linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
	Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 23:09:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sh0dqec5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf1be459-22d7-6b23-7b1f-847dad5e028f@gmail.com>

Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Michael, Ben, Paul,
>
> Do you know if anyone has tried this series on PowerPC?

I have. No obvious breakage.

My test does a loop of adding and removing multiple CPUs multiple times,
and in the past that has uncovered refcounting bugs. So I don't think
we're leaking any with this series applied.

I used the tracepoint patch to keep an eye on the refcounts :)

  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/751602/


I'm happy for this series to go into linux-next where it should get some
more testing.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-05 15:24 [PATCH v6 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs frowand.list
2018-11-07 12:14   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-07 14:57     ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node() frowand.list
2018-11-07 12:23   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-07 14:58     ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] of: overlay: do not duplicate properties from overlay for " frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] of: dynamic: change type of of_{at,de}tach_node() to void frowand.list
2018-11-07 12:08   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-07 14:55     ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-07 23:48       ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] of: overlay: make all pr_debug() and pr_err() messages unique frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments add or delete " frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] of: unittest: remove unused of_unittest_apply_overlay() argument frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] of: overlay: set node fields from properties when add new overlay node frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] of: unittest: allow base devicetree to have symbol metadata frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index frowand.list
2018-11-05 15:25 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] of: unittest: initialize args before calling of_*parse_*() frowand.list
2018-11-05 19:24 ` [PATCH v6 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes Rob Herring
2018-11-05 21:55   ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-07 12:09     ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-11-07 14:59       ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sh0dqec5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).