From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] drm/mediatek: redefine mtk_ddp_sout_sel
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 10:06:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552615576.31200.19.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMq1KBTN61hmWy2K+rrx3NL0eR7AXhFQBkCpcHu5nhUw_6xjw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-12-25 at 11:57 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:52 PM Yongqiang Niu
> <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch redefine mtk_ddp_sout_sel
>
> Can you describe a bit more why you are making this change?
the format of "mtk_ddp_sout_sel"was not flexible, after we add more
mediatek SOC support, that will be redundant
set this function format like mtk_ddp_mout_en and mtk_ddp_sel_in
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > index adb37e4..592f852 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > @@ -405,21 +405,27 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_sel_in(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > return value;
> > }
> >
> > -static void mtk_ddp_sout_sel(void __iomem *config_regs,
> > - enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > - enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next)
> > +static unsigned int mtk_ddp_sout_sel(void __iomem *config_regs,
>
> You don't use config_regs anymore, drop it.
ok, will drop it in next version
>
> > + enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > + enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next,
> > + unsigned int *addr)
> > {
> > + unsigned int value;
> > +
> > if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {
> > - writel_relaxed(BLS_TO_DSI_RDMA1_TO_DPI1,
> > - config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL);
> > + *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL;
> > + value = BLS_TO_DSI_RDMA1_TO_DPI1;
>
> You can directly return BLS_TO_DSI_RDMA1_TO_DPI1.
just format this like mtk_ddp_mout_en and mtk_ddp_sel_in
>
> > } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0) {
> > - writel_relaxed(BLS_TO_DPI_RDMA1_TO_DSI,
> > - config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL);
> > - writel_relaxed(DSI_SEL_IN_RDMA,
> > - config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL);
> > - writel_relaxed(DPI_SEL_IN_BLS,
> > - config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL);
> > + *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL;
> > + value = BLS_TO_DPI_RDMA1_TO_DSI;
>
> I (kind of) understand the change above, as you still end up writing
> BLS_TO_DSI_RDMA1_TO_DPI1 in DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL.
>
> This changes the behaviour, as now you only write
> BLS_TO_DPI_RDMA1_TO_DSI to DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL, but the previous
> revision of the code would also write to DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL and
> DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL. Why?
>
DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL set in the next lines.
DPI_SEL_IN_BLS is 0 for DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL set, and hardware
default setting is also 0, so this one is no need anymore
> > + } else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {
> > + *addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL;
> > + value = DSI_SEL_IN_RDMA;
> > + } else {
> > + value = 0;
> > }
> > +
> > + return value;
> > }
> >
> > void mtk_ddp_add_comp_to_path(void __iomem *config_regs,
> > @@ -434,7 +440,9 @@ void mtk_ddp_add_comp_to_path(void __iomem *config_regs,
> > writel_relaxed(reg, config_regs + addr);
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_ddp_sout_sel(config_regs, cur, next);
> > + value = mtk_ddp_sout_sel(cur, next, &addr);
> > + if (value)
> > + writel_relaxed(value, config_regs + addr);
>
> Why this change? I don't see mtk_ddp_sout_sel being used later in the
> series, so I'm not sure why we don't directly write the value into the
> register.
>
in the patch "[PATCH 04/18] drm/mediatek: move rdma sout from
mtk_ddp_mout_en into mtk_ddp_sout_sel", i moved all rdma out to here,
rdma only have single out, no multi out.
if keep this format, there will many writel_relaxed in mtk_ddp_sout_sel.
and modify this format like mtk_ddp_mout_en and mtk_ddp_sel_in looks
better.
>
>
> > value = mtk_ddp_sel_in(cur, next, &addr);
> > if (value) {
> > --
> > 1.8.1.1.dirty
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-15 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1545638931-24938-1-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-4-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-25 3:57 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/mediatek: redefine mtk_ddp_sout_sel Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-15 2:06 ` Yongqiang Niu [this message]
2019-03-15 3:22 ` Nicolas Boichat
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-11-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-25 4:15 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/mediatek: add gmc_bits for ovl private data Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-15 2:34 ` Yongqiang Niu
2019-03-15 3:26 ` Nicolas Boichat
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-17-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-25 4:19 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/mediatek: add function mtk_ddp_comp_get_type Nicolas Boichat
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-18-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-25 4:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/mediatek: add ovl0/ovl0_2l usecase Nicolas Boichat
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-2-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-26 1:49 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/mediatek: update dt-bindings for mt8183 CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-3-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-26 2:56 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/mediatek: add mutex mod and sof into ddp private data CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-5-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-26 3:51 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/mediatek: move rdma sout from mtk_ddp_mout_en into mtk_ddp_sout_sel CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-6-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-26 5:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/mediatek: add ddp component CCORR CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-7-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-26 6:01 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/mediatek: add mmsys private data for ddp path config CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-8-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-26 9:09 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/mediatek: add commponent OVL0_2L CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-10-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-26 9:13 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/mediatek: add component DITHER CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-12-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-27 1:16 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/medaitek: add layer_nr for ovl private data CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-14-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-27 4:26 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/mediatek: add ddp write register common api CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-15-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-27 4:56 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/mediatek: add connect function for ovl CK Hu
[not found] ` <1545638931-24938-16-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
2018-12-27 8:08 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/mediatek: add RDMA1 fifo size into RDMA private data CK Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1552615576.31200.19.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).