From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx4: Avoid implicit enumerated type conversion
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:33:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538087622.226558.8.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180927222821.GC28301@ziepe.ca>
On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 16:28 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> > > Neither ib_qp_create_flags nor mlx4_ib_qp_flags have negative values, is
> > > signedness necessary?
> >
> > enums are by default restricted to the range of ints.
>
> That's not quite right, the compiler sizes the enum to be able to fit
> the largest value contained within, today that is int, but if we added
> 1<<31, then it would become larger.
Hi Jason,
Are you perhaps confusing C and C++? For C++, an enumeration whose underlying
type is not fixed, the underlying type is an integral type that can represent
all the enumerator values defined in the enumeration. For C however I think
that enumeration values are restricted to what fits in an int.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-27 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-24 19:57 [PATCH] IB/mlx4: Avoid implicit enumerated type conversion Nathan Chancellor
2018-09-24 22:24 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-24 22:27 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-09-24 22:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-25 2:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-09-27 1:08 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-09-27 4:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-09-27 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-27 20:28 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-09-27 20:34 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-27 20:36 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-09-27 22:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-09-27 22:33 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-09-27 22:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-27 22:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-09-27 23:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-09-28 0:55 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-09-28 3:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-09-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Nathan Chancellor
2018-09-27 20:53 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-10-03 22:35 ` [PATCH] " Jason Gunthorpe
2018-10-03 22:53 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-10-03 23:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-10-03 23:09 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1538087622.226558.8.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).