linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
To: "stefan@agner.ch" <stefan@agner.ch>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"leonard.crestez@nxp.com" <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Cc: "hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"andrew.smirnov@gmail.com" <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: imx6: limit DBI register length
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:34:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1543250062.18519.34.camel@impinj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee74fde8e40a0ca40bd8b69755c9b0919f779b13.camel@nxp.com>

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 10:16 +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 21:42 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > On 20.11.2018 20:13, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 18:19 +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 17:56 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > > > > Define the length of the DBI registers. This makes sure that
> > > > > the kernel does not access registers beyond that point, avoiding
> > > > > the following abort on a i.MX 6Quad:
> > > > >   # cat
> > > > > /sys/devices/soc0/soc/1ffc000.pcie/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:00.0/config
> > > > >   [  100.021433] Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1406)
> > > > > at 0xb6ea7000
> > > > >   ...
> > > > >   [  100.056423] PC is at dw_pcie_read+0x50/0x84
> > > > >   [  100.060790] LR is at dw_pcie_rd_own_conf+0x44/0x48
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know exactly where this limitation comes from, I can indeed
> > > > reproduce a stack dump when dumping pci config from /sys/
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately this seems to block access to registers used for
> > > > functionality like interrupts. For example dw_handle_msi_irq does:
> > > > 
> > > > 	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS +
> > > > 			    (i * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE),
> > > > 			    4, &val);
> > > > 
> > > > where PCI_MSI_INTR0_STATUS is 0x830. There are more accesses like this.
> > > 
> > > On IMX7d, there are significant blocks of 00s in the config space, and
> > > all 0xff at 0xb50 on up.
> > > 
> > > I.e., significant portions are empty, in the middle of the config
> > > space, not just at the end.
> > > 
> > > But they can be read without problem.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps imx6q aborts on a read of an unimplemented address instead of
> > > returning zeros like imx7d.  In that case it really needs something
> > > more complex to prevent abort than just a length.
> > 
> > Yeah it seems those SoCs behave differently.
> > 
> > Describing a register set with holes will get complicated, I guess it
> > would ask for a regmap...
> 
> The PortLogic area seems to be always at 0x700-0xA00, there are defines
> for it. So this would only require one additional range, no regmap
> stuff.
> 
> I don't know if making portlogic accessible to userspace is useful. In
> theory somebody could read debug DWC registers via /sys/blah/config,
> but there are better ways to read HW registers from userspace.
> 
> Browsing through the docs I can't find stuff like reads with side-
> effects so I can't say that it's harmful either.

I doubt those register are used much from userspace, since AFAIK there
are no public docs for them.  I have dumped the config regs from
userspace in imx7d to debug a hang problem, but those registers weren't
useful to me.  Maybe they would have been, no docs...

> > > It also seems to me that this doesn't need to be in the internal pci
> > > config access functions.  The driver shouldn't be reading registers
> > > that don't exist anyway.  It's really about trying to fix sysfs access
> > > to registers that don't exist.  So maybe it should be done there.
> > 
> > That was my first approach
> 
> Doing it on a per-soc basis is better, this seems to affect both 6q and
> 6qp (those are distinct!) but not others.
> 
> The pci config area from userspace is accessed through pci_ops.read =
> dw_pcie_rd_conf while internal accesses go through dw_pcie_rd_own_conf.
> So moving the dbi_length check up one level would work easily.

What about something like:

static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
                           int size, u32 *val)
{
	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;

	if (!dw_pcie_valid_device(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn))) {
		*val = 0xffffffff;
		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
	}

	if (bus->number == pp->root_bus_nr) {
+		if (pp->ops->cfg_valid && !pp->ops_cfg_valid(pp, where, size)) {
+			*val = 0xffffffff;
+			return PCIBIOS_SOMETHING_GOES_HERE;
+		}
+
                return dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, where, size, val);
+	}
	return dw_pcie_rd_other_conf(pp, bus, devfn, where, size, val);
}

imx6q and imx6qp can provide cfg_valid that checks their range.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-20 16:56 [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: imx6: introduce drvdata Stefan Agner
2018-11-20 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: imx6: limit DBI register length Stefan Agner
2018-11-20 18:19   ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-20 19:13     ` Trent Piepho
2018-11-20 20:42       ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-20 21:28         ` Trent Piepho
2018-11-21 13:47           ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-21 14:17             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-28 12:19             ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-28 17:36               ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-28 17:50                 ` Lucas Stach
2018-11-28 17:56                   ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-28 18:01                 ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-26 10:16         ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-26 16:34           ` Trent Piepho [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1543250062.18519.34.camel@impinj.com \
    --to=tpiepho@impinj.com \
    --cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).