[PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu]

Add header defining for lpass internal digital codecs rx,tx and va
dai node id's.

Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org>
---
 include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
index 7b0b80b..187af45 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
 
 #define LPASS_DP_RX	5
 
+#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX0 6
+#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_TX3 7
+#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
+#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9
+
 #define LPASS_MCLK0	0
 
 #endif /* __DT_QCOM_LPASS_H */
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-09-06 06:27:34)
> Add header defining for lpass internal digital codecs rx,tx and va
> dai node id's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
> index 7b0b80b..187af45 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
>
>  #define LPASS_DP_RX    5
>
> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX0 6
> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_TX3 7
> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
> +#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9

Do we need LPASS_MAX_PORTS in the binding?

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu]

Thanks For Review Stephen!!!

On 9/8/2021 1:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-09-06 06:27:34)
>> Add header defining for lpass internal digital codecs rx,tx and va
>> dai node id's.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
>> index 7b0b80b..187af45 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
>>
>>   #define LPASS_DP_RX    5
>>
>> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX0 6
>> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_TX3 7
>> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
>> +#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9
> Do we need LPASS_MAX_PORTS in the binding?
Yes.  based on this creating array of streams in machine driver. So to 
make upper limit introduced this macro.

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 516 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:08:33AM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> On 9/8/2021 1:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-09-06 06:27:34)

> > > +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
> > > +#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9

> > Do we need LPASS_MAX_PORTS in the binding?

> Yes.  based on this creating array of streams in machine driver. So to make
> upper limit introduced this macro.

That's saying it's useful to have it in the code, do we need it in the
binding itself though?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu]

Thanks for Your Time Mark Brown!!!

On 9/8/2021 3:53 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:08:33AM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>> On 9/8/2021 1:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-09-06 06:27:34)
>>>> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
>>>> +#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9
>>> Do we need LPASS_MAX_PORTS in the binding?
>> Yes.  based on this creating array of streams in machine driver. So to make
>> upper limit introduced this macro.
> That's saying it's useful to have it in the code, do we need it in the
> binding itself though?
Okay.  Got it. will remove it and share new patch.

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Srinivas Kandagatla]

On 06/09/2021 14:27, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX0 6

You are only adding RX0, what happens to RX1.. RX7

TBH, skipping other entries for ex CDC_DMA_RX will end up with sparse 
numbering.

Please add all the entries for CDC_DMA_RX and other ports as well.

Like:

#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX0	6
#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX1	7
#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX2	8
#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX3	9
#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX4	10
#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX5	11
#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX6	12
#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX7	13


> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_TX3 7
> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
You mean VA_TX0?


> +#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9
We really do not need this in bindings.
You could add this is some of the driver header files instead.

--srini
> +

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu]

Thanks for your time and valuable suggestions Srini!!

On 9/8/2021 3:11 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/2021 14:27, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX0 6
>
> You are only adding RX0, what happens to RX1.. RX7
>
> TBH, skipping other entries for ex CDC_DMA_RX will end up with sparse 
> numbering.
>
> Please add all the entries for CDC_DMA_RX and other ports as well.
>
> Like:
>
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX0    6
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX1    7
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX2    8
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX3    9
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX4    10
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX5    11
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX6    12
> #define LPASS_CDC_DMA_RX7    13
>
>
Okay. Will add and Share new patch.
>> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_TX3 7
>> +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
> You mean VA_TX0?
>
Yes. Will change accordingly.
>
>> +#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9
> We really do not need this in bindings.
> You could add this is some of the driver header files instead.
>
Okay Will remove.
> --srini
>> +

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 18:57:34 +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> Add header defining for lpass internal digital codecs rx,tx and va
> dai node id's.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for digital codecs
      commit: bfad37c53ae6168d03ab06868ea44e77995c43d5

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark