linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@cambridge.redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@cambridge.redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:27:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17752.987024422@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:56:09 PDT." <3AD48CA9.CA03B85D@uow.edu.au>


> You need sterner testing stuff :)  I hit the BUG at the end of rwsem_wake()
> in about a second running rwsem-4.  Removed the BUG and everything stops
> in D state.
> 
> Grab rwsem-4 from
> 
> 	http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/rwsem.tar.gz
> 
> It's very simple.  But running fully in-kernel shortens the
> code paths enormously and allows you to find those little
> timing windows.  Run rmsem-4 in two modes: one with
> the schedule() in sched() enabled, and also with it
> commented out.  If it passes that, it works.  When
> you remove the module it'll print out the number of
> read-grants versus write-grants.  If these run at 6:1
> with schedule() disabled then you've kicked butt.
> 
> Also, rwsem-4 checks that the rwsems are actually providing
> exclusion between readers and writers, and between
> writers and writers.  A useful thing to check, that.

It now works (patch to follow).

schedule() enabled:
 reads taken: 686273
 writes taken: 193414

schedule() disabled:
 reads taken: 585619
 writes taken: 292997

David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-11 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3AD0FD0F.9B0C47FD@uow.edu.au>
2001-04-09  3:08 ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-09  4:18   ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-09 13:55     ` rw_semaphores Ben LaHaise
2001-04-10  2:41 ` rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro
2001-04-10  5:43   ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10  7:47     ` rw_semaphores David Howells
2001-04-10 18:02       ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
2001-04-10 19:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10 19:56           ` x86 cpu configuration (was: Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix) Jeff Garzik
2001-04-10 21:58             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-10 20:05           ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
2001-04-10 20:16             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10 22:00             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:00               ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  0:13                 ` David Weinehall
2001-04-11  0:20                   ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  0:56                     ` David Weinehall
2001-04-11  1:04                       ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11 12:32                     ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:55                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11  1:07                     ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  1:12                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11  1:23                         ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11 12:36                           ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 18:05                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 12:28                 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 18:06                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 22:06                     ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 22:42                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 22:55                         ` Alan Cox
2001-04-10 21:57           ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:40             ` Tim Wright
2001-04-11  7:38           ` David Howells
2001-04-11 12:24             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-11 12:57           ` [PATCH] 2nd try: " David Howells
2001-04-11 16:37             ` [PATCH] 3rd " David Howells
2001-04-11 21:41               ` [PATCH] 4th " David Howells
2001-04-12 18:16                 ` Andrew Morton
2001-04-11 23:00               ` [PATCH] 3rd " Anton Blanchard
2001-04-12 15:06                 ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores, general abstraction patch David Howells
2001-04-11 16:56         ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andrew Morton
2001-04-11 17:36           ` David Howells
2001-04-11 18:41             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11 21:27           ` David Howells [this message]
2001-04-16 14:39       ` rw_semaphores yodaiken
2001-04-16 14:56         ` rw_semaphores Alan Cox
2001-04-16 17:05         ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-16 17:34           ` rw_semaphores yodaiken
2001-04-16 17:26         ` rw_semaphores Andrew Morton
2001-04-10  6:33   ` rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17752.987024422@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@cambridge.redhat.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).