[PATCH 0/7] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs to accept NULL opp_table

[PATCH 0/7] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs to accept NULL opp_table

[Viresh Kumar]

Hello,

This patchset updates the dev_pm_opp_put_*() helpers to accept a NULL
pointer for the OPP table, in order to allow the callers to drop the
unnecessary checks they had to carry.

All these must get merged upstream through the OPP tree as there is a
hard dependency on the first patch here. Thanks.

Viresh Kumar (7):
  opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs to accept NULL opp_table
  cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() accepts NULL argument
  cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-nvmem: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
  devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
  drm/lima: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
  drm/panfrost: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
  media: venus: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c                   |  6 ++----
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c           | 15 ++++++---------
 drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c                   | 12 ++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c            | 13 ++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c    |  6 ++----
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c |  3 +--
 drivers/opp/core.c                             | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

[PATCH 1/7] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs to accept NULL opp_table

[Viresh Kumar]

This allows the callers to drop the unnecessary checks.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/opp/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index b24f685823ae..9d145bb99a59 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1660,6 +1660,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw);
  */
 void dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
+	if (unlikely(!opp_table))
+		return;
+
 	/* Make sure there are no concurrent readers while updating opp_table */
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->opp_list));
 
@@ -1716,6 +1719,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_set_prop_name);
  */
 void dev_pm_opp_put_prop_name(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
+	if (unlikely(!opp_table))
+		return;
+
 	/* Make sure there are no concurrent readers while updating opp_table */
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->opp_list));
 
@@ -1844,6 +1850,9 @@ void dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (unlikely(!opp_table))
+		return;
+
 	if (!opp_table->regulators)
 		goto put_opp_table;
 
@@ -1926,6 +1935,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_set_clkname);
  */
 void dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
+	if (unlikely(!opp_table))
+		return;
+
 	/* Make sure there are no concurrent readers while updating opp_table */
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->opp_list));
 
@@ -1981,6 +1993,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper);
  */
 void dev_pm_opp_unregister_set_opp_helper(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
+	if (unlikely(!opp_table))
+		return;
+
 	/* Make sure there are no concurrent readers while updating opp_table */
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->opp_list));
 
@@ -2109,6 +2124,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd);
  */
 void dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(struct opp_table *opp_table)
 {
+	if (unlikely(!opp_table))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Acquire genpd_virt_dev_lock to make sure virt_dev isn't getting
 	 * used in parallel.
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

[PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra checks. Drop them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index 66b3db5efb53..5c049428a6f5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int cpu)
 out:
 	if (priv->have_static_opps)
 		dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
-	if (priv->opp_table)
-		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
+	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
 	free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -305,8 +304,7 @@ static void dt_cpufreq_release(void)
 		dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &priv->freq_table);
 		if (priv->have_static_opps)
 			dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
-		if (priv->opp_table)
-			dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
+		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
 		free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
 		list_del(&priv->node);
 	}
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

[PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-nvmem: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra checks. Drop them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
index d06b37822c3d..747d602f221e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
@@ -397,19 +397,19 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 free_genpd_opp:
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]))
+		if (IS_ERR(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]))
 			break;
 		dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]);
 	}
 	kfree(drv->genpd_opp_tables);
 free_opp:
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]))
+		if (IS_ERR(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]))
 			break;
 		dev_pm_opp_put_prop_name(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]);
 	}
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]))
+		if (IS_ERR(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]))
 			break;
 		dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]);
 	}
@@ -430,12 +430,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_device_unregister(cpufreq_dt_pdev);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (drv->names_opp_tables[cpu])
-			dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]);
-		if (drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu])
-			dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]);
-		if (drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu])
-			dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]);
+		dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]);
+		dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]);
+		dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]);
 	}
 
 	kfree(drv->names_opp_tables);
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

[PATCH 4/7] devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
index 1e684a448c9e..143fd58ec3dc 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
@@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
 
