From: frowand.list@gmail.com
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 08/18] of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 07:25:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1541431515-25197-9-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1541431515-25197-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com>
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Order the fields of struct fragment in the same order as
struct of_overlay_notify_data. The order in struct fragment is
not significant. If both structs are ordered the same then when
examining the data in a debugger or dump the human involved does
not have to remember which context they are examining.
Tested-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
---
drivers/of/overlay.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
index 9808aae4621a..15be3da34fef 100644
--- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ struct target {
* @overlay: pointer to the __overlay__ node
*/
struct fragment {
- struct device_node *target;
struct device_node *overlay;
+ struct device_node *target;
};
/**
--
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-05 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 15:24 [PATCH v6 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs frowand.list
2018-11-07 12:14 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-07 14:57 ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node() frowand.list
2018-11-07 12:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-07 14:58 ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] of: overlay: do not duplicate properties from overlay for " frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] of: dynamic: change type of of_{at,de}tach_node() to void frowand.list
2018-11-07 12:08 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-07 14:55 ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-07 23:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-05 15:25 ` frowand.list [this message]
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] of: overlay: make all pr_debug() and pr_err() messages unique frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments add or delete " frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] of: unittest: remove unused of_unittest_apply_overlay() argument frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] of: overlay: set node fields from properties when add new overlay node frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] of: unittest: allow base devicetree to have symbol metadata frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] of: unittest: initialize args before calling of_*parse_*() frowand.list
2018-11-05 19:24 ` [PATCH v6 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes Rob Herring
2018-11-05 21:55 ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-07 12:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-07 14:59 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1541431515-25197-9-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=atull@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).