linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq()
@ 2020-08-27  5:24 Viresh Kumar
  2020-08-27  5:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Do WARN() for invalid relation Viresh Kumar
  2020-08-27 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq() Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2020-08-27  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linux-pm, Vincent Guittot, linux-kernel

"cpufreq_driver" is guaranteed to be valid here, no need to check it
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 02ab56b2a0d8..47aa90f9a7c2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -703,8 +703,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
 	freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
 	if (freq)
 		ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", freq);
-	else if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy &&
-			cpufreq_driver->get)
+	else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
 		ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu));
 	else
 		ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur);
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Do WARN() for invalid relation
  2020-08-27  5:24 [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq() Viresh Kumar
@ 2020-08-27  5:24 ` Viresh Kumar
  2020-08-27 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq() Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2020-08-27  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linux-pm, Vincent Guittot, linux-kernel

The relation can't be invalid here, if it is just WARN() and return 0.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 8f141d4c859c..a911e5d06845 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -956,8 +956,8 @@ static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	case CPUFREQ_RELATION_C:
 		return cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, target_freq);
 	default:
-		pr_err("%s: Invalid relation: %d\n", __func__, relation);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		return 0;
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq()
  2020-08-27  5:24 [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq() Viresh Kumar
  2020-08-27  5:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Do WARN() for invalid relation Viresh Kumar
@ 2020-08-27 10:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-08-27 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Viresh Kumar
  Cc: Rafael Wysocki, Linux PM, Vincent Guittot, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:24 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> "cpufreq_driver" is guaranteed to be valid here, no need to check it
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 02ab56b2a0d8..47aa90f9a7c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -703,8 +703,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>         freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
>         if (freq)
>                 ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", freq);
> -       else if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy &&
> -                       cpufreq_driver->get)
> +       else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
>                 ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu));
>         else
>                 ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur);
> --

This and the [2/2] applied, the latter with some minor edits in the
subject/changelog.

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-27 12:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-27  5:24 [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq() Viresh Kumar
2020-08-27  5:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Do WARN() for invalid relation Viresh Kumar
2020-08-27 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq() Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).