.
 		 * So now it's safe to run pte_offset_map().
+		 * This is not applicable to the speculative page fault handler
+		 * but in that case, the pte is fetched earlier in
+		 * handle_speculative_fault().
 		 */
 		vmf->pte = pte_offset_map(vmf->pmd, vmf->address);
 		vmf->orig_pte = *vmf->pte;
@@ -4004,6 +4114,8 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (!vmf->pte) {
 		if (vma_is_anonymous(vmf->vma))
 			return do_anonymous_page(vmf);
+		else if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE)
+			return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 		else
 			return do_fault(vmf);
 	}
@@ -4101,6 +4213,9 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 	vmf.pmd = pmd_alloc(mm, vmf.pud, address);
 	if (!vmf.pmd)
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	vmf.sequence = raw_read_seqcount(&vma->vm_sequence);
+#endif
 	if (pmd_none(*vmf.pmd) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma)) {
 		ret = create_huge_pmd(&vmf);
 		if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
@@ -4134,6 +4249,206 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 	return handle_pte_fault(&vmf);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+
+#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
+/* This is required by vm_normal_page() */
+#error "Speculative page fault handler requires __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL"
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * vm_normal_page() adds some processing which should be done while
+ * hodling the mmap_sem.
+ */
+int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
+			     unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct vm_fault vmf = {
+		.address = address,
+	};
+	pgd_t *pgd, pgdval;
+	p4d_t *p4d, p4dval;
+	pud_t pudval;
+	int seq, ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	struct mempolicy *pol;
+#endif
+
+	/* Clear flags that may lead to release the mmap_sem to retry */
+	flags &= ~(FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY|FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE);
+	flags |= FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE;
+
+	vma = get_vma(mm, address);
+	if (!vma)
+		return ret;
+
+	seq = raw_read_seqcount(&vma->vm_sequence); /* rmb <-> seqlock,vma_rb_erase() */
+	if (seq & 1)
+		goto out_put;
+
+	/*
+	 * Can't call vm_ops service has we don't know what they would do
+	 * with the VMA.
+	 * This include huge page from hugetlbfs.
+	 */
+	if (vma->vm_ops)
+		goto out_put;
+
+	/*
+	 * __anon_vma_prepare() requires the mmap_sem to be held
+	 * because vm_next and vm_prev must be safe. This can't be guaranteed
+	 * in the speculative path.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma))
+		goto out_put;
+
+	vmf.vma_flags = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_flags);
+	vmf.vma_page_prot = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot);
+
+	/* Can't call userland page fault handler in the speculative path */
+	if (unlikely(vmf.vma_flags & VM_UFFD_MISSING))
+		goto out_put;
+
+	if (vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN || vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSUP)
+		/*
+		 * This could be detected by the check address against VMA's
+		 * boundaries but we want to trace it as not supported instead
+		 * of changed.
+		 */
+		goto out_put;
+
+	if (address < READ_ONCE(vma->vm_start)
+	    || READ_ONCE(vma->vm_end) <= address)
+		goto out_put;
+
+	if (!arch_vma_access_permitted(vma, flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE,
+				       flags & FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION,
+				       flags & FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE)) {
+		ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
+		goto out_put;
+	}
+
+	/* This is one is required to check that the VMA has write access set */
+	if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
+		if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & VM_WRITE))) {
+			ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
+			goto out_put;
+		}
+	} else if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & (VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_WRITE)))) {
+		ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
+		goto out_put;
+	}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	/*
+	 * MPOL_INTERLEAVE implies additional check in mpol_misplaced() which
+	 * are not compatible with the speculative page fault processing.
+	 */
+	pol = __get_vma_policy(vma, address);
+	if (!pol)
+		pol = get_task_policy(current);
+	if (pol && pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
+		goto out_put;
+#endif
+
+	/*
+	 * Do a speculative lookup of the PTE entry.
+	 */
+	local_irq_disable();
+	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
+	pgdval = READ_ONCE(*pgd);
+	if (pgd_none(pgdval) || unlikely(pgd_bad(pgdval)))
+		goto out_walk;
+
+	p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, address);
+	p4dval = READ_ONCE(*p4d);
+	if (p4d_none(p4dval) || unlikely(p4d_bad(p4dval)))
+		goto out_walk;
+
+	vmf.pud = pud_offset(p4d, address);
+	pudval = READ_ONCE(*vmf.pud);
+	if (pud_none(pudval) || unlikely(pud_bad(pudval)))
+		goto out_walk;
+
+	/* Huge pages at PUD level are not supported. */
+	if (unlikely(pud_trans_huge(pudval)))
+		goto out_walk;
+
+	vmf.pmd = pmd_offset(vmf.pud, address);
+	vmf.orig_pmd = READ_ONCE(*vmf.pmd);
+	/*
+	 * pmd_none could mean that a hugepage collapse is in progress
+	 * in our back as collapse_huge_page() mark it before
+	 * invalidating the pte (which is done once the IPI is catched
+	 * by all CPU and we have interrupt disabled).
+	 * For this reason we cannot handle THP in a speculative way since we
+	 * can't safely indentify an in progress collapse operation done in our
+	 * back on that PMD.
+	 * Regarding the order of the following checks, see comment in
+	 * pmd_devmap_trans_unstable()
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(pmd_devmap(vmf.orig_pmd) ||
+		     pmd_none(vmf.orig_pmd) || pmd_trans_huge(vmf.orig_pmd) ||
+		     is_swap_pmd(vmf.orig_pmd)))
+		goto out_walk;
+
+	/*
+	 * The above does not allocate/instantiate page-tables because doing so
+	 * would lead to the possibility of instantiating page-tables after
+	 * free_pgtables() -- and consequently leaking them.
+	 *
+	 * The result is that we take at least one !speculative fault per PMD
+	 * in order to instantiate it.
+	 */
+
+	vmf.pte = pte_offset_map(vmf.pmd, address);
+	vmf.orig_pte = READ_ONCE(*vmf.pte);
+	barrier(); /* See comment in handle_pte_fault() */
+	if (pte_none(vmf.orig_pte)) {
+		pte_unmap(vmf.pte);
+		vmf.pte = NULL;
+	}
+
+	vmf.vma = vma;
+	vmf.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address);
+	vmf.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma);
+	vmf.sequence = seq;
+	vmf.flags = flags;
+
+	local_irq_enable();
+
+	/*
+	 * We need to re-validate the VMA after checking the bounds, otherwise
+	 * we might have a false positive on the bounds.
+	 */
+	if (read_seqcount_retry(&vma->vm_sequence, seq))
+		goto out_put;
+
+	mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
+	ret = handle_pte_fault(&vmf);
+	mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
+
+	put_vma(vma);
+
+	/*
+	 * The task may have entered a memcg OOM situation but
+	 * if the allocation error was handled gracefully (no
+	 * VM_FAULT_OOM), there is no need to kill anything.
+	 * Just clean up the OOM state peacefully.
+	 */
+	if (task_in_memcg_oom(current) && !(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
+		mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(false);
+	return ret;
+
+out_walk:
+	local_irq_enable();
+out_put:
+	put_vma(vma);
+	return ret;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
+
 /*
  * By the time we get here, we already hold the mm semaphore
  *
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 18/24] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] mm: Provide speculative fault infrastructure Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 18:18   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] mm: Adding speculative page fault failure trace events Laurent Dufour
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

There is a deadlock when a CPU is doing a speculative page fault and
another one is calling do_unmap().

The deadlock occurred because the speculative path try to spinlock the
pte while the interrupt are disabled. When the other CPU in the
unmap's path has locked the pte then is waiting for all the CPU to
invalidate the TLB. As the CPU doing the speculative fault have the
interrupt disable it can't invalidate the TLB, and can't get the lock.

Since we are in a speculative path, we can race with other mm action.
So let assume that the lock may not get acquired and fail the
speculative page fault.

Here are the stacks captured during the deadlock:

	CPU 0
	native_flush_tlb_others+0x7c/0x260
	flush_tlb_mm_range+0x6a/0x220
	tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly+0x63/0xc0
	unmap_page_range+0x897/0x9d0
	? unmap_single_vma+0x7d/0xe0
	? release_pages+0x2b3/0x360
	unmap_single_vma+0x7d/0xe0
	unmap_vmas+0x51/0xa0
	unmap_region+0xbd/0x130
	do_munmap+0x279/0x460
	SyS_munmap+0x53/0x70

	CPU 1
	do_raw_spin_lock+0x14e/0x160
	_raw_spin_lock+0x5d/0x80
	? pte_map_lock+0x169/0x1b0
	pte_map_lock+0x169/0x1b0
	handle_pte_fault+0xbf2/0xd80
	? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
	handle_speculative_fault+0x272/0x280
	handle_speculative_fault+0x5/0x280
	__do_page_fault+0x187/0x580
	trace_do_page_fault+0x52/0x260
	do_async_page_fault+0x19/0x70
	async_page_fault+0x28/0x30

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 96720cc7ca74..83640079d407 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2472,7 +2472,8 @@ static bool pte_spinlock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		goto out;
 
 	vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
-	spin_lock(vmf->ptl);
+	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(vmf->ptl)))
+		goto out;
 
 	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
 		spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
@@ -2526,8 +2527,20 @@ static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (!pmd_same(pmdval, vmf->orig_pmd))
 		goto out;
 
-	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
-				  vmf->address, &ptl);
+	/*
+	 * Same as pte_offset_map_lock() except that we call
+	 * spin_trylock() in place of spin_lock() to avoid race with
+	 * unmap path which may have the lock and wait for this CPU
+	 * to invalidate TLB but this CPU has irq disabled.
+	 * Since we are in a speculative patch, accept it could fail
+	 */
+	ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
+	pte = pte_offset_map(vmf->pmd, vmf->address);
+	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(ptl))) {
+		pte_unmap(pte);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
 		pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
 		goto out;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 19/24] mm: Adding speculative page fault failure trace events
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] perf: Add a speculative page fault sw event Laurent Dufour
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

This patch a set of new trace events to collect the speculative page fault
event failures.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/trace/events/pagefault.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/memory.c                      | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/trace/events/pagefault.h

diff --git a/include/trace/events/pagefault.h b/include/trace/events/pagefault.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1d793f8c739b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/trace/events/pagefault.h
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM pagefault
+
+#if !defined(_TRACE_PAGEFAULT_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_PAGEFAULT_H
+
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(spf,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long caller,
+		 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address),
+
+	TP_ARGS(caller, vma, address),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(unsigned long, caller)
+		__field(unsigned long, vm_start)
+		__field(unsigned long, vm_end)
+		__field(unsigned long, address)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->caller		= caller;
+		__entry->vm_start	= vma->vm_start;
+		__entry->vm_end		= vma->vm_end;
+		__entry->address	= address;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("ip:%lx vma:%lx-%lx address:%lx",
+		  __entry->caller, __entry->vm_start, __entry->vm_end,
+		  __entry->address)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(spf, spf_pte_lock,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long caller,
+		 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address),
+
+	TP_ARGS(caller, vma, address)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(spf, spf_vma_changed,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long caller,
+		 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address),
+
+	TP_ARGS(caller, vma, address)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(spf, spf_vma_noanon,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long caller,
+		 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address),
+
+	TP_ARGS(caller, vma, address)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(spf, spf_vma_notsup,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long caller,
+		 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address),
+
+	TP_ARGS(caller, vma, address)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(spf, spf_vma_access,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long caller,
+		 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address),
+
+	TP_ARGS(caller, vma, address)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(spf, spf_pmd_changed,
+
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long caller,
+		 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address),
+
+	TP_ARGS(caller, vma, address)
+);
+
+#endif /* _TRACE_PAGEFAULT_H */
+
+/* This part must be outside protection */
+#include <trace/define_trace.h>
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 83640079d407..6ccb1f45473a 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include <trace/events/pagefault.h>
+
 #ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
 #warning Unfortunate NUMA and NUMA Balancing config, growing page-frame for last_cpupid.
 #endif
@@ -2460,23 +2463,30 @@ static bool pte_spinlock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	}
 
 	local_irq_disable();
-	if (vma_has_changed(vmf))
+	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We check if the pmd value is still the same to ensure that there
 	 * is a huge collapse operation in progress in our back.
 	 */
 	pmdval = READ_ONCE(*vmf->pmd);
-	if (!pmd_same(pmdval, vmf->orig_pmd))
+	if (!pmd_same(pmdval, vmf->orig_pmd)) {
+		trace_spf_pmd_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
-	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(vmf->ptl)))
+	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(vmf->ptl))) {
+		trace_spf_pte_lock(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
 		spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -2516,16 +2526,20 @@ static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	 * block on the PTL and thus we're safe.
 	 */
 	local_irq_disable();
-	if (vma_has_changed(vmf))
+	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We check if the pmd value is still the same to ensure that there
 	 * is a huge collapse operation in progress in our back.
 	 */
 	pmdval = READ_ONCE(*vmf->pmd);
-	if (!pmd_same(pmdval, vmf->orig_pmd))
+	if (!pmd_same(pmdval, vmf->orig_pmd)) {
+		trace_spf_pmd_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Same as pte_offset_map_lock() except that we call
@@ -2538,11 +2552,13 @@ static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	pte = pte_offset_map(vmf->pmd, vmf->address);
 	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(ptl))) {
 		pte_unmap(pte);
+		trace_spf_pte_lock(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (vma_has_changed(vmf)) {
 		pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf->vma, vmf->address);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -4297,47 +4313,60 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 		return ret;
 
 	seq = raw_read_seqcount(&vma->vm_sequence); /* rmb <-> seqlock,vma_rb_erase() */
-	if (seq & 1)
+	if (seq & 1) {
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Can't call vm_ops service has we don't know what they would do
 	 * with the VMA.
 	 * This include huge page from hugetlbfs.
 	 */
-	if (vma->vm_ops)
+	if (vma->vm_ops) {
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * __anon_vma_prepare() requires the mmap_sem to be held
 	 * because vm_next and vm_prev must be safe. This can't be guaranteed
 	 * in the speculative path.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma))
+	if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 
 	vmf.vma_flags = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_flags);
 	vmf.vma_page_prot = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot);
 
 	/* Can't call userland page fault handler in the speculative path */
-	if (unlikely(vmf.vma_flags & VM_UFFD_MISSING))
+	if (unlikely(vmf.vma_flags & VM_UFFD_MISSING)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 
-	if (vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN || vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSUP)
+	if (vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN || vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSUP) {
 		/*
 		 * This could be detected by the check address against VMA's
 		 * boundaries but we want to trace it as not supported instead
 		 * of changed.
 		 */
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 
 	if (address < READ_ONCE(vma->vm_start)
-	    || READ_ONCE(vma->vm_end) <= address)
+	    || READ_ONCE(vma->vm_end) <= address) {
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 
 	if (!arch_vma_access_permitted(vma, flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE,
 				       flags & FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION,
 				       flags & FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_access(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
 		goto out_put;
 	}
@@ -4345,10 +4374,12 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	/* This is one is required to check that the VMA has write access set */
 	if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
 		if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & VM_WRITE))) {
+			trace_spf_vma_access(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 			ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
 			goto out_put;
 		}
 	} else if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & (VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_WRITE)))) {
+		trace_spf_vma_access(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
 		goto out_put;
 	}
@@ -4361,8 +4392,10 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	pol = __get_vma_policy(vma, address);
 	if (!pol)
 		pol = get_task_policy(current);
-	if (pol && pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
+	if (pol && pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 #endif
 
 	/*
@@ -4435,8 +4468,10 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	 * We need to re-validate the VMA after checking the bounds, otherwise
 	 * we might have a false positive on the bounds.
 	 */
-	if (read_seqcount_retry(&vma->vm_sequence, seq))
+	if (read_seqcount_retry(&vma->vm_sequence, seq)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 		goto out_put;
+	}
 
 	mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
 	ret = handle_pte_fault(&vmf);
@@ -4455,6 +4490,7 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	return ret;
 
 out_walk:
+	trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
 	local_irq_enable();
 out_put:
 	put_vma(vma);
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 20/24] perf: Add a speculative page fault sw event
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] mm: Adding speculative page fault failure trace events Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] perf tools: Add support for the SPF perf event Laurent Dufour
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

Add a new software event to count succeeded speculative page faults.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 769533696483..06c7fdb14f89 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ enum perf_sw_ids {
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS		= 8,
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY			= 9,
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT		= 10,
+	PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF			= 11,
 
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX,			/* non-ABI */
 };
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 21/24] perf tools: Add support for the SPF perf event
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] perf: Add a speculative page fault sw event Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA Laurent Dufour
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

Add support for the new speculative faults event.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c               | 1 +
 tools/perf/util/parse-events.c        | 4 ++++
 tools/perf/util/parse-events.l        | 1 +
 tools/perf/util/python.c              | 1 +
 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 769533696483..06c7fdb14f89 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ enum perf_sw_ids {
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS		= 8,
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY			= 9,
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT		= 10,
+	PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF			= 11,
 
 	PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX,			/* non-ABI */
 };
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index a4d256ea0dc4..9493d7b0f9b7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ const char *perf_evsel__sw_names[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX] = {
 	"alignment-faults",
 	"emulation-faults",
 	"dummy",
+	"speculative-faults",
 };
 
 static const char *__perf_evsel__sw_name(u64 config)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 170316795a18..e75de3c3ffbb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -137,6 +137,10 @@ struct event_symbol event_symbols_sw[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX] = {
 		.symbol = "bpf-output",
 		.alias  = "",
 	},
+	[PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF] = {
+		.symbol = "speculative-faults",
+		.alias	= "spf",
+	},
 };
 
 #define __PERF_EVENT_FIELD(config, name) \
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
index 655ecff636a8..5d6782426b30 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l
@@ -308,6 +308,7 @@ emulation-faults				{ return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_EM
 dummy						{ return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY); }
 duration_time					{ return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY); }
 bpf-output					{ return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT); }
+speculative-faults|spf				{ return sym(yyscanner, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF); }
 
 	/*
 	 * We have to handle the kernel PMU event cycles-ct/cycles-t/mem-loads/mem-stores separately.
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/python.c b/tools/perf/util/python.c
index b1e999bd21ef..100507d632fa 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/python.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/python.c
@@ -1142,6 +1142,7 @@ static struct {
 	PERF_CONST(COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS),
 	PERF_CONST(COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS),
 	PERF_CONST(COUNT_SW_DUMMY),
+	PERF_CONST(COUNT_SW_SPF),
 
 	PERF_CONST(SAMPLE_IP),
 	PERF_CONST(SAMPLE_TID),
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] perf tools: Add support for the SPF perf event Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 19:02   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling Laurent Dufour
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

When the speculative page fault handler is returning VM_RETRY, there is a
chance that VMA fetched without grabbing the mmap_sem can be reused by the
legacy page fault handler.  By reusing it, we avoid calling find_vma()
again. To achieve, that we must ensure that the VMA structure will not be
freed in our back. This is done by getting the reference on it (get_vma())
and by assuming that the caller will call the new service
can_reuse_spf_vma() once it has grabbed the mmap_sem.

can_reuse_spf_vma() is first checking that the VMA is still in the RB tree
, and then that the VMA's boundaries matched the passed address and release
the reference on the VMA so that it can be freed if needed.

In the case the VMA is freed, can_reuse_spf_vma() will have returned false
as the VMA is no more in the RB tree.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |   5 +-
 mm/memory.c        | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 4d8a7621da8a..02da17792f0d 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1354,7 +1354,10 @@ extern int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		unsigned int flags);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPF
 extern int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
-				    unsigned long address, unsigned int flags);
+				    unsigned long address, unsigned int flags,
+				    struct vm_area_struct **vma);
+extern bool can_reuse_spf_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+			      unsigned long address);
 #endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
 extern int fixup_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
 			    unsigned long address, unsigned int fault_flags,
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 6ccb1f45473a..e1f172ac2c90 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4284,13 +4284,22 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 /* This is required by vm_normal_page() */
 #error "Speculative page fault handler requires __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL"
 #endif
-
 /*
  * vm_normal_page() adds some processing which should be done while
  * hodling the mmap_sem.
  */
+
+/*
+ * Tries to handle the page fault in a speculative way, without grabbing the
+ * mmap_sem.
+ * When VM_FAULT_RETRY is returned, the vma pointer is valid and this vma must
+ * be checked later when the mmap_sem has been grabbed by calling
+ * can_reuse_spf_vma().
+ * This is needed as the returned vma is kept in memory until the call to
+ * can_reuse_spf_vma() is made.
+ */
 int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
-			     unsigned int flags)
+			     unsigned int flags, struct vm_area_struct **vma)
 {
 	struct vm_fault vmf = {
 		.address = address,
@@ -4299,7 +4308,6 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	p4d_t *p4d, p4dval;
 	pud_t pudval;
 	int seq, ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
-	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 	struct mempolicy *pol;
 #endif
@@ -4308,14 +4316,16 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	flags &= ~(FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY|FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE);
 	flags |= FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE;
 
-	vma = get_vma(mm, address);
-	if (!vma)
+	*vma = get_vma(mm, address);
+	if (!*vma)
 		return ret;
+	vmf.vma = *vma;
 
-	seq = raw_read_seqcount(&vma->vm_sequence); /* rmb <-> seqlock,vma_rb_erase() */
+	/* rmb <-> seqlock,vma_rb_erase() */
+	seq = raw_read_seqcount(&vmf.vma->vm_sequence);
 	if (seq & 1) {
-		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -4323,9 +4333,9 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	 * with the VMA.
 	 * This include huge page from hugetlbfs.
 	 */
-	if (vma->vm_ops) {
-		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+	if (vmf.vma->vm_ops) {
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -4333,18 +4343,18 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	 * because vm_next and vm_prev must be safe. This can't be guaranteed
 	 * in the speculative path.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma)) {
-		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+	if (unlikely(!vmf.vma->anon_vma)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	vmf.vma_flags = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_flags);
-	vmf.vma_page_prot = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot);
+	vmf.vma_flags = READ_ONCE(vmf.vma->vm_flags);
+	vmf.vma_page_prot = READ_ONCE(vmf.vma->vm_page_prot);
 
 	/* Can't call userland page fault handler in the speculative path */
 	if (unlikely(vmf.vma_flags & VM_UFFD_MISSING)) {
-		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	if (vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN || vmf.vma_flags & VM_GROWSUP) {
@@ -4353,48 +4363,39 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 		 * boundaries but we want to trace it as not supported instead
 		 * of changed.
 		 */
-		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (address < READ_ONCE(vma->vm_start)
-	    || READ_ONCE(vma->vm_end) <= address) {
-		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+	if (address < READ_ONCE(vmf.vma->vm_start)
+	    || READ_ONCE(vmf.vma->vm_end) <= address) {
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (!arch_vma_access_permitted(vma, flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE,
+	if (!arch_vma_access_permitted(vmf.vma, flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE,
 				       flags & FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION,
-				       flags & FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE)) {
-		trace_spf_vma_access(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
-		goto out_put;
-	}
+				       flags & FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE))
+		goto out_segv;
 
 	/* This is one is required to check that the VMA has write access set */
 	if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
-		if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & VM_WRITE))) {
-			trace_spf_vma_access(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-			ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
-			goto out_put;
-		}
-	} else if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & (VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_WRITE)))) {
-		trace_spf_vma_access(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		ret = VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
-		goto out_put;
-	}
+		if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & VM_WRITE)))
+			goto out_segv;
+	} else if (unlikely(!(vmf.vma_flags & (VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_WRITE))))
+		goto out_segv;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 	/*
 	 * MPOL_INTERLEAVE implies additional check in mpol_misplaced() which
 	 * are not compatible with the speculative page fault processing.
 	 */
-	pol = __get_vma_policy(vma, address);
+	pol = __get_vma_policy(vmf.vma, address);
 	if (!pol)
 		pol = get_task_policy(current);
 	if (pol && pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
-		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+		trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 #endif
 
@@ -4456,9 +4457,8 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 		vmf.pte = NULL;
 	}
 
-	vmf.vma = vma;
-	vmf.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address);
-	vmf.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma);
+	vmf.pgoff = linear_page_index(vmf.vma, address);
+	vmf.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vmf.vma);
 	vmf.sequence = seq;
 	vmf.flags = flags;
 
@@ -4468,16 +4468,22 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	 * We need to re-validate the VMA after checking the bounds, otherwise
 	 * we might have a false positive on the bounds.
 	 */
-	if (read_seqcount_retry(&vma->vm_sequence, seq)) {
-		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
-		goto out_put;
+	if (read_seqcount_retry(&vmf.vma->vm_sequence, seq)) {
+		trace_spf_vma_changed(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
 	ret = handle_pte_fault(&vmf);
 	mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
 
-	put_vma(vma);
+	/*
+	 * If there is no need to retry, don't return the vma to the caller.
+	 */
+	if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY)) {
+		put_vma(vmf.vma);
+		*vma = NULL;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * The task may have entered a memcg OOM situation but
@@ -4490,9 +4496,35 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	return ret;
 
 out_walk:
-	trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vma, address);
+	trace_spf_vma_notsup(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
 	local_irq_enable();
-out_put:
+	return ret;
+
+out_segv:
+	trace_spf_vma_access(_RET_IP_, vmf.vma, address);
+	/*
+	 * We don't return VM_FAULT_RETRY so the caller is not expected to
+	 * retrieve the fetched VMA.
+	 */
+	put_vma(vmf.vma);
+	*vma = NULL;
+	return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This is used to know if the vma fetch in the speculative page fault handler
+ * is still valid when trying the regular fault path while holding the
+ * mmap_sem.
+ * The call to put_vma(vma) must be made after checking the vma's fields, as
+ * the vma may be freed by put_vma(). In such a case it is expected that false
+ * is returned.
+ */
+bool can_reuse_spf_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
+{
+	bool ret;
+
+	ret = !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&vma->vm_rb) &&
+		vma->vm_start <= address && address < vma->vm_end;
 	put_vma(vma);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 23/24] x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-16 15:11 ` [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Kirill A. Shutemov
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Try a speculative fault before acquiring mmap_sem, if it returns with
VM_FAULT_RETRY continue with the mmap_sem acquisition and do the
traditional fault.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[Clearing of FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is now done in
 handle_speculative_fault()]
[Retry with usual fault path in the case VM_ERROR is returned by
 handle_speculative_fault(). This allows signal to be delivered]
[Don't build SPF call if !CONFIG_SPF]
[Try speculative fault path only for multi threaded processes]
[Try to the VMA fetch during the speculative path in case of retry]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 06fe3d51d385..8db69a116521 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -1242,6 +1242,9 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		unsigned long address)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	struct vm_area_struct *spf_vma = NULL;
+#endif
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	int fault, major = 0;
@@ -1339,6 +1342,27 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR)
 		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	if ((error_code & X86_PF_USER) && (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1)) {
+		fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address, flags,
+						 &spf_vma);
+
+		if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY)) {
+			if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
+				perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF, 1,
+					      regs, address);
+				goto done;
+			}
+			/*
+			 * In case of error we need the pkey value, but
+			 * can't get it from the spf_vma as it is only returned
+			 * when VM_FAULT_RETRY is returned. So we have to
+			 * retry the page fault with the mmap_sem grabbed.
+			 */
+		}
+	}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
+
 	/*
 	 * When running in the kernel we expect faults to occur only to
 	 * addresses in user space.  All other faults represent errors in
@@ -1372,7 +1396,16 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		might_sleep();
 	}
 
-	vma = find_vma(mm, address);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	if (spf_vma) {
+		if (can_reuse_spf_vma(spf_vma, address))
+			vma = spf_vma;
+		else
+			vma = find_vma(mm, address);
+		spf_vma = NULL;
+	} else
+#endif
+		vma = find_vma(mm, address);
 	if (unlikely(!vma)) {
 		bad_area(regs, error_code, address);
 		return;
@@ -1458,6 +1491,9 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		return;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+done:
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * Major/minor page fault accounting. If any of the events
 	 * returned VM_FAULT_MAJOR, we account it as a major fault.
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 24/24] powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 17:26 ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-16 15:11 ` [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Kirill A. Shutemov
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-12 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

This patch enable the speculative page fault on the PowerPC
architecture.

This will try a speculative page fault without holding the mmap_sem,
if it returns with VM_FAULT_RETRY, the mmap_sem is acquired and the
traditional page fault processing is done.

The speculative path is only tried for multithreaded process as there is no
risk of contention on the mmap_sem otherwise.

Build on if CONFIG_SPF is defined (currently for BOOK3S_64 && SMP).

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
index 6e1e39035380..67b4c6aa7975 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
@@ -384,6 +384,9 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
 			   unsigned long error_code)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct * vma;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	struct vm_area_struct *spf_vma = NULL;
+#endif
 	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
 	unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
  	int is_exec = TRAP(regs) == 0x400;
@@ -447,6 +450,20 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
 	if (is_exec)
 		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	if (is_user && (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1)) {
+		/* let's try a speculative page fault without grabbing the
+		 * mmap_sem.
+		 */
+		fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address, flags, &spf_vma);
+		if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY)) {
+			perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF, 1,
+				      regs, address);
+			goto done;
+		}
+	}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
+
 	/* When running in the kernel we expect faults to occur only to
 	 * addresses in user space.  All other faults represent errors in the
 	 * kernel and should generate an OOPS.  Unfortunately, in the case of an
@@ -477,7 +494,16 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
 		might_sleep();
 	}
 
-	vma = find_vma(mm, address);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+	if (spf_vma) {
+		if (can_reuse_spf_vma(spf_vma, address))
+			vma = spf_vma;
+		else
+			vma =  find_vma(mm, address);
+		spf_vma = NULL;
+	} else
+#endif
+		vma = find_vma(mm, address);
 	if (unlikely(!vma))
 		return bad_area(regs, address);
 	if (likely(vma->vm_start <= address))
@@ -531,6 +557,9 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
 
 	up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+done:
+#endif
 	if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))
 		return mm_fault_error(regs, address, fault);
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 18/24] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 18:18   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2018-01-16 13:24     ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-01-12 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:26:02PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> There is a deadlock when a CPU is doing a speculative page fault and
> another one is calling do_unmap().
> 
> The deadlock occurred because the speculative path try to spinlock the
> pte while the interrupt are disabled. When the other CPU in the
> unmap's path has locked the pte then is waiting for all the CPU to
> invalidate the TLB. As the CPU doing the speculative fault have the
> interrupt disable it can't invalidate the TLB, and can't get the lock.
> 
> Since we are in a speculative path, we can race with other mm action.
> So let assume that the lock may not get acquired and fail the
> speculative page fault.

It seems like you introduced this bug in the previous patch, and now
you're fixing it in this patch?  Why not merge the two?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 16/24] mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 18:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2018-01-15 17:42     ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-01-12 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:26:00PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> -static void __vma_rb_erase(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct rb_root *root)
> +static void __vma_rb_erase(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> +	struct rb_root *root = &mm->mm_rb;
>  	/*
>  	 * Note rb_erase_augmented is a fairly large inline function,
>  	 * so make sure we instantiate it only once with our desired
>  	 * augmented rbtree callbacks.
>  	 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
> +	write_lock(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
> +#endif
>  	rb_erase_augmented(&vma->vm_rb, root, &vma_gap_callbacks);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
> +	write_unlock(&mm->mm_rb_lock); /* wmb */
> +#endif

I can't say I love this.  Have you considered:

#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
#define vma_rb_write_lock(mm)	write_lock(&mm->mm_rb_lock)
#define vma_rb_write_unlock(mm)	write_unlock(&mm->mm_rb_lock)
#else
#define vma_rb_write_lock(mm)	do { } while (0)
#define vma_rb_write_unlock(mm)	do { } while (0)
#endif

Also, SPF is kind of uninformative.  CONFIG_MM_SPF might be better?
Or perhaps even CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT, just to make it really
painful to do these one-liner ifdefs that make the code so hard to read.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 18:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
  2018-01-15 17:37     ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2018-01-12 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:

> Introduce CONFIG_SPF which turns on the Speculative Page Fault handler when
> building for 64bits with SMP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index a317d5594b6a..d74353b85aaf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -2882,6 +2882,10 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
>  config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP
>  	def_bool y
>  
> +config SPF
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on X86_64 && SMP

Can you please put that into a generic place as

    config SPF
    	   bool

and let the architectures select it.

Also SPF could be bit more elaborate and self explaining for the causual
reader. 3 letter acronyms are reserved for non existing agencies.

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-12 19:02   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2018-01-13  4:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-01-12 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:26:06PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> @@ -1354,7 +1354,10 @@ extern int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  		unsigned int flags);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPF
>  extern int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +				    unsigned long address, unsigned int flags,
> +				    struct vm_area_struct **vma);

I think this shows that we need to create 'struct vm_fault' on the stack
in the arch code and then pass it to handle_speculative_fault(), followed
by handle_mm_fault().  That should be quite a nice cleanup actually.
I know that's only 30+ architectures to change ;-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA
  2018-01-12 19:02   ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2018-01-13  4:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
  2018-01-16 14:47       ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-01-13  4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:02:51AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:26:06PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> > @@ -1354,7 +1354,10 @@ extern int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> >  		unsigned int flags);
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SPF
> >  extern int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +				    unsigned long address, unsigned int flags,
> > +				    struct vm_area_struct **vma);
> 
> I think this shows that we need to create 'struct vm_fault' on the stack
> in the arch code and then pass it to handle_speculative_fault(), followed
> by handle_mm_fault().  That should be quite a nice cleanup actually.
> I know that's only 30+ architectures to change ;-)

Of course, we don't need to change them all.  Try this:

Subject: [PATCH] Add vm_handle_fault

For the speculative fault handler, we want to create the struct vm_fault
on the stack in the arch code and pass it into the generic mm code.
To avoid changing 30+ architectures, leave handle_mm_fault with its
current function signature and move its guts into the new vm_handle_fault
function.  Even this saves a nice 172 bytes on the random x86-64 .config
I happen to have around.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 5eb3d2524bdc..403934297a3d 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3977,36 +3977,28 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
  * The mmap_sem may have been released depending on flags and our
  * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __lock_page_or_retry().
  */
-static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
-		unsigned int flags)
+static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	struct vm_fault vmf = {
-		.vma = vma,
-		.address = address & PAGE_MASK,
-		.flags = flags,
-		.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address),
-		.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma),
-	};
-	unsigned int dirty = flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
-	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+	unsigned int dirty = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = vmf->vma->vm_mm;
 	pgd_t *pgd;
 	p4d_t *p4d;
 	int ret;
 
-	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
-	p4d = p4d_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
+	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, vmf->address);
+	p4d = p4d_alloc(mm, pgd, vmf->address);
 	if (!p4d)
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
 
-	vmf.pud = pud_alloc(mm, p4d, address);
-	if (!vmf.pud)
+	vmf->pud = pud_alloc(mm, p4d, vmf->address);
+	if (!vmf->pud)
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
-	if (pud_none(*vmf.pud) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma)) {
-		ret = create_huge_pud(&vmf);
+	if (pud_none(*vmf->pud) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vmf->vma)) {
+		ret = create_huge_pud(vmf);
 		if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
 			return ret;
 	} else {
-		pud_t orig_pud = *vmf.pud;
+		pud_t orig_pud = *vmf->pud;
 
 		barrier();
 		if (pud_trans_huge(orig_pud) || pud_devmap(orig_pud)) {
@@ -4014,50 +4006,51 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 			/* NUMA case for anonymous PUDs would go here */
 
 			if (dirty && !pud_access_permitted(orig_pud, WRITE)) {
-				ret = wp_huge_pud(&vmf, orig_pud);
+				ret = wp_huge_pud(vmf, orig_pud);
 				if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
 					return ret;
 			} else {
-				huge_pud_set_accessed(&vmf, orig_pud);
+				huge_pud_set_accessed(vmf, orig_pud);
 				return 0;
 			}
 		}
 	}
 
