* [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS
@ 2021-05-07 8:54 Masami Hiramatsu
2021-05-07 8:54 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang Masami Hiramatsu
2021-05-10 12:14 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2021-05-07 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: Anders Roxell, Leo Yan, Sergey Senozhatsky, linux-kernel
Hi Arnaldo,
Recently, I tested the perf build by clang on arm64 and found an issue
in arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c, related to missing-field-initializers warning.
----
tools/perf $ make CC=clang LLVM=1
...
arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c:74:9: error: missing field 'ops' initializer [-Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers]
{ NULL },
^
1 error generated.
----
That error itself can be fixed easily by just adding field initializers
[1/1] Note that I didn't add Fixes tag, because I'm not sure clang build
of perf is officially supported or not, and this seems correct C code
to initialize a data structure with zero.(*)
And while investigating the error, I found another issue in the Makefile.config.
It seems to make CFLAGS from CORE_CFLAGS, INC_FLAGS, EXTRA_CFLAGS, EXTRA_WARNINGS
in the following order;
CFLAGS = $EXTRA_CFLAGS $EXTRA_WARNINGS $CORE_CFLAGS $INC_FLAGS
But since CORE_CFLAGS includes -Wall and -Wextra, the other -Wno-XXXX in
EXTRA_CFLAGS and EXTRA_WARNINGS are overriden and ignored.
So, I think it is better to define it as
CFLAGS = $CORE_CFLAGS $INC_FLAGS $EXTRA_CFLAGS $EXTRA_WARNINGS
But I also saw some configs tweaks CFLAGS directly. I think they should
modify EXTRA_CFLAGS.
My question is that this order is intentional or not. I might
miss something on it.
(*) BTW, there seems a discussion on the clang warning behavior,
because gcc doesn't warn it anymore
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750).
It might be better to add -Wno-missing-field-initializers in case
of CC=clang by default.
Thank you,
---
Masami Hiramatsu (1):
tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang 2021-05-07 8:54 [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS Masami Hiramatsu @ 2021-05-07 8:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2021-05-09 12:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2021-05-10 12:14 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2021-05-07 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Anders Roxell, Leo Yan, Sergey Senozhatsky, linux-kernel Since Clang's -Wmissing-field-initializers warns if a data structure is initialized with a signle NULL as below, ---- tools/perf $ make CC=clang LLVM=1 ... arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c:74:9: error: missing field 'ops' initializer [-Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers] { NULL }, ^ 1 error generated. ---- add another field initializer expressly as same as other arch's kvm-stat.c code. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> --- tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c index 2303256b7d05..73d18e0ed6f6 100644 --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ struct kvm_reg_events_ops kvm_reg_events_ops[] = { .name = "vmexit", .ops = &exit_events, }, - { NULL }, + { NULL, NULL }, }; const char * const kvm_skip_events[] = { ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang 2021-05-07 8:54 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang Masami Hiramatsu @ 2021-05-09 12:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2021-05-09 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masami Hiramatsu; +Cc: Anders Roxell, Leo Yan, Sergey Senozhatsky, linux-kernel Em Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:54:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > Since Clang's -Wmissing-field-initializers warns if a data > structure is initialized with a signle NULL as below, > > ---- > tools/perf $ make CC=clang LLVM=1 > ... > arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c:74:9: error: missing field 'ops' initializer [-Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers] > { NULL }, > ^ > 1 error generated. > ---- Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo > add another field initializer expressly as same as other > arch's kvm-stat.c code. > > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> > --- > tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c > index 2303256b7d05..73d18e0ed6f6 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ struct kvm_reg_events_ops kvm_reg_events_ops[] = { > .name = "vmexit", > .ops = &exit_events, > }, > - { NULL }, > + { NULL, NULL }, > }; > > const char * const kvm_skip_events[] = { > -- - Arnaldo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS 2021-05-07 8:54 [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS Masami Hiramatsu 2021-05-07 8:54 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang Masami Hiramatsu @ 2021-05-10 12:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2021-05-11 10:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2021-05-10 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masami Hiramatsu; +Cc: Anders Roxell, Leo Yan, Sergey Senozhatsky, linux-kernel Em Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:54:25PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > Hi Arnaldo, > > Recently, I tested the perf build by clang on arm64 and found an issue Cross building? What toolchain? I regularly build perf with lots of clang versions, but cross building with clang isn't yet performed in my tests. > in arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c, related to missing-field-initializers warning. > > ---- > tools/perf $ make CC=clang LLVM=1 > ... > arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c:74:9: error: missing field 'ops' initializer [-Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers] > { NULL }, > ^ > 1 error generated. > ---- > > That error itself can be fixed easily by just adding field initializers > [1/1] Note that I didn't add Fixes tag, because I'm not sure clang build > of perf is officially supported or not, and this seems correct C code > to initialize a data structure with zero.(*) I'd say it is supported, at least by me, for quite a while, as can be seen in all pull requests I send upstream, for instance: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YIxSJ7bdtjv4wHok@kernel.org/ # export PERF_TARBALL=http://192.168.86.5/perf/perf-5.12.0.tar.xz # dm 1 72.92 alpine:3.4 : Ok gcc (Alpine 5.3.0) 5.3.0 , clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final) 2 74.56 alpine:3.5 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.2.1) 6.2.1 20160822 , clang version 3.8.1 (tags/RELEASE_381/final) 3 81.19 alpine:3.6 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.3.0) 6.3.0 , clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final) 4 90.07 alpine:3.7 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0 , Alpine clang version 5.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_500/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.0) 5 83.40 alpine:3.8 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0 , Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1) 6 85.30 alpine:3.9 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0 , Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_502/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1) 7 110.88 alpine:3.10 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0 , Alpine clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final) (based on LLVM 8.0.0) 8 140.86 alpine:3.11 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0 , Alpine clang version 9.0.0 (https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports f7f0d2c2b8bcd6a5843401a9a702029556492689) (based on LLVM 9.0.0) 9 127.60 alpine:3.12 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0 , Alpine clang version 10.0.0 (https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports.git 7445adce501f8473efdb93b17b5eaf2f1445ed4c) 10 278.42 alpine:3.13 : Ok gcc (Alpine 10.2.1_pre1) 10.2.1 20201203 , Alpine clang version 10.0.1 11 235.62 alpine:edge : Ok gcc (Alpine 10.3.1_git20210424) 10.3.1 20210424 , Alpine clang version 11.1.0 12 161.23 alt:p8 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20151207 (ALT p8 5.3.1-alt3.M80P.1) , clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final) 13 390.70 alt:p9 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.4.1 20200305 (ALT p9 8.4.1-alt0.p9.1) , clang version 10.0.0 14 95.00 alt:sisyphus : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20210313 (ALT Sisyphus 10.2.1-alt3) , clang version 10.0.1 15 77.78 amazonlinux:1 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2) , clang version 3.6.2 (tags/RELEASE_362/final) 16 103.23 amazonlinux:2 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-12) , clang version 7.0.1 (Amazon Linux 2 7.0.1-1.amzn2.0.2) 17 22.16 android-ndk:r12b-arm : Ok arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease) 18 22.10 android-ndk:r15c-arm : Ok arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease) 19 25.74 centos:6 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23) 20 31.40 centos:7 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) 21 97.31 centos:8 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5) , clang version 10.0.1 (Red Hat 10.0.1-1.module_el8.3.0+467+cb298d5b) 22 60.94 clearlinux:latest : Ok gcc (Clear Linux OS for Intel Architecture) 10.2.1 20201217 releases/gcc-10.2.0-643-g7cbb07d2fc , clang version 10.0.1 23 77.23 debian:8 : Ok gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u2) 4.9.2 , Debian clang version 3.5.0-10 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) (based on LLVM 3.5.0) 24 82.00 debian:9 : Ok gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1) 6.3.0 20170516 , clang version 3.8.1-24 (tags/RELEASE_381/final) 25 75.27 debian:10 : Ok gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 , clang version 7.0.1-8+deb10u2 (tags/RELEASE_701/final) 26 74.40 debian:experimental : Ok gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 , Debian clang version 11.0.1-2 27 32.81 debian:experimental-x-arm64 : Ok aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 28 28.53 debian:experimental-x-mips : Ok mips-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-3) 10.2.1 20201224 29 30.96 debian:experimental-x-mips64 : Ok mips64-linux-gnuabi64-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-3) 10.2.1 20201224 30 31.13 debian:experimental-x-mipsel : Ok mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-3) 10.2.1 20201224 31 29.13 fedora:20 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7) 32 29.51 fedora:22 : Ok gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6) , clang version 3.5.0 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) 33 68.17 fedora:23 : Ok gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6) , clang version 3.7.0 (tags/RELEASE_370/final) 34 80.83 fedora:24 : Ok gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20161221 (Red Hat 6.3.1-1) , clang version 3.8.1 (tags/RELEASE_381/final) 35 26.32 fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc : Ok arc-linux-gcc (ARCompact ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2017.09-rc2) 7.1.1 20170710 36 82.85 fedora:25 : Ok gcc (GCC) 6.4.1 20170727 (Red Hat 6.4.1-1) , clang version 3.9.1 (tags/RELEASE_391/final) 37 94.47 fedora:26 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180130 (Red Hat 7.3.1-2) , clang version 4.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_401/final) 38 96.40 fedora:27 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-6) , clang version 5.0.2 (tags/RELEASE_502/final) 39 108.54 fedora:28 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat 8.3.1-2) , clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final) 40 113.97 fedora:29 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat 8.3.1-2) , clang version 7.0.1 (Fedora 7.0.1-6.fc29) 41 119.26 fedora:30 : Ok gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2) , clang version 8.0.0 (Fedora 8.0.0-3.fc30) 42 25.92 fedora:30-x-ARC-uClibc : Ok arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225 43 117.82 fedora:31 : Ok gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2) , clang version 9.0.1 (Fedora 9.0.1-4.fc31) 44 97.12 fedora:32 : Ok gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20201125 (Red Hat 10.2.1-9) , clang version 10.0.1 (Fedora 10.0.1-3.fc32) 45 94.80 fedora:33 : Ok gcc (GCC) 10.3.1 20210422 (Red Hat 10.3.1-1) , clang version 11.0.0 (Fedora 11.0.0-2.fc33) 46 99.46 fedora:34 : Ok gcc (GCC) 11.0.1 20210324 (Red Hat 11.0.1-0) , clang version 12.0.0 (Fedora 12.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc34) 47 98.91 fedora:rawhide : Ok gcc (GCC) 11.0.1 20210423 (Red Hat 11.0.1-0) , clang version 12.0.0 (Fedora 12.0.0-1.fc35) 48 34.11 gentoo-stage3-amd64:latest : Ok gcc (Gentoo 9.3.0-r1 p3) 9.3.0 49 66.98 mageia:5 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 , clang version 3.5.2 (tags/RELEASE_352/final) 50 83.81 mageia:6 : Ok gcc (Mageia 5.5.0-1.mga6) 5.5.0 , clang version 3.9.1 (tags/RELEASE_391/final) 51 48.52 mageia:7 : FAIL clang version 8.0.0 (Mageia 8.0.0-1.mga7) yychar = yylex (&yylval, &yylloc, scanner); ^ #define yylex parse_events_lex ^ 1 error generated. make[3]: *** [/git/perf-5.12.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2 52 221.66 openmandriva:cooker : Ok gcc (GCC) 10.3.0 20210408 (OpenMandriva) , OpenMandriva 12.0.0-1 clang version 12.0.0 (/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-llvmorg-12.0.0/clang b3a1e025e0452bb54d01ab5281bbf509ac4e3c72) 53 119.19 opensuse:15.0 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.4.1 20190905 [gcc-7-branch revision 275407] , clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final 312548) 54 127.85 opensuse:15.1 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 , clang version 7.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_701/final 349238) 55 117.53 opensuse:15.2 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 , clang version 9.0.1 56 131.22 opensuse:15.3 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 , clang version 7.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_701/final 349238) 57 114.64 opensuse:42.3 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.5 , clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final 262553) 58 108.83 opensuse:tumbleweed : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 10.2.1 20200825 [revision c0746a1beb1ba073c7981eb09f55b3d993b32e5c] , clang version 10.0.1 59 25.02 oraclelinux:6 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23.0.1) 60 30.76 oraclelinux:7 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44.0.3) 61 95.29 oraclelinux:8 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5.0.2) , clang version 10.0.1 (Red Hat 10.0.1-1.0.1.module+el8.3.0+7827+89335dbf) 62 25.85 ubuntu:12.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 , Ubuntu clang version 3.0-6ubuntu3 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) (based on LLVM 3.0) 63 29.09 ubuntu:14.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4 64 81.27 ubuntu:16.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.12) 5.4.0 20160609 , clang version 3.8.0-2ubuntu4 (tags/RELEASE_380/final) 65 27.09 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm : Ok arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 66 27.59 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64 : Ok aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 67 26.25 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc : Ok powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 68 26.87 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64 : Ok powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 69 27.69 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64el : Ok powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 70 26.58 ubuntu:16.04-x-s390 : Ok s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 71 88.21 ubuntu:18.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 , clang version 6.0.0-1ubuntu2 (tags/RELEASE_600/final) 72 28.46 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm : Ok arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 73 29.25 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm64 : Ok aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 74 23.59 ubuntu:18.04-x-m68k : Ok m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 75 27.97 ubuntu:18.04-x-powerpc : Ok powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 76 29.83 ubuntu:18.04-x-powerpc64 : Ok powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 77 30.41 ubuntu:18.04-x-powerpc64el : Ok powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 78 172.25 ubuntu:18.04-x-riscv64 : Ok riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 79 26.09 ubuntu:18.04-x-s390 : Ok s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 80 28.18 ubuntu:18.04-x-sh4 : Ok sh4-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 81 26.43 ubuntu:18.04-x-sparc64 : Ok sparc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 82 76.46 ubuntu:20.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0 , clang version 10.0.0-4ubuntu1 83 31.35 ubuntu:20.04-x-powerpc64el : Ok powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04) 10.2.0 84 74.85 ubuntu:20.10 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 10.2.0-13ubuntu1) 10.2.0 , Ubuntu clang version 11.0.0-2 85 71.63 ubuntu:21.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 10.3.0-1ubuntu1) 10.3.0 , Ubuntu clang version 12.0.0-1ubuntu1 But I couldn't find so far, and I haven't researched this lately, a distro that has all the devel packages cross-built so that I could cross build a full featured perf tool, are you aware of one? In the -x-ARCH tests above I end up just manually cross-building elfutils and zlib to get a minimal perf cross build. > And while investigating the error, I found another issue in the Makefile.config. > > It seems to make CFLAGS from CORE_CFLAGS, INC_FLAGS, EXTRA_CFLAGS, EXTRA_WARNINGS > in the following order; > > CFLAGS = $EXTRA_CFLAGS $EXTRA_WARNINGS $CORE_CFLAGS $INC_FLAGS > > But since CORE_CFLAGS includes -Wall and -Wextra, the other -Wno-XXXX in > EXTRA_CFLAGS and EXTRA_WARNINGS are overriden and ignored. > So, I think it is better to define it as > > CFLAGS = $CORE_CFLAGS $INC_FLAGS $EXTRA_CFLAGS $EXTRA_WARNINGS > > But I also saw some configs tweaks CFLAGS directly. I think they should > modify EXTRA_CFLAGS. > > My question is that this order is intentional or not. I might > miss something on it. Oh the joy with Makefiles.. Most likely unintentional, please submit a patch, please reuse your wording above to justify it. > (*) BTW, there seems a discussion on the clang warning behavior, > because gcc doesn't warn it anymore > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750). > It might be better to add -Wno-missing-field-initializers in case > of CC=clang by default. Humm, unsure about that, I applied your patch, but I'd say it'd be better to use the variant that initialized the first field to zero/NULL and then all the other (not explicitely initialized) ones will be zeroed. > > Thank you, > > --- > > Masami Hiramatsu (1): > tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang > > > tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@kernel.org> -- - Arnaldo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS 2021-05-10 12:14 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2021-05-11 10:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2021-05-11 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Anders Roxell, Leo Yan, Sergey Senozhatsky, linux-kernel On Mon, 10 May 2021 09:14:01 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > Em Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:54:25PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > > Hi Arnaldo, > > > > Recently, I tested the perf build by clang on arm64 and found an issue > > Cross building? What toolchain? I regularly build perf with lots of > clang versions, but cross building with clang isn't yet performed in my > tests. > > > in arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c, related to missing-field-initializers warning. > > > > ---- > > tools/perf $ make CC=clang LLVM=1 > > ... > > arch/arm64/util/kvm-stat.c:74:9: error: missing field 'ops' initializer [-Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers] > > { NULL }, > > ^ > > 1 error generated. > > ---- > > > > That error itself can be fixed easily by just adding field initializers > > [1/1] Note that I didn't add Fixes tag, because I'm not sure clang build > > of perf is officially supported or not, and this seems correct C code > > to initialize a data structure with zero.(*) > > I'd say it is supported, at least by me, for quite a while, as can be > seen in all pull requests I send upstream, for instance: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YIxSJ7bdtjv4wHok@kernel.org/ > > # export PERF_TARBALL=http://192.168.86.5/perf/perf-5.12.0.tar.xz > # dm > 1 72.92 alpine:3.4 : Ok gcc (Alpine 5.3.0) 5.3.0 , clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final) > 2 74.56 alpine:3.5 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.2.1) 6.2.1 20160822 , clang version 3.8.1 (tags/RELEASE_381/final) > 3 81.19 alpine:3.6 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.3.0) 6.3.0 , clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final) > 4 90.07 alpine:3.7 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0 , Alpine clang version 5.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_500/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.0) > 5 83.40 alpine:3.8 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0 , Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1) > 6 85.30 alpine:3.9 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0 , Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_502/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1) > 7 110.88 alpine:3.10 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0 , Alpine clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final) (based on LLVM 8.0.0) > 8 140.86 alpine:3.11 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0 , Alpine clang version 9.0.0 (https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports f7f0d2c2b8bcd6a5843401a9a702029556492689) (based on LLVM 9.0.0) > 9 127.60 alpine:3.12 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0 , Alpine clang version 10.0.0 (https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports.git 7445adce501f8473efdb93b17b5eaf2f1445ed4c) > 10 278.42 alpine:3.13 : Ok gcc (Alpine 10.2.1_pre1) 10.2.1 20201203 , Alpine clang version 10.0.1 > 11 235.62 alpine:edge : Ok gcc (Alpine 10.3.1_git20210424) 10.3.1 20210424 , Alpine clang version 11.1.0 > 12 161.23 alt:p8 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20151207 (ALT p8 5.3.1-alt3.M80P.1) , clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final) > 13 390.70 alt:p9 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.4.1 20200305 (ALT p9 8.4.1-alt0.p9.1) , clang version 10.0.0 > 14 95.00 alt:sisyphus : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20210313 (ALT Sisyphus 10.2.1-alt3) , clang version 10.0.1 > 15 77.78 amazonlinux:1 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2) , clang version 3.6.2 (tags/RELEASE_362/final) > 16 103.23 amazonlinux:2 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-12) , clang version 7.0.1 (Amazon Linux 2 7.0.1-1.amzn2.0.2) > 17 22.16 android-ndk:r12b-arm : Ok arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease) > 18 22.10 android-ndk:r15c-arm : Ok arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease) > 19 25.74 centos:6 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23) > 20 31.40 centos:7 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) > 21 97.31 centos:8 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5) , clang version 10.0.1 (Red Hat 10.0.1-1.module_el8.3.0+467+cb298d5b) > 22 60.94 clearlinux:latest : Ok gcc (Clear Linux OS for Intel Architecture) 10.2.1 20201217 releases/gcc-10.2.0-643-g7cbb07d2fc , clang version 10.0.1 > 23 77.23 debian:8 : Ok gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u2) 4.9.2 , Debian clang version 3.5.0-10 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) (based on LLVM 3.5.0) > 24 82.00 debian:9 : Ok gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1) 6.3.0 20170516 , clang version 3.8.1-24 (tags/RELEASE_381/final) > 25 75.27 debian:10 : Ok gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 , clang version 7.0.1-8+deb10u2 (tags/RELEASE_701/final) > 26 74.40 debian:experimental : Ok gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 , Debian clang version 11.0.1-2 > 27 32.81 debian:experimental-x-arm64 : Ok aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 > 28 28.53 debian:experimental-x-mips : Ok mips-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-3) 10.2.1 20201224 > 29 30.96 debian:experimental-x-mips64 : Ok mips64-linux-gnuabi64-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-3) 10.2.1 20201224 > 30 31.13 debian:experimental-x-mipsel : Ok mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-3) 10.2.1 20201224 > 31 29.13 fedora:20 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7) > 32 29.51 fedora:22 : Ok gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6) , clang version 3.5.0 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) > 33 68.17 fedora:23 : Ok gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6) , clang version 3.7.0 (tags/RELEASE_370/final) > 34 80.83 fedora:24 : Ok gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20161221 (Red Hat 6.3.1-1) , clang version 3.8.1 (tags/RELEASE_381/final) > 35 26.32 fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc : Ok arc-linux-gcc (ARCompact ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2017.09-rc2) 7.1.1 20170710 > 36 82.85 fedora:25 : Ok gcc (GCC) 6.4.1 20170727 (Red Hat 6.4.1-1) , clang version 3.9.1 (tags/RELEASE_391/final) > 37 94.47 fedora:26 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180130 (Red Hat 7.3.1-2) , clang version 4.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_401/final) > 38 96.40 fedora:27 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-6) , clang version 5.0.2 (tags/RELEASE_502/final) > 39 108.54 fedora:28 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat 8.3.1-2) , clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final) > 40 113.97 fedora:29 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat 8.3.1-2) , clang version 7.0.1 (Fedora 7.0.1-6.fc29) > 41 119.26 fedora:30 : Ok gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2) , clang version 8.0.0 (Fedora 8.0.0-3.fc30) > 42 25.92 fedora:30-x-ARC-uClibc : Ok arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225 > 43 117.82 fedora:31 : Ok gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2) , clang version 9.0.1 (Fedora 9.0.1-4.fc31) > 44 97.12 fedora:32 : Ok gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20201125 (Red Hat 10.2.1-9) , clang version 10.0.1 (Fedora 10.0.1-3.fc32) > 45 94.80 fedora:33 : Ok gcc (GCC) 10.3.1 20210422 (Red Hat 10.3.1-1) , clang version 11.0.0 (Fedora 11.0.0-2.fc33) > 46 99.46 fedora:34 : Ok gcc (GCC) 11.0.1 20210324 (Red Hat 11.0.1-0) , clang version 12.0.0 (Fedora 12.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc34) > 47 98.91 fedora:rawhide : Ok gcc (GCC) 11.0.1 20210423 (Red Hat 11.0.1-0) , clang version 12.0.0 (Fedora 12.0.0-1.fc35) > 48 34.11 gentoo-stage3-amd64:latest : Ok gcc (Gentoo 9.3.0-r1 p3) 9.3.0 > 49 66.98 mageia:5 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 , clang version 3.5.2 (tags/RELEASE_352/final) > 50 83.81 mageia:6 : Ok gcc (Mageia 5.5.0-1.mga6) 5.5.0 , clang version 3.9.1 (tags/RELEASE_391/final) > 51 48.52 mageia:7 : FAIL clang version 8.0.0 (Mageia 8.0.0-1.mga7) > yychar = yylex (&yylval, &yylloc, scanner); > ^ > #define yylex parse_events_lex > ^ > 1 error generated. > make[3]: *** [/git/perf-5.12.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2 > 52 221.66 openmandriva:cooker : Ok gcc (GCC) 10.3.0 20210408 (OpenMandriva) , OpenMandriva 12.0.0-1 clang version 12.0.0 (/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-project-llvmorg-12.0.0/clang b3a1e025e0452bb54d01ab5281bbf509ac4e3c72) > 53 119.19 opensuse:15.0 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.4.1 20190905 [gcc-7-branch revision 275407] , clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final 312548) > 54 127.85 opensuse:15.1 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 , clang version 7.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_701/final 349238) > 55 117.53 opensuse:15.2 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 , clang version 9.0.1 > 56 131.22 opensuse:15.3 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 , clang version 7.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_701/final 349238) > 57 114.64 opensuse:42.3 : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.5 , clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final 262553) > 58 108.83 opensuse:tumbleweed : Ok gcc (SUSE Linux) 10.2.1 20200825 [revision c0746a1beb1ba073c7981eb09f55b3d993b32e5c] , clang version 10.0.1 > 59 25.02 oraclelinux:6 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23.0.1) > 60 30.76 oraclelinux:7 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44.0.3) > 61 95.29 oraclelinux:8 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5.0.2) , clang version 10.0.1 (Red Hat 10.0.1-1.0.1.module+el8.3.0+7827+89335dbf) > 62 25.85 ubuntu:12.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 , Ubuntu clang version 3.0-6ubuntu3 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) (based on LLVM 3.0) > 63 29.09 ubuntu:14.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4 > 64 81.27 ubuntu:16.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.12) 5.4.0 20160609 , clang version 3.8.0-2ubuntu4 (tags/RELEASE_380/final) > 65 27.09 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm : Ok arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 > 66 27.59 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64 : Ok aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 > 67 26.25 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc : Ok powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 > 68 26.87 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64 : Ok powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 > 69 27.69 ubuntu:16.04-x-powerpc64el : Ok powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/IBM 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 > 70 26.58 ubuntu:16.04-x-s390 : Ok s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609 > 71 88.21 ubuntu:18.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 , clang version 6.0.0-1ubuntu2 (tags/RELEASE_600/final) > 72 28.46 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm : Ok arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 73 29.25 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm64 : Ok aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 74 23.59 ubuntu:18.04-x-m68k : Ok m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 75 27.97 ubuntu:18.04-x-powerpc : Ok powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 76 29.83 ubuntu:18.04-x-powerpc64 : Ok powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 77 30.41 ubuntu:18.04-x-powerpc64el : Ok powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 78 172.25 ubuntu:18.04-x-riscv64 : Ok riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 79 26.09 ubuntu:18.04-x-s390 : Ok s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 80 28.18 ubuntu:18.04-x-sh4 : Ok sh4-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 81 26.43 ubuntu:18.04-x-sparc64 : Ok sparc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0 > 82 76.46 ubuntu:20.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0 , clang version 10.0.0-4ubuntu1 > 83 31.35 ubuntu:20.04-x-powerpc64el : Ok powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04) 10.2.0 > 84 74.85 ubuntu:20.10 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 10.2.0-13ubuntu1) 10.2.0 , Ubuntu clang version 11.0.0-2 > 85 71.63 ubuntu:21.04 : Ok gcc (Ubuntu 10.3.0-1ubuntu1) 10.3.0 , Ubuntu clang version 12.0.0-1ubuntu1 > > > But I couldn't find so far, and I haven't researched this lately, a distro that has all the > devel packages cross-built so that I could cross build a full featured perf tool, are you > aware of one? In the -x-ARCH tests above I end up just manually cross-building elfutils and zlib > to get a minimal perf cross build. Actually, this only happens with clang, not with gcc. And clang's cross build is different from GCC (clang only needs the target option, but you can use same tool, no need to add aarch64-linux-gnu-*). Anders works on this and he made a hack. > > And while investigating the error, I found another issue in the Makefile.config. > > > > It seems to make CFLAGS from CORE_CFLAGS, INC_FLAGS, EXTRA_CFLAGS, EXTRA_WARNINGS > > in the following order; > > > > CFLAGS = $EXTRA_CFLAGS $EXTRA_WARNINGS $CORE_CFLAGS $INC_FLAGS > > > > But since CORE_CFLAGS includes -Wall and -Wextra, the other -Wno-XXXX in > > EXTRA_CFLAGS and EXTRA_WARNINGS are overriden and ignored. > > So, I think it is better to define it as > > > > CFLAGS = $CORE_CFLAGS $INC_FLAGS $EXTRA_CFLAGS $EXTRA_WARNINGS > > > > But I also saw some configs tweaks CFLAGS directly. I think they should > > modify EXTRA_CFLAGS. > > > > My question is that this order is intentional or not. I might > > miss something on it. > > Oh the joy with Makefiles.. Most likely unintentional, please submit a patch, please reuse > your wording above to justify it. OK, I'll fix that. > > (*) BTW, there seems a discussion on the clang warning behavior, > > because gcc doesn't warn it anymore > > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750). > > It might be better to add -Wno-missing-field-initializers in case > > of CC=clang by default. > > Humm, unsure about that, I applied your patch, but I'd say it'd be better to > use the variant that initialized the first field to zero/NULL and then all the > other (not explicitely initialized) ones will be zeroed. OK, then I'll add this option. Thank you! -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-11 10:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-05-07 8:54 [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS Masami Hiramatsu 2021-05-07 8:54 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix a build error on arm64 with clang Masami Hiramatsu 2021-05-09 12:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2021-05-10 12:14 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: build issues with Clang on arm64 and CFLAGS Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2021-05-11 10:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).