linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix msm8998 cache nodes
@ 2021-12-17 21:11 Rob Herring
  2022-01-24 14:53 ` Rob Herring
  2022-02-01  5:20 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-12-17 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson; +Cc: linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel

The msm8998 cache nodes have some issues. First, L1 caches are described
within cpu nodes, not as separate nodes. The 'next-level-cache' property
is of course in the correct location, otherwise the cache hierarchy
walking would not work. Remove all the L1 cache nodes.

Second, 'arm,arch-cache' is not a documented compatible string. "cache"
is a sufficient compatible string for the Arm architected caches.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 52 ++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
index 408f265e277b..00adee461b52 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
@@ -138,15 +138,9 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
 			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
 			L2_0: l2-cache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+				compatible = "cache";
 				cache-level = <2>;
 			};
-			L1_I_0: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_0: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		CPU1: cpu@1 {
@@ -157,12 +151,6 @@ CPU1: cpu@1 {
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
-			L1_I_1: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_1: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		CPU2: cpu@2 {
@@ -173,12 +161,6 @@ CPU2: cpu@2 {
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
-			L1_I_2: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_2: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		CPU3: cpu@3 {
@@ -189,12 +171,6 @@ CPU3: cpu@3 {
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
-			L1_I_3: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_3: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		CPU4: cpu@100 {
@@ -206,15 +182,9 @@ CPU4: cpu@100 {
 			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
 			L2_1: l2-cache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+				compatible = "cache";
 				cache-level = <2>;
 			};
-			L1_I_100: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_100: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		CPU5: cpu@101 {
@@ -225,12 +195,6 @@ CPU5: cpu@101 {
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1536>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
-			L1_I_101: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_101: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		CPU6: cpu@102 {
@@ -241,12 +205,6 @@ CPU6: cpu@102 {
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1536>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
-			L1_I_102: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_102: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		CPU7: cpu@103 {
@@ -257,12 +215,6 @@ CPU7: cpu@103 {
 			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1536>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
-			L1_I_103: l1-icache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
-			L1_D_103: l1-dcache {
-				compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
-			};
 		};
 
 		cpu-map {
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix msm8998 cache nodes
  2021-12-17 21:11 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix msm8998 cache nodes Rob Herring
@ 2022-01-24 14:53 ` Rob Herring
  2022-02-01  5:20 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2022-01-24 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson; +Cc: linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:11 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The msm8998 cache nodes have some issues. First, L1 caches are described
> within cpu nodes, not as separate nodes. The 'next-level-cache' property
> is of course in the correct location, otherwise the cache hierarchy
> walking would not work. Remove all the L1 cache nodes.
>
> Second, 'arm,arch-cache' is not a documented compatible string. "cache"
> is a sufficient compatible string for the Arm architected caches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 52 ++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

Ping

>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> index 408f265e277b..00adee461b52 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> @@ -138,15 +138,9 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
>                         L2_0: l2-cache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> +                               compatible = "cache";
>                                 cache-level = <2>;
>                         };
> -                       L1_I_0: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_0: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 CPU1: cpu@1 {
> @@ -157,12 +151,6 @@ CPU1: cpu@1 {
>                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> -                       L1_I_1: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_1: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 CPU2: cpu@2 {
> @@ -173,12 +161,6 @@ CPU2: cpu@2 {
>                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> -                       L1_I_2: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_2: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 CPU3: cpu@3 {
> @@ -189,12 +171,6 @@ CPU3: cpu@3 {
>                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> -                       L1_I_3: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_3: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 CPU4: cpu@100 {
> @@ -206,15 +182,9 @@ CPU4: cpu@100 {
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
>                         L2_1: l2-cache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> +                               compatible = "cache";
>                                 cache-level = <2>;
>                         };
> -                       L1_I_100: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_100: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 CPU5: cpu@101 {
> @@ -225,12 +195,6 @@ CPU5: cpu@101 {
>                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <1536>;
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
> -                       L1_I_101: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_101: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 CPU6: cpu@102 {
> @@ -241,12 +205,6 @@ CPU6: cpu@102 {
>                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <1536>;
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
> -                       L1_I_102: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_102: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 CPU7: cpu@103 {
> @@ -257,12 +215,6 @@ CPU7: cpu@103 {
>                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <1536>;
>                         cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1>;
>                         next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
> -                       L1_I_103: l1-icache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
> -                       L1_D_103: l1-dcache {
> -                               compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
> -                       };
>                 };
>
>                 cpu-map {
> --
> 2.32.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: (subset) [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix msm8998 cache nodes
  2021-12-17 21:11 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix msm8998 cache nodes Rob Herring
  2022-01-24 14:53 ` Rob Herring
@ 2022-02-01  5:20 ` Bjorn Andersson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2022-02-01  5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring, Andy Gross; +Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:11:36 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The msm8998 cache nodes have some issues. First, L1 caches are described
> within cpu nodes, not as separate nodes. The 'next-level-cache' property
> is of course in the correct location, otherwise the cache hierarchy
> walking would not work. Remove all the L1 cache nodes.
> 
> Second, 'arm,arch-cache' is not a documented compatible string. "cache"
> is a sufficient compatible string for the Arm architected caches.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix msm8998 cache nodes
      commit: fad35efa75a22050bb4b7cace8c1c9dd4fc70d16

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-01  5:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-17 21:11 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix msm8998 cache nodes Rob Herring
2022-01-24 14:53 ` Rob Herring
2022-02-01  5:20 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).