[PATCH] ASoC: core: remove setting platform_max in kcontrol macros

[PATCH] ASoC: core: remove setting platform_max in kcontrol macros

[Srinivas Kandagatla]

platform_max should not be set by the driver, its intended for machine drivers
or DT to override the max value for platform specific reasons.

So remove setting this from Kcontrol macros.

Setting this to max in these macros would limit the range when min
value is less then zero.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
---

This patch is result of disussion at https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg146134.html

 include/sound/soc.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h
index aad24a1d3276..4351d86eedf6 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc.h
@@ -31,31 +31,31 @@
 #define SOC_DOUBLE_VALUE(xreg, shift_left, shift_right, xmax, xinvert, xautodisable) \
 	((unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 	{.reg = xreg, .rreg = xreg, .shift = shift_left, \
-	.rshift = shift_right, .max = xmax, .platform_max = xmax, \
+	.rshift = shift_right, .max = xmax, \
 	.invert = xinvert, .autodisable = xautodisable})
 #define SOC_DOUBLE_S_VALUE(xreg, shift_left, shift_right, xmin, xmax, xsign_bit, xinvert, xautodisable) \
 	((unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 	{.reg = xreg, .rreg = xreg, .shift = shift_left, \
-	.rshift = shift_right, .min = xmin, .max = xmax, .platform_max = xmax, \
+	.rshift = shift_right, .min = xmin, .max = xmax, \
 	.sign_bit = xsign_bit, .invert = xinvert, .autodisable = xautodisable})
 #define SOC_SINGLE_VALUE(xreg, xshift, xmax, xinvert, xautodisable) \
 	SOC_DOUBLE_VALUE(xreg, xshift, xshift, xmax, xinvert, xautodisable)
 #define SOC_SINGLE_VALUE_EXT(xreg, xmax, xinvert) \
 	((unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
-	{.reg = xreg, .max = xmax, .platform_max = xmax, .invert = xinvert})
+	{.reg = xreg, .max = xmax, .invert = xinvert})
 #define SOC_DOUBLE_R_VALUE(xlreg, xrreg, xshift, xmax, xinvert) \
 	((unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 	{.reg = xlreg, .rreg = xrreg, .shift = xshift, .rshift = xshift, \
-	.max = xmax, .platform_max = xmax, .invert = xinvert})
+	.max = xmax, .invert = xinvert})
 #define SOC_DOUBLE_R_S_VALUE(xlreg, xrreg, xshift, xmin, xmax, xsign_bit, xinvert) \
 	((unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 	{.reg = xlreg, .rreg = xrreg, .shift = xshift, .rshift = xshift, \
-	.max = xmax, .min = xmin, .platform_max = xmax, .sign_bit = xsign_bit, \
+	.max = xmax, .min = xmin, .sign_bit = xsign_bit, \
 	.invert = xinvert})
 #define SOC_DOUBLE_R_RANGE_VALUE(xlreg, xrreg, xshift, xmin, xmax, xinvert) \
 	((unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 	{.reg = xlreg, .rreg = xrreg, .shift = xshift, .rshift = xshift, \
-	.min = xmin, .max = xmax, .platform_max = xmax, .invert = xinvert})
+	.min = xmin, .max = xmax, .invert = xinvert})
 #define SOC_SINGLE(xname, reg, shift, max, invert) \
 {	.iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = xname, \
 	.info = snd_soc_info_volsw, .get = snd_soc_get_volsw,\
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 	.private_value = (unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 		{.reg = xreg, .rreg = xreg, .shift = xshift, \
 		 .rshift = xshift,  .min = xmin, .max = xmax, \
-		 .platform_max = xmax, .invert = xinvert} }
+		 .invert = xinvert} }
 #define SOC_SINGLE_TLV(xname, reg, shift, max, invert, tlv_array) \
 {	.iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = xname, \
 	.access = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_TLV_READ |\
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
 	.private_value = (unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 		{.reg = xreg, .rreg = xreg, .shift = xshift, \
 		 .rshift = xshift, .min = xmin, .max = xmax, \
-		 .platform_max = xmax, .invert = xinvert} }
+		 .invert = xinvert} }
 #define SOC_DOUBLE(xname, reg, shift_left, shift_right, max, invert) \
 {	.iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = (xname),\
 	.info = snd_soc_info_volsw, .get = snd_soc_get_volsw, \
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
 	.put = snd_soc_put_volsw, \
 	.private_value = (unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 	{.reg = xreg, .rreg = xreg,  \
-	 .min = xmin, .max = xmax, .platform_max = xmax, \
+	 .min = xmin, .max = xmax, \
 	.sign_bit = 7,} }
 #define SOC_DOUBLE_S8_TLV(xname, xreg, xmin, xmax, tlv_array) \
 {	.iface  = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = (xname), \
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@
 	.private_value = (unsigned long)&(struct soc_mixer_control) \
 		{.reg = xreg, .rreg = xreg, .shift = xshift, \
 		 .rshift = xshift, .min = xmin, .max = xmax, \
-		 .platform_max = xmax, .invert = xinvert} }
+		 .invert = xinvert} }
 #define SOC_DOUBLE_EXT_TLV(xname, xreg, shift_left, shift_right, xmax, xinvert,\
 	 xhandler_get, xhandler_put, tlv_array) \
 {	.iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = (xname), \
-- 
2.21.0

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: core: remove setting platform_max in kcontrol macros

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:21:29 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> platform_max should not be set by the driver, its intended for machine drivers
> or DT to override the max value for platform specific reasons.
> 
> So remove setting this from Kcontrol macros.
> 
> Setting this to max in these macros would limit the range when min
> value is less then zero.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: core: remove setting platform_max in kcontrol macros
      commit: 26bdcc4ba12351642cd94339aa6996f96434dd47

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark