linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RESEND PATCH v1 0/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec"
@ 2021-03-10 10:56 Yongqiang Niu
  2021-03-10 10:56 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted before send" Yongqiang Niu
  2021-03-10 10:56 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 2/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" Yongqiang Niu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yongqiang Niu @ 2021-03-10 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, CK Hu
  Cc: Jassi Brar, Bibby Hsieh, Yongqiang Niu, Dennis YC Hsieh,
	devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This series base linux 5.12-rc1
these two patches will cause home ui flick when cursor moved,
there is no fix solution yet, revert these patches first.

change since v1:
fix build error

Yongqiang Niu (2):
  Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted
    before send"
  Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to
    atomic_exec"

 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c |  1 -
 drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c      | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.1.dirty


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted before send"
  2021-03-10 10:56 [RESEND PATCH v1 0/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" Yongqiang Niu
@ 2021-03-10 10:56 ` Yongqiang Niu
  2021-03-10 10:56 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 2/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" Yongqiang Niu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yongqiang Niu @ 2021-03-10 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, CK Hu
  Cc: Jassi Brar, Bibby Hsieh, Yongqiang Niu, Dennis YC Hsieh,
	devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This reverts commit 839cbf0531428f3f9535077a461b8631359c1165.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
index 8b0de90..c76f446 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
@@ -463,7 +463,6 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_hw_config(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
 	}
 #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
 	if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_client) {
-		mbox_flush(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client->chan, 2000);
 		cmdq_handle = cmdq_pkt_create(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client, PAGE_SIZE);
 		cmdq_pkt_clear_event(cmdq_handle, mtk_crtc->cmdq_event);
 		cmdq_pkt_wfe(cmdq_handle, mtk_crtc->cmdq_event, false);
-- 
1.8.1.1.dirty


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RESEND PATCH v1 2/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec"
  2021-03-10 10:56 [RESEND PATCH v1 0/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" Yongqiang Niu
  2021-03-10 10:56 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted before send" Yongqiang Niu
@ 2021-03-10 10:56 ` Yongqiang Niu
  2021-03-10 23:35   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yongqiang Niu @ 2021-03-10 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, CK Hu
  Cc: Jassi Brar, Bibby Hsieh, Yongqiang Niu, Dennis YC Hsieh,
	devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

This reverts commit c9ea564f3d9dd20d88bd34f40a6ff6d31a0d7e8c.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
index 5665b6e..e0d9a86 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct cmdq_thread {
 	void __iomem		*base;
 	struct list_head	task_busy_list;
 	u32			priority;
+	bool			atomic_exec;
 };
 
 struct cmdq_task {
@@ -168,18 +169,56 @@ static void cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(struct cmdq_task *task)
 	dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, prev_task->pa_base,
 				prev_task->pkt->cmd_buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 	prev_task_base[CMDQ_NUM_CMD(prev_task->pkt) - 1] =
-		(u64)CMDQ_JUMP_BY_PA << 32 | task->pa_base;
+		(u64)CMDQ_JUMP_BY_PA << 32 |
+		(task->pa_base >> task->cmdq->shift_pa);
 	dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, prev_task->pa_base,
 				   prev_task->pkt->cmd_buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 
 	cmdq_thread_invalidate_fetched_data(thread);
 }
 
+static bool cmdq_command_is_wfe(u64 cmd)
+{
+	u64 wfe_option = CMDQ_WFE_UPDATE | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT_VALUE;
+	u64 wfe_op = (u64)(CMDQ_CODE_WFE << CMDQ_OP_CODE_SHIFT) << 32;
+	u64 wfe_mask = (u64)CMDQ_OP_CODE_MASK << 32 | 0xffffffff;
+
+	return ((cmd & wfe_mask) == (wfe_op | wfe_option));
+}
+
+/* we assume tasks in the same display GCE thread are waiting the same event. */
+static void cmdq_task_remove_wfe(struct cmdq_task *task)
+{
+	struct device *dev = task->cmdq->mbox.dev;
+	u64 *base = task->pkt->va_base;
+	int i;
+
+	dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, task->pa_base, task->pkt->cmd_buf_size,
+				DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+	for (i = 0; i < CMDQ_NUM_CMD(task->pkt); i++)
+		if (cmdq_command_is_wfe(base[i]))
+			base[i] = (u64)CMDQ_JUMP_BY_OFFSET << 32 |
+				  (CMDQ_JUMP_PASS >> task->cmdq->shift_pa);
+	dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, task->pa_base, task->pkt->cmd_buf_size,
+				   DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+}
+
 static bool cmdq_thread_is_in_wfe(struct cmdq_thread *thread)
 {
 	return readl(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_WAIT_TOKEN) & CMDQ_THR_IS_WAITING;
 }
 
