[PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: remove unused required property

[PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: remove unused required property

[Li-hao Kuo]

fix issue
/builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.example.dt.yaml:
spi@9C002D80: 'clocks-names' is a required property
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
delete unused required(clock-name)

Fixes: 3b8ab4da34 ("spi: Fix test error for sp7021")

Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
index 298eac2..3a58cf0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ required:
   - interrupts
   - interrupt-names
   - clocks
-  - clocks-names
   - resets
   - pinctrl-names
   - pinctrl-0
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: remove unused required property

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:31:53 +0800, Li-hao Kuo wrote:
> fix issue
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.example.dt.yaml:
> spi@9C002D80: 'clocks-names' is a required property
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
> delete unused required(clock-name)
> 
> Fixes: 3b8ab4da34 ("spi: Fix test error for sp7021")
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: dt-bindings: remove unused required property
      commit: 83854c231262d2ad43c4fb32414ba25304f925d8

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark