linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kaneda, Erik" <erik.kaneda@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: RE: [RFT][PATCH v2 3/4] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings if supported by OS
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:53:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1599FBA57730E5C74B9B4588F0930@MWHPR11MB1599.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13749323.0m2ImmhSHx@kreacher>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:02 AM
> To: Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Kaneda, Erik
> <erik.kaneda@intel.com>
> Cc: Wysocki, Rafael J <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown
> <lenb@kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>; Weiny, Ira
> <ira.weiny@intel.com>; James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>; Myron
> Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; Moore, Robert
> <robert.moore@intel.com>
> Subject: [RFT][PATCH v2 3/4] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings
> if supported by OS
> 
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The ACPICA's strategy with respect to the handling of memory mappings
> associated with memory operation regions is to avoid mapping the
> entire region at once which may be problematic at least in principle
> (for example, it may lead to conflicts with overlapping mappings
> having different attributes created by drivers).  It may also be
> wasteful, because memory opregions on some systems take up vast
> chunks of address space while the fields in those regions actually
> accessed by AML are sparsely distributed.
> 
> For this reason, a one-page "window" is mapped for a given opregion
> on the first memory access through it and if that "window" does not
> cover an address range accessed through that opregion subsequently,
> it is unmapped and a new "window" is mapped to replace it.  Next,
> if the new "window" is not sufficient to access memory through the
> opregion in question in the future, it will be replaced with yet
> another "window" and so on.  That may lead to a suboptimal sequence
> of memory mapping and unmapping operations, for example if two fields
> in one opregion separated from each other by a sufficiently wide
> chunk of unused address space are accessed in an alternating pattern.
> 
> The situation may still be suboptimal if the deferred unmapping
> introduced previously is supported by the OS layer.  For instance,
> the alternating memory access pattern mentioned above may produce
> a relatively long list of mappings to release with substantial
> duplication among the entries in it, which could be avoided if
> acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler() did not release the mapping
> used by it previously as soon as the current access was not covered
> by it.
> 
> In order to improve that, modify acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler()
> to take advantage of the memory mappings reference counting at the OS
> level if a suitable interface is provided.
> 
Hi,

> Namely, if ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING is set, the OS is expected to
> implement acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path() that will return NULL if
> there is no mapping covering the given address range known to it.
> If such a mapping is there, however, its reference counter will be
> incremented and a pointer representing the requested virtual address
> will be returned right away without any additional consequences.

I do not fully understand why this is under a #ifdef. Is this to support operating systems that might not want to add support for this behavior?

Also, instead of using the terminology fast_path, I think it would be easier to use terminology that describes the mechanism..
It might be easier for other Operating systems to understand something like acpi_os_map_preserved_memory or acpi_os_map_sysmem_opregion_memory.

Thanks,
Erik
> 
> That allows acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler() to acquire
> additional references to all new memory mappings with the help
> of acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path() so as to retain them until the
> memory opregions associated with them go away.  The function will
> still use a new "window" mapping if the current one does not
> cover the address range at hand, but it will avoid unmapping the
> current one right away by adding it to a list of "known" mappings
> associated with the given memory opregion which will be deleted at
> the opregion deactivation time.  The mappings in that list can be
> used every time a "new window" is needed so as to avoid overhead
> related to the mapping and unmapping of memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/acinterp.h |   4 +
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c |   7 +-
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c | 159
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/acinterp.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/acinterp.h
> index 1f1026fb06e9..db9c279baa2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/acinterp.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/acinterp.h
> @@ -479,8 +479,12 @@ void acpi_ex_pci_cls_to_string(char *dest, u8
> class_code[3]);
> 
>  u8 acpi_is_valid_space_id(u8 space_id);
> 
> +struct acpi_mem_space_context
> *acpi_ex_alloc_mem_space_context(void);
> +
>  void acpi_ex_unmap_region_memory(struct acpi_mem_space_context
> *mem_info);
> 
> +void acpi_ex_unmap_all_region_mappings(struct
> acpi_mem_space_context *mem_info);
> +
>  /*
>   * exregion - default op_region handlers
>   */
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c
> index 9f33114a74ca..f6c5feea10bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c
> @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ acpi_ev_system_memory_region_setup(acpi_handle
> handle,
>  			local_region_context =
>  			    (struct acpi_mem_space_context
> *)*region_context;
> 
> -			/* Delete a cached mapping if present */
> +			/* Delete memory mappings if present */
> 
>  			if (local_region_context->mapped_length) {
> -
> 	acpi_ex_unmap_region_memory(local_region_context);
> +
> 	acpi_ex_unmap_all_region_mappings(local_region_context);
>  			}
>  			ACPI_FREE(local_region_context);
>  			*region_context = NULL;
> @@ -59,8 +59,7 @@ acpi_ev_system_memory_region_setup(acpi_handle
> handle,
> 
>  	/* Create a new context */
> 
> -	local_region_context =
> -	    ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct
> acpi_mem_space_context));
> +	local_region_context = acpi_ex_alloc_mem_space_context();
>  	if (!(local_region_context)) {
>  		return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c
> index af777b7fccb0..9d97b6a67074 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,40 @@
>  #define _COMPONENT          ACPI_EXECUTER
>  ACPI_MODULE_NAME("exregion")
> 
> +struct acpi_mem_mapping {
> +	acpi_physical_address physical_address;
> +	u8 *logical_address;
> +	acpi_size length;
> +	struct acpi_mem_mapping *next_mm;
> +};
> +
> +struct acpi_mm_context {
> +	struct acpi_mem_space_context mem_info;
> +	struct acpi_mem_mapping *first_mm;
> +};
> +
> +/*********************************************************
> ********************
> + *
> + * FUNCTION:    acpi_ex_alloc_mem_space_context
> + *
> + * PARAMETERS:  None
> + *
> + * RETURN:      Pointer to a new region context object.
> + *
> + * DESCRIPTION: Allocate memory for memory operation region
> representation.
> + *
> +
> **********************************************************
> ******************/
> +struct acpi_mem_space_context
> *acpi_ex_alloc_mem_space_context(void)
> +{
> +	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_ex_alloc_mem_space_context);
> +
> +#ifdef ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING
> +	return ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct acpi_mm_context));
> +#else
> +	return ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct
> acpi_mem_space_context));
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> 
> /**********************************************************
> *******************
>   *
>   * FUNCTION:    acpi_ex_unmap_region_memory
> @@ -40,6 +74,44 @@ void acpi_ex_unmap_region_memory(struct
> acpi_mem_space_context *mem_info)
>  	return_VOID;
>  }
> 
> +/*********************************************************
> ********************
> + *
> + * FUNCTION:    acpi_ex_unmap_all_region_mappings
> + *
> + * PARAMETERS:  mem_info            - Region specific context
> + *
> + * RETURN:      None
> + *
> + * DESCRIPTION: Unmap all mappings associated with a memory operation
> region.
> + *
> +
> **********************************************************
> ******************/
> +void acpi_ex_unmap_all_region_mappings(struct
> acpi_mem_space_context *mem_info)
> +{
> +#ifdef ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING
> +	struct acpi_mm_context *mm_context = (struct acpi_mm_context
> *)mem_info;
> +	struct acpi_mem_mapping *mm;
> +#endif
> +
> +	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_ex_unmap_all_region_mappings);
> +
> +	acpi_ex_unmap_region_memory(mem_info);
> +
> +#ifdef ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING
> +	while (mm_context->first_mm) {
> +		mm = mm_context->first_mm;
> +		mm_context->first_mm = mm->next_mm;
> +#ifdef ACPI_USE_DEFERRED_UNMAPPING
> +		acpi_os_unmap_deferred(mm->logical_address, mm-
> >length);
> +#else
> +		acpi_os_unmap_memory(mm->logical_address, mm-
> >length);
> +#endif
> +		ACPI_FREE(mm);
> +	}
> +#endif /* ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING */
> +
> +	return_VOID;
> +}
> +
> 
> /**********************************************************
> *********************
>   *
>   * FUNCTION:    acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler
> @@ -70,6 +142,10 @@ acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler(u32
> function,
>  	u32 length;
>  	acpi_size map_length;
>  	acpi_size page_boundary_map_length;
> +#ifdef ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING
> +	struct acpi_mm_context *mm_context = (struct acpi_mm_context
> *)mem_info;
> +	struct acpi_mem_mapping *mm;
> +#endif
>  #ifdef ACPI_MISALIGNMENT_NOT_SUPPORTED
>  	u32 remainder;
>  #endif
> @@ -128,7 +204,7 @@ acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler(u32
> function,
>  					 mem_info->mapped_length))) {
>  		/*
>  		 * The request cannot be resolved by the current memory
> mapping;
> -		 * Delete the existing mapping and create a new one.
> +		 * Delete the current cached mapping and get a new one.
>  		 */
>  		if (mem_info->mapped_length) {
> 
> @@ -137,6 +213,36 @@ acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler(u32
> function,
>  			acpi_ex_unmap_region_memory(mem_info);
>  		}
> 
> +#ifdef ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING
> +		/*
> +		 * Look for an existing saved mapping matching the address
> range
> +		 * at hand.  If found, make the OS layer bump up the
> reference
> +		 * counter of that mapping, cache it and carry out the access.
> +		 */
> +		for (mm = mm_context->first_mm; mm; mm = mm-
> >next_mm) {
> +			if (address < mm->physical_address)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			if ((u64)address + length >
> +					(u64)mm->physical_address + mm-
> >length)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * When called on a known-existing memory mapping,
> +			 * acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path() must return
> the same
> +			 * logical address as before or NULL.
> +			 */
> +			if (!acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path(mm-
> >physical_address,
> +							  mm->length))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			mem_info->mapped_logical_address = mm-
> >logical_address;
> +			mem_info->mapped_physical_address = mm-
> >physical_address;
> +			mem_info->mapped_length = mm->length;
> +			goto access;
> +		}
> +#endif /* ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING */
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * October 2009: Attempt to map from the requested
> address to the
>  		 * end of the region. However, we will never map more than
> one
> @@ -168,9 +274,8 @@ acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler(u32
> function,
> 
>  		/* Create a new mapping starting at the address given */
> 
> -		mem_info->mapped_logical_address =
> -		    acpi_os_map_memory(address, map_length);
> -		if (!mem_info->mapped_logical_address) {
> +		logical_addr_ptr = acpi_os_map_memory(address,
> map_length);
> +		if (!logical_addr_ptr) {
>  			ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
>  				    "Could not map memory at 0x%8.8X%8.8X,
> size %u",
>  				    ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64(address),
> @@ -181,10 +286,56 @@ acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler(u32
> function,
> 
>  		/* Save the physical address and mapping size */
> 
> +		mem_info->mapped_logical_address = logical_addr_ptr;
>  		mem_info->mapped_physical_address = address;
>  		mem_info->mapped_length = map_length;
> +
> +#ifdef ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING
> +		/*
> +		 * Create a new mm list entry to save the new mapping for
> +		 * removal at the operation region deactivation time.
> +		 */
> +		mm = ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(*mm));
> +		if (!mm) {
> +			/*
> +			 * No room to save the new mapping, but this is not
> +			 * critical.  Just log the error and carry out the
> +			 * access as requested.
> +			 */
> +			ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
> +				    "Not enough memory to save memory
> mapping at 0x%8.8X%8.8X, size %u",
> +				    ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64(address),
> +				    (u32)map_length));
> +			goto access;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * Bump up the new mapping's reference counter in the OS
> layer
> +		 * to prevent it from getting dropped prematurely.
> +		 */
> +		if (!acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path(address, map_length))
> {
> +			/*
> +			 * Something has gone wrong, but this is not critical.
> +			 * Log the error, free the mm list entry that won't be
> +			 * used and carry out the access as requested.
> +			 */
> +			ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
> +				    "Unable to save memory mapping at
> 0x%8.8X%8.8X, size %u",
> +				    ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64(address),
> +				    (u32)map_length));
> +			ACPI_FREE(mm);
> +			goto access;
> +		}
> +		mm->physical_address = address;
> +		mm->logical_address = logical_addr_ptr;
> +		mm->length = map_length;
> +		mm->next_mm = mm_context->first_mm;
> +		mm_context->first_mm = mm;
>  	}
> 
> +access:
> +#else /* !ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING */
> +	}
> +#endif /* !ACPI_USE_FAST_PATH_MAPPING */
>  	/*
>  	 * Generate a logical pointer corresponding to the address we want
> to
>  	 * access
> --
> 2.26.2
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-26 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-07 23:39 [PATCH v2] ACPI: Drop rcu usage for MMIO mappings Dan Williams
2020-05-13  8:52 ` [ACPI] 5a91d41f89: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/locking/mutex.c kernel test robot
2020-06-05 13:32 ` [PATCH v2] ACPI: Drop rcu usage for MMIO mappings Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 16:18   ` Dan Williams
2020-06-05 16:21     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 16:39       ` Dan Williams
2020-06-05 17:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 14:06 ` [RFT][PATCH] ACPI: OSL: Use rwlock instead of RCU for memory management Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 17:08   ` Dan Williams
2020-06-06  6:56     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-08 15:33       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-08 16:29         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-05 19:40   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-06  6:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-10 12:17 ` [RFT][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-10 12:20   ` [RFT][PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Defer unmapping of memory used in memory opregions Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-10 12:21   ` [RFT][PATCH 2/3] ACPICA: Remove unused memory mappings on interpreter exit Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-12  0:12     ` Kaneda, Erik
2020-06-12 12:05       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-13 19:28         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-15 19:06           ` Dan Williams
2020-06-10 12:22   ` [RFT][PATCH 3/3] ACPI: OSL: Define ACPI_OS_MAP_MEMORY_FAST_PATH() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-13 19:19   ` [RFT][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 13:50 ` [RFT][PATCH v2 0/4] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 13:52   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 1/4] ACPICA: Defer unmapping of opregion memory if supported by OS Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 13:53   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 2/4] ACPI: OSL: Add support for deferred unmapping of ACPI memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 14:56     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-22 15:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 15:46         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-22 14:01   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 3/4] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings if supported by OS Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 22:53     ` Kaneda, Erik [this message]
2020-06-29 13:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 14:02   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI: OSL: Implement acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:28   ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/4] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:31     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 1/4] ACPICA: Take deferred unmapping of memory into account Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:31     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 2/4] ACPI: OSL: Implement deferred unmapping of ACPI memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:32     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 3/4] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings if supported by OS Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 17:33     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 4/4] ACPI: OSL: Implement acpi_os_map_memory_fast_path() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-26 18:41     ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/4] ACPI: ACPICA / OSL: Avoid unmapping ACPI memory inside of the AML interpreter Dan Williams
2020-06-28 17:09       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 20:46         ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30 11:04           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 16:31     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 16:33       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: OSL: Implement deferred unmapping of ACPI memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 16:33       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ACPICA: Preserve memory opregion mappings Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-29 20:57         ` Al Stone
2020-06-30 11:44           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-30 15:31             ` Al Stone
2020-06-30 15:52               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-30 19:57                 ` Al Stone
2020-07-16 19:22         ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-07-19 19:14           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB1599FBA57730E5C74B9B4588F0930@MWHPR11MB1599.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=erik.kaneda@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).