From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] clk: Introduce get_parent_hw clk op
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:29:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155026616459.115909.14315694127255521155@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <488f5033-c7a5-b49b-b973-c1415e533019@codeaurora.org>
Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-02-15 11:29:26)
> On 2/15/2019 11:47 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-02-11 08:09:00)
> >> On 1/28/2019 11:10 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>
> >>> +static int clk_init_parent(struct clk_core *core)
> >>> +{
> >>> + core->parent = __clk_init_parent(core, true);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(core->parent))
> >>> + return PTR_ERR(core->parent);
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Populate core->parent if parent has already been clk_core_init'd. If
> >>> + * parent has not yet been clk_core_init'd then place clk in the orphan
> >>> + * list. If clk doesn't have any parents then place it in the root
> >>> + * clk list.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Every time a new clk is clk_init'd then we walk the list of orphan
> >>> + * clocks and re-parent any that are children of the clock currently
> >>> + * being clk_init'd.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (core->parent) {
> >>> + hlist_add_head(&core->child_node,
> >>> + &core->parent->children);
> >>> + core->orphan = core->parent->orphan;
> >>> + } else if (!core->num_parents) {
> >>> + hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_root_list);
> >>> + core->orphan = false;
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_orphan_list);
> >>
> >> Missing "core->orphan = true;"?
> >> The snippet below had that line. Its not clear why it appears to be
> >> dropped here.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm. Weird. I think I may have been getting ahead of myself and moving
> > the orphan updating code into __clk_init_parent(). I can't remember why
> > though, so I guess I'll go all the way and move it all into
> > __clk_init_parent() now. Thanks for pointing it out.
> >
>
> No problem.
>
> Just FYI, I've rebased the 8998 mmcc series on top of this, and as far
> as I can tell, everything seems to be working great.
>
Cool. Are you using the new way to specify parents or have you
maintained the previous design of using string names for parents?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 6:10 [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite clk parent handling Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] clk: Combine __clk_get() and __clk_create_clk() Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 2/9] clk: Introduce get_parent_hw clk op Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 9:34 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-01-29 21:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-30 9:53 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-01-30 21:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-31 18:40 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-06 0:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-02-13 9:16 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-15 17:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-02-11 16:09 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-02-15 18:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-02-15 19:29 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-02-15 21:29 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-02-15 21:34 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] clk: core: clarify the check for runtime PM Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 4/9] clk: Introduce of_clk_get_hw_from_clkspec() Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 5/9] clk: Inform the core about consumer devices Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] clk: Move of_clk_*() APIs into clk.c from clkdev.c Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 7/9] clk: Allow parents to be specified without string names Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 10:12 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-01-29 18:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 21:08 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-13 9:32 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-15 21:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 8/9] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm845: Migrate to DT parent mapping Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 6:10 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: Specify XO clk as input to GCC node Stephen Boyd
2019-01-29 10:12 ` [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite clk parent handling Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155026616459.115909.14315694127255521155@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).