-	vmf.pmd = pmd_alloc(mm, vmf.pud, address);
-	if (!vmf.pmd)
+	vmf->pmd = pmd_alloc(mm, vmf->pud, vmf->address);
+	if (!vmf->pmd)
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
-	if (pmd_none(*vmf.pmd) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma)) {
-		ret = create_huge_pmd(&vmf);
+	if (pmd_none(*vmf->pmd) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vmf->vma)) {
+		ret = create_huge_pmd(vmf);
 		if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
 			return ret;
 	} else {
-		pmd_t orig_pmd = *vmf.pmd;
+		pmd_t orig_pmd = *vmf->pmd;
 
 		barrier();
 		if (unlikely(is_swap_pmd(orig_pmd))) {
 			VM_BUG_ON(thp_migration_supported() &&
 					  !is_pmd_migration_entry(orig_pmd));
 			if (is_pmd_migration_entry(orig_pmd))
-				pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, vmf.pmd);
+				pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, vmf->pmd);
 			return 0;
 		}
 		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd) || pmd_devmap(orig_pmd)) {
-			if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma))
-				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&vmf, orig_pmd);
+			if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) &&
+						vma_is_accessible(vmf->vma))
+				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(vmf, orig_pmd);
 
 			if (dirty && !pmd_access_permitted(orig_pmd, WRITE)) {
-				ret = wp_huge_pmd(&vmf, orig_pmd);
+				ret = wp_huge_pmd(vmf, orig_pmd);
 				if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
 					return ret;
 			} else {
-				huge_pmd_set_accessed(&vmf, orig_pmd);
+				huge_pmd_set_accessed(vmf, orig_pmd);
 				return 0;
 			}
 		}
 	}
 
-	return handle_pte_fault(&vmf);
+	return handle_pte_fault(vmf);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4066,9 +4059,10 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
  * The mmap_sem may have been released depending on flags and our
  * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __lock_page_or_retry().
  */
-int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
-		unsigned int flags)
+int vm_handle_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
+	unsigned int flags = vmf->flags;
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 	int ret;
 
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
@@ -4092,9 +4086,9 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
 
 	if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
-		ret = hugetlb_fault(vma->vm_mm, vma, address, flags);
+		ret = hugetlb_fault(vma->vm_mm, vma, vmf->address, flags);
 	else
-		ret = __handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags);
+		ret = __handle_mm_fault(vmf);
 
 	if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_USER) {
 		mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
@@ -4110,6 +4104,26 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 
 	return ret;
 }
+
+/*
+ * By the time we get here, we already hold the mm semaphore
+ *
+ * The mmap_sem may have been released depending on flags and our
+ * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __lock_page_or_retry().
+ */
+int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+		unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct vm_fault vmf = {
+		.vma = vma,
+		.address = address & PAGE_MASK,
+		.flags = flags,
+		.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address),
+		.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma),
+	};
+
+	return vm_handle_fault(&vmf);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_mm_fault);
 
 #ifndef __PAGETABLE_P4D_FOLDED

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  2018-01-12 18:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2018-01-15 17:37     ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-15 17:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-15 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for reviewing this series.

On 12/01/2018 19:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> 
>> Introduce CONFIG_SPF which turns on the Speculative Page Fault handler when
>> building for 64bits with SMP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index a317d5594b6a..d74353b85aaf 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -2882,6 +2882,10 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
>>  config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP
>>  	def_bool y
>>  
>> +config SPF
>> +	def_bool y
>> +	depends on X86_64 && SMP
> 
> Can you please put that into a generic place as
> 
>     config SPF
>     	   bool
> 
> and let the architectures select it.

I'll change that to let the architectures (x86 and ppc64 currently)
selecting it, but the definition will remain in the arch/xxx/Kconfig file
since it depends on the architecture support in the page fault handler.

> Also SPF could be bit more elaborate and self explaining for the causual
> reader. 3 letter acronyms are reserved for non existing agencies.

That's true 3 letter acronyms are already reserved...
I'll change it to CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT as suggested by Matthew Wilcox.

Thanks,
Laurent.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 16/24] mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock
  2018-01-12 18:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2018-01-15 17:42     ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-15 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

Hi Matthew,

Thanks for reviewing this series.

On 12/01/2018 19:48, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:26:00PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> -static void __vma_rb_erase(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct rb_root *root)
>> +static void __vma_rb_erase(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm)
>>  {
>> +	struct rb_root *root = &mm->mm_rb;
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Note rb_erase_augmented is a fairly large inline function,
>>  	 * so make sure we instantiate it only once with our desired
>>  	 * augmented rbtree callbacks.
>>  	 */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
>> +	write_lock(&mm->mm_rb_lock);
>> +#endif
>>  	rb_erase_augmented(&vma->vm_rb, root, &vma_gap_callbacks);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
>> +	write_unlock(&mm->mm_rb_lock); /* wmb */
>> +#endif
> 
> I can't say I love this.  Have you considered:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPF
> #define vma_rb_write_lock(mm)	write_lock(&mm->mm_rb_lock)
> #define vma_rb_write_unlock(mm)	write_unlock(&mm->mm_rb_lock)
> #else
> #define vma_rb_write_lock(mm)	do { } while (0)
> #define vma_rb_write_unlock(mm)	do { } while (0)
> #endif

I haven't consider this, but this sounds to be smarter. I'll do that.

> Also, SPF is kind of uninformative.  CONFIG_MM_SPF might be better?
> Or perhaps even CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT, just to make it really
> painful to do these one-liner ifdefs that make the code so hard to read.

Thomas also complained about that, and I agree, SPF is quite cryptic. This
being said, I don't think that CONFIG_MM_SPF will be far better, so I'll
change this define to CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT, even if it's longer,
it should not be too much present in the code.

Thanks,
Laurent.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  2018-01-15 17:37     ` Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-15 17:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
  2018-01-15 18:37         ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2018-01-15 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 12/01/2018 19:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> > 
> >> Introduce CONFIG_SPF which turns on the Speculative Page Fault handler when
> >> building for 64bits with SMP.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> >> index a317d5594b6a..d74353b85aaf 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> >> @@ -2882,6 +2882,10 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
> >>  config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP
> >>  	def_bool y
> >>  
> >> +config SPF
> >> +	def_bool y
> >> +	depends on X86_64 && SMP
> > 
> > Can you please put that into a generic place as
> > 
> >     config SPF
> >     	   bool
> > 
> > and let the architectures select it.
> 
> I'll change that to let the architectures (x86 and ppc64 currently)
> selecting it, but the definition will remain in the arch/xxx/Kconfig file
> since it depends on the architecture support in the page fault handler.

Errm. No.

	config SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
      		bool

goes into a generic config file, e.g. mm/Kconfig

Each architecture which implements support does:

	select SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT

in arch/xxx/Kconfig

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF
  2018-01-15 17:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2018-01-15 18:37         ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-15 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On 15/01/2018 18:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> On 12/01/2018 19:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Introduce CONFIG_SPF which turns on the Speculative Page Fault handler when
>>>> building for 64bits with SMP.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> index a317d5594b6a..d74353b85aaf 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -2882,6 +2882,10 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP
>>>>  config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP
>>>>  	def_bool y
>>>>  
>>>> +config SPF
>>>> +	def_bool y
>>>> +	depends on X86_64 && SMP
>>>
>>> Can you please put that into a generic place as
>>>
>>>     config SPF
>>>     	   bool
>>>
>>> and let the architectures select it.
>>
>> I'll change that to let the architectures (x86 and ppc64 currently)
>> selecting it, but the definition will remain in the arch/xxx/Kconfig file
>> since it depends on the architecture support in the page fault handler.
> 
> Errm. No.
> 
> 	config SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>       		bool
> 
> goes into a generic config file, e.g. mm/Kconfig
> 
> Each architecture which implements support does:
> 
> 	select SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> 
> in arch/xxx/Kconfig

Oh ok, I think I got it this time ;)

Will do this way, this will be smarter.

Thanks a lot,
Laurent.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 18/24] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path
  2018-01-12 18:18   ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2018-01-16 13:24     ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-16 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On 12/01/2018 19:18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:26:02PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> There is a deadlock when a CPU is doing a speculative page fault and
>> another one is calling do_unmap().
>>
>> The deadlock occurred because the speculative path try to spinlock the
>> pte while the interrupt are disabled. When the other CPU in the
>> unmap's path has locked the pte then is waiting for all the CPU to
>> invalidate the TLB. As the CPU doing the speculative fault have the
>> interrupt disable it can't invalidate the TLB, and can't get the lock.
>>
>> Since we are in a speculative path, we can race with other mm action.
>> So let assume that the lock may not get acquired and fail the
>> speculative page fault.
> 
> It seems like you introduced this bug in the previous patch, and now
> you're fixing it in this patch?  Why not merge the two?

You're right this is a fix from the previous patch. Initially my idea was
to keep the original Peter's patch as is, but sounds that this is not a
good idea.
I'll merge it in the previous one.

Thanks,
Laurent.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA
  2018-01-13  4:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2018-01-16 14:47       ` Laurent Dufour
  2018-01-16 14:58         ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-16 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On 13/01/2018 05:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:02:51AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:26:06PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>> @@ -1354,7 +1354,10 @@ extern int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>>  		unsigned int flags);
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPF
>>>  extern int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> +				    unsigned long address, unsigned int flags,
>>> +				    struct vm_area_struct **vma);
>>
>> I think this shows that we need to create 'struct vm_fault' on the stack
>> in the arch code and then pass it to handle_speculative_fault(), followed
>> by handle_mm_fault().  That should be quite a nice cleanup actually.
>> I know that's only 30+ architectures to change ;-)
> 
> Of course, we don't need to change them all.  Try this:

That would be good candidate for a clean up but I'm not sure this should be
part of this already too long series.

If you don't mind, unless a global agreement is stated on that, I'd prefer
to postpone such a change once the initial series is accepted.

Cheers,
Laurent.

> Subject: [PATCH] Add vm_handle_fault
> 
> For the speculative fault handler, we want to create the struct vm_fault
> on the stack in the arch code and pass it into the generic mm code.
> To avoid changing 30+ architectures, leave handle_mm_fault with its
> current function signature and move its guts into the new vm_handle_fault
> function.  Even this saves a nice 172 bytes on the random x86-64 .config
> I happen to have around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 5eb3d2524bdc..403934297a3d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3977,36 +3977,28 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>   * The mmap_sem may have been released depending on flags and our
>   * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __lock_page_or_retry().
>   */
> -static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> -		unsigned int flags)
> +static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  {
> -	struct vm_fault vmf = {
> -		.vma = vma,
> -		.address = address & PAGE_MASK,
> -		.flags = flags,
> -		.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address),
> -		.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma),
> -	};
> -	unsigned int dirty = flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> -	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> +	unsigned int dirty = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = vmf->vma->vm_mm;
>  	pgd_t *pgd;
>  	p4d_t *p4d;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
> -	p4d = p4d_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
> +	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, vmf->address);
> +	p4d = p4d_alloc(mm, pgd, vmf->address);
>  	if (!p4d)
>  		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
> 
> -	vmf.pud = pud_alloc(mm, p4d, address);
> -	if (!vmf.pud)
> +	vmf->pud = pud_alloc(mm, p4d, vmf->address);
> +	if (!vmf->pud)
>  		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
> -	if (pud_none(*vmf.pud) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma)) {
> -		ret = create_huge_pud(&vmf);
> +	if (pud_none(*vmf->pud) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vmf->vma)) {
> +		ret = create_huge_pud(vmf);
>  		if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
>  			return ret;
>  	} else {
> -		pud_t orig_pud = *vmf.pud;
> +		pud_t orig_pud = *vmf->pud;
> 
>  		barrier();
>  		if (pud_trans_huge(orig_pud) || pud_devmap(orig_pud)) {
> @@ -4014,50 +4006,51 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  			/* NUMA case for anonymous PUDs would go here */
> 
>  			if (dirty && !pud_access_permitted(orig_pud, WRITE)) {
> -				ret = wp_huge_pud(&vmf, orig_pud);
> +				ret = wp_huge_pud(vmf, orig_pud);
>  				if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
>  					return ret;
>  			} else {
> -				huge_pud_set_accessed(&vmf, orig_pud);
> +				huge_pud_set_accessed(vmf, orig_pud);
>  				return 0;
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> -	vmf.pmd = pmd_alloc(mm, vmf.pud, address);
> -	if (!vmf.pmd)
> +	vmf->pmd = pmd_alloc(mm, vmf->pud, vmf->address);
> +	if (!vmf->pmd)
>  		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
> -	if (pmd_none(*vmf.pmd) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma)) {
> -		ret = create_huge_pmd(&vmf);
> +	if (pmd_none(*vmf->pmd) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vmf->vma)) {
> +		ret = create_huge_pmd(vmf);
>  		if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
>  			return ret;
>  	} else {
> -		pmd_t orig_pmd = *vmf.pmd;
> +		pmd_t orig_pmd = *vmf->pmd;
> 
>  		barrier();
>  		if (unlikely(is_swap_pmd(orig_pmd))) {
>  			VM_BUG_ON(thp_migration_supported() &&
>  					  !is_pmd_migration_entry(orig_pmd));
>  			if (is_pmd_migration_entry(orig_pmd))
> -				pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, vmf.pmd);
> +				pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, vmf->pmd);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd) || pmd_devmap(orig_pmd)) {
> -			if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma))
> -				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&vmf, orig_pmd);
> +			if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) &&
> +						vma_is_accessible(vmf->vma))
> +				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(vmf, orig_pmd);
> 
>  			if (dirty && !pmd_access_permitted(orig_pmd, WRITE)) {
> -				ret = wp_huge_pmd(&vmf, orig_pmd);
> +				ret = wp_huge_pmd(vmf, orig_pmd);
>  				if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK))
>  					return ret;
>  			} else {
> -				huge_pmd_set_accessed(&vmf, orig_pmd);
> +				huge_pmd_set_accessed(vmf, orig_pmd);
>  				return 0;
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> -	return handle_pte_fault(&vmf);
> +	return handle_pte_fault(vmf);
>  }
> 
>  /*
> @@ -4066,9 +4059,10 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>   * The mmap_sem may have been released depending on flags and our
>   * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __lock_page_or_retry().
>   */
> -int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> -		unsigned int flags)
> +int vm_handle_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  {
> +	unsigned int flags = vmf->flags;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
>  	int ret;
> 
>  	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> @@ -4092,9 +4086,9 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  		mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
> 
>  	if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
> -		ret = hugetlb_fault(vma->vm_mm, vma, address, flags);
> +		ret = hugetlb_fault(vma->vm_mm, vma, vmf->address, flags);
>  	else
> -		ret = __handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags);
> +		ret = __handle_mm_fault(vmf);
> 
>  	if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_USER) {
>  		mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
> @@ -4110,6 +4104,26 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> 
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * By the time we get here, we already hold the mm semaphore
> + *
> + * The mmap_sem may have been released depending on flags and our
> + * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __lock_page_or_retry().
> + */
> +int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> +		unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	struct vm_fault vmf = {
> +		.vma = vma,
> +		.address = address & PAGE_MASK,
> +		.flags = flags,
> +		.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address),
> +		.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma),
> +	};
> +
> +	return vm_handle_fault(&vmf);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_mm_fault);
> 
>  #ifndef __PAGETABLE_P4D_FOLDED
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA
  2018-01-16 14:47       ` Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-16 14:58         ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-01-16 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, benh, mpe,
	paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa, Will Deacon,
	Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli, Alexei Starovoitov,
	kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora, Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev,
	x86

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 03:47:51PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 13/01/2018 05:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Of course, we don't need to change them all.  Try this:
> 
> That would be good candidate for a clean up but I'm not sure this should be
> part of this already too long series.
> 
> If you don't mind, unless a global agreement is stated on that, I'd prefer
> to postpone such a change once the initial series is accepted.

Actually, I think this can go in first, independently of the speculative
fault series.  It's a win in memory savings, and probably shaves a
cycle or two off the fault handler due to less argument marshalling in
the call-stack.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults
  2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
                   ` (23 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-16 15:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
  2018-01-17 15:15   ` Laurent Dufour
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Kirill A. Shutemov @ 2018-01-16 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, Matthew Wilcox,
	benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa,
	Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:25:44PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> ------------------
> Benchmarks results
> 
> Base kernel is 4.15-rc6-mmotm-2018-01-04-16-19
> SPF is BASE + this series

Do you have THP=always here? Lack of THP support worries me.

What is performance in the worst case scenario? Like when we go far enough into
speculative code path on every page fault and then fallback to normal page
fault?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults
  2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults Laurent Dufour
@ 2018-01-17  3:04   ` Andi Kleen
  2018-01-17  8:57     ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2018-01-17  3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Dufour
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> One of the side effects of speculating on faults (without holding
> mmap_sem) is that we can race with free_pgtables() and therefore we
> cannot assume the page-tables will stick around.
>
> Remove the reliance on the pte pointer.

This needs a lot more explanation. So why is this code not needed with
SPF only?

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults
  2018-01-17  3:04   ` Andi Kleen
@ 2018-01-17  8:57     ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-17  8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, kirill, mhocko, dave, jack,
	Matthew Wilcox, benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	hpa, Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

On 17/01/2018 04:04, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>
>> One of the side effects of speculating on faults (without holding
>> mmap_sem) is that we can race with free_pgtables() and therefore we
>> cannot assume the page-tables will stick around.
>>
>> Remove the reliance on the pte pointer.
> 
> This needs a lot more explanation. So why is this code not needed with
> SPF only?

Hi Andi,

This is a good question, and I should detail that more in the commit's log.

Here is my response to Balbir when he asked for:

On 10/07/2017 19:48, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 07/07/2017 09:07, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 19:52 +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>>
>>> One of the side effects of speculating on faults (without holding
>>> mmap_sem) is that we can race with free_pgtables() and therefore we
>>> cannot assume the page-tables will stick around.
>>>
>>> Remove the relyance on the pte pointer.
>>              ^^ reliance
>>
>> Looking at the changelog and the code the impact is not clear.
>> It looks like after this patch we always assume the pte is not
>> the same. What is the impact of this patch?
> 
> Hi Balbir,
> 
> In most of the case pte_unmap_same() was returning 1, which meaning that
> do_swap_page() should do its processing.
> 
> So in most of the case there will be no impact.
> 
> Now regarding the case where pte_unmap_safe() was returning 0, and thus
> do_swap_page return 0 too, this happens when the page has already been
> swapped back. This may happen before do_swap_page() get called or while in
> the call to do_swap_page(). In that later case, the check done when
> swapin_readahead() returns will detect that case.
> 
> The worst case would be that a page fault is occuring on 2 threads at the
> same time on the same swapped out page. In that case one thread will take
> much time looping in __read_swap_cache_async(). But in the regular page
> fault path, this is even worse since the thread would wait for semaphore to
> be released before starting anything.
> 
> Cheers,
> Laurent.
> 

I'll add that to the commit's log.

Thanks,
Laurent.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults
  2018-01-16 15:11 ` [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Kirill A. Shutemov
@ 2018-01-17 15:15   ` Laurent Dufour
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Dufour @ 2018-01-17 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kirill A. Shutemov
  Cc: paulmck, peterz, akpm, ak, mhocko, dave, jack, Matthew Wilcox,
	benh, mpe, paulus, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, hpa,
	Will Deacon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrea Arcangeli,
	Alexei Starovoitov, kemi.wang, sergey.senozhatsky.work,
	linux-kernel, linux-mm, haren, khandual, npiggin, bsingharora,
	Tim Chen, linuxppc-dev, x86

Hi Kirill,

Thanks for reviewing this series.

On 16/01/2018 16:11, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:25:44PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> ------------------
>> Benchmarks results
>>
>> Base kernel is 4.15-rc6-mmotm-2018-01-04-16-19
>> SPF is BASE + this series
> 
> Do you have THP=always here? Lack of THP support worries me.

Yes my kernel is built with THP=always.

For the record, I wrote all the code to support THP, but when I was about
to plug it into the speculative page fault handler, I was wondering about
the pmd_none() check and this raises the issue with khugepaged and the way
it is invalidating the pmd before collapsing the underlying pages.
Currently, there is no easy way to detect when such a collapsing operation
is occurring.

> What is performance in the worst case scenario? Like when we go far enough into
> speculative code path on every page fault and then fallback to normal page
> fault?

I did further tests focusing on the THP with a patched ebizzy (to use
posix_memalign() and MADV_HUGEPAGE) to force the use of the transparent
huge pages. I double checked that use through /proc/#/smaps.

Here is the result I got on a 16 CPUs x86 VM (higher the best):
	BASE	SPF
mean	276.83	276.93	record/s
max	280	280	record/s

The run was done 100 times using a large enough size records (128 MB).

Here is also the event I recorded when running ebizzy during 60s:

275 records/s
 Performance counter stats for './ebizzy -HT -s 134217728':

           182,470      faults

             5,085      spf

           176,634      pagefault:spf_vma_notsup


      10.518504612 seconds time elapsed

Most of the speculative page fault events were aborted because the VMA was
not supported, which is matching the huge pages (pagefault:spf_vma_notsup).
Only 5,000 were managed fully without holding the mmap_sem, I guess for
other part of the memory's process.

Running the same command on the Base kernel gave:

293 records/s
 Performance counter stats for './ebizzy -HT -s 134217728':

           183,170      faults


      10.660787623 seconds time elapsed

So I'd say that aborting the speculative page fault handler when a THP is
detected, has no visible impact.

Cheers,
Laurent.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-17 15:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-12 17:25 [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] x86/mm: Define CONFIG_SPF Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 18:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-15 17:37     ` Laurent Dufour
2018-01-15 17:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-15 18:37         ` Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] powerpc/mm: " Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults Laurent Dufour
2018-01-17  3:04   ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-17  8:57     ` Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] mm: Introduce pte_spinlock " Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] mm: VMA sequence count Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] mm: Protect VMA modifications using " Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] mm: protect mremap() against SPF hanlder Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] mm: Protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] mm: Cache some VMA fields in the vm_fault structure Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] mm/migrate: Pass vm_fault pointer to migrate_misplaced_page() Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] mm: Introduce __maybe_mkwrite() Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] mm: Introduce __vm_normal_page() Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] mm: Introduce __page_add_new_anon_rmap() Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] mm: Protect mm_rb tree with a rwlock Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 18:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-15 17:42     ` Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] mm: Provide speculative fault infrastructure Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 18:18   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-16 13:24     ` Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] mm: Adding speculative page fault failure trace events Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] perf: Add a speculative page fault sw event Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] perf tools: Add support for the SPF perf event Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] mm: Speculative page fault handler return VMA Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 19:02   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-13  4:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-16 14:47       ` Laurent Dufour
2018-01-16 14:58         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling Laurent Dufour
2018-01-12 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault Laurent Dufour
2018-01-16 15:11 ` [PATCH v6 00/24] Speculative page faults Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-01-17 15:15   ` Laurent Dufour

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).