linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new
@ 2023-12-04 18:04 Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward Jaegeuk Kim
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2023-12-04 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

If fsck can allocate a new zone, it'd be better to use that instead of
allocating a new one.

And, it modifies kernel messages.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 08e2f44a1264..9081c9af977a 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -4949,20 +4949,18 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
-		/*
-		 * If there are valid blocks and the write pointer doesn't match
-		 * with them, we need to report the inconsistency and fill
-		 * the zone till the end to close the zone. This inconsistency
-		 * does not cause write error because the zone will not be
-		 * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
-		 */
-		f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
+	/*
+	 * If there are valid blocks and the write pointer doesn't match
+	 * with them, we need to report the inconsistency and fill
+	 * the zone till the end to close the zone. This inconsistency
+	 * does not cause write error because the zone will not be
+	 * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
+	 */
+	f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
 			    "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
 			    GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
 			    GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
 			    wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
-	}
 
 	ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(fdev->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH,
 				zone->start, zone->len, GFP_NOFS);
@@ -5053,15 +5051,18 @@ static int fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
 		f2fs_notice(sbi, "Unaligned curseg[%d] with write pointer: "
 			    "curseg[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno,
 			    cs->next_blkoff, wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
-	} else {
-		f2fs_notice(sbi, "Not successfully unmounted in the previous "
-			    "mount");
 	}
 
-	f2fs_notice(sbi, "Assign new section to curseg[%d]: "
-		    "curseg[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
+	/* Allocate a new section if it's not new. */
+	if (cs->next_blkoff) {
+		unsigned int old_segno = cs->segno, old_blkoff = cs->next_blkoff;
 
-	f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, type, true);
+		f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, type, true);
+		f2fs_notice(sbi, "Assign new section to curseg[%d]: "
+				"[0x%x,0x%x] -> [0x%x,0x%x]",
+				type, old_segno, old_blkoff,
+				cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
+	}
 
 	/* check consistency of the zone curseg pointed to */
 	if (check_zone_write_pointer(sbi, zbd, &zone))
-- 
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward
  2023-12-04 18:04 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2023-12-04 18:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 19:02   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: check write pointers when checkpoint=disable Jaegeuk Kim
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2023-12-04 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

1. do roll forward recovery
2. update current segments pointers
3. fix the entire zones' write pointers
4. do checkpoint

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index 16415c770b45..d0f24ccbd1ac 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -917,6 +917,8 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
 	if (!err && fix_curseg_write_pointer && !f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb) &&
 			f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) {
 		err = f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(sbi);
+		if (!err)
+			err = f2fs_check_write_pointer(sbi);
 		ret = err;
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: check write pointers when checkpoint=disable
  2023-12-04 18:04 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2023-12-04 18:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 19:03   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time Jaegeuk Kim
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2023-12-04 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

Even if f2fs was rebooted as staying checkpoint=disable, let's match the write
pointers all the time.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 617340e9ea7f..9a874b4d1501 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -4741,7 +4741,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
 	f2fs_recover_quota_end(sbi, quota_enabled);
 #endif
-
+reset_checkpoint:
 	/*
 	 * If the f2fs is not readonly and fsync data recovery succeeds,
 	 * check zoned block devices' write pointer consistency.
@@ -4752,7 +4752,6 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 			goto free_meta;
 	}
 
-reset_checkpoint:
 	f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(sbi);
 
 	/* f2fs_recover_fsync_data() cleared this already */
-- 
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time
  2023-12-04 18:04 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: check write pointers when checkpoint=disable Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2023-12-04 18:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 19:11   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
  2023-12-05 19:29   ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 18:53 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Daeho Jeong
  2023-12-14 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
  4 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2023-12-04 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

In order to limit # of open zones, let's finish or reset zones given # of
valid blocks per section and its zone condition.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 74 +++++++++++------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 9081c9af977a..5696a4d381ff 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -4870,82 +4870,44 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 				    struct f2fs_dev_info *fdev,
 				    struct blk_zone *zone)
 {
-	unsigned int wp_segno, wp_blkoff, zone_secno, zone_segno, segno;
-	block_t zone_block, wp_block, last_valid_block;
+	unsigned int zone_segno;
+	block_t zone_block, wp_block, valid_block_cnt;
 	unsigned int log_sectors_per_block = sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT;
-	int i, s, b, ret;
-	struct seg_entry *se;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (zone->type != BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ)
 		return 0;
 
 	wp_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->wp >> log_sectors_per_block);
-	wp_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, wp_block);
-	wp_blkoff = wp_block - START_BLOCK(sbi, wp_segno);
 	zone_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->start >> log_sectors_per_block);
 	zone_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, zone_block);
-	zone_secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno);
-
-	if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi))
-		return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Skip check of zones cursegs point to, since
 	 * fix_curseg_write_pointer() checks them.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < NO_CHECK_TYPE; i++)
-		if (zone_secno == GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi,
-						   CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->segno))
-			return 0;
+	if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi) ||
+	    IS_CURSEC(sbi, GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno)))
+		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * Get last valid block of the zone.
+	 * Get # of valid block of the zone.
 	 */
-	last_valid_block = zone_block - 1;
-	for (s = sbi->segs_per_sec - 1; s >= 0; s--) {
-		segno = zone_segno + s;
-		se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
-		for (b = sbi->blocks_per_seg - 1; b >= 0; b--)
-			if (f2fs_test_bit(b, se->cur_valid_map)) {
-				last_valid_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno) + b;
-				break;
-			}
-		if (last_valid_block >= zone_block)
-			break;
-	}
+	valid_block_cnt = get_valid_blocks(sbi, zone_segno, true);
 
-	/*
-	 * When safely unmounted in the previous mount, we can trust write
-	 * pointers. Otherwise, finish zones.
-	 */
-	if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
-		/*
-		 * The write pointer matches with the valid blocks or
-		 * already points to the end of the zone.
-		 */
-		if ((last_valid_block + 1 == wp_block) ||
-				(zone->wp == zone->start + zone->len))
-			return 0;
-	}
+	if ((!valid_block_cnt && zone->cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY) ||
+	    (valid_block_cnt && zone->cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_FULL))
+		return 0;
 
-	if (last_valid_block + 1 == zone_block) {
-		if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
-			/*
-			 * If there is no valid block in the zone and if write
-			 * pointer is not at zone start, reset the write
-			 * pointer.
-			 */
-			f2fs_notice(sbi,
-			      "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
-			      "pointer. Reset the write pointer: wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
-			      wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
-		}
+	if (!valid_block_cnt) {
+		f2fs_notice(sbi, "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
+			    "pointer. Reset the write pointer: cond[0x%x]",
+			    zone->cond);
 		ret = __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(sbi, fdev->bdev, zone_block,
 					zone->len >> log_sectors_per_block);
 		if (ret)
 			f2fs_err(sbi, "Discard zone failed: %s (errno=%d)",
 				 fdev->path, ret);
-
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -4957,10 +4919,8 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	 * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
 	 */
 	f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
-			    "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
-			    GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
-			    GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
-			    wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
+		    "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] cond[0x%x]",
+		    zone_segno, valid_block_cnt, zone->cond);
 
 	ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(fdev->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH,
 				zone->start, zone->len, GFP_NOFS);
-- 
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new
  2023-12-04 18:04 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Jaegeuk Kim
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2023-12-04 18:53 ` Daeho Jeong
  2023-12-14 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daeho Jeong @ 2023-12-04 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

LGTM

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:06 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> If fsck can allocate a new zone, it'd be better to use that instead of
> allocating a new one.
>
> And, it modifies kernel messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 08e2f44a1264..9081c9af977a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -4949,20 +4949,18 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> -       if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
> -               /*
> -                * If there are valid blocks and the write pointer doesn't match
> -                * with them, we need to report the inconsistency and fill
> -                * the zone till the end to close the zone. This inconsistency
> -                * does not cause write error because the zone will not be
> -                * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
> -                */
> -               f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
> +       /*
> +        * If there are valid blocks and the write pointer doesn't match
> +        * with them, we need to report the inconsistency and fill
> +        * the zone till the end to close the zone. This inconsistency
> +        * does not cause write error because the zone will not be
> +        * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
> +        */
> +       f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
>                             "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
>                             GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
>                             GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
>                             wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> -       }
>
>         ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(fdev->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH,
>                                 zone->start, zone->len, GFP_NOFS);
> @@ -5053,15 +5051,18 @@ static int fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
>                 f2fs_notice(sbi, "Unaligned curseg[%d] with write pointer: "
>                             "curseg[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno,
>                             cs->next_blkoff, wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> -       } else {
> -               f2fs_notice(sbi, "Not successfully unmounted in the previous "
> -                           "mount");
>         }
>
> -       f2fs_notice(sbi, "Assign new section to curseg[%d]: "
> -                   "curseg[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
> +       /* Allocate a new section if it's not new. */
> +       if (cs->next_blkoff) {
> +               unsigned int old_segno = cs->segno, old_blkoff = cs->next_blkoff;
>
> -       f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, type, true);
> +               f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, type, true);
> +               f2fs_notice(sbi, "Assign new section to curseg[%d]: "
> +                               "[0x%x,0x%x] -> [0x%x,0x%x]",
> +                               type, old_segno, old_blkoff,
> +                               cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
> +       }
>
>         /* check consistency of the zone curseg pointed to */
>         if (check_zone_write_pointer(sbi, zbd, &zone))
> --
> 2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2023-12-04 19:02   ` Daeho Jeong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daeho Jeong @ 2023-12-04 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

LGTM

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:06 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> 1. do roll forward recovery
> 2. update current segments pointers
> 3. fix the entire zones' write pointers
> 4. do checkpoint
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> index 16415c770b45..d0f24ccbd1ac 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> @@ -917,6 +917,8 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
>         if (!err && fix_curseg_write_pointer && !f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb) &&
>                         f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) {
>                 err = f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(sbi);
> +               if (!err)
> +                       err = f2fs_check_write_pointer(sbi);
>                 ret = err;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: check write pointers when checkpoint=disable
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: check write pointers when checkpoint=disable Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2023-12-04 19:03   ` Daeho Jeong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daeho Jeong @ 2023-12-04 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

LGTM

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:06 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Even if f2fs was rebooted as staying checkpoint=disable, let's match the write
> pointers all the time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 617340e9ea7f..9a874b4d1501 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -4741,7 +4741,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>         f2fs_recover_quota_end(sbi, quota_enabled);
>  #endif
> -
> +reset_checkpoint:
>         /*
>          * If the f2fs is not readonly and fsync data recovery succeeds,
>          * check zoned block devices' write pointer consistency.
> @@ -4752,7 +4752,6 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>                         goto free_meta;
>         }
>
> -reset_checkpoint:
>         f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(sbi);
>
>         /* f2fs_recover_fsync_data() cleared this already */
> --
> 2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2023-12-04 19:11   ` Daeho Jeong
  2023-12-05 19:29   ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daeho Jeong @ 2023-12-04 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

LGTM

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:07 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> In order to limit # of open zones, let's finish or reset zones given # of
> valid blocks per section and its zone condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 74 +++++++++++------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 9081c9af977a..5696a4d381ff 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -4870,82 +4870,44 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>                                     struct f2fs_dev_info *fdev,
>                                     struct blk_zone *zone)
>  {
> -       unsigned int wp_segno, wp_blkoff, zone_secno, zone_segno, segno;
> -       block_t zone_block, wp_block, last_valid_block;
> +       unsigned int zone_segno;
> +       block_t zone_block, wp_block, valid_block_cnt;
>         unsigned int log_sectors_per_block = sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT;
> -       int i, s, b, ret;
> -       struct seg_entry *se;
> +       int ret;
>
>         if (zone->type != BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ)
>                 return 0;
>
>         wp_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->wp >> log_sectors_per_block);
> -       wp_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, wp_block);
> -       wp_blkoff = wp_block - START_BLOCK(sbi, wp_segno);
>         zone_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->start >> log_sectors_per_block);
>         zone_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, zone_block);
> -       zone_secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno);
> -
> -       if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi))
> -               return 0;
>
>         /*
>          * Skip check of zones cursegs point to, since
>          * fix_curseg_write_pointer() checks them.
>          */
> -       for (i = 0; i < NO_CHECK_TYPE; i++)
> -               if (zone_secno == GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi,
> -                                                  CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->segno))
> -                       return 0;
> +       if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi) ||
> +           IS_CURSEC(sbi, GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno)))
> +               return 0;
>
>         /*
> -        * Get last valid block of the zone.
> +        * Get # of valid block of the zone.
>          */
> -       last_valid_block = zone_block - 1;
> -       for (s = sbi->segs_per_sec - 1; s >= 0; s--) {
> -               segno = zone_segno + s;
> -               se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> -               for (b = sbi->blocks_per_seg - 1; b >= 0; b--)
> -                       if (f2fs_test_bit(b, se->cur_valid_map)) {
> -                               last_valid_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno) + b;
> -                               break;
> -                       }
> -               if (last_valid_block >= zone_block)
> -                       break;
> -       }
> +       valid_block_cnt = get_valid_blocks(sbi, zone_segno, true);
>
> -       /*
> -        * When safely unmounted in the previous mount, we can trust write
> -        * pointers. Otherwise, finish zones.
> -        */
> -       if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
> -               /*
> -                * The write pointer matches with the valid blocks or
> -                * already points to the end of the zone.
> -                */
> -               if ((last_valid_block + 1 == wp_block) ||
> -                               (zone->wp == zone->start + zone->len))
> -                       return 0;
> -       }
> +       if ((!valid_block_cnt && zone->cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY) ||
> +           (valid_block_cnt && zone->cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_FULL))
> +               return 0;
>
> -       if (last_valid_block + 1 == zone_block) {
> -               if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
> -                       /*
> -                        * If there is no valid block in the zone and if write
> -                        * pointer is not at zone start, reset the write
> -                        * pointer.
> -                        */
> -                       f2fs_notice(sbi,
> -                             "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
> -                             "pointer. Reset the write pointer: wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
> -                             wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> -               }
> +       if (!valid_block_cnt) {
> +               f2fs_notice(sbi, "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
> +                           "pointer. Reset the write pointer: cond[0x%x]",
> +                           zone->cond);
>                 ret = __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(sbi, fdev->bdev, zone_block,
>                                         zone->len >> log_sectors_per_block);
>                 if (ret)
>                         f2fs_err(sbi, "Discard zone failed: %s (errno=%d)",
>                                  fdev->path, ret);
> -
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> @@ -4957,10 +4919,8 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>          * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
>          */
>         f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
> -                           "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
> -                           GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
> -                           GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
> -                           wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> +                   "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] cond[0x%x]",
> +                   zone_segno, valid_block_cnt, zone->cond);
>
>         ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(fdev->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH,
>                                 zone->start, zone->len, GFP_NOFS);
> --
> 2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time
  2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time Jaegeuk Kim
  2023-12-04 19:11   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
@ 2023-12-05 19:29   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2023-12-05 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

In order to limit # of open zones, let's finish or reset zones given # of
valid blocks per section and its zone condition.

Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---

 - remove unnecessary wp_block

 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 75 +++++++++++------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 9081c9af977a..007ebb107236 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -4870,82 +4870,43 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 				    struct f2fs_dev_info *fdev,
 				    struct blk_zone *zone)
 {
-	unsigned int wp_segno, wp_blkoff, zone_secno, zone_segno, segno;
-	block_t zone_block, wp_block, last_valid_block;
+	unsigned int zone_segno;
+	block_t zone_block, valid_block_cnt;
 	unsigned int log_sectors_per_block = sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT;
-	int i, s, b, ret;
-	struct seg_entry *se;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (zone->type != BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ)
 		return 0;
 
-	wp_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->wp >> log_sectors_per_block);
-	wp_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, wp_block);
-	wp_blkoff = wp_block - START_BLOCK(sbi, wp_segno);
 	zone_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->start >> log_sectors_per_block);
 	zone_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, zone_block);
-	zone_secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno);
-
-	if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi))
-		return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Skip check of zones cursegs point to, since
 	 * fix_curseg_write_pointer() checks them.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < NO_CHECK_TYPE; i++)
-		if (zone_secno == GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi,
-						   CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->segno))
-			return 0;
+	if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi) ||
+	    IS_CURSEC(sbi, GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno)))
+		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * Get last valid block of the zone.
+	 * Get # of valid block of the zone.
 	 */
-	last_valid_block = zone_block - 1;
-	for (s = sbi->segs_per_sec - 1; s >= 0; s--) {
-		segno = zone_segno + s;
-		se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
-		for (b = sbi->blocks_per_seg - 1; b >= 0; b--)
-			if (f2fs_test_bit(b, se->cur_valid_map)) {
-				last_valid_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno) + b;
-				break;
-			}
-		if (last_valid_block >= zone_block)
-			break;
-	}
+	valid_block_cnt = get_valid_blocks(sbi, zone_segno, true);
 
-	/*
-	 * When safely unmounted in the previous mount, we can trust write
-	 * pointers. Otherwise, finish zones.
-	 */
-	if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
-		/*
-		 * The write pointer matches with the valid blocks or
-		 * already points to the end of the zone.
-		 */
-		if ((last_valid_block + 1 == wp_block) ||
-				(zone->wp == zone->start + zone->len))
-			return 0;
-	}
+	if ((!valid_block_cnt && zone->cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY) ||
+	    (valid_block_cnt && zone->cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_FULL))
+		return 0;
 
-	if (last_valid_block + 1 == zone_block) {
-		if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_UMOUNT_FLAG)) {
-			/*
-			 * If there is no valid block in the zone and if write
-			 * pointer is not at zone start, reset the write
-			 * pointer.
-			 */
-			f2fs_notice(sbi,
-			      "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
-			      "pointer. Reset the write pointer: wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
-			      wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
-		}
+	if (!valid_block_cnt) {
+		f2fs_notice(sbi, "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
+			    "pointer. Reset the write pointer: cond[0x%x]",
+			    zone->cond);
 		ret = __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(sbi, fdev->bdev, zone_block,
 					zone->len >> log_sectors_per_block);
 		if (ret)
 			f2fs_err(sbi, "Discard zone failed: %s (errno=%d)",
 				 fdev->path, ret);
-
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -4957,10 +4918,8 @@ static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	 * selected for write operation until it get discarded.
 	 */
 	f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid blocks are not aligned with write "
-			    "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
-			    GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
-			    GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
-			    wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
+		    "pointer: valid block[0x%x,0x%x] cond[0x%x]",
+		    zone_segno, valid_block_cnt, zone->cond);
 
 	ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(fdev->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH,
 				zone->start, zone->len, GFP_NOFS);
-- 
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new
  2023-12-04 18:04 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Jaegeuk Kim
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-12-04 18:53 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Daeho Jeong
@ 2023-12-14 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs @ 2023-12-14 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

Hello:

This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:

On Mon,  4 Dec 2023 10:04:25 -0800 you wrote:
> If fsck can allocate a new zone, it'd be better to use that instead of
> allocating a new one.
> 
> And, it modifies kernel messages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [f2fs-dev,1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/15a76c8014f9
  - [f2fs-dev,2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/9dad4d964291
  - [f2fs-dev,3/4] f2fs: check write pointers when checkpoint=disable
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/aca90eea8a90
  - [f2fs-dev,4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-14 20:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-04 18:04 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Jaegeuk Kim
2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix write pointers on zoned device after roll forward Jaegeuk Kim
2023-12-04 19:02   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: check write pointers when checkpoint=disable Jaegeuk Kim
2023-12-04 19:03   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2023-12-04 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: let's finish or reset zones all the time Jaegeuk Kim
2023-12-04 19:11   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2023-12-05 19:29   ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2023-12-04 18:53 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: allocate new section if it's not new Daeho Jeong
2023-12-14 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).