 	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
-	if (bus->opp_table) {
-		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
-		bus->opp_table = NULL;
-	}
+	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+	bus->opp_table = NULL;
 }
 
 static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
@@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
 err_reg:
-	if (!passive) {
-		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
-		bus->opp_table = NULL;
-	}
+	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+	bus->opp_table = NULL;
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

[PATCH 5/7] drm/lima: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 13 ++++---------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
index bbe02817721b..e7b7b8dfd792 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
@@ -110,15 +110,10 @@ void lima_devfreq_fini(struct lima_device *ldev)
 		devfreq->opp_of_table_added = false;
 	}
 
-	if (devfreq->regulators_opp_table) {
-		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(devfreq->regulators_opp_table);
-		devfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
-	}
-
-	if (devfreq->clkname_opp_table) {
-		dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(devfreq->clkname_opp_table);
-		devfreq->clkname_opp_table = NULL;
-	}
+	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(devfreq->regulators_opp_table);
+	dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(devfreq->clkname_opp_table);
+	devfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
+	devfreq->clkname_opp_table = NULL;
 }
 
 int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

[PATCH 6/7] drm/panfrost: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
index 8ab025d0035f..97b5abc7c188 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
@@ -170,10 +170,8 @@ void panfrost_devfreq_fini(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 		pfdevfreq->opp_of_table_added = false;
 	}
 
-	if (pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table) {
-		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table);
-		pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
-	}
+	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table);
+	pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
 }
 
 void panfrost_devfreq_resume(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

[PATCH 7/7] media: venus: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
index 57877eacecf0..e1e9130288ad 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
@@ -898,8 +898,7 @@ static void core_put_v4(struct device *dev)
 
 	if (core->has_opp_table)
 		dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
-	if (core->opp_table)
-		dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(core->opp_table);
+	dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(core->opp_table);
 
 }
 
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

Re: [PATCH 4/7] devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Viresh,

On 11/6/20 4:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> index 1e684a448c9e..143fd58ec3dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> -	if (bus->opp_table) {
> -		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> -		bus->opp_table = NULL;
> -	}
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> +	bus->opp_table = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
> @@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>  err_reg:
> -	if (!passive) {
> -		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> -		bus->opp_table = NULL;
> -	}
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> +	bus->opp_table = NULL;
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 

Applied it. Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: [PATCH 4/7] devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Chanwoo Choi]

On 11/6/20 4:42 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
> 
> On 11/6/20 4:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
>> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 12 ++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> index 1e684a448c9e..143fd58ec3dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
>>  
>>  	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>> -	if (bus->opp_table) {
>> -		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> -		bus->opp_table = NULL;
>> -	}
>> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> +	bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
>> @@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>>  err_reg:
>> -	if (!passive) {
>> -		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> -		bus->opp_table = NULL;
>> -	}
>> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> +	bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>  
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>
> 
> Applied it. Thanks.
> 

It seems that this patch depends on first patch.
So, need to be merged to one git repository.

Instead of applying it to devfreq.git,
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: [PATCH 4/7] devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

On 06-11-20, 16:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 11/6/20 4:46 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > It seems that this patch depends on first patch.
> > So, need to be merged to one git repository.
> > 
> > Instead of applying it to devfreq.git,
> > Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> > 
> 
> Also, need to add 'PM /' prefix to patch title 
> in order to keep the same format with already merged devfreq patches.
> - 'PM / devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument'

Done, thanks.

