linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace beautify: Beautify flags of mount(2) and umount(2).
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:52:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539143546.2716467.1536750504.65ADF11A@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1535665851.2058334.1491869472.4E860103@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Hi Arnaldo,
Did you get a chance to look at this again?

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 14:50, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 11:28, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Benjamin Peterson escreveu:
> > > Example output of perf trace -e mount,umount2:
> > > 
> > >   6243.930 ( 0.052 ms): mount/30976 mount(dev_name: 0x55dc541bb920, dir_name: 0x55dc541bc960, type: 0x55dc541b9c40, flags: BIND) = 0
> > >   7851.821 (26.015 ms): umount/30983 umount2(name: 0x558daa82cf50, flags: MNT_FORCE                        ) = 0
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
> > 
> > So, I tried:
> > 
> > Before your patch:
> > 
> >   # perf trace -e *mount* mount /dev/mapper/fedora-home /s
> >      0.000 ( 4.335 ms): mount/3126 mount(dev_name: 0x55deecc4d480, 
> > dir_name: 0x55deecc4d4a0, type: 0x55deecc53880, flags: 3236757504) = 0
> >   #
> >   # perf trace -e *mount* umount /dev/mapper/fedora-home /s
> >          ? (         ): umount/3138  ... [continued]: umount2()) = 0
> >     11.576 (umount:  0.004 ms): /s: not mounted.umount/
> > 3138 umount2(arg0: 94501956754656, arg1: 0, arg2: 1, arg3: 
> > 140051050083104, arg4: 4, arg5: 94501956755136) = -1 EINVAL Invalid 
> > argument
> >   #
> > 
> > After:
> > 
> > [root@jouet ~]# perf trace -e *mount* mount /dev/mapper/fedora-home /s
> >      0.000 ( 1.213 ms): mount/5244 mount(dev_name: 0x5558c1169480, 
> > dir_name: 0x5558c11694a0, type: 0x5558c116f880, flags: ) = 0
> > [root@jouet ~]# perf trace -e *mount* umount /s
> >      0.000 ( 9.241 ms): umount/5251 umount2(name: 
> > 0x55f74a986480                                          ) = 0
> > 
> > The flags for mount got empty? Can you pleaes check that? I.e. using the
> > default mount options, not specifying a 'bind' mount like you did.
> 
> That comes from these lines in syscall_arg__scnprintf_mount_flags:
> 
> if ((flags & MS_MGC_MSK) == MS_MGC_VAL)
> 	flags &= ~MS_MGC_MSK;
> 
> The reason for this is explained in the comment for do_mount in fs/namespace.c:
> 
> /*
>  * Pre-0.97 versions of mount() didn't have a flags word.
>  * When the flags word was introduced its top half was required
>  * to have the magic value 0xC0ED, and this remained so until 2.4.0-test9.
>  * Therefore, if this magic number is present, it carries no information
>  * and must be discarded.
> */
> 
> (I used a bind mount for my commit message example because a "default" 
> mount() doesn't use any flags.)
> 
> > 
> > I'm splitting this patch so that the aliasing of 'umount2' to 'umount'
> > gets merged now,
> > 
> > Check my perf/core branch at:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git
> 
> LGTM. Thanks
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-10  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-28  3:53 [PATCH] perf trace beautify: Beautify flags of mount(2) and umount(2) Benjamin Peterson
2018-08-30 18:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-08-30 21:50   ` Benjamin Peterson
2018-10-10  3:52     ` Benjamin Peterson [this message]
2018-10-10 12:55       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-10 12:56         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-23  2:40         ` Benjamin Peterson
2018-10-24 20:18           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26  6:23             ` Benjamin Peterson
2018-09-06 13:44 ` [tip:perf/core] perf trace beauty: Alias 'umount' to 'umount2' tip-bot for Benjamin Peterson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1539143546.2716467.1536750504.65ADF11A@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=benjamin@python.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).