Kildall

Kildall

[Ove Bjørn Karlsen]

I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, Karmic 
Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little recognition 
of my later low-jitter work it would seem. (That actually removed all 
"disk read" stops, from high-performance demanding games like Doom 3. 
Enabling a fluent 3x72 fps, since the engine does 3 passes pr. frame.)

And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like Microsoft 
could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some real 
issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room.

In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.

Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the 
Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M 
(~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as MS-DOS.

When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. Gary 
Kildall had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here in 
Norway even seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While many know 
the enthusiast computing environment have had their brilliant people.

When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business Practises", one 
should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall

That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even admitted 
to have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.

Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to leave 
"MS" support for the same.

Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe some 
new OS have a chance :)

My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized innerloop 
construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated language, making 
most of the OS language one, and usable by newbies and advanced, that 
might make assembly aswell. Where often used library macros could 
ultimately be made in H/W and accelerated.

If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the flag, 
and be american supergun... :|

Or.. make a music video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U

Peaceful Saluations.

Re: Kildall

[Ove Bjørn Karlsen]

Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
> I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
> Karmic Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
> recognition of my later low-jitter work it would seem. (That actually 
> removed all "disk read" stops, from high-performance demanding games 
> like Doom 3. Enabling a fluent 3x72 fps, since the engine does 3 
> passes pr. frame.)
>
> And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
> Microsoft could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was 
> some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room.
>
> In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
>
> Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the 
> Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, 
> CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied 
> as MS-DOS.
>
> When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. Gary 
> Kildall had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here in 
> Norway even seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While many 
> know the enthusiast computing environment have had their brilliant 
> people.
>
> When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business Practises", one 
> should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
>
> That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even admitted 
> to have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
>
> Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to leave 
> "MS" support for the same.
>
> Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe some 
> new OS have a chance :)
>
> My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized innerloop 
> construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated language, 
> making most of the OS language one, and usable by newbies and 
> advanced, that might make assembly aswell. Where often used library 
> macros could ultimately be made in H/W and accelerated.
>
> If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the flag, 
> and be american supergun... :|
>
> Or.. make a music video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
>
> Peaceful Saluations.
>
So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys Metaphysical Laws.

Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding concept. 
(Probably not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was that.) 
.                                  .

Peaceful Salutations.

Re: Kildall

[Ove Bjørn Karlsen]

Den 10/3/2016 17:10, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
> Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>> I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
>> Karmic Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
>> recognition of my later low-jitter work it would seem. (That actually 
>> removed all "disk read" stops, from high-performance demanding games 
>> like Doom 3. Enabling a fluent 3x72 fps, since the engine does 3 
>> passes pr. frame.)
>>
>> And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
>> Microsoft could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was 
>> some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room.
>>
>> In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
>>
>> Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been 
>> the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer 
>> OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and 
>> copied as MS-DOS.
>>
>> When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. Gary 
>> Kildall had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here 
>> in Norway even seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While many 
>> know the enthusiast computing environment have had their brilliant 
>> people.
>>
>> When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business Practises", 
>> one should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
>>
>> That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even 
>> admitted to have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
>>
>> Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to leave 
>> "MS" support for the same.
>>
>> Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe some 
>> new OS have a chance :)
>>
>> My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized 
>> innerloop construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated 
>> language, making most of the OS language one, and usable by newbies 
>> and advanced, that might make assembly aswell. Where often used 
>> library macros could ultimately be made in H/W and accelerated.
>>
>> If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the flag, 
>> and be american supergun... :|
>>
>> Or.. make a music video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
>>
>> Peaceful Saluations.
>>
> So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys Metaphysical Laws.
>
> Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding concept. 
> (Probably not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was 
> that.) .                                  .
>
> Peaceful Salutations.
>
I also wrote this: 
https://medium.com/@Stage_Mind/the-metaphysical-realities-of-a-good-low-jitter-operating-system-93e7b248e458#.gitf5ib10

Re: Kildall

[Ove Bjørn Karlsen]

Den 10/6/2016 10:37, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
> Den 10/3/2016 17:10, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>> Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>> I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
>>> Karmic Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
>>> recognition of my later low-jitter work it would seem. (That 
>>> actually removed all "disk read" stops, from high-performance 
>>> demanding games like Doom 3. Enabling a fluent 3x72 fps, since the 
>>> engine does 3 passes pr. frame.)
>>>
>>> And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
>>> Microsoft could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was 
>>> some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the 
>>> room.
>>>
>>> In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
>>>
>>> Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been 
>>> the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer 
>>> OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and 
>>> copied as MS-DOS.
>>>
>>> When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. Gary 
>>> Kildall had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here 
>>> in Norway even seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While 
>>> many know the enthusiast computing environment have had their 
>>> brilliant people.
>>>
>>> When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business Practises", 
>>> one should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
>>>
>>> That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even 
>>> admitted to have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
>>>
>>> Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to 
>>> leave "MS" support for the same.
>>>
>>> Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe 
>>> some new OS have a chance :)
>>>
>>> My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized 
>>> innerloop construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated 
>>> language, making most of the OS language one, and usable by newbies 
>>> and advanced, that might make assembly aswell. Where often used 
>>> library macros could ultimately be made in H/W and accelerated.
>>>
>>> If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the 
>>> flag, and be american supergun... :|
>>>
>>> Or.. make a music video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
>>>
>>> Peaceful Saluations.
>>>
>> So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys Metaphysical Laws.
>>
>> Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding concept. 
>> (Probably not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was 
>> that.) .                                  .
>>
>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>
> I also wrote this: 
> https://medium.com/@Stage_Mind/the-metaphysical-realities-of-a-good-low-jitter-operating-system-93e7b248e458#.gitf5ib10
>
>
Just to be a little bit crazy, if the remotest chance of anyone wanting 
me to work with this, and finance it, I would.

RightOS by Admirers Of Paradox Theos. Some of the most intelligen men in 
the world who respect the metaphysical might pull this off. And fix so 
many obscurities we find with the modern internet.

Peaceful Salutations.

Re: Kildall

[Ove Bjørn Karlsen]

Den 10/15/2016 23:19, skrev jdow:
> On 2016-10-15 05:31, Ove Bjørn Karlsen wrote:
>> Den 10/6/2016 10:37, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>> Den 10/3/2016 17:10, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>> Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>>> I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
>>>>> Karmic
>>>>> Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
>>>>> recognition of my
>>>>> later low-jitter work it would seem. (That actually removed all 
>>>>> "disk read"
>>>>> stops, from high-performance demanding games like Doom 3. Enabling 
>>>>> a fluent
>>>>> 3x72 fps, since the engine does 3 passes pr. frame.)
>>>>>
>>>>> And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
>>>>> Microsoft
>>>>> could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some 
>>>>> real issue,
>>>>> some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room.
>>>>>
>>>>> In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
>>>>>
>>>>> Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been 
>>>>> the Bill
>>>>> Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M
>>>>> (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as 
>>>>> MS-DOS.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. 
>>>>> Gary Kildall
>>>>> had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here in 
>>>>> Norway even
>>>>> seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While many know the 
>>>>> enthusiast
>>>>> computing environment have had their brilliant people.
>>>>>
>>>>> When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business Practises", 
>>>>> one
>>>>> should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
>>>>>
>>>>> That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even 
>>>>> admitted to
>>>>> have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to 
>>>>> leave "MS"
>>>>> support for the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe 
>>>>> some new OS
>>>>> have a chance :)
>>>>>
>>>>> My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized 
>>>>> innerloop
>>>>> construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated language, 
>>>>> making most
>>>>> of the OS language one, and usable by newbies and advanced, that 
>>>>> might make
>>>>> assembly aswell. Where often used library macros could ultimately 
>>>>> be made in
>>>>> H/W and accelerated.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the 
>>>>> flag, and be
>>>>> american supergun... :|
>>>>>
>>>>> Or.. make a music video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
>>>>>
>>>>> Peaceful Saluations.
>>>>>
>>>> So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys Metaphysical 
>>>> Laws.
>>>>
>>>> Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding concept. 
>>>> (Probably
>>>> not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was that.)
>>>> .                                  .
>>>>
>>>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>>>
>>> I also wrote this:
>>> https://medium.com/@Stage_Mind/the-metaphysical-realities-of-a-good-low-jitter-operating-system-93e7b248e458#.gitf5ib10 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Just to be a little bit crazy, if the remotest chance of anyone 
>> wanting me to
>> work with this, and finance it, I would.
>>
>> RightOS by Admirers Of Paradox Theos. Some of the most intelligen men 
>> in the
>> world who respect the metaphysical might pull this off. And fix so many
>> obscurities we find with the modern internet.
>>
>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>
>>
>
> Just off hand after between 15 and 20 years monitoring the LKML the 
> fellows here didn't bother to read the rant. And incidentally, Gary 
> Kildall was an American first with ancestors from your neck of the 
> woods. He spoke American English with no more accent than a few stiff 
> drinks might cause. I met him at a computer convention many years ago 
> and had the chance to chatter with him. So if you're getting all 
> national pride, you're being a little silly. Next time approach it 
> without the rant. It might get a better reception. This group does NOT 
> go for demonstrations of ego in the code or newbie coders.
>
> {^_^}

I do not need to you speak of behalf of "the fellows". And, no, I am not 
a newbie coder, I have done some of the worlds best DSP, beating all 
your contemporary recordlabels, better kernel configs than most here, 
and the philosophy I present is also better than all current Microsoft, 
Linux, CP/M etc, that honestly, are all based in phallic totems, that 
can never really be truly good.

It is that point of intelligence, beyond phallic totems, that people 
truly should reach for. However to become conscious of this, and 
actually do it, seems hard, in a culture where 99% of it, seems phallic 
based, thought relevant to mindreducing drugs, or citypromiscuity and 
liqour. And even it all is about sex and ofcourse really children, many 
of these doesn´t even hit the mark there.

I have gone there though, and made it simpler for the rest. Follow, 
Intelligent People.

My summary of research on religion has been top 1% research on Academia 
aswell, and is available here: https://independent.academia.edu/OveKarlsen

Peaceful Salutations

Re: Kildall

[Ove Bjørn Karlsen]

Den 10/16/2016 22:41, skrev jdow:
> On 2016-10-16 13:12, Ove Bjørn Karlsen wrote:
>> Den 10/15/2016 23:19, skrev jdow:
>>> On 2016-10-15 05:31, Ove Bjørn Karlsen wrote:
>>>> Den 10/6/2016 10:37, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>>> Den 10/3/2016 17:10, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>>>> Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>>>>> I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
>>>>>>> Karmic
>>>>>>> Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
>>>>>>> recognition of my
>>>>>>> later low-jitter work it would seem. (That actually removed all 
>>>>>>> "disk read"
>>>>>>> stops, from high-performance demanding games like Doom 3. 
>>>>>>> Enabling a fluent
>>>>>>> 3x72 fps, since the engine does 3 passes pr. frame.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
>>>>>>> Microsoft
>>>>>>> could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some 
>>>>>>> real issue,
>>>>>>> some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have 
>>>>>>> been the Bill
>>>>>>> Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M
>>>>>>> (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied 
>>>>>>> as MS-DOS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. 
>>>>>>> Gary Kildall
>>>>>>> had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here in 
>>>>>>> Norway even
>>>>>>> seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While many know the 
>>>>>>> enthusiast
>>>>>>> computing environment have had their brilliant people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business 
>>>>>>> Practises", one
>>>>>>> should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even 
>>>>>>> admitted to
>>>>>>> have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to 
>>>>>>> leave "MS"
>>>>>>> support for the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe 
>>>>>>> some new OS
>>>>>>> have a chance :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized 
>>>>>>> innerloop
>>>>>>> construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated language, 
>>>>>>> making most
>>>>>>> of the OS language one, and usable by newbies and advanced, that 
>>>>>>> might make
>>>>>>> assembly aswell. Where often used library macros could 
>>>>>>> ultimately be made in
>>>>>>> H/W and accelerated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the 
>>>>>>> flag, and be
>>>>>>> american supergun... :|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or.. make a music video: 
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peaceful Saluations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys 
>>>>>> Metaphysical Laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding 
>>>>>> concept. (Probably
>>>>>> not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was that.)
>>>>>> .                                  .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I also wrote this:
>>>>> https://medium.com/@Stage_Mind/the-metaphysical-realities-of-a-good-low-jitter-operating-system-93e7b248e458#.gitf5ib10 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Just to be a little bit crazy, if the remotest chance of anyone 
>>>> wanting me to
>>>> work with this, and finance it, I would.
>>>>
>>>> RightOS by Admirers Of Paradox Theos. Some of the most intelligen 
>>>> men in the
>>>> world who respect the metaphysical might pull this off. And fix so 
>>>> many
>>>> obscurities we find with the modern internet.
>>>>
>>>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just off hand after between 15 and 20 years monitoring the LKML the 
>>> fellows
>>> here didn't bother to read the rant. And incidentally, Gary Kildall 
>>> was an
>>> American first with ancestors from your neck of the woods. He spoke 
>>> American
>>> English with no more accent than a few stiff drinks might cause. I 
>>> met him at
>>> a computer convention many years ago and had the chance to chatter 
>>> with him.
>>> So if you're getting all national pride, you're being a little 
>>> silly. Next
>>> time approach it without the rant. It might get a better reception. 
>>> This group
>>> does NOT go for demonstrations of ego in the code or newbie coders.
>>>
>>> {^_^}
>>
>> I do not need to you speak of behalf of "the fellows". And, no, I am 
>> not a
>> newbie coder, I have done some of the worlds best DSP, beating all your
>> contemporary recordlabels, better kernel configs than most here, and the
>> philosophy I present is also better than all current Microsoft, 
>> Linux, CP/M etc,
>> that honestly, are all based in phallic totems, that can never really 
>> be truly
>> good.
>>
>> It is that point of intelligence, beyond phallic totems, that people 
>> truly
>> should reach for. However to become conscious of this, and actually 
>> do it, seems
>> hard, in a culture where 99% of it, seems phallic based, thought 
>> relevant to
>> mindreducing drugs, or citypromiscuity and liqour. And even it all is 
>> about sex
>> and ofcourse really children, many of these doesn´t even hit the mark 
>> there.
>>
>> I have gone there though, and made it simpler for the rest. Follow, 
>> Intelligent
>> People.
>>
>> My summary of research on religion has been top 1% research on 
>> Academia aswell,
>> and is available here: https://independent.academia.edu/OveKarlsen
>>
>> Peaceful Salutations
>>
>
> It's not me you have to convince. I'm more an observer than a 
> contributor, although there is a miniscule bit of my coding in the 
> pile of other people's contributions. I'm mostly just an interested 72 
> year old lady who tried to make an observation. Your emails bristle 
> with ego, rightly or wrongly. The kernel developers do not take kindly 
> to king size egos and tend to bruise them severely. They are very big 
> on proven contributions politely offered. And as far as this group 
> goes, you are a newbie according to the group's dynamics. You 
> contribute, you build your reputation, and eventually you're a full 
> blown contributor who is no longer a newbie. I was speaking of newbie 
> to the group not to coding in general.
>
> What does researching religion have to do with the price of tea on the 
> Moon let alone the LKML? At least you picked a topic that people 
> should be investigating these days. The first time I bounced on 
> examining that particular ideology may have your birth by a goodly 
> number of years. Every time I've looked at it since I've become more 
> disgusted with it. It's humanities collective suicide pact wrapped in 
> pig intestines and served up as sausage, which is totally enough said 
> about an odious topic.
>
> {^_^}

This is the kind of nutter who likes a phallic totem, guys. Is that the 
kind of company you would prefer? Obviously the internet truly needs a 
correct paradigm.

Peaceful Salutations,
Ove Bjørn Karlsen
AKA Admirer Of Paradox Theos.

PS: I am also testing my philosophy in pop culture: 
https://www.internetdj.com/user/1648283118719701_fb