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH 4/7] devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Chanwoo Choi]

On 11/6/20 4:46 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 11/6/20 4:42 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Viresh,
>>
>> On 11/6/20 4:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
>>> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 12 ++++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>> index 1e684a448c9e..143fd58ec3dc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
>>>  
>>>  	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>>> -	if (bus->opp_table) {
>>> -		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>>> -		bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>> -	}
>>> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>>> +	bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
>>> @@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>>>  err_reg:
>>> -	if (!passive) {
>>> -		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>>> -		bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>> -	}
>>> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>>> +	bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>>  
>>>  	return ret;
>>>  }
>>>
>>
>> Applied it. Thanks.
>>
> 
> It seems that this patch depends on first patch.
> So, need to be merged to one git repository.
> 
> Instead of applying it to devfreq.git,
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> 

Also, need to add 'PM /' prefix to patch title 
in order to keep the same format with already merged devfreq patches.
- 'PM / devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument'

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: [PATCH 0/7] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs to accept NULL opp_table

[Ilia Lin]

Reviewed-by: Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@kernel.org>


On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:05 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This patchset updates the dev_pm_opp_put_*() helpers to accept a NULL
> pointer for the OPP table, in order to allow the callers to drop the
> unnecessary checks they had to carry.
>
> All these must get merged upstream through the OPP tree as there is a
> hard dependency on the first patch here. Thanks.
>
> Viresh Kumar (7):
>   opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs to accept NULL opp_table
>   cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() accepts NULL argument
>   cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-nvmem: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
>   devfreq: exynos: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
>   drm/lima: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
>   drm/panfrost: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
>   media: venus: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument
>
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c                   |  6 ++----
>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c           | 15 ++++++---------
>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c                   | 12 ++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c            | 13 ++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c    |  6 ++----
>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c |  3 +--
>  drivers/opp/core.c                             | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
>

Re: [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-nvmem: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Ilia Lin]

Reviewed-by: Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@kernel.org>

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:05 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
> there is no need for us to carry the extra checks. Drop them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> index d06b37822c3d..747d602f221e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> @@ -397,19 +397,19 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>  free_genpd_opp:
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]))
> +               if (IS_ERR(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]))
>                         break;
>                 dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]);
>         }
>         kfree(drv->genpd_opp_tables);
>  free_opp:
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]))
> +               if (IS_ERR(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]))
>                         break;
>                 dev_pm_opp_put_prop_name(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]);
>         }
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]))
> +               if (IS_ERR(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]))
>                         break;
>                 dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]);
>         }
> @@ -430,12 +430,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         platform_device_unregister(cpufreq_dt_pdev);
>
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -               if (drv->names_opp_tables[cpu])
> -                       dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]);
> -               if (drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu])
> -                       dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]);
> -               if (drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu])
> -                       dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]);
> +               dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->names_opp_tables[cpu]);
> +               dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(drv->hw_opp_tables[cpu]);
> +               dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(drv->genpd_opp_tables[cpu]);
>         }
>
>         kfree(drv->names_opp_tables);
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
>

Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/panfrost: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Steven Price]

On 06/11/2020 07:03, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 6 ++----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> index 8ab025d0035f..97b5abc7c188 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> @@ -170,10 +170,8 @@ void panfrost_devfreq_fini(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>   		pfdevfreq->opp_of_table_added = false;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table) {
> -		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table);
> -		pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
> -	}
> +	dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table);
> +	pfdevfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
>   }
>   
>   void panfrost_devfreq_resume(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
> 

Re: [PATCH 5/7] drm/lima: dev_pm_opp_put_*() accepts NULL argument

[Qiang Yu]

Looks good for me, patch is:
Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>

Regards,
Qiang

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 3:05 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 13 ++++---------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> index bbe02817721b..e7b7b8dfd792 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> @@ -110,15 +110,10 @@ void lima_devfreq_fini(struct lima_device *ldev)
>                 devfreq->opp_of_table_added = false;
>         }
>
> -       if (devfreq->regulators_opp_table) {
> -               dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(devfreq->regulators_opp_table);
> -               devfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (devfreq->clkname_opp_table) {
> -               dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(devfreq->clkname_opp_table);
> -               devfreq->clkname_opp_table = NULL;
> -       }
> +       dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(devfreq->regulators_opp_table);
> +       dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(devfreq->clkname_opp_table);
> +       devfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
> +       devfreq->clkname_opp_table = NULL;
>  }
>
>  int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
>