* [PATCH] s390/dasd: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset
@ 2022-04-19 1:43 Haowen Bai
2022-04-19 5:43 ` Sven Schnelle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Haowen Bai @ 2022-04-19 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Haberland, Jan Hoeppner, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik,
Alexander Gordeev, Christian Borntraeger, Sven Schnelle
Cc: Haowen Bai, linux-s390, linux-kernel
Use kzalloc rather than duplicating its implementation, which
makes code simple and easy to understand.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
---
drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
index 8410a25a65c1..74a035c56c3e 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
@@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
{
struct pe_handler_work_data *data;
- data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
+ data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
if (!data) {
if (mutex_trylock(&dasd_pe_handler_mutex)) {
data = pe_handler_worker;
@@ -1489,7 +1489,6 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
return -ENOMEM;
}
} else {
- memset(data, 0, sizeof(*data));
data->isglobal = 0;
}
INIT_WORK(&data->worker, do_pe_handler_work);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/dasd: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset
2022-04-19 1:43 [PATCH] s390/dasd: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset Haowen Bai
@ 2022-04-19 5:43 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-04-19 6:05 ` [PATCH V2] " Haowen Bai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sven Schnelle @ 2022-04-19 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Haowen Bai
Cc: Stefan Haberland, Jan Hoeppner, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik,
Alexander Gordeev, Christian Borntraeger, linux-s390,
linux-kernel
Hi,
Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com> writes:
> Use kzalloc rather than duplicating its implementation, which
> makes code simple and easy to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> index 8410a25a65c1..74a035c56c3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> @@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
> {
> struct pe_handler_work_data *data;
>
> - data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
> + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
> if (!data) {
> if (mutex_trylock(&dasd_pe_handler_mutex)) {
> data = pe_handler_worker;
> @@ -1489,7 +1489,6 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> } else {
> - memset(data, 0, sizeof(*data));
> data->isglobal = 0;
Maybe also remove the isglobal assigment above, so the whole else block
could go away?
> }
> INIT_WORK(&data->worker, do_pe_handler_work);
Thanks,
Sven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2] s390/dasd: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset
2022-04-19 5:43 ` Sven Schnelle
@ 2022-04-19 6:05 ` Haowen Bai
2022-04-20 6:44 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-04-29 12:52 ` Stefan Haberland
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Haowen Bai @ 2022-04-19 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: svens
Cc: agordeev, baihaowen, borntraeger, gor, hca, hoeppner,
linux-kernel, linux-s390, sth
Use kzalloc rather than duplicating its implementation, which
makes code simple and easy to understand.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
---
V1->V2: also remove the isglobal assigment above, so the whole else block
could go away
drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
index 8410a25a65c1..6b70f9dfff02 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
@@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
{
struct pe_handler_work_data *data;
- data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
+ data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
if (!data) {
if (mutex_trylock(&dasd_pe_handler_mutex)) {
data = pe_handler_worker;
@@ -1488,9 +1488,6 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
} else {
return -ENOMEM;
}
- } else {
- memset(data, 0, sizeof(*data));
- data->isglobal = 0;
}
INIT_WORK(&data->worker, do_pe_handler_work);
dasd_get_device(device);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] s390/dasd: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset
2022-04-19 6:05 ` [PATCH V2] " Haowen Bai
@ 2022-04-20 6:44 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-04-29 12:52 ` Stefan Haberland
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sven Schnelle @ 2022-04-20 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Haowen Bai
Cc: agordeev, borntraeger, gor, hca, hoeppner, linux-kernel, linux-s390, sth
Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com> writes:
> Use kzalloc rather than duplicating its implementation, which
> makes code simple and easy to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
> ---
> V1->V2: also remove the isglobal assigment above, so the whole else block
> could go away
>
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> index 8410a25a65c1..6b70f9dfff02 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> @@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
> {
> struct pe_handler_work_data *data;
>
> - data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
> + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
> if (!data) {
> if (mutex_trylock(&dasd_pe_handler_mutex)) {
> data = pe_handler_worker;
> @@ -1488,9 +1488,6 @@ static int dasd_eckd_pe_handler(struct dasd_device *device,
> } else {
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> - } else {
> - memset(data, 0, sizeof(*data));
> - data->isglobal = 0;
> }
> INIT_WORK(&data->worker, do_pe_handler_work);
> dasd_get_device(device);
Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] s390/dasd: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset
2022-04-19 6:05 ` [PATCH V2] " Haowen Bai
2022-04-20 6:44 ` Sven Schnelle
@ 2022-04-29 12:52 ` Stefan Haberland
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Haberland @ 2022-04-29 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Haowen Bai, svens
Cc: agordeev, borntraeger, gor, hca, hoeppner, linux-kernel, linux-s390
Am 19.04.22 um 08:05 schrieb Haowen Bai:
> Use kzalloc rather than duplicating its implementation, which
> makes code simple and easy to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
> ---
> V1->V2: also remove the isglobal assigment above, so the whole else block
> could go away
thanks, applied!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-29 12:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-19 1:43 [PATCH] s390/dasd: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset Haowen Bai
2022-04-19 5:43 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-04-19 6:05 ` [PATCH V2] " Haowen Bai
2022-04-20 6:44 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-04-29 12:52 ` Stefan Haberland
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).