linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: mscc: ocelot: support L2 multicast entries
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:41:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16a2c3df-5d83-bb08-13a7-921fbd7c051e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201029022738.722794-6-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>



On 10/28/2020 7:27 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> There is one main difference in mscc_ocelot between IP multicast and L2
> multicast. With IP multicast, destination ports are encoded into the
> upper bytes of the multicast MAC address. Example: to deliver the
> address 01:00:5E:11:22:33 to ports 3, 8, and 9, one would need to
> program the address of 00:03:08:11:22:33 into hardware. Whereas for L2
> multicast, the MAC table entry points to a Port Group ID (PGID), and
> that PGID contains the port mask that the packet will be forwarded to.
> As to why it is this way, no clue. My guess is that not all port
> combinations can be supported simultaneously with the limited number of
> PGIDs, and this was somehow an issue for IP multicast but not for L2
> multicast. Anyway.
> 
> Prior to this change, the raw L2 multicast code was bogus, due to the
> fact that there wasn't really any way to test it using the bridge code.
> There were 2 issues:
> - A multicast PGID was allocated for each MDB entry, but it wasn't in
>   fact programmed to hardware. It was dummy.
> - In fact we don't want to reserve a multicast PGID for every single MDB
>   entry. That would be odd because we can only have ~60 PGIDs, but
>   thousands of MDB entries. So instead, we want to reserve a multicast
>   PGID for every single port combination for multicast traffic. And
>   since we can have 2 (or more) MDB entries delivered to the same port
>   group (and therefore PGID), we need to reference-count the PGIDs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

I believe you have the same gfp_t comment applicable here as in patch #4.
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-29  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-29  2:27 [PATCH net-next 0/5] L2 multicast forwarding for Ocelot switch Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-29  2:27 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: mscc: ocelot: classify L2 mdb entries as LOCKED Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-29  2:31   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-29  2:27 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: mscc: ocelot: use ether_addr_copy Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-29  2:32   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-29  2:27 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mscc: ocelot: remove the "new" variable in ocelot_port_mdb_add Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-29  2:32   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-29  2:27 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: mscc: ocelot: make entry_type a member of struct ocelot_multicast Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-29  2:37   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-10-29 11:06     ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-31  1:16   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-31  9:07     ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-29  2:27 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: mscc: ocelot: support L2 multicast entries Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-29  2:41   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2020-10-31  1:27 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] L2 multicast forwarding for Ocelot switch Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16a2c3df-5d83-bb08-13a7-921fbd7c051e@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).