[PATCH] spi: microchip-core: Simplify some error message

[PATCH] spi: microchip-core: Simplify some error message

[Christophe JAILLET]

dev_err_probe() already prints the error code in a human readable way, so
there is no need to duplicate it as a numerical value at the end of the
message.

Moreover, in the case of devm_clk_get() it would only display '0' because
'ret' is know to be 0 at this point.

Fixes: cdeaf3a99a02 ("spi: microchip-core: switch to use dev_err_probe()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
index ce4385330b19..d352844c798c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
@@ -548,12 +548,12 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			       IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), master);
 	if (ret)
 		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
-				     "could not request irq: %d\n", ret);
+				     "could not request irq\n");
 
 	spi->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(spi->clk))
 		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(spi->clk),
-				     "could not get clk: %d\n", ret);
+				     "could not get clk\n");
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(spi->clk);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] spi: microchip-core: Simplify some error message

[Conor.Dooley]

On 05/08/2022 22:33, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> dev_err_probe() already prints the error code in a human readable way, so
> there is no need to duplicate it as a numerical value at the end of the
> message.
> 
> Moreover, in the case of devm_clk_get() it would only display '0' because
> 'ret' is know to be 0 at this point.
> 
> Fixes: cdeaf3a99a02 ("spi: microchip-core: switch to use dev_err_probe()")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

bah, should have noticed that when I reviewed the switch over...
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Thanks!

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
> index ce4385330b19..d352844c798c 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
> @@ -548,12 +548,12 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			       IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), master);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> -				     "could not request irq: %d\n", ret);
> +				     "could not request irq\n");
>  
>  	spi->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(spi->clk))
>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(spi->clk),
> -				     "could not get clk: %d\n", ret);
> +				     "could not get clk\n");
>  
>  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(spi->clk);
>  	if (ret)

Re: [PATCH] spi: microchip-core: Simplify some error message

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 23:33:17 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> dev_err_probe() already prints the error code in a human readable way, so
> there is no need to duplicate it as a numerical value at the end of the
> message.
> 
> Moreover, in the case of devm_clk_get() it would only display '0' because
> 'ret' is know to be 0 at this point.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: microchip-core: Simplify some error message
      commit: 7964e817d2311b37b86d6fbf588cd9fbe747b108

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark