linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Kaneda, Erik" <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
	"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" 
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"myron.stowe@redhat.com" <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 19:22:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1738949fd49e9804722bf82d790e3022fc714677.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1794490.F2OrUDcHQn@kreacher>

On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 18:33 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The ACPICA's strategy with respect to the handling of memory mappings
> associated with memory operation regions is to avoid mapping the
> entire region at once which may be problematic at least in principle
> (for example, it may lead to conflicts with overlapping mappings
> having different attributes created by drivers).  It may also be
> wasteful, because memory opregions on some systems take up vast
> chunks of address space while the fields in those regions actually
> accessed by AML are sparsely distributed.
> 
> For this reason, a one-page "window" is mapped for a given opregion
> on the first memory access through it and if that "window" does not
> cover an address range accessed through that opregion subsequently,
> it is unmapped and a new "window" is mapped to replace it.  Next,
> if the new "window" is not sufficient to acess memory through the
> opregion in question in the future, it will be replaced with yet
> another "window" and so on.  That may lead to a suboptimal sequence
> of memory mapping and unmapping operations, for example if two fields
> in one opregion separated from each other by a sufficiently wide
> chunk of unused address space are accessed in an alternating pattern.
> 
> The situation may still be suboptimal if the deferred unmapping
> introduced previously is supported by the OS layer.  For instance,
> the alternating memory access pattern mentioned above may produce
> a relatively long list of mappings to release with substantial
> duplication among the entries in it, which could be avoided if
> acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler() did not release the mapping
> used by it previously as soon as the current access was not covered
> by it.
> 
> In order to improve that, modify acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler()
> to preserve all of the memory mappings created by it until the memory
> regions associated with them go away.
> 
> Accordingly, update acpi_ev_system_memory_region_setup() to unmap all
> memory associated with memory opregions that go away.
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c | 14 ++++----
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/acpi/actypes.h         | 12 +++++--
>  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Rafael,

Picking up from Dan while he's out - I had these patches tested by the
original reporter, and they work fine. I see you had them staged in the
acpica-osl branch. Is that slated to go in during the 5.9 merge window?

You can add:
Tested-by: Xiang Li <xiang.z.li@intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-07 23:39 [PATCH v2] ACPI: Drop rcu usage for MMIO mappings Dan Williams
2020-05-13  8:52 ` [ACPI] 5a91d41f89: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/locking/mutex.c kernel test robot
2020-06-05 13:32 ` [PATCH v2] ACPI: Drop rcu usage for MMIO mappings Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 16:18   ` Dan Williams
2020-06-05 16:21     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 16:39       ` Dan Williams
2020-06-05 17:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 14:06 ` [RFT][PATCH] ACPI: OSL: Use rwlock instead of RCU for memory management Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 17:08   ` Dan Williams
2020-06-06  6:56     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-08 15:33       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-08 16:29         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 19:40   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-06  6:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-10 12:17 ` [RFT][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-10 12:20   ` [RFT][PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Defer unmapping of memory used in memory opregions Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-10 12:21   ` [RFT][PATCH 2/3] ACPICA: Remove unused memory mappings on interpreter exit Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-12  0:12     ` Kaneda, Erik
2020-06-12 12:05       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-13 19:28         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-15 19:06           ` Dan Williams
2020-06-10 12:22   ` [RFT][PATCH 3/3] ACPI: OSL: Define ACPI_OS_MAP_MEMORY_FAST_PATH() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-13 19:19   ` [RFT][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 13:50 ` [RFT][PATCH v2 0/4] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 13:52   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 1/4] ACPICA: Defer unmapping of opregion memory if supported by OS Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 13:53   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 2/4] ACPI: OSL: Add support for deferred unmapping of ACPI memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 14:56     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-22 15:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 15:46         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-22 14:01   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 3/4] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings if supported by OS Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 22:53     ` Kaneda, Erik
2020-06-29 13:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 14:02   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI: OSL: Implement acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:28   ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/4] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:31     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 1/4] ACPICA: Take deferred unmapping of memory into account Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:31     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 2/4] ACPI: OSL: Implement deferred unmapping of ACPI memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:32     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 3/4] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings if supported by OS Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:33     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 4/4] ACPI: OSL: Implement acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 18:41     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/4] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Dan Williams
2020-06-28 17:09       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 20:46         ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30 11:04           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 16:31     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 16:33       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: OSL: Implement deferred unmapping of ACPI memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 16:33       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 20:57         ` Al Stone
2020-06-30 11:44           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-30 15:31             ` Al Stone
2020-06-30 15:52               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-30 19:57                 ` Al Stone
2020-07-16 19:22         ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2020-07-19 19:14           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1738949fd49e9804722bf82d790e3022fc714677.camel@intel.com \
    --to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=erik.kaneda@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).