linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem()
@ 2020-01-03  8:41 Anshuman Khandual
  2020-01-05  8:59 ` Mike Rapoport
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2020-01-03  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik,
	Christian Borntraeger, Martin Schwidefsky, Collin Walling,
	Gerald Schaefer, Philipp Rudo, Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton,
	linux-s390, linux-kernel

On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling
into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be
used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for
physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES
instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve().
While here replace some function name strings with (%s __func__) in various
memblock_dbg() call sites.

Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try
on a real system.

 arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 14 ++++----------
 include/linux/memblock.h |  3 +++
 mm/memblock.c            | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
index 9cbf490fd162..79a7b1872e5a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
@@ -761,14 +761,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void)
 		memblock_free(start, size);
 }
 
-static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size)
-{
-	memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
-		     start, start + size - 1);
-	memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0);
-	memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0);
-}
-
 static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void)
 {
 	switch (mem_detect.info_source) {
@@ -793,8 +785,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void)
 		     get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source);
 	/* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */
 	memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
-	for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end)
-		memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start);
+	for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) {
+		memblock_add(start, end - start);
+		memblock_physmem(start, end - start);
+	}
 	memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
 	memblock_dump_all();
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 1510b12de031..d17e7b841cb6 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
+int memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
+#endif
 void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
 bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
 			      phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 3e20c6ba2101..f6d17a1f30e3 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
 
-	memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
+	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
 		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
 	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
 
-	memblock_dbg("memblock_remove: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
+	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
 		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
 	return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.memory, base, size);
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
 
-	memblock_dbg("   memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
+	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
 		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
 	kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
@@ -824,12 +824,24 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
 
-	memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
+	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
 		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
 	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
+int __init_memblock memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+{
+	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+
+	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
+		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
+
+	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region
  * @base: base address of the region
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem()
  2020-01-03  8:41 [RFC] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem() Anshuman Khandual
@ 2020-01-05  8:59 ` Mike Rapoport
  2020-01-06  2:28   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Rapoport @ 2020-01-05  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: linux-mm, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Christian Borntraeger,
	Martin Schwidefsky, Collin Walling, Gerald Schaefer,
	Philipp Rudo, Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton, linux-s390,
	linux-kernel

Hi Anshuman,

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:11:06PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling
> into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be
> used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for
> physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES
> instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve().
> While here replace some function name strings with (%s __func__) in various
> memblock_dbg() call sites.
 
I'd prefer to have memblock_dbg() updates as a separate patch.

> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try
> on a real system.
> 
>  arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 14 ++++----------
>  include/linux/memblock.h |  3 +++
>  mm/memblock.c            | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> index 9cbf490fd162..79a7b1872e5a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -761,14 +761,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void)
>  		memblock_free(start, size);
>  }
>  
> -static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
> -		     start, start + size - 1);
> -	memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0);
> -	memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0);
> -}
> -
>  static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void)
>  {
>  	switch (mem_detect.info_source) {
> @@ -793,8 +785,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void)
>  		     get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source);
>  	/* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */
>  	memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
> -	for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end)
> -		memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start);
> +	for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) {
> +		memblock_add(start, end - start);
> +		memblock_physmem(start, end - start);

Maybe memblock_physmem_add()?

And, since memblock_add_range() will actually become private, cab you
please make it static?

> +	}
>  	memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
>  	memblock_dump_all();
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 1510b12de031..d17e7b841cb6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>  int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>  int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>  int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> +int memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +#endif
>  void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
>  bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
>  			      phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 3e20c6ba2101..f6d17a1f30e3 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>  
> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>  
>  	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>  
> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_remove: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>  
>  	return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.memory, base, size);
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>  
> -	memblock_dbg("   memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>  
>  	kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
> @@ -824,12 +824,24 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>  
> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>  
>  	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> +int __init_memblock memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> +	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
> +
> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> +		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> +
> +	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region
>   * @base: base address of the region
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem()
  2020-01-05  8:59 ` Mike Rapoport
@ 2020-01-06  2:28   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2020-01-06  2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Rapoport
  Cc: linux-mm, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Christian Borntraeger,
	Martin Schwidefsky, Collin Walling, Gerald Schaefer,
	Philipp Rudo, Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton, linux-s390,
	linux-kernel


On 01/05/2020 02:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:11:06PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling
>> into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be
>> used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for
>> physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES
>> instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve().
>> While here replace some function name strings with (%s __func__) in various
>> memblock_dbg() call sites.
>  
> I'd prefer to have memblock_dbg() updates as a separate patch.

Sure, will do.

> 
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try
>> on a real system.
>>
>>  arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 14 ++++----------
>>  include/linux/memblock.h |  3 +++
>>  mm/memblock.c            | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
>> index 9cbf490fd162..79a7b1872e5a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -761,14 +761,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void)
>>  		memblock_free(start, size);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size)
>> -{
>> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
>> -		     start, start + size - 1);
>> -	memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0);
>> -	memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0);
>> -}
>> -
>>  static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void)
>>  {
>>  	switch (mem_detect.info_source) {
>> @@ -793,8 +785,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void)
>>  		     get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source);
>>  	/* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */
>>  	memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
>> -	for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end)
>> -		memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start);
>> +	for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) {
>> +		memblock_add(start, end - start);
>> +		memblock_physmem(start, end - start);
> 
> Maybe memblock_physmem_add()?

Okay.

> 
> And, since memblock_add_range() will actually become private, cab you
> please make it static?

Sure, will do.

> 
>> +	}
>>  	memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
>>  	memblock_dump_all();
>>  }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> index 1510b12de031..d17e7b841cb6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>>  int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>>  int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>>  int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
>> +int memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>> +#endif
>>  void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
>>  bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
>>  			      phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>> index 3e20c6ba2101..f6d17a1f30e3 100644
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
>> @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>>  {
>>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>>  
>> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
>> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>>  
>>  	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
>> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>>  {
>>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>>  
>> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_remove: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
>> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>>  
>>  	return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.memory, base, size);
>> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>>  {
>>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>>  
>> -	memblock_dbg("   memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
>> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>>  
>>  	kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
>> @@ -824,12 +824,24 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>>  {
>>  	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>>  
>> -	memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
>> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>>  		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>>  
>>  	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
>>  }
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
>> +int __init_memblock memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>> +{
>> +	phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>> +
>> +	memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
>> +		     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>> +
>> +	return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region
>>   * @base: base address of the region
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>>
>>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-06  2:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-03  8:41 [RFC] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem() Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-05  8:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-01-06  2:28   ` Anshuman Khandual

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).