linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: ak@suse.de (Andi Kleen)
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), ak@suse.de (Andi Kleen),
	tao@acc.umu.se (David Weinehall),
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
	dhowells@cambridge.redhat.com (David Howells),
	andrewm@uow.edu.au (Andrew Morton), bcrl@redhat.com (Ben LaHaise),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Kernel Mailing List)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:36:48 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E14nJre-0006Y0-00@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010411032354.A29422@gruyere.muc.suse.de> from "Andi Kleen" at Apr 11, 2001 03:23:54 AM

> It's currently done this way, ld-linux.so looks in a special "686" path when
> the ELF vector mentions it, otherwise normal path. There is a special 686
> version of glibc and linuxthread. Just it's a very complicated and disk 
> space chewing solution for a simple problem (some distributions are starting 
> to drop support for 386 because of that)

So drop your support for that distribution. I do not see the problem here. Look
at PS/2 support as another example. Supporting the IBM PS/2 machines is
commercially impractical and has no business case. Red Hat won't install on
a PS/2 machine. Debian has different constraints and guess what - Debian 
installs beautifully on a PS/2.

Alan


  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-11 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3AD0FD0F.9B0C47FD@uow.edu.au>
2001-04-09  3:08 ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-09  4:18   ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-09 13:55     ` rw_semaphores Ben LaHaise
2001-04-10  2:41 ` rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro
2001-04-10  5:43   ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10  7:47     ` rw_semaphores David Howells
2001-04-10 18:02       ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix David Howells
2001-04-10 19:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10 19:56           ` x86 cpu configuration (was: Re: [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix) Jeff Garzik
2001-04-10 21:58             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-10 20:05           ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andi Kleen
2001-04-10 20:16             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-10 22:00             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:00               ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  0:13                 ` David Weinehall
2001-04-11  0:20                   ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  0:56                     ` David Weinehall
2001-04-11  1:04                       ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11 12:32                     ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:55                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11  1:07                     ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11  1:12                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11  1:23                         ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-11 12:36                           ` Alan Cox [this message]
2001-04-11 18:05                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 12:28                 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 18:06                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 22:06                     ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11 22:42                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-11 22:55                         ` Alan Cox
2001-04-10 21:57           ` Alan Cox
2001-04-11  0:40             ` Tim Wright
2001-04-11  7:38           ` David Howells
2001-04-11 12:24             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-04-11 12:57           ` [PATCH] 2nd try: " David Howells
2001-04-11 16:37             ` [PATCH] 3rd " David Howells
2001-04-11 21:41               ` [PATCH] 4th " David Howells
2001-04-12 18:16                 ` Andrew Morton
2001-04-11 23:00               ` [PATCH] 3rd " Anton Blanchard
2001-04-12 15:06                 ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores, general abstraction patch David Howells
2001-04-11 16:56         ` [PATCH] i386 rw_semaphores fix Andrew Morton
2001-04-11 17:36           ` David Howells
2001-04-11 18:41             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-11 21:27           ` David Howells
2001-04-16 14:39       ` rw_semaphores yodaiken
2001-04-16 14:56         ` rw_semaphores Alan Cox
2001-04-16 17:05         ` rw_semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-16 17:34           ` rw_semaphores yodaiken
2001-04-16 17:26         ` rw_semaphores Andrew Morton
2001-04-10  6:33   ` rw_semaphores Tachino Nobuhiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E14nJre-0006Y0-00@the-village.bc.nu \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@cambridge.redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tao@acc.umu.se \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).