+static void cmdq_thread_wait_end(struct cmdq_thread *thread,
+				 unsigned long end_pa)
+{
+	struct device *dev = thread->chan->mbox->dev;
+	unsigned long curr_pa;
+
+	if (readl_poll_timeout_atomic(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR,
+			curr_pa, curr_pa == end_pa, 1, 20))
+		dev_err(dev, "GCE thread cannot run to end.\n");
+}
+
 static void cmdq_task_exec_done(struct cmdq_task *task, enum cmdq_cb_status sta)
 {
 	struct cmdq_task_cb *cb = &task->pkt->async_cb;
@@ -371,15 +410,37 @@ static int cmdq_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
 			cmdq->shift_pa;
 		end_pa = readl(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR) <<
 			cmdq->shift_pa;
-		/* check boundary */
-		if (curr_pa == end_pa - CMDQ_INST_SIZE ||
-		    curr_pa == end_pa) {
-			/* set to this task directly */
-			writel(task->pa_base >> cmdq->shift_pa,
-			       thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
+
+		/*
+		 * Atomic execution should remove the following wfe, i.e. only
+		 * wait event at first task, and prevent to pause when running.
+		 */
+		if (thread->atomic_exec) {
+			/* GCE is executing if command is not WFE */
+			if (!cmdq_thread_is_in_wfe(thread)) {
+				cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
+				cmdq_thread_wait_end(thread,
+						     end_pa >> cmdq->shift_pa);
+				WARN_ON(cmdq_thread_suspend(cmdq, thread) < 0);
+				/* set to this task directly */
+				writel(task->pa_base >> cmdq->shift_pa,
+				       thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
+			} else {
+				cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(task);
+				cmdq_task_remove_wfe(task);
+				smp_mb(); /* modify jump before enable thread */
+			}
 		} else {
-			cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(task);
-			smp_mb(); /* modify jump before enable thread */
+			/* check boundary */
+			if (curr_pa == end_pa - CMDQ_INST_SIZE ||
+			    curr_pa == end_pa) {
+				/* set to this task directly */
+				writel(task->pa_base >> cmdq->shift_pa,
+				       thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
+			} else {
+				cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(task);
+				smp_mb(); /* modify jump before enable thread */
+			}
 		}
 		writel((task->pa_base + pkt->cmd_buf_size) >> cmdq->shift_pa,
 		       thread->base + CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR);
@@ -500,6 +561,7 @@ static struct mbox_chan *cmdq_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
 
 	thread = (struct cmdq_thread *)mbox->chans[ind].con_priv;
 	thread->priority = sp->args[1];
+	thread->atomic_exec = (sp->args[2] != 0);
 	thread->chan = &mbox->chans[ind];
 
 	return &mbox->chans[ind];
-- 
1.8.1.1.dirty


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 2/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec"
  2021-03-10 10:56 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 2/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" Yongqiang Niu
@ 2021-03-10 23:35   ` Chun-Kuang Hu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chun-Kuang Hu @ 2021-03-10 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yongqiang Niu
  Cc: Rob Herring, Matthias Brugger, CK Hu, Jassi Brar, Bibby Hsieh,
	Dennis YC Hsieh, DTML, Linux ARM,
	moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-kernel,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group

Hi, Yongqiang:

Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> 於 2021年3月10日 週三 下午6:58寫道:
>
> This reverts commit c9ea564f3d9dd20d88bd34f40a6ff6d31a0d7e8c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index 5665b6e..e0d9a86 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct cmdq_thread {
>         void __iomem            *base;
>         struct list_head        task_busy_list;
>         u32                     priority;
> +       bool                    atomic_exec;
>  };
>
>  struct cmdq_task {
> @@ -168,18 +169,56 @@ static void cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(struct cmdq_task *task)
>         dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, prev_task->pa_base,
>                                 prev_task->pkt->cmd_buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>         prev_task_base[CMDQ_NUM_CMD(prev_task->pkt) - 1] =
> -               (u64)CMDQ_JUMP_BY_PA << 32 | task->pa_base;
> +               (u64)CMDQ_JUMP_BY_PA << 32 |
> +               (task->pa_base >> task->cmdq->shift_pa);
>         dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, prev_task->pa_base,
>                                    prev_task->pkt->cmd_buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>
>         cmdq_thread_invalidate_fetched_data(thread);
>  }
>
> +static bool cmdq_command_is_wfe(u64 cmd)
> +{
> +       u64 wfe_option = CMDQ_WFE_UPDATE | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT_VALUE;
> +       u64 wfe_op = (u64)(CMDQ_CODE_WFE << CMDQ_OP_CODE_SHIFT) << 32;
> +       u64 wfe_mask = (u64)CMDQ_OP_CODE_MASK << 32 | 0xffffffff;
> +
> +       return ((cmd & wfe_mask) == (wfe_op | wfe_option));
> +}
> +
> +/* we assume tasks in the same display GCE thread are waiting the same event. */
> +static void cmdq_task_remove_wfe(struct cmdq_task *task)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev = task->cmdq->mbox.dev;
> +       u64 *base = task->pkt->va_base;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, task->pa_base, task->pkt->cmd_buf_size,
> +                               DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +       for (i = 0; i < CMDQ_NUM_CMD(task->pkt); i++)
> +               if (cmdq_command_is_wfe(base[i]))
> +                       base[i] = (u64)CMDQ_JUMP_BY_OFFSET << 32 |
> +                                 (CMDQ_JUMP_PASS >> task->cmdq->shift_pa);
> +       dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, task->pa_base, task->pkt->cmd_buf_size,
> +                                  DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +}
> +
>  static bool cmdq_thread_is_in_wfe(struct cmdq_thread *thread)
>  {
>         return readl(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_WAIT_TOKEN) & CMDQ_THR_IS_WAITING;
>  }
>
> +static void cmdq_thread_wait_end(struct cmdq_thread *thread,
> +                                unsigned long end_pa)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev = thread->chan->mbox->dev;
> +       unsigned long curr_pa;
> +
> +       if (readl_poll_timeout_atomic(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR,
> +                       curr_pa, curr_pa == end_pa, 1, 20))
> +               dev_err(dev, "GCE thread cannot run to end.\n");
> +}
> +
>  static void cmdq_task_exec_done(struct cmdq_task *task, enum cmdq_cb_status sta)
>  {
>         struct cmdq_task_cb *cb = &task->pkt->async_cb;
> @@ -371,15 +410,37 @@ static int cmdq_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
>                         cmdq->shift_pa;
>                 end_pa = readl(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR) <<
>                         cmdq->shift_pa;
> -               /* check boundary */
> -               if (curr_pa == end_pa - CMDQ_INST_SIZE ||
> -                   curr_pa == end_pa) {
> -                       /* set to this task directly */
> -                       writel(task->pa_base >> cmdq->shift_pa,
> -                              thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * Atomic execution should remove the following wfe, i.e. only
> +                * wait event at first task, and prevent to pause when running.
> +                */
> +               if (thread->atomic_exec) {
> +                       /* GCE is executing if command is not WFE */
> +                       if (!cmdq_thread_is_in_wfe(thread)) {
> +                               cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> +                               cmdq_thread_wait_end(thread,
> +                                                    end_pa >> cmdq->shift_pa);
> +                               WARN_ON(cmdq_thread_suspend(cmdq, thread) < 0);
> +                               /* set to this task directly */
> +                               writel(task->pa_base >> cmdq->shift_pa,
> +                                      thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> +                       } else {
> +                               cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(task);
> +                               cmdq_task_remove_wfe(task);
> +                               smp_mb(); /* modify jump before enable thread */
> +                       }
>                 } else {
> -                       cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(task);
> -                       smp_mb(); /* modify jump before enable thread */
> +                       /* check boundary */
> +                       if (curr_pa == end_pa - CMDQ_INST_SIZE ||
> +                           curr_pa == end_pa) {
> +                               /* set to this task directly */
> +                               writel(task->pa_base >> cmdq->shift_pa,
> +                                      thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> +                       } else {
> +                               cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(task);
> +                               smp_mb(); /* modify jump before enable thread */
> +                       }
>                 }
>                 writel((task->pa_base + pkt->cmd_buf_size) >> cmdq->shift_pa,
>                        thread->base + CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR);
> @@ -500,6 +561,7 @@ static struct mbox_chan *cmdq_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
>
>         thread = (struct cmdq_thread *)mbox->chans[ind].con_priv;
>         thread->priority = sp->args[1];
> +       thread->atomic_exec = (sp->args[2] != 0);

This does not match the binding [1].
Why not just fix the bug rather than revert this patch?

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mtk-gce.txt?h=v5.12-rc2

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>         thread->chan = &mbox->chans[ind];
>
>         return &mbox->chans[ind];
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-10 23:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-10 10:56 [RESEND PATCH v1 0/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" Yongqiang Niu
2021-03-10 10:56 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted before send" Yongqiang Niu
2021-03-10 10:56 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 2/2] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" Yongqiang Niu
2021-03-10 23:35   ` Chun-Kuang Hu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).