* [PATCH net 1/4] rxrpc: Fix use-after-free in rxrpc_put_local()
2020-01-31 13:29 [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes David Howells
@ 2020-01-31 13:29 ` David Howells
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 2/4] rxrpc: Fix insufficient receive notification generation David Howells
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2020-01-31 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: dhowells, linux-afs, linux-kernel
Fix rxrpc_put_local() to not access local->debug_id after calling
atomic_dec_return() as, unless that returned n==0, we no longer have the
right to access the object.
Fixes: 06d9532fa6b3 ("rxrpc: Fix read-after-free in rxrpc_queue_local()")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/local_object.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
index 36587260cabd..3aa179efcda4 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
@@ -364,11 +364,14 @@ void rxrpc_queue_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
void rxrpc_put_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
{
const void *here = __builtin_return_address(0);
+ unsigned int debug_id;
int n;
if (local) {
+ debug_id = local->debug_id;
+
n = atomic_dec_return(&local->usage);
- trace_rxrpc_local(local->debug_id, rxrpc_local_put, n, here);
+ trace_rxrpc_local(debug_id, rxrpc_local_put, n, here);
if (n == 0)
call_rcu(&local->rcu, rxrpc_local_rcu);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH net 2/4] rxrpc: Fix insufficient receive notification generation
2020-01-31 13:29 [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes David Howells
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 1/4] rxrpc: Fix use-after-free in rxrpc_put_local() David Howells
@ 2020-01-31 13:29 ` David Howells
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object David Howells
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 4/4] rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect David Howells
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2020-01-31 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: dhowells, linux-afs, linux-kernel
In rxrpc_input_data(), rxrpc_notify_socket() is called if the base sequence
number of the packet is immediately following the hard-ack point at the end
of the function. However, this isn't sufficient, since the recvmsg side
may have been advancing the window and then overrun the position in which
we're adding - at which point rx_hard_ack >= seq0 and no notification is
generated.
Fix this by always generating a notification at the end of the input
function.
Without this, a long call may stall, possibly indefinitely.
Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/input.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/input.c b/net/rxrpc/input.c
index 96d54e5bf7bc..ef10fbf71b15 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/input.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/input.c
@@ -599,10 +599,8 @@ static void rxrpc_input_data(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb)
false, true,
rxrpc_propose_ack_input_data);
- if (seq0 == READ_ONCE(call->rx_hard_ack) + 1) {
- trace_rxrpc_notify_socket(call->debug_id, serial);
- rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
- }
+ trace_rxrpc_notify_socket(call->debug_id, serial);
+ rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
unlock:
spin_unlock(&call->input_lock);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object
2020-01-31 13:29 [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes David Howells
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 1/4] rxrpc: Fix use-after-free in rxrpc_put_local() David Howells
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 2/4] rxrpc: Fix insufficient receive notification generation David Howells
@ 2020-01-31 13:29 ` David Howells
2020-02-02 20:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-02-03 10:23 ` David Howells
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 4/4] rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect David Howells
3 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2020-01-31 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: dhowells, linux-afs, linux-kernel
The introduction of a split between the reference count on rxrpc_local
objects and the usage count didn't quite go far enough. A number of kernel
work items need to make use of the socket to perform transmission. These
also need to get an active count on the local object to prevent the socket
from being closed.
Fix this by getting the active count in those places.
Also split out the raw active count get/put functions as these places tend
to hold refs on the rxrpc_local object already, so getting and putting an
extra object ref is just a waste of time.
The problem can lead to symptoms like:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
..
CPU: 2 PID: 818 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Not tainted 5.5.0-fscache+ #51
...
RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sendmsg+0x5/0x13
...
Call Trace:
security_socket_sendmsg+0x2c/0x3e
sock_sendmsg+0x1a/0x46
rxrpc_send_keepalive+0x131/0x1ae
rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x219/0x34b
process_one_work+0x18e/0x271
worker_thread+0x1a3/0x247
kthread+0xe6/0xeb
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Fixes: 730c5fd42c1e ("rxrpc: Fix local endpoint refcounting")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 2 ++
net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 10 ++++++++++
net/rxrpc/conn_event.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
net/rxrpc/local_object.c | 18 +++++++-----------
net/rxrpc/peer_event.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
index 9d3c4d2d893a..fe42f986cd94 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int rxrpc_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *saddr, int len)
service_in_use:
write_unlock(&local->services_lock);
rxrpc_unuse_local(local);
+ rxrpc_put_local(local);
ret = -EADDRINUSE;
error_unlock:
release_sock(&rx->sk);
@@ -899,6 +900,7 @@ static int rxrpc_release_sock(struct sock *sk)
rxrpc_purge_queue(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
rxrpc_unuse_local(rx->local);
+ rxrpc_put_local(rx->local);
rx->local = NULL;
key_put(rx->key);
rx->key = NULL;
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index 5e99df80e80a..94441fee85bc 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -1021,6 +1021,16 @@ void rxrpc_unuse_local(struct rxrpc_local *);
void rxrpc_queue_local(struct rxrpc_local *);
void rxrpc_destroy_all_locals(struct rxrpc_net *);
+static inline bool __rxrpc_unuse_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
+{
+ return atomic_dec_return(&local->active_users) == 0;
+}
+
+static inline bool __rxrpc_use_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
+{
+ return atomic_fetch_add_unless(&local->active_users, 1, 0) != 0;
+}
+
/*
* misc.c
*/
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
index 808a4723f868..abfff3e0921c 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void rxrpc_conn_retransmit_call(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
break;
}
+ BUG_ON(!conn->params.local);
+ BUG_ON(!conn->params.local->socket);
ret = kernel_sendmsg(conn->params.local->socket, &msg, iov, ioc, len);
conn->params.peer->last_tx_at = ktime_get_seconds();
if (ret < 0)
@@ -438,16 +440,12 @@ static void rxrpc_process_delayed_final_acks(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
/*
* connection-level event processor
*/
-void rxrpc_process_connection(struct work_struct *work)
+static void rxrpc_do_process_connection(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
{
- struct rxrpc_connection *conn =
- container_of(work, struct rxrpc_connection, processor);
struct sk_buff *skb;
u32 abort_code = RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
int ret;
- rxrpc_see_connection(conn);
-
if (test_and_clear_bit(RXRPC_CONN_EV_CHALLENGE, &conn->events))
rxrpc_secure_connection(conn);
@@ -475,18 +473,32 @@ void rxrpc_process_connection(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
-out:
- rxrpc_put_connection(conn);
- _leave("");
return;
requeue_and_leave:
skb_queue_head(&conn->rx_queue, skb);
- goto out;
+ return;
protocol_error:
if (rxrpc_abort_connection(conn, ret, abort_code) < 0)
goto requeue_and_leave;
rxrpc_free_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_freed);
- goto out;
+ return;
+}
+
+void rxrpc_process_connection(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct rxrpc_connection *conn =
+ container_of(work, struct rxrpc_connection, processor);
+
+ rxrpc_see_connection(conn);
+
+ if (__rxrpc_use_local(conn->params.local)) {
+ rxrpc_do_process_connection(conn);
+ rxrpc_unuse_local(conn->params.local);
+ }
+
+ rxrpc_put_connection(conn);
+ _leave("");
+ return;
}
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
index 3aa179efcda4..a6c1349e965d 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
@@ -383,14 +383,11 @@ void rxrpc_put_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
*/
struct rxrpc_local *rxrpc_use_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
{
- unsigned int au;
-
local = rxrpc_get_local_maybe(local);
if (!local)
return NULL;
- au = atomic_fetch_add_unless(&local->active_users, 1, 0);
- if (au == 0) {
+ if (!__rxrpc_use_local(local)) {
rxrpc_put_local(local);
return NULL;
}
@@ -404,14 +401,11 @@ struct rxrpc_local *rxrpc_use_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
*/
void rxrpc_unuse_local(struct rxrpc_local *local)
{
- unsigned int au;
-
if (local) {
- au = atomic_dec_return(&local->active_users);
- if (au == 0)
+ if (__rxrpc_unuse_local(local)) {
+ rxrpc_get_local(local);
rxrpc_queue_local(local);
- else
- rxrpc_put_local(local);
+ }
}
}
@@ -468,7 +462,7 @@ static void rxrpc_local_processor(struct work_struct *work)
do {
again = false;
- if (atomic_read(&local->active_users) == 0) {
+ if (!__rxrpc_use_local(local)) {
rxrpc_local_destroyer(local);
break;
}
@@ -482,6 +476,8 @@ static void rxrpc_local_processor(struct work_struct *work)
rxrpc_process_local_events(local);
again = true;
}
+
+ __rxrpc_unuse_local(local);
} while (again);
rxrpc_put_local(local);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/peer_event.c b/net/rxrpc/peer_event.c
index 48f67a9b1037..923b263c401b 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/peer_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/peer_event.c
@@ -364,27 +364,31 @@ static void rxrpc_peer_keepalive_dispatch(struct rxrpc_net *rxnet,
if (!rxrpc_get_peer_maybe(peer))
continue;
- spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
-
- keepalive_at = peer->last_tx_at + RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME;
- slot = keepalive_at - base;
- _debug("%02x peer %u t=%d {%pISp}",
- cursor, peer->debug_id, slot, &peer->srx.transport);
+ if (__rxrpc_use_local(peer->local)) {
+ spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
+
+ keepalive_at = peer->last_tx_at + RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME;
+ slot = keepalive_at - base;
+ _debug("%02x peer %u t=%d {%pISp}",
+ cursor, peer->debug_id, slot, &peer->srx.transport);
+
+ if (keepalive_at <= base ||
+ keepalive_at > base + RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME) {
+ rxrpc_send_keepalive(peer);
+ slot = RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME;
+ }
- if (keepalive_at <= base ||
- keepalive_at > base + RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME) {
- rxrpc_send_keepalive(peer);
- slot = RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME;
+ /* A transmission to this peer occurred since last we
+ * examined it so put it into the appropriate future
+ * bucket.
+ */
+ slot += cursor;
+ slot &= mask;
+ spin_lock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&peer->keepalive_link,
+ &rxnet->peer_keepalive[slot & mask]);
+ rxrpc_unuse_local(peer->local);
}
-
- /* A transmission to this peer occurred since last we examined
- * it so put it into the appropriate future bucket.
- */
- slot += cursor;
- slot &= mask;
- spin_lock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
- list_add_tail(&peer->keepalive_link,
- &rxnet->peer_keepalive[slot & mask]);
rxrpc_put_peer_locked(peer);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object David Howells
@ 2020-02-02 20:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-02-03 10:23 ` David Howells
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-02-02 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells; +Cc: netdev, linux-afs, linux-kernel
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:29:36 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> index 808a4723f868..abfff3e0921c 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void rxrpc_conn_retransmit_call(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
> break;
> }
>
> + BUG_ON(!conn->params.local);
> + BUG_ON(!conn->params.local->socket);
Is this really, really not possible to convert those into a WARN_ON()
and return?
> ret = kernel_sendmsg(conn->params.local->socket, &msg, iov, ioc, len);
> conn->params.peer->last_tx_at = ktime_get_seconds();
> if (ret < 0)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object David Howells
2020-02-02 20:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-02-03 10:23 ` David Howells
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2020-02-03 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski; +Cc: dhowells, netdev, linux-afs, linux-kernel
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > + BUG_ON(!conn->params.local);
> > + BUG_ON(!conn->params.local->socket);
>
> Is this really, really not possible to convert those into a WARN_ON()
> and return?
I can take those out - I actually put them in to help figure out which pointer
had become NULL - but turning them into a WARN_ON() and return doesn't
actually help that much since, without this patch, there was nothing to stop
the relevant pointer getting cleared between this point and the next access,
so there's a chance you'd end up with the same oops anyway.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 4/4] rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect
2020-01-31 13:29 [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes David Howells
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-01-31 13:29 ` [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object David Howells
@ 2020-01-31 13:29 ` David Howells
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2020-01-31 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: dhowells, linux-afs, linux-kernel
When a call is disconnected, the connection pointer from the call is
cleared to make sure it isn't used again and to prevent further attempted
transmission for the call. Unfortunately, there might be a daemon trying
to use it at the same time to transmit a packet.
Fix this by keeping call->conn set, but setting a flag on the call to
indicate disconnection instead.
Remove also the bits in the transmission functions where the conn pointer is
checked and a ref taken under spinlock as this is now redundant.
Fixes: 8d94aa381dab ("rxrpc: Calls shouldn't hold socket refs")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 1 +
net/rxrpc/call_object.c | 4 ++--
net/rxrpc/conn_client.c | 3 +--
net/rxrpc/conn_object.c | 4 ++--
net/rxrpc/output.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index 94441fee85bc..7d730c438404 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ enum rxrpc_call_flag {
RXRPC_CALL_RX_HEARD, /* The peer responded at least once to this call */
RXRPC_CALL_RX_UNDERRUN, /* Got data underrun */
RXRPC_CALL_IS_INTR, /* The call is interruptible */
+ RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, /* The call has been disconnected */
};
/*
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
index a31c18c09894..dbdbc4f18b5e 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ void rxrpc_release_call(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct rxrpc_call *call)
_debug("RELEASE CALL %p (%d CONN %p)", call, call->debug_id, conn);
- if (conn)
+ if (conn && !test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, &call->flags))
rxrpc_disconnect_call(call);
if (call->security)
call->security->free_call_crypto(call);
@@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ static void rxrpc_rcu_destroy_call(struct rcu_head *rcu)
struct rxrpc_call *call = container_of(rcu, struct rxrpc_call, rcu);
struct rxrpc_net *rxnet = call->rxnet;
+ rxrpc_put_connection(call->conn);
rxrpc_put_peer(call->peer);
kfree(call->rxtx_buffer);
kfree(call->rxtx_annotations);
@@ -590,7 +591,6 @@ void rxrpc_cleanup_call(struct rxrpc_call *call)
ASSERTCMP(call->state, ==, RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE);
ASSERT(test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags));
- ASSERTCMP(call->conn, ==, NULL);
rxrpc_cleanup_ring(call);
rxrpc_free_skb(call->tx_pending, rxrpc_skb_cleaned);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_client.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_client.c
index 376370cd9285..ea7d4c21f889 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_client.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_client.c
@@ -785,6 +785,7 @@ void rxrpc_disconnect_client_call(struct rxrpc_call *call)
u32 cid;
spin_lock(&conn->channel_lock);
+ set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, &call->flags);
cid = call->cid;
if (cid) {
@@ -792,7 +793,6 @@ void rxrpc_disconnect_client_call(struct rxrpc_call *call)
chan = &conn->channels[channel];
}
trace_rxrpc_client(conn, channel, rxrpc_client_chan_disconnect);
- call->conn = NULL;
/* Calls that have never actually been assigned a channel can simply be
* discarded. If the conn didn't get used either, it will follow
@@ -908,7 +908,6 @@ void rxrpc_disconnect_client_call(struct rxrpc_call *call)
spin_unlock(&rxnet->client_conn_cache_lock);
out_2:
spin_unlock(&conn->channel_lock);
- rxrpc_put_connection(conn);
_leave("");
return;
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
index 38d718e90dc6..c0b3154f7a7e 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
@@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ void __rxrpc_disconnect_call(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
_enter("%d,%x", conn->debug_id, call->cid);
+ set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, &call->flags);
+
if (rcu_access_pointer(chan->call) == call) {
/* Save the result of the call so that we can repeat it if necessary
* through the channel, whilst disposing of the actual call record.
@@ -223,9 +225,7 @@ void rxrpc_disconnect_call(struct rxrpc_call *call)
__rxrpc_disconnect_call(conn, call);
spin_unlock(&conn->channel_lock);
- call->conn = NULL;
conn->idle_timestamp = jiffies;
- rxrpc_put_connection(conn);
}
/*
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c
index 935bb60fff56..bad3d2420344 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/output.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static size_t rxrpc_fill_out_ack(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
int rxrpc_send_ack_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, bool ping,
rxrpc_serial_t *_serial)
{
- struct rxrpc_connection *conn = NULL;
+ struct rxrpc_connection *conn;
struct rxrpc_ack_buffer *pkt;
struct msghdr msg;
struct kvec iov[2];
@@ -139,18 +139,14 @@ int rxrpc_send_ack_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, bool ping,
int ret;
u8 reason;
- spin_lock_bh(&call->lock);
- if (call->conn)
- conn = rxrpc_get_connection_maybe(call->conn);
- spin_unlock_bh(&call->lock);
- if (!conn)
+ if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, &call->flags))
return -ECONNRESET;
pkt = kzalloc(sizeof(*pkt), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pkt) {
- rxrpc_put_connection(conn);
+ if (!pkt)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
+
+ conn = call->conn;
msg.msg_name = &call->peer->srx.transport;
msg.msg_namelen = call->peer->srx.transport_len;
@@ -244,7 +240,6 @@ int rxrpc_send_ack_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, bool ping,
}
out:
- rxrpc_put_connection(conn);
kfree(pkt);
return ret;
}
@@ -254,7 +249,7 @@ int rxrpc_send_ack_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, bool ping,
*/
int rxrpc_send_abort_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call)
{
- struct rxrpc_connection *conn = NULL;
+ struct rxrpc_connection *conn;
struct rxrpc_abort_buffer pkt;
struct msghdr msg;
struct kvec iov[1];
@@ -271,13 +266,11 @@ int rxrpc_send_abort_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call)
test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, &call->flags))
return 0;
- spin_lock_bh(&call->lock);
- if (call->conn)
- conn = rxrpc_get_connection_maybe(call->conn);
- spin_unlock_bh(&call->lock);
- if (!conn)
+ if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_DISCONNECTED, &call->flags))
return -ECONNRESET;
+ conn = call->conn;
+
msg.msg_name = &call->peer->srx.transport;
msg.msg_namelen = call->peer->srx.transport_len;
msg.msg_control = NULL;
@@ -312,8 +305,6 @@ int rxrpc_send_abort_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call)
trace_rxrpc_tx_packet(call->debug_id, &pkt.whdr,
rxrpc_tx_point_call_abort);
rxrpc_tx_backoff(call, ret);
-
- rxrpc_put_connection(conn);
return ret;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread