linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net v2] net: dsa: microchip: fix race condition
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 18:30:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1774255.9Jiduhijpd@n95hx1g2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201006162125.ulftqdiufdxjesn7@skbuf>

On Tuesday, 6 October 2020, 18:21:25 CEST, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:56:51PM +0200, Christian Eggers wrote:
> > - Checking for mib_read_interval in ksz_switch_remove() can be obmitted,
> >   as the condition is always true when ksz_switch_remove() is called.
> 
> If there's an error in the probe path, I expect that the
> mib_read_interval will not get set, and the delayed workqueue will not
> be scheduled, will it? So I think the check is ok there.

If think that ksz_switch_remove() will not be called at all if there is an 
error in the probe path. In all other cases, the work should be queued.

Regards
Christian




  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-06 15:56 [net v2] net: dsa: microchip: fix race condition Christian Eggers
2020-10-06 16:21 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-06 16:24   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-06 16:30   ` Christian Eggers [this message]
2020-10-06 16:57     ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-10-06 20:36 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1774255.9Jiduhijpd@n95hx1g2 \
    --to=ceggers@arri.